QUOTE(Sentinel92 @ May 2 2014, 04:54 PM)
On par with a GTX 780 would be a more fitting statement. [OFFICIAL]Rig Suggestion Q&A Thread V5!
[OFFICIAL]Rig Suggestion Q&A Thread V5!
|
|
May 2 2014, 04:56 PM
Return to original view | Post
#61
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,084 posts Joined: Feb 2011 From: Penang |
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 2 2014, 05:15 PM
Return to original view | Post
#62
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,084 posts Joined: Feb 2011 From: Penang |
QUOTE(Minecrafter @ May 2 2014, 05:10 PM) lolzcalvin What you mean by max possible overclock settings? The Gigabyte card does come factory overclock at 1040 MHz (stock is 947 MHz), so you should get a very small performance boost from that. Want to go further? You have to manually overclock it yourself then. Anyhow, I have tested AC4 on the R9 290 before. Buttery smooth, no issues at all. |
|
|
May 2 2014, 05:46 PM
Return to original view | Post
#63
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,084 posts Joined: Feb 2011 From: Penang |
QUOTE(mykchin8 @ May 2 2014, 05:28 PM) The Turbo Boost feature is a function of the Intel CPU, and both the B85 & Z87 chipsets support Intel's Turbo Boost feature. That is my understanding as well. That's why I was wondering why he would need a Z87 board with a Xeon CPU with locked multiplier. The advantage that Z87 has is to overclock Intel K CPUs by changing the multiplier, and also to support multi-GPU configurations. The Asus Z87-K has a TurboV EVO function to automatically overclock CPUs, but I think it is better to manually overclock, and it is also valid with Intel K CPUs, and the Xeon E3 is not good for overclocking, auto or manual, since it cannot change multiplier. |
|
|
May 2 2014, 09:00 PM
Return to original view | Post
#64
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,084 posts Joined: Feb 2011 From: Penang |
|
|
|
May 2 2014, 10:43 PM
Return to original view | Post
#65
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,084 posts Joined: Feb 2011 From: Penang |
QUOTE(jdachum @ May 2 2014, 10:13 PM) i3-4130 RM 349 You can try Asrock B85M-HDS, RM249.Asrock H81M-DGS RM 179 Corsair 8GB DDR3 1600MHz RM 229 FSP Hexa 500W RM 149 Palit GTX750 StormX OC 1GB GDDR5 RM 420 (GBros) Hey guys, I got another question again. Since this mobo suggested to me only has USB3.0 for back panel, is there any other mobo I can use that will let me install a front panel USB? Other than that, what is the significant difference between HyperX Fury and valueram? HyperX Fury has a lower CAS latency IINM. Price also not much difference with value RAM, go with this if you can. |
|
|
May 2 2014, 11:11 PM
Return to original view | Post
#66
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,084 posts Joined: Feb 2011 From: Penang |
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 3 2014, 12:02 AM
Return to original view | Post
#67
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,084 posts Joined: Feb 2011 From: Penang |
QUOTE(jdachum @ May 2 2014, 11:52 PM) So, I was right that B mobos are for business! But B mobos lack what in terms of performance compared to H mobos? Take B85 and H81 for example. Put it this way, they do not in any way lack in terms of performance, but rather just feature wise, as already pointed out above. B85 boards are actually very budget segmented boards, in terms of the features you've gained compared to H81 boards. |
|
|
May 3 2014, 12:13 AM
Return to original view | Post
#68
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,084 posts Joined: Feb 2011 From: Penang |
QUOTE(lolzcalvin @ May 2 2014, 06:28 PM) Can you suggest a rig not over RM4000 including R9 290? I'm comparing between minecrafter's, zgames and your recommendation. This is what I can propose. Intel Xeon E3 1230 v3 - RM799 Asrock B85M Pro4 – RM279 Corsair Value Ram 8GB DDR3 1600MHz - RM229 Gigabyte R9 290 Windforce OC - RM1649 Seasonic S12 II 620W PSU - RM299 Plextor M5S 128GB SSD – RM284 WD Caviar Blue 1TB HDD - RM189 Corsair Carbide Spec-03 – RM205 Lite-On 24x DVDRW – RM59 Total – RM3992 (prices are from Viewnet) |
|
|
May 3 2014, 12:23 AM
Return to original view | Post
#69
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,084 posts Joined: Feb 2011 From: Penang |
QUOTE(jdachum @ May 3 2014, 12:08 AM) So, we can say that B85 is actually better than H81, features wise but without any lack of performance even though the article above said B mobos " lack many of the performance features"? I wonder what performance features B85 lack compared to H81. Yes, you're right. By going with B/H series (compared to Z series), basically you will lose out on CPU overclocking and proper SLI/CFG configuration. If neither of these features concern you, then there is no point going for Z series boards. If you look at it from a different light, perhaps this is what the writer meant when referring to "performance features". |
|
|
May 3 2014, 12:29 AM
Return to original view | Post
#70
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,084 posts Joined: Feb 2011 From: Penang |
QUOTE(jdachum @ May 3 2014, 12:21 AM) What if I am interested in doing slight overclocking of both CPU and GPU, using multiple OS in it and such. I won't miss out right? Do note that anything other than Z87 boards won't allow you to overclock your CPU, as far as I know. There were reports on some B85 boards offering limited overclocking capability, perhaps you can google for more info. GPU is a different entity all together, so no impact for your case. |
|
|
May 3 2014, 07:53 AM
Return to original view | Post
#71
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,084 posts Joined: Feb 2011 From: Penang |
QUOTE(sil3ntlif3 @ May 3 2014, 03:11 AM) No the cpu turbo boost rely on the motherboard not on the cpu itself No, I don't think so. Even H81 boards support Intel Turbo Boost 2.0. Unless you're talking about some form of instant CPU overclocking feature "Turbo OC" or something along that line, then yes I believe only Z87 boards allow you that privilege.As for the GPU i'm not well versed with it so i dont know which is the best and which is best value...so some help maybe? http://www.asrock.com/mb/Intel/H81M-HDS/?cat=Specifications http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/arc...technology.html This is what mykchin8 mentioned earlier. QUOTE The Asus Z87-K has a TurboV EVO function to automatically overclock CPUs, but I think it is better to manually overclock, and it is also valid with Intel K CPUs, and the Xeon E3 is not good for overclocking, auto or manual, since it cannot change multiplier. |
|
|
May 3 2014, 09:27 PM
Return to original view | Post
#72
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,084 posts Joined: Feb 2011 From: Penang |
QUOTE(UnskilledOne @ May 3 2014, 09:19 PM) [Budget] RM3000 Intel Core i5 4440 - RM579[Purpose] Mainly gaming and for movie. Looking for another desktop system that can keep up in the coming few years. [Hardwares that will be re-use] Keyboard, mouse and all other external peripheral. [Monitor resolution] 1920x1080 [Games & softwares that use frequently] BF4, CoD and generally the latest titles. [Personal preferences] I just need a unit powerful enough for gaming and general use. Best if don't exceed budget. No need for anything fancy. [Location] KL Please advice. Thanks. Asrock B85M Pro4 – RM279 Corsair Value Ram 8GB DDR3 1600MHz - RM229 Zotac GTX 760 2GB – RM799 (Cycom) Antec VP-550 550W PSU - RM199 WD Caviar Blue 1TB HDD - RM189 Cooler Master K380 Casing - RM149 Viewsonic VX2370SMH 23" IPS LED - RM549 Lite-On 24x DVDRW – RM59 Total - RM3031 (prices are from Viewnet) |
|
|
May 4 2014, 05:48 PM
Return to original view | Post
#73
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,084 posts Joined: Feb 2011 From: Penang |
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 5 2014, 07:09 AM
Return to original view | Post
#74
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,084 posts Joined: Feb 2011 From: Penang |
QUOTE(UnskilledOne @ May 5 2014, 02:38 AM) Thanks for the recommendation. What do you guys think about this? Just ignore the 4GB variants of the GTX 770. You will simply run out of GPU processing power long before hitting the VRAM wall (limit). Go for higher clocked 2GB models, the Gainward GTX 770 Phantom is a good choice, also being nicely priced. CPU: i5-4440 Mobo: Asrock B85M Pro4 GPU: MSI 770GTX (Anyone care to tell me what's the diff with the 2gb and 4gb version?) Ram: 8GB Value ram HDD: WD Caviar Blue 1TB and 128GB SSD PSU: Please recommend me one accordingly. Thanks. Casing: Corsair Carbide Spec-03 Casing Liteon 24x DVDRW Please advice, thanks. Here's my suggestion for you. Intel Core i5 4440 - RM579 Asrock B85M Pro4 – RM279 Corsair Value Ram 8GB DDR3 1600MHz - RM229 Gainward GTX 770 Phantom – RM1199 (lingloong) Seasonic S12 II 620W PSU - RM299 WD Caviar Blue 1TB HDD - RM189 Plextor M5S 128GB SSD - RM284 Cooler Master K380 Casing - RM149 Lite-On 24x DVDRW – RM59 Total - RM3266 (prices are from Viewnet) |
|
|
May 5 2014, 10:31 AM
Return to original view | Post
#75
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,084 posts Joined: Feb 2011 From: Penang |
QUOTE(mykchin8 @ May 5 2014, 08:11 AM) Tom's Hardware has a report indicating that the Phantom's cooling solution is not as efficient as MSI's Twin Frozr or Gigabyte's WindForce, based on measurements, there is up to 10degC delta in performance. Does anyone have any issues with the temps of Phantoms that you are using now? I would personally consider cooling solutions from Palit, Gainward and Zotac as 2nd tier compared to the ones from Asus, Gigabyte and MSI. After all, you get what you pay for. As we have discussed before many times, the cooler from e.g Asus is usually superior in all regards compared to the competition. |
|
|
May 5 2014, 12:15 PM
Return to original view | Post
#76
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,084 posts Joined: Feb 2011 From: Penang |
QUOTE(mykchin8 @ May 5 2014, 11:50 AM) Yes, I was just wondering if someone had the experience with the Phantoms in Malaysia, and whether there was a problem encountered for the cooling performance. The Phantoms are recommended quite often in this forum, so it is quite popular. I was wondering if the lower cost is worth the lower cooling performance. I personally recommend the Phantom because they're one of the highest clocked 770 in our market. The only one with slightly higher memory clocks is the Zotac AMP! Edition. Though I know the Phantom cooler is unlikely to compare with the likes of Asus or Gigabyte. |
|
|
May 5 2014, 01:19 PM
Return to original view | Post
#77
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,084 posts Joined: Feb 2011 From: Penang |
QUOTE(UnskilledOne @ May 5 2014, 12:33 PM) If I'm willing to pay a little more for a better long term solution, will the other 770s prove to be better in any other ways? Or is the phantom sturdy enough with it's lower price? I have close to zero experience with these. I find the Phantom to be just fine, I don't think you would go wrong with this card. Palit GTX 770 Jetstream at RM1239 (lingloong) is also a nice card. Tested and approved! Same clock speed as Gainward Phantom also. The problem with other 770s (e.g Asus, Gigabyte) is that they're aren't priced as attractive as the Gainward card, and can be up to RM100 - 200 more expensive. QUOTE(Human10 @ May 5 2014, 12:41 PM) Cannot compare like that la, different price at different product range. |
|
|
May 5 2014, 01:25 PM
Return to original view | Post
#78
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,084 posts Joined: Feb 2011 From: Penang |
QUOTE(Human10 @ May 5 2014, 01:23 PM) And at that price might as well get R9 290. Sorry you mean the higher temps for the 290? I referring to this lah... http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/radeon...90x,3728-6.html |
|
|
May 5 2014, 02:02 PM
Return to original view | Post
#79
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,084 posts Joined: Feb 2011 From: Penang |
QUOTE(Human10 @ May 5 2014, 01:26 PM) The normal superior DCUII proven not suitable to handle the beasty R9 290 (conditionally). Guess different reviewers, different cup of tea. Also I had a friend's 290 DCUII gone overheat for mining, LEL... As usual, we usually trade off quietness for lower temps. Guess Asus on the "quiet" BIOS is clearly unmatched (albeit the higher temps), at least according to Techpowerup. I have earlier commented on the design of the heatsink for the DCUII, it actually isn't specifically designed for Hawaii GPU. Asus simply leveraged an existing design and tweaked it to accommodate the Hawaii chips, that's why 2 of its 5 heatpipes are not in direct contact with the GPU. Mining different issue though, wonder any Tri-X failed as well? QUOTE Our tests had the Tri-X produce very good gaming noise levels that are slightly quieter than the GTX Titan and GTX 780 Ti. While the card is far from inaudible, it has still taken a big step in the right direction. Noise levels in idle haven't improved at all, which is a shame. Sapphire could have engineered an extremely quiet card for work in idle, which would have benefited people who do not game all the time and want their PCs to be as quiet as possible. Don't get me wrong, the card is quiet in idle, but it could be virtually inaudible. Sapphire decided not to use the dual BIOS feature for a performance/quiet BIOS combo, which means that user can't opt to run the card very quietly but with higher temperatures or with lower temperatures but a bit more noise. The ASUS R9 290X DirectCU II OC does have the option, and I consider it an extremely useful feature because it eliminates the need for manual fan control via software. But with only a single BIOS, the Tri-X's acoustics (37 dBA) and temperatures (73°C) are well tuned. I would have opted for slightly higher temperatures with less noise as there is a ton of temperature headroom to do so. Remember, AMD's reference design runs 95°C, which is perfectly safe. I think Sapphire tried to focus on lower temperatures to impress people who get scared by such high temperatures, though. The ASUS DC II OC with its quiet BIOS enabled is a better choice if you want the absolutely quietest R9 290X out there, and it even comes with that backplate Sapphire's Tri-X doesn't have. http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/Sapphir...ri-X_OC/29.html http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/ASUS/R9...u_II_OC/29.html |
|
|
May 5 2014, 02:27 PM
Return to original view | Post
#80
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,084 posts Joined: Feb 2011 From: Penang |
QUOTE(Eiensakura @ May 5 2014, 02:18 PM) Is there a big diff between i5-4440 and i5-4570? http://ark.intel.com/compare/75043,75038Btw, this is the rig i'm looking at atm CPU: i5-4570 -619 Mobo: Asrock Z87 xtreme 3 -449 RAM: Corsair 8GB DDR3 1600MHz -229 GPU: Gainward 770 phantom - 1299 PSU: Seasonic S12 620W -299 HDD: WD 1 TB caviar blue -189 ODD: Lite-On 24x DVDRW – RM59 Chassis: NZXT H230- 215 Cooling: +- rm100 Monitor: Samsung S23C350H -524 rm3882, can anyone give me any suggestions to tweak this build for best money to performance ratio? In a nutshell, higher base and turbo clock speed for i5 4570. But isn't really worth the extra you paying, in my opinion. Here's my proposal. Intel Core i5 4440 - RM579 Asrock B85M Pro4 – RM279 Corsair Value Ram 8GB DDR3 1600MHz - RM229 Gainward GTX 770 Phantom 2GB – RM1199 (lingloong / IdealTech) Seasonic S12 II 620W PSU - RM299 WD Caviar Blue 1TB HDD - RM189 Plextor M5S 128GB SSD - RM284 Corsair Carbide Spec-03 Casing - RM219 LG 23EA63V 23" IPS LED - RM579 Lite-On 24x DVDRW – RM59 Total - RM3915 (prices are from Viewnet) |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0622sec
0.45
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 5th December 2025 - 03:53 AM |