Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
126 Pages « < 45 46 47 48 49 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 -= MyForte - Naza Kia Forte Owners Club =- V20, Leaves You Speechless

views
     
drewgtan
post May 5 2014, 09:54 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
24 posts

Joined: Aug 2013


QUOTE(Peggy Khor @ May 5 2014, 09:32 PM)
to replace my old car =)
*
how do u normally commute? long/short distance? mostly highway/city? driving style steady/like to speed? need autocruise? all these will help u decide ^^
TSepo
post May 5 2014, 11:20 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
892 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Sg Buloh


QUOTE(Peggy Khor @ May 5 2014, 09:32 PM)
to replace my old car =)
*
Lolzzz
roxor
post May 5 2014, 11:28 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
2 posts

Joined: Aug 2010
QUOTE(Peggy Khor @ May 5 2014, 07:42 PM)
Having a difficulty on the options below, hope that all sifus can give some opinion.  sad.gif  sad.gif  sad.gif

Forte A - 30km mileage , 2.0, 2011 manufactured year, 6 speed
Forte B - 15km mileage, 1.6 SX, 2012 manufactured year, 6 speed

both condition are superb.

Pricing about the same. Which one would be better?

Is 1.6 having better fc? or anything i should concern with ?  hmm.gif  hmm.gif

Thankssss
*
I'm sure those who are driving 2.0 would have been very satisfied with the extra power + pick up over 1.6. IMHO, FC should not be a concern as long we enjoy the drive.
Besides, you can drive confidently knowing your car has got extra 'pecut' when you really need it to chiong on certain occasions cool2.gif

g88
post May 5 2014, 11:45 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,631 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(Peggy Khor @ May 5 2014, 09:32 PM)
to replace my old car =)
*
Detail = your usage (e.g travel highway alot), only use for 30km working per day, stuck alot in jam etc
rompers
post May 6 2014, 02:50 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
76 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
QUOTE(Peggy Khor @ May 5 2014, 09:32 PM)
to replace my old car =)
*
laugh.gif laugh.gif laugh.gif
craxors
post May 6 2014, 08:24 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,546 posts

Joined: Dec 2007
QUOTE(Peggy Khor @ May 5 2014, 07:42 PM)
Having a difficulty on the options below, hope that all sifus can give some opinion.  sad.gif  sad.gif  sad.gif

Forte A - 30km mileage , 2.0, 2011 manufactured year, 6 speed
Forte B - 15km mileage, 1.6 SX, 2012 manufactured year, 6 speed

both condition are superb.

Pricing about the same. Which one would be better?

Is 1.6 having better fc? or anything i should concern with ?  hmm.gif  hmm.gif

Thankssss
*
pls do check the service record. hmm.gif
Peggy Khor
post May 6 2014, 10:57 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
19 posts

Joined: Aug 2013


QUOTE(drewgtan @ May 5 2014, 09:54 PM)
how do u normally commute? long/short distance? mostly highway/city? driving style steady/like to speed? need autocruise? all these will help u decide ^^
*
I would say a mix of the above. i usually try avoid city drive. I hate jam !! When i drive to the city i will make sure it have less or minimum jam. tongue.gif drool.gif

QUOTE(roxor @ May 5 2014, 11:28 PM)
I'm sure those who are driving 2.0 would have been very satisfied with the extra power + pick up over 1.6. IMHO, FC should not be a concern as long we enjoy the drive.
Besides, you can drive confidently knowing your car has got extra 'pecut' when you really need it to chiong on certain occasions  cool2.gif
*
agreed, the 2.0 should have better pick up & xtra power.

QUOTE(g88 @ May 5 2014, 11:45 PM)
Detail = your usage (e.g travel highway alot), only use for 30km working per day, stuck alot in jam etc
*
Should consider highway 70 - 30. as i stay in sg buloh. XD

QUOTE(craxors @ May 6 2014, 08:24 AM)
pls do check the service record.  hmm.gif
*
They have full kia service record

So taking the 2.0 would be a better for getting xtra hp, theta engine ?
craxors
post May 6 2014, 11:17 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,546 posts

Joined: Dec 2007
for same price/condition..i def would go for 2.0. u'll get all the extra functions. thumbup.gif

and fc didnt dif much. maybe +- 50km/tank. laugh.gif
Peggy Khor
post May 6 2014, 11:45 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
19 posts

Joined: Aug 2013


QUOTE(craxors @ May 6 2014, 11:17 AM)
for same price/condition..i def would go for 2.0. u'll get all the extra functions.  thumbup.gif

and fc didnt dif much. maybe +- 50km/tank.  laugh.gif
*
The usage of mileage doesnt really mean too much right? coz the other was like less thn 15k.
TSepo
post May 6 2014, 11:48 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
892 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Sg Buloh


QUOTE(Peggy Khor @ May 6 2014, 10:57 AM)
Should consider highway 70 - 30. as i stay in sg buloh. XD
*
Sg Buloh where ? I'm from sg buloh too...

QUOTE(Peggy Khor @ May 6 2014, 11:45 AM)
The usage of mileage doesnt really mean too much right? coz the other was like less thn 15k.
*
Heard used car can modify the mileage but dunno whether they can do for forte or not...
craxors
post May 6 2014, 11:52 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,546 posts

Joined: Dec 2007
QUOTE(Peggy Khor @ May 6 2014, 11:45 AM)
The usage of mileage doesnt really mean too much right? coz the other was like less thn 15k.
*
2011 car...30k mileage...i think its normal. rolleyes.gif

but mine already 70k. same years. laugh.gif
TSepo
post May 6 2014, 11:54 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
892 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Sg Buloh


2010 car, 60k mileage... mine x normal... cry.gif
craxors
post May 6 2014, 12:22 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,546 posts

Joined: Dec 2007
QUOTE(epo @ May 6 2014, 11:54 AM)
2010 car, 60k mileage... mine x normal...  cry.gif
*
normal for mat rempit.
tongue.gif
flex3x
post May 6 2014, 12:23 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
3 posts

Joined: Aug 2010


QUOTE(Peggy Khor @ May 5 2014, 07:42 PM)
Having a difficulty on the options below, hope that all sifus can give some opinion.  sad.gif  sad.gif  sad.gif

Forte A - 30km mileage , 2.0, 2011 manufactured year, 6 speed
Forte B - 15km mileage, 1.6 SX, 2012 manufactured year, 6 speed

both condition are superb.

Pricing about the same. Which one would be better?

Is 1.6 having better fc? or anything i should concern with ?  hmm.gif  hmm.gif

Thankssss
*
of course is 2.0..you can feel the differences during high speed smile.gif
Peggy Khor
post May 6 2014, 01:10 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
19 posts

Joined: Aug 2013


Thanks all sifus ~ for the kind & useful comment rclxms.gif
TSepo
post May 6 2014, 03:00 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
892 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Sg Buloh


QUOTE(craxors @ May 6 2014, 12:22 PM)
normal for mat rempit.
tongue.gif
*
But 60k divide by 4yrs equal to 15k km / year... I think acceptable...
Last I used my car was during school holiday in Mar, now near 2nd school holiday at end of May...
Should rent a car instead of buy it... sweat.gif
craxors
post May 6 2014, 03:50 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,546 posts

Joined: Dec 2007
QUOTE(epo @ May 6 2014, 03:00 PM)
But 60k divide by 4yrs equal to 15k km / year... I think acceptable...
Last I used my car was during school holiday in Mar, now near 2nd school holiday at end of May...
Should rent a car instead of buy it...  sweat.gif
*
should 'give' rent the car instead terperap kat rumah. tongue.gif
drewgtan
post May 6 2014, 10:49 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
24 posts

Joined: Aug 2013


QUOTE(Peggy Khor @ May 6 2014, 10:57 AM)
I would say a mix of the above. i usually try avoid city drive. I hate jam !! When i drive to the city i will make sure it have less or minimum jam.  tongue.gif  drool.gif
agreed, the 2.0 should have better pick up & xtra power.
Should consider highway 70 - 30. as i stay in sg buloh. XD
They have full kia service record

So taking the 2.0 would be a better for getting xtra hp, theta engine ?
*
You've got your answer then! thumbup.gif
tanson
post May 7 2014, 11:01 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
125 posts

Joined: Jul 2009
From: Malaysia


QUOTE(roxor @ May 5 2014, 11:28 PM)
I'm sure those who are driving 2.0 would have been very satisfied with the extra power + pick up over 1.6. IMHO, FC should not be a concern as long we enjoy the drive.
Besides, you can drive confidently knowing your car has got extra 'pecut' when you really need it to chiong on certain occasions  cool2.gif
*
totally agree with you thumbup.gif
craxors
post May 7 2014, 12:03 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,546 posts

Joined: Dec 2007
QUOTE(roxor @ May 5 2014, 11:28 PM)
I'm sure those who are driving 2.0 would have been very satisfied with the extra power + pick up over 1.6. IMHO, FC should not be a concern as long we enjoy the drive.
Besides, you can drive confidently knowing your car has got extra 'pecut' when you really need it to chiong on certain occasions  cool2.gif
*
and...chiong confidently cos got 6 airbags?? whistling.gif

126 Pages « < 45 46 47 48 49 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0485sec    1.39    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 19th December 2025 - 03:24 AM