is it maybe because of the nature of Viper is more light and small? Easier to carry in a carrier in large quantity? IDK, just assuming.

Coz cobra require smaller space for storage..... usefull on helicopter carrier ships.

because Cobra is half the headache (cost, crew, support, logistic) and now even with similar radar and weapon package
and because it was built for the marine, the built quality is much more tough due to marine operate at sea.

heck IINM even heavyduty said that the cobra seen action twice then apache

the main reason I like viper due to its durability.
Low operation and maintenance cost were also gooding.

Sembang2 jugak....mai...mai...nk jemput beramai2 ke TLDM open day....26 & 27 Apr kt lumut. Kt sepangar 27 Apr.....

Sembang2 jugak....mai...mai...nk jemput beramai2 ke TLDM open day....26 & 27 Apr kt lumut. Kt sepangar 27 Apr.....

Kuantan 26 dan 27 

bulan bila tu

silap, mabuk laut kejap

hahaha
just in case
bulan ni laaa

Kuantan 26 dan 27 

Aku tumpu kt tempat yg ade sub je.... lumut byk kapal skit. Kt sepangar kurang skit la....byk kapal kt ops area... cuma ade TRZ je la yg extra

booooo, cakap je lahh kuantan tarak aset sangat ekeke

kalo pk balik mmg ada FAC ngan Kedah Class je
hehhee

kecik dan ringan. macam apache tu berat gila especially bila bawak longbow radar.
cuba tengok afghanistan campaign, mana ada US apache bawak longbow radar along. only the british does it because of their rolls-royce engine (note: Westland Apache, not Boeing)

Comparing Murican made Atck Heli.

Between Apache and Viper which one more gooding?
Are they any special role for either of the Heli to carry?
If i am to generalize between these two, for me both are atck heli with some minor differences like speed, weapons hardpoints and range.

But i dont know any major differences. Anyone care to story a bit?

Yeah but the british operate their agustawestland apache capable to operate on navy ships just like what the US marine did with their AH-1Z Viper