Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
7 Pages < 1 2 3 4 5 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography The Official Nikon Discussion Thread Ver.23, National Geography edition

views
     
mingyuyu
post Dec 21 2013, 11:37 PM

B A N N E D
Group Icon
Elite
3,249 posts

Joined: Oct 2011


QUOTE(copperwire93 @ Dec 21 2013, 11:26 PM)
another addition for what has everyone stated: LR is such a memory hog software compared to PS. vmad.gif
*
LR only hog RAM, wait until you save your files as PSD in PS tongue.gif that things kills HDD.
mingyuyu
post Dec 21 2013, 11:51 PM

B A N N E D
Group Icon
Elite
3,249 posts

Joined: Oct 2011


QUOTE(Koki @ Dec 21 2013, 11:47 PM)
Kill HDD never mind, my laptop has an mSATA and another HDD  brows.gif
LR and PS if same type of processing they can do, why adobe like to release so many subsets of the same thing  shakehead.gif
cheaper price for software specifically for photography processing?
*
Yes, that answers your question. LR is a very simple program with a lot more limitations compared to PS, yet a lot more simple and easy to use. One thing I like about LR is the menu layout and also the ability to do non-destructive editing by letting you to undo your editings anytime. While in PS the only think you can do is save in PSD if you want to revert your settings one day, not to mention a lot more complicated editings compared to LR.
mingyuyu
post Dec 22 2013, 05:23 PM

B A N N E D
Group Icon
Elite
3,249 posts

Joined: Oct 2011


Joining the bugs lines tongue.gif

What species is this? I heard people say it is very venomous?

user posted image
IMG_6681 by tuna97, on Flickr

Baby housefly? looks very pale in color and small in size.

user posted image
IMG_6659 by tuna97, on Flickr

Something i've never see before.
user posted image
IMG_6665 by tuna97, on Flickr

Shit bug?
user posted image
IMG_6675 by tuna97, on Flickr
mingyuyu
post Dec 22 2013, 11:55 PM

B A N N E D
Group Icon
Elite
3,249 posts

Joined: Oct 2011


QUOTE(PF T.J. @ Dec 22 2013, 09:05 PM)
Happy Winter Solstice!  notworthy.gif
Nice shots man!
#1 should be a Phintella versicolor ♂, don't think its a baby haha
#2 is a juvenile Cosmophasis thalassina. They love to point their abdomens upwards while moving~ And they become very beautiful when grown up:

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


#2 is not an easy shot since this particular species is always on the go lol, great one!
#1 is an orange-banded hornet, not to be trifled with laugh.gif Its not venomous la, but the sting will be very painful, and it has unlimited "ammo", unlike bees
#2 is a young housefly I think, whereas #3 is a signal fly (nice find!)
But what amazed me most is #4 haha, don't even know what it is!
Nice one shooting with tripod and stacking  thumbup.gif
*
ohhh ok, thanks for the info. always so takut when bump into them since they are so large and the sound they made while flying is really loud too. yeah #3 is quite rare i think, very tiny in size and always hide in the darker area. #4 is really weird bug, they are everywhere around Kari leaves, but never move away, just stay there. haha no tripod and no stacking, all shot with Tamron 70-200 f2.8 with some cropping. that lens will be damn perfect for macro if it has a little better magnification since I can shoot faraway with it.

EDIT: Okay, myth solved.

It's the larva of a species of Tortoise Bettle called Silana farinosa.

It looks really damn different compared to the bug itself, no wonder I spot those white guys around them.

the white guy.
http://tchuanye.smugmug.com/Macro-Photogra...300_VgF9x-L.jpg

This post has been edited by mingyuyu: Dec 23 2013, 12:50 AM
mingyuyu
post Dec 23 2013, 05:29 PM

B A N N E D
Group Icon
Elite
3,249 posts

Joined: Oct 2011


QUOTE(Agito666 @ Dec 23 2013, 02:37 PM)
post 1 nub photo to show how important raw file can recover from highlight and shadows
blush.gif

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

*
How amazing FF sensor is* tongue.gif
mingyuyu
post Dec 23 2013, 05:56 PM

B A N N E D
Group Icon
Elite
3,249 posts

Joined: Oct 2011


QUOTE(jepertine90 @ Dec 23 2013, 05:46 PM)
only FF can do it? DX can't? sad.gif
*
Of course DX can, but FF's dynamic range is a lot better than DX. smile.gif
mingyuyu
post Dec 23 2013, 08:57 PM

B A N N E D
Group Icon
Elite
3,249 posts

Joined: Oct 2011


More macro shots, the DOF from 200mm f5.6 is really awesome biggrin.gif

user posted image
IMG_6669 by tuna97, on Flickr

user posted image
IMG_6677 by tuna97, on Flickr

user posted image
IMG_6673 by tuna97, on Flickr
mingyuyu
post Dec 24 2013, 04:05 PM

B A N N E D
Group Icon
Elite
3,249 posts

Joined: Oct 2011


My turn for macro tongue.gif

user posted image
IMG_6839 by tuna97, on Flickr

user posted image
IMG_6843 by tuna97, on Flickr

user posted image
IMG_6853 by tuna97, on Flickr

user posted image
IMG_6872 by tuna97, on Flickr
mingyuyu
post Dec 24 2013, 09:38 PM

B A N N E D
Group Icon
Elite
3,249 posts

Joined: Oct 2011


QUOTE(jepertine90 @ Dec 24 2013, 06:01 PM)
I realised that too, but edi try my best to bring back the details.. so meh~  cry.gif
*
looks fake to me after the editing. and you can simply use the adjustment brush to recover the details on the skirt by brushing on it and decrease the exposure by around half stop.

QUOTE(copperwire93 @ Dec 24 2013, 06:37 PM)
Nice, I didn't focus on the white dress until others mentioned about it tho. My eyes went straight to her face laugh.gif
Can use brush tool man. Carefully painting the white areas of the dress and while still in brush tool, lower down highlight, or lowering a bit of exposure, add some contrast I think. Still can be recovered. nod.gif
Great work, man I don't even have a zoom lens for this. I like the moth's wings, if only can see the pattern clearer. thumbup.gif

Another National Geography edition laugh.gif
user posted image
Love is in the air by NurAzam, on Flickr
*
haha thanks, what I love about that lens is I have a nice working distance (about 1 meter) from any bugs and 200mm can really blows everything in the bg into one color patch tongue.gif just wished that it has a better magnification (heard that slapping extension tubes only increase the magnification modestly but decrease the working distance a lot cry.gif )
mingyuyu
post Dec 25 2013, 12:58 AM

B A N N E D
Group Icon
Elite
3,249 posts

Joined: Oct 2011


QUOTE(PF T.J. @ Dec 25 2013, 12:37 AM)
One of my favourite spiders- Herennia multipuncta

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

Lens - Nikkor 105mm + ET (36mm + 12mm)
Aperture - f/16
Shutter Speed - 1/250 secs
ISO - 400

Flash fired at 1/32
*
that looks really creepy tongue.gif

awesome photos though

This post has been edited by mingyuyu: Dec 25 2013, 12:58 AM
mingyuyu
post Dec 26 2013, 03:35 PM

B A N N E D
Group Icon
Elite
3,249 posts

Joined: Oct 2011


QUOTE(f5calvin @ Dec 26 2013, 01:14 PM)
not sharper arh? hmm.. nvm la. u got many gold ring.. 58mm go grab!
*
haha if want super sharp quality, go get the Zeiss Otus, that thing is crazy, even won some Medium Format lenses.

but price wise, more than rm10k tongue.gif
mingyuyu
post Dec 26 2013, 05:07 PM

B A N N E D
Group Icon
Elite
3,249 posts

Joined: Oct 2011


QUOTE(coolkwc @ Dec 26 2013, 05:02 PM)
Wait guys...The 35mm f/1.8G lens don have manual aperture ring, means it is impossible to reverse lens if i want to play macro?
*
Hmm... Nikon lenses' aperture is controlled by the tiny clip thingy right? If yes, is it possible to use DOF preview and remove the lens like Canon?
mingyuyu
post Dec 26 2013, 11:41 PM

B A N N E D
Group Icon
Elite
3,249 posts

Joined: Oct 2011


QUOTE(gunzerdude @ Dec 26 2013, 11:14 PM)
Probably not gua, but sweat and moisture does make the rubber expand la, which is part of the reason for it to peel.
*
it's worse when it absorbs your sweat and get smelly, so embarrassing when you hand in your camera to others to preview shot.
mingyuyu
post Dec 27 2013, 05:26 PM

B A N N E D
Group Icon
Elite
3,249 posts

Joined: Oct 2011


QUOTE(coolkwc @ Dec 27 2013, 04:08 PM)
Read alot of entry level DSLR recommendation threads today...

Curiously i wonder why ppl seldom recommend Nikon entry level DSLR if compare to Canon and Sony? I read alot of reviews, those in depth analysis, also shown output quality from Nikon is higher than other brands in the same class. The most commendable item for Nikon is hard to learn for newbie in fact they know the quality of Nikon is better.

I dun know, before i own my D3200 less than 2 months ago, i have almost near to nil knowledge regarding the relation of exposure, shutter and aperture. But after less than 2 months, i already able to use manual mode now. Almost every night at home since i bought, i will take out my Nikon to play around even though i have nothing special to shoot (Yesterday i check my shutter count, reached 3359 just over 6 weeks), just shoot and compare the difference of each setting, read and understand the histogram, read online guide, read camera magazine (5th issue bought this week). IMO, Nikon menu setup is not as hard as they mentioned, each items has guide on that, just press a little '?' button will do. For me just same as driving a brand new manual car and learn all the characteristic from the feedback of the car.

My opinion, if ones feel difficult to learn, is not becos it is difficult, just they dun have enough patient and passion for it. Then i would recommend taking compact cam rather than DSLR, cheap and easy to use.

Just my thought.
*
because it's more common lo. just like why most phone shops will recommend samsung/ iphone to people when they want to buy new phone. same logic also, any brand can take good picture, just that you must like the camera you had in your hand. when i bought my 550D last year, i only took like 3-4days to master the buttons/ controls, while with my friend's nikon, i can clearly tell you nikon's menu is a lot more complicated and harder to use for beginner.

QUOTE(Agito666 @ Dec 27 2013, 04:48 PM)
not to mention Fuji is chasing up too whistling.gif

well canon in that range i don't think can fight with.

and Samsung i'm not sure, but got a little for the market due to the name i guess...
*
samsung actually make better cameras than sony (the NEX is really crappy imo after trying it out). and if you go and check samsung's lenses lineup, there are plenty of good glass from them (85mm f1/4, quality macro with OS etc), while all sony offers to nex is crappy slow zoom.
mingyuyu
post Dec 27 2013, 05:26 PM

B A N N E D
Group Icon
Elite
3,249 posts

Joined: Oct 2011


QUOTE(coolkwc @ Dec 27 2013, 04:08 PM)
Read alot of entry level DSLR recommendation threads today...

Curiously i wonder why ppl seldom recommend Nikon entry level DSLR if compare to Canon and Sony? I read alot of reviews, those in depth analysis, also shown output quality from Nikon is higher than other brands in the same class. The most commendable item for Nikon is hard to learn for newbie in fact they know the quality of Nikon is better.

I dun know, before i own my D3200 less than 2 months ago, i have almost near to nil knowledge regarding the relation of exposure, shutter and aperture. But after less than 2 months, i already able to use manual mode now. Almost every night at home since i bought, i will take out my Nikon to play around even though i have nothing special to shoot (Yesterday i check my shutter count, reached 3359 just over 6 weeks), just shoot and compare the difference of each setting, read and understand the histogram, read online guide, read camera magazine (5th issue bought this week). IMO, Nikon menu setup is not as hard as they mentioned, each items has guide on that, just press a little '?' button will do. For me just same as driving a brand new manual car and learn all the characteristic from the feedback of the car.

My opinion, if ones feel difficult to learn, is not becos it is difficult, just they dun have enough patient and passion for it. Then i would recommend taking compact cam rather than DSLR, cheap and easy to use.

Just my thought.
*
because it's more common lo. just like why most phone shops will recommend samsung/ iphone to people when they want to buy new phone. same logic also, any brand can take good picture, just that you must like the camera you had in your hand. when i bought my 550D last year, i only took like 3-4days to master the buttons/ controls, while with my friend's nikon, i can clearly tell you nikon's menu is a lot more complicated and harder to use for beginner.

QUOTE(Agito666 @ Dec 27 2013, 04:48 PM)
not to mention Fuji is chasing up too whistling.gif

well canon in that range i don't think can fight with.

and Samsung i'm not sure, but got a little for the market due to the name i guess...
*
samsung actually make better cameras than sony (the NEX is really crappy imo after trying it out). and if you go and check samsung's lenses lineup, there are plenty of good glass from them (85mm f1/4, quality macro with OS etc), while all sony offers to nex is crappy slow zoom.
mingyuyu
post Dec 28 2013, 11:56 AM

B A N N E D
Group Icon
Elite
3,249 posts

Joined: Oct 2011


Too bad didn't get the whole net in focus sad.gif

user posted image
IMG_7657 by tuna97, on Flickr
mingyuyu
post Dec 28 2013, 11:56 AM

B A N N E D
Group Icon
Elite
3,249 posts

Joined: Oct 2011


EDIT : DOUBLE POSTED

This post has been edited by mingyuyu: Dec 28 2013, 02:10 PM
mingyuyu
post Dec 28 2013, 02:17 PM

B A N N E D
Group Icon
Elite
3,249 posts

Joined: Oct 2011


QUOTE(copperwire93 @ Dec 28 2013, 01:51 PM)
Double posted, hehe. But nice one, like the sparkle from the web, and the spider looks like a lime. lol! laugh.gif
*
didn't notice that, probably something wrong with the connection just now. haha yeap it is, probably ate too much XD
mingyuyu
post Dec 28 2013, 02:17 PM

B A N N E D
Group Icon
Elite
3,249 posts

Joined: Oct 2011


QUOTE(copperwire93 @ Dec 28 2013, 01:51 PM)
Double posted, hehe. But nice one, like the sparkle from the web, and the spider looks like a lime. lol! laugh.gif
*
didn't notice that, probably something wrong with the connection just now. haha yeap it is, probably ate too much XD
mingyuyu
post Dec 29 2013, 12:03 AM

B A N N E D
Group Icon
Elite
3,249 posts

Joined: Oct 2011


QUOTE(amduser @ Dec 28 2013, 10:16 PM)
sometime i really wonder if nikon is really using sony sensors, i've seen many sony camera doesn't capture good low light shoots like nikon does hmm.gif

canon lens is cheap because they dont have focus motor inside, but their lens lineup is more like quantity > quality, i heard their 35mm 1.8 prime is really bad at wide open and need to stop down to f2.8 and above laugh.gif

what i like about nikon is the dynamic range and the color, tried to do single image HDR on canon and nikon and i like nikon RAW file more biggrin.gif

and canon having larger user base most likely is because of the advertisement and sponsored event from canon malaysia, you dont really see much nikon sponsored event, even advertisement also not as much as canon
NEX crappy? i thought nex is better than sony alpha entry level and peoples always talking about nex nex nex

but one thing i dont like about sony dslr is the electronic viewfinder, used too much battery, i've seen some sony user posting in their facebook that their camera can only last for one day for normal usage in event
*
no la, canon lenses all have internal built-in motors, that's why you have EF/ EFS lenses thats made for EOS cameras.

hmm... but I don't really like NEX at all, last time when I played one at sony store, it just felt cheap and plasticky, not to mention the horrible menu system. not many good lenses available too, it's more aimed to consumer market rather than the pro market. the A7/A7R is a totally different story though tongue.gif

7 Pages < 1 2 3 4 5 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0498sec    0.32    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 12th December 2025 - 04:42 AM