Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Inspira vs Forte, Which is better value for money?

views
     
TSimwhoiam
post Jun 24 2013, 03:17 PM, updated 13y ago

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
202 posts

Joined: Apr 2007
From: Chelas



I am planning to sell my VIVA to get a more fitting car for my small family (4 adults).

After much research on the forum and some sites,
My budget would allow me to look at a few options, and i have narrowed down to the following

1. KIA Forte 1.6 SX - ~85k (non local brand, low interest (1.68% or 1.88%), good amount of equipment)
2. PROTON Inspira 2.0 Premium - ~92k (good discount around 7k, good amount of equipment)
3. PROTON Inspira 1.8 Manual - ~78k (good discount around 7k, way cheaper than above after discount)

Hope the sifus here are able to give more insight on which to get and why?
hanifw
post Jun 24 2013, 03:20 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
389 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

Preve >> all~
SUSkimsim
post Jun 24 2013, 03:29 PM

Let Me ❤️ You
*******
Senior Member
5,847 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
From: Malaysia 🇲🇾


Wanna Sushi and stick with inspira.
Like more kimchi then Forte loh.
Support malaysia then Preve will do.

This post has been edited by kimsim: Jun 24 2013, 03:30 PM
ReVolVolution
post Jun 24 2013, 03:31 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
311 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
QUOTE(imwhoiam @ Jun 24 2013, 03:17 PM)
I am planning to sell my VIVA to get a more fitting car for my small family (4 adults).

After much research on the forum and some sites,
My budget would allow me to look at a few options, and i have narrowed down to the following

1. KIA Forte 1.6 SX - ~85k (non local brand, low interest (1.68% or 1.88%), good amount of equipment)
2. PROTON Inspira 2.0 Premium - ~92k (good discount around 7k, good amount of equipment)
3. PROTON Inspira 1.8 Manual - ~78k (good discount around 7k, way cheaper than above after discount)

Hope the sifus here are able to give more insight on which to get and why?
*
i would go for inspira 2.0 as most of the build quality is from Mitsu. Hence, cannot go wrong. My friend driving one. After 2 years, so far no problems.


SUSkimsim
post Jun 24 2013, 03:34 PM

Let Me ❤️ You
*******
Senior Member
5,847 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
From: Malaysia 🇲🇾


QUOTE(ReVolVolution @ Jun 24 2013, 03:31 PM)
i would go for inspira 2.0 as most of the build quality is from Mitsu. Hence, cannot go wrong. My friend driving one. After 2 years, so far no problems.
*
I Like Mivc engine. The cover name as campro is fake cover.
Try to order from Mitsubishi and instead of fake cover that so.
ReVolVolution
post Jun 24 2013, 03:38 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
311 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
QUOTE(kimsim @ Jun 24 2013, 03:34 PM)
I Like Mivc engine. The cover name as campro is fake cover.
Try to order from Mitsubishi and instead of fake cover that so.
*
The thing about Inspira is that it's more of a cruiser than a "fast" car. Don't expect anything from a CVT gearbox as it sucks all the fun out of the car. However, it's smooth that you can cruize with ease...

Never like Kimchi as parts are not durable and expensive.


SUSkimsim
post Jun 24 2013, 03:43 PM

Let Me ❤️ You
*******
Senior Member
5,847 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
From: Malaysia 🇲🇾


QUOTE(ReVolVolution @ Jun 24 2013, 03:38 PM)
The thing about Inspira is that it's more of a cruiser than a "fast" car. Don't expect anything from a CVT gearbox as it sucks all the fun out of the car. However, it's smooth that you can cruize with ease...

Never like Kimchi as parts are not durable and expensive.
*
At lease the power window module still under Mitsubishi smile.gif
MeToo
post Jun 24 2013, 03:53 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,336 posts

Joined: May 2009
QUOTE(imwhoiam @ Jun 24 2013, 03:17 PM)
I am planning to sell my VIVA to get a more fitting car for my small family (4 adults).

After much research on the forum and some sites,
My budget would allow me to look at a few options, and i have narrowed down to the following

1. KIA Forte 1.6 SX - ~85k (non local brand, low interest (1.68% or 1.88%), good amount of equipment)
2. PROTON Inspira 2.0 Premium - ~92k (good discount around 7k, good amount of equipment)
3. PROTON Inspira 1.8 Manual - ~78k (good discount around 7k, way cheaper than above after discount)

Hope the sifus here are able to give more insight on which to get and why?
*
ANything but proton la... i read in this forum that inspira is 99% local, infact most Lancer owners claim that's true! If Inspira is same as Lancer, why would people go buy lancer and pay 30~40k more?! THey are not stupid la.

As for the inspira/Campro engine..... I was standing there when this picture was taken.... so i can confirm its not photochopped



Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
SUSkimsim
post Jun 24 2013, 04:03 PM

Let Me ❤️ You
*******
Senior Member
5,847 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
From: Malaysia 🇲🇾


QUOTE(MeToo @ Jun 24 2013, 03:53 PM)
ANything but proton la... i read in this forum that inspira is 99% local, infact most Lancer owners claim that's true! If Inspira is same as Lancer, why would people go buy lancer and pay 30~40k more?! THey are not stupid la.

As for the inspira/Campro engine..... I was standing there when this picture was taken.... so i can confirm its not photochopped
*
Buy original at lease the main logo and car card still name it as Mitsubishi lancer right.

If under budget who care lancer or proton logo.
Also like passo & myvi. At lease myvi parts still able to find from daihatsu.

http://keretaproton-lanz.blogspot.sg/2011/...lancer.html?m=1

This post has been edited by kimsim: Jun 24 2013, 04:11 PM
conan1
post Jun 24 2013, 04:14 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
224 posts

Joined: Jan 2011
QUOTE(MeToo @ Jun 24 2013, 03:53 PM)
ANything but proton la... i read in this forum that inspira is 99% local, infact most Lancer owners claim that's true! If Inspira is same as Lancer, why would people go buy lancer and pay 30~40k more?! THey are not stupid la.

As for the inspira/Campro engine..... I was standing there when this picture was taken.... so i can confirm its not photochopped
*
here we go againnnn...
shinjun
post Jun 24 2013, 04:16 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,247 posts

Joined: Jan 2007


QUOTE(MeToo @ Jun 24 2013, 03:53 PM)
ANything but proton la... i read in this forum that inspira is 99% local, infact most Lancer owners claim that's true! If Inspira is same as Lancer, why would people go buy lancer and pay 30~40k more?! THey are not stupid la.

As for the inspira/Campro engine..... I was standing there when this picture was taken.... so i can confirm its not photochopped
*
"Why so serious?" smile.gif
gheyfriend
post Jun 24 2013, 04:18 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
281 posts

Joined: Jun 2011
from experience, u better stop buying proton...wait new VIOS, u will never regret... no need compare spec, just compare name and you will b fine kid
K3nnYkl82
post Jun 24 2013, 05:13 PM

NewBie
*******
Senior Member
2,479 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mars
Forte for sure.. Need to ask ah kuai meh?
^pomen_GTR^
post Jun 24 2013, 05:21 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,077 posts

Joined: Jan 2013
inspira 1.8 manual
theanswer
post Jun 24 2013, 05:24 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,024 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: Kajang


forte la. the price might be a bit expensive..but 6 airbags and esp might be bonus.
TSimwhoiam
post Jun 24 2013, 06:00 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
202 posts

Joined: Apr 2007
From: Chelas



QUOTE(theanswer @ Jun 24 2013, 05:24 PM)
forte la. the price might be a bit expensive..but 6 airbags and esp might be bonus.
*
I think the 1.6 SX variant only comes with 2 airbags, the driver and front passenger airbag. The 6 airbags only available in 2.0 SX model. That's what the NAZA KIA SA told me.


SUSkimsim
post Jun 24 2013, 07:01 PM

Let Me ❤️ You
*******
Senior Member
5,847 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
From: Malaysia 🇲🇾


Said bye bye to forte and welcome to Cerato anytime smile.gif




mADmAN
post Jun 24 2013, 07:51 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
10,530 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: Petaling Jaya & Mid Valley


our of curiosity.... why no exora?
SUSMatrix
post Jun 24 2013, 08:30 PM

King of Char Siew!
********
Senior Member
15,022 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Damansara Jaya/Bandar Utama


TS: Go test drive lar...ask here no use....Everyone will be bias. LOL.

IMO, Forte must get 2.0....Forte 1.6 really sucks in power...legarthic like my old KIA Sephia....car too big and power too little....you will be ownz by Viva's on the road.

After testing Forte and Inspira...i bought Inspira, now 2 years+...thumbup.gif...still loving my Inspira.

This post has been edited by Matrix: Jun 24 2013, 08:31 PM
ruffstuff
post Jun 24 2013, 08:46 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,345 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(K3nnYkl82 @ Jun 24 2013, 05:13 PM)
Forte for sure.. Need to ask ah kuai meh?
*
QUOTE(theanswer @ Jun 24 2013, 05:24 PM)
forte la. the price might be a bit expensive..but 6 airbags and esp might be bonus.
*
Forte is 4 star car only despite with the 6 airbags and ESP. The A pillar bent, thus only manage 4 star.
monocle
post Jun 24 2013, 09:05 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,645 posts

Joined: Jun 2012
QUOTE(Matrix @ Jun 24 2013, 08:30 PM)
TS: Go test drive lar...ask here no use....Everyone will be bias. LOL.

IMO, Forte must get 2.0....Forte 1.6 really sucks in power...legarthic like my old KIA Sephia....car too big and power too little....you will be ownz by Viva's on the road.

After testing Forte and Inspira...i bought Inspira, now 2 years+...thumbup.gif...still loving my Inspira.
*
To be honest, inspira is a much nicer car to drive compare to forte..
MR_alien
post Jun 24 2013, 09:23 PM

Mr.Alien on the loss
*******
Senior Member
3,581 posts

Joined: Oct 2007
From: everywhere in sabah



for me...inspira all the way
depending on what transmission u like, thn u go for whichever
mostly is CVT if u plan to drive on weekdays
edison1437
post Jun 24 2013, 10:29 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
819 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: Moon's Dark Side
QUOTE(K3nnYkl82 @ Jun 24 2013, 05:13 PM)
Forte for sure.. Need to ask ah kuai meh?
*
i know a fella own both rclxms.gif rclxms.gif
theanswer
post Jun 24 2013, 11:12 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,024 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: Kajang


QUOTE(imwhoiam @ Jun 24 2013, 06:00 PM)
I think the 1.6 SX variant only comes with 2 airbags, the driver and front passenger airbag. The 6 airbags only available in 2.0 SX model. That's what the NAZA KIA SA told me.
*
ah sorry..read it wrong. but 1.6 sx still got esp right?
JBSwagger
post Jun 24 2013, 11:49 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
1 posts

Joined: Apr 2013
From: Refer to name


Too many Forte on the road already. Sick of this car, like Vios and Maimee.

Seldom see Inspira, so go get one manual or better if got R3 spec.
jayraptor
post Jun 25 2013, 12:44 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
115 posts

Joined: Apr 2013
QUOTE(JBSwagger @ Jun 24 2013, 11:49 PM)
Too many Forte on the road already. Sick of this car, like Vios and Maimee.

Seldom see Inspira, so go get one manual or better if got R3 spec.
*
More cars on the road means more spare parts as well as spare part supplier will bring in more spare parts.

Compared Forte 2.0L vs Inspira 2.0L, these 2 are still exact match as the new K3 Cerato will be sold under Japanese C-segment range.

Forte is Korean made but DNA for its engine & tech from MMC, reliability & durability proven. Spare parts also cheap and highly available. Handling could beat Inspira with help from VSC. Maintenance is also cheaper using conventional 6AT that has stronger gears for startup from idle. FC wise, Forte wins by at least 0.3km/L city driving difference.
Kerb weight 1293kg (lighter due to torsion beam)
0-100km/h 9.8s

Inspira is using Lancer chassis, detuned GL engine + standard CVT JATCO gearbox with smaller gears. Other than these, the rest of the parts are built by P1. The suspension is not the same as in Lancer GT. What I dislike about CVT, ATF fluid change not exceeding 60,000km interval and have to pay RM400.
Kerb weight 1335kg
0-100km/h 10.5s

Verdict is, go test drive both kawkaw and check which 1 do you prefer. Personally I love the Lancer GT but I like the Forte now. Dun like Inspira as the bumpers, steering and some of the non-ori MMC parts seems cheap.
shelby_yong
post Jun 25 2013, 01:34 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
550 posts

Joined: Jun 2009


QUOTE(jayraptor @ Jun 25 2013, 12:44 AM)
More cars on the road means more spare parts as well as spare part supplier will bring in more spare parts.

Compared Forte 2.0L vs Inspira 2.0L, these 2 are still exact match as the new K3 Cerato will be sold under Japanese C-segment range.

Forte is Korean made but DNA for its engine & tech from MMC, reliability & durability proven. Spare parts also cheap and highly available. Handling could beat Inspira with help from VSC. Maintenance is also cheaper using conventional 6AT that has stronger gears for startup from idle. FC wise, Forte wins by at least 0.3km/L city driving difference.
Kerb weight 1293kg (lighter due to torsion beam)
0-100km/h 9.8s

Inspira is using Lancer chassis, detuned GL engine + standard CVT JATCO gearbox with smaller gears. Other than these, the rest of the parts are built by P1. The suspension is not the same as in Lancer GT. What I dislike about CVT, ATF fluid change not exceeding 60,000km interval and have to pay RM400.
Kerb weight 1335kg
0-100km/h 10.5s

Verdict is, go test drive both kawkaw and check which 1 do you prefer. Personally I love the Lancer GT but I like the Forte now. Dun like Inspira as the bumpers, steering and some of the non-ori MMC parts seems cheap.
*
bro u are rite rclxms.gif rclxms.gif
i didnt know that inspira was detuned no wonder i lose to vios...
TS... see my siggy for the answer
-w@kau--
post Jun 25 2013, 01:39 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
183 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
From: Klang Bukit Tinggi


Preve ~
SUSkimsim
post Jun 25 2013, 06:17 AM

Let Me ❤️ You
*******
Senior Member
5,847 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
From: Malaysia 🇲🇾


QUOTE(JBSwagger @ Jun 24 2013, 11:49 PM)
Too many Forte on the road already. Sick of this car, like Vios and Maimee.

Seldom see Inspira, so go get one manual or better if got R3 spec.
*
Bro you prefer which state?

In JB town really hardly to see Forte on the road an not like Myvi or Vios.

I believe after 3 yrs Forte will be outdated and much ppls would bother it.

Due to Korean tech improved as fast than JDM specs.
Just like Samsung S1 to S3 as short preiod only.



This post has been edited by kimsim: Jun 25 2013, 06:25 AM
edison1437
post Jun 25 2013, 08:35 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
819 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: Moon's Dark Side
QUOTE(jayraptor @ Jun 25 2013, 12:44 AM)
More cars on the road means more spare parts as well as spare part supplier will bring in more spare parts.

Compared Forte 2.0L vs Inspira 2.0L, these 2 are still exact match as the new K3 Cerato will be sold under Japanese C-segment range.

Forte is Korean made but DNA for its engine & tech from MMC, reliability & durability proven. Spare parts also cheap and highly available. Handling could beat Inspira with help from VSC. Maintenance is also cheaper using conventional 6AT that has stronger gears for startup from idle. FC wise, Forte wins by at least 0.3km/L city driving difference.
Kerb weight 1293kg (lighter due to torsion beam)
0-100km/h 9.8s

Inspira is using Lancer chassis, detuned GL engine + standard CVT JATCO gearbox with smaller gears. Other than these, the rest of the parts are built by P1. The suspension is not the same as in Lancer GT. What I dislike about CVT, ATF fluid change not exceeding 60,000km interval and have to pay RM400.
Kerb weight 1335kg
0-100km/h 10.5s

Verdict is, go test drive both kawkaw and check which 1 do you prefer. Personally I love the Lancer GT but I like the Forte now. Dun like Inspira as the bumpers, steering and some of the non-ori MMC parts seems cheap.
*
honestly I doubt your statements laugh.gif
Deja Vu
post Jun 25 2013, 09:01 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,863 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
TS,
Go test drive both if possible.

My vote goes to Inspira 1.8M->Inspira 2.0P -> current Forte 1.6EX/SX, mainly b'coz
- steering feel is too numb
- dash design vs exterior's kinda mismatched (ala Korean interior vs European skin)
theanswer
post Jun 25 2013, 09:14 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,024 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: Kajang


handling wise forte is so-so only. inspira is better. but forte still a good car.
kcng
post Jun 25 2013, 10:40 AM

~ Or@ng Giler ~
********
Senior Member
17,566 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: FFK Division - Klang



QUOTE(jayraptor @ Jun 25 2013, 12:44 AM)
More cars on the road means more spare parts as well as spare part supplier will bring in more spare parts.

Compared Forte 2.0L vs Inspira 2.0L, these 2 are still exact match as the new K3 Cerato will be sold under Japanese C-segment range.

Forte is Korean made but DNA for its engine & tech from MMC, reliability & durability proven. Spare parts also cheap and highly available. Handling could beat Inspira with help from VSC. Maintenance is also cheaper using conventional 6AT that has stronger gears for startup from idle. FC wise, Forte wins by at least 0.3km/L city driving difference.
Kerb weight 1293kg (lighter due to torsion beam)
0-100km/h 9.8s

Inspira is using Lancer chassis, detuned GL engine + standard CVT JATCO gearbox with smaller gears. Other than these, the rest of the parts are built by P1. The suspension is not the same as in Lancer GT. What I dislike about CVT, ATF fluid change not exceeding 60,000km interval and have to pay RM400.
Kerb weight 1335kg
0-100km/h 10.5s

Verdict is, go test drive both kawkaw and check which 1 do you prefer. Personally I love the Lancer GT but I like the Forte now. Dun like Inspira as the bumpers, steering and some of the non-ori MMC parts seems cheap.
*
HOLY S.H.I.T....

VSC can make your car handling godlike...
thumbup.gif thumbup.gif notworthy.gif notworthy.gif

i am beyond words to describe the next level of facepalmsu....
zweimmk
post Jun 25 2013, 10:49 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
512 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(kcng @ Jun 25 2013, 10:40 AM)
HOLY S.H.I.T....

VSC can make your car handling godlike...
thumbup.gif  thumbup.gif  notworthy.gif  notworthy.gif

i am beyond words to describe the next level of facepalmsu....
*
Didn't VSC make our test golf stick to the line?
kcng
post Jun 25 2013, 10:53 AM

~ Or@ng Giler ~
********
Senior Member
17,566 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: FFK Division - Klang



QUOTE(zweimmk @ Jun 25 2013, 10:49 AM)
Didn't VSC make our test golf stick to the line?
*
our golf has much higher chassis capability and better ESP tuning compared to a forte...
but then again we are just going in circles literally so there is not much ESP intervening works needed apart from just braking the inner wheel...

now try it again on multiple corners that require frequent weight transfers like B-roads or in Sepang..
i overshoot 3 corners in sepang even with ESP...
ph34r.gif

not to mention our golf is running on aluminium arm link and its independent suspension all round... compared to a errrr torsion beam on a regular road car...

if u are talking megane, different story all together la..
drool.gif drool.gif

This post has been edited by kcng: Jun 25 2013, 10:56 AM
gheyfriend
post Jun 25 2013, 11:18 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
281 posts

Joined: Jun 2011
when u wana buy car n consider so many technical stuff such as vsc, vtc, atc, abc...better stick to viva la..here all proton driver but in their heart, they wish to drive other car
SUSkimsim
post Jun 25 2013, 11:24 AM

Let Me ❤️ You
*******
Senior Member
5,847 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
From: Malaysia 🇲🇾


Back to proton saga 1st batch lah.

No ABS, no airbag, no EDB, No ESP, no VSC, no front impact bar, all don't have but still can find everywhere.
hafizi01
post Jun 25 2013, 11:41 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
32 posts

Joined: Jan 2009
either both will do.. if u r a kind of guy who like to drive a manual trans, go with inspira 1.8(m).. quite good imo.. hwever, look wise, eventho i really like to keep my trans in manual mode, i will choose forte 2.0 instead.. still, it's a matter of perspective.. lain orang, lain mata, lain hati..
kcng
post Jun 25 2013, 11:46 AM

~ Or@ng Giler ~
********
Senior Member
17,566 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: FFK Division - Klang



QUOTE(gheyfriend @ Jun 25 2013, 11:18 AM)
when u wana buy car n consider so many technical stuff such as vsc, vtc, atc, abc...better stick to viva la..here all proton driver but in their heart, they wish to drive other car
*
yup sad die me sir...
my proton got no DVVT sir...
no lagi best lagi power tagline also sir....
cry.gif cry.gif
ironthomas
post Jun 25 2013, 12:20 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Nov 2012
QUOTE(jayraptor @ Jun 25 2013, 12:44 AM)
More cars on the road means more spare parts as well as spare part supplier will bring in more spare parts.

Compared Forte 2.0L vs Inspira 2.0L, these 2 are still exact match as the new K3 Cerato will be sold under Japanese C-segment range.

Forte is Korean made but DNA for its engine & tech from MMC, reliability & durability proven. Spare parts also cheap and highly available. Handling could beat Inspira with help from VSC. Maintenance is also cheaper using conventional 6AT that has stronger gears for startup from idle. FC wise, Forte wins by at least 0.3km/L city driving difference.
Kerb weight 1293kg (lighter due to torsion beam)
0-100km/h 9.8s

Inspira is using Lancer chassis, detuned GL engine + standard CVT JATCO gearbox with smaller gears. Other than these, the rest of the parts are built by P1. The suspension is not the same as in Lancer GT. What I dislike about CVT, ATF fluid change not exceeding 60,000km interval and have to pay RM400.
Kerb weight 1335kg
0-100km/h 10.5s

Verdict is, go test drive both kawkaw and check which 1 do you prefer. Personally I love the Lancer GT but I like the Forte now. Dun like Inspira as the bumpers, steering and some of the non-ori MMC parts seems cheap.
*
I actually got a friend told me Inspira engine is make from Proton. His cousin work in Proton told him that and the suspension also from proton. That why he bought himself a Forte that is actually using MMC. That what he told me la. thumbup.gif Maybe ur right!
SUSkimsim
post Jun 25 2013, 12:59 PM

Let Me ❤️ You
*******
Senior Member
5,847 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
From: Malaysia 🇲🇾


We understanding on proton with Mitsubishi relationship.

Just we not bother proton what they like in package with Exora put on 1.6L engine.

If they get smart on Exora very early stage has been selling 1.8 or 2.0L anytime..

If you guys get smart you know what meant.

This post has been edited by kimsim: Jun 25 2013, 01:01 PM
ruffstuff
post Jun 25 2013, 01:27 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,345 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(kimsim @ Jun 25 2013, 12:59 PM)
We understanding on proton with Mitsubishi relationship.

Just we not bother proton what they like in package with Exora put on 1.6L engine.

If they get smart on Exora very early stage has been selling 1.8 or 2.0L anytime..

If you guys get smart you know what meant.
*
Because Proton not smart enough to have 1.8 or 2.0 engine at that time. Now, they have 1.6 turbocharged engine which is powerful enough to move the heavy exora.
SUSkimsim
post Jun 25 2013, 01:32 PM

Let Me ❤️ You
*******
Senior Member
5,847 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
From: Malaysia 🇲🇾


QUOTE(ruffstuff @ Jun 25 2013, 01:27 PM)
Because Proton not smart enough to have 1.8 or 2.0 engine at that time.  Now, they have 1.6 turbocharged engine which is powerful enough to move the heavy exora.
*
Do you how the Airport taxi said?

When Exora got 2.0L for them...
ruffstuff
post Jun 25 2013, 01:39 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,345 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(kimsim @ Jun 25 2013, 01:32 PM)
Do you how the Airport taxi said?

When Exora got 2.0L for them...
*
The 1.6 turbocharged have higher torque than 2.0l engine. The ECU tuned with better pickup than Preve.

Proton have eventually solved the under power problem, for all their current models.
SUSkimsim
post Jun 25 2013, 01:48 PM

Let Me ❤️ You
*******
Senior Member
5,847 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
From: Malaysia 🇲🇾


QUOTE(ruffstuff @ Jun 25 2013, 01:39 PM)
The 1.6 turbocharged have higher torque than 2.0l engine.  The ECU tuned with better pickup than Preve.

Proton have eventually solved the under power problem, for all their current models.
*
No any option for 2.0L for Exora or Preve?


ruffstuff
post Jun 25 2013, 01:54 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,345 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(kimsim @ Jun 25 2013, 01:48 PM)
No any option for 2.0L for Exora or Preve?
*
No. Because they simply dont have any 2.0, and they have 1.6 turbocharged for the same amount of power.

Proton campro replacement is NFE 1.2, 1.4, 1.8. NA and turbocharged. This is not include the Petronas 1.8/2.0. That engine is not in schedule for mass market.
khusyairi
post Jun 25 2013, 02:00 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
147 posts

Joined: Dec 2011



QUOTE(ruffstuff @ Jun 25 2013, 01:54 PM)
No. Because they simply dont have any 2.0, and they have 1.6 turbocharged for the same amount of power.

Proton campro replacement is NFE 1.2, 1.4, 1.8. NA and turbocharged.  This is not include the Petronas 1.8/2.0.  That engine is not in schedule for mass market.
*
Campro 1.6 CFE not powerful like 2.0L engine. Still can feel lack of power. What to expect from 138hp engine. If 10 years ago, maybe yes..
Current 2.0L NA engine can give no less 150hp. Some Korean car engine that being said inferior tech can give 160-170hp.
Somemore CVT not a proper mate wt CFE.

This post has been edited by khusyairi: Jun 25 2013, 02:01 PM
SUSkimsim
post Jun 25 2013, 02:07 PM

Let Me ❤️ You
*******
Senior Member
5,847 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
From: Malaysia 🇲🇾


Actually I like my Sylphy at low Hp, but in high torque

Engine type: MR20DE 1,997cc, 4-cylinder electronic fuel injection system (ECCS), DOHC with CVTC, balancer shaft and drive-by-wire technology
Max. Power: 131hp @ 5,200rpm
Max. Torque: 191Nm @ 4,400rpm

Just slightly accleerate on up hill only, never feel the lack power of CVT.
ruffstuff
post Jun 25 2013, 02:07 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,345 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(khusyairi @ Jun 25 2013, 02:00 PM)
Campro 1.6 CFE not powerful like 2.0L engine. Still can feel lack of power. What to expect from 138hp engine. If 10 years ago, maybe yes..
Current 2.0L NA engine can give no less 150hp. Some Korean car engine that being said inferior tech can give 160-170hp.
Somemore CVT not a proper mate wt CFE.
*
The ECU was tuned to meet the CVT torque capped. 1.6 NA campro can be tuned to give insane output. See those R3 race car. We are not talking about output alone. As far as underpower issued with Exora, it is already solved with CFE. Just keep in mind, it is a people mover vehicle.


khusyairi
post Jun 25 2013, 02:25 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
147 posts

Joined: Dec 2011



QUOTE(kimsim @ Jun 25 2013, 02:07 PM)
Actually I like my Sylphy at low Hp, but in high torque

Engine type: MR20DE 1,997cc, 4-cylinder electronic fuel injection system (ECCS), DOHC with CVTC, balancer shaft and drive-by-wire technology
Max. Power: 131hp @ 5,200rpm
Max. Torque: 191Nm @ 4,400rpm

Just slightly accleerate on up hill only, never feel the lack power of CVT.
*
10 years old tech engine. not being use anymore in new sylphy 2013 due to low hp.
SUSkimsim
post Jun 25 2013, 02:42 PM

Let Me ❤️ You
*******
Senior Member
5,847 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
From: Malaysia 🇲🇾


QUOTE(khusyairi @ Jun 25 2013, 02:25 PM)
10 years old tech engine. not being use anymore in new sylphy 2013 due to low hp.
*
Ya correct the high specs in 1.8L only.
Dual C-CVT and pure drive CVT.

For me I was still prefer the current 2.0L over than smaller 1.8L for fuel economy.

That's why I would suggest ppl buy Inspira 2.0L rather than get CFE.
BravoZeroTwo
post Jun 25 2013, 02:47 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,128 posts

Joined: Jul 2012
QUOTE(ruffstuff @ Jun 25 2013, 02:54 PM)
No. Because they simply dont have any 2.0, and they have 1.6 turbocharged for the same amount of power.

Proton campro replacement is NFE 1.2, 1.4, 1.8. NA and turbocharged.  This is not include the Petronas 1.8/2.0.  That engine is not in schedule for mass market.
*
Petronas engines of 1.8/2.0 is not for mass market ? Thanks.
khusyairi
post Jun 25 2013, 02:48 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
147 posts

Joined: Dec 2011



QUOTE(kimsim @ Jun 25 2013, 02:42 PM)
Ya correct the high specs in 1.8L only.
Dual C-CVT and pure drive CVT.

For me I was still prefer the current 2.0L over than smaller 1.8L for fuel economy.

That's why I would suggest ppl buy Inspira 2.0L rather than get CFE.
*
True. Usually bigger cc will give better feel & power.
Same also wt Merc 2.0 kompressor. I still think 2.4 cc Accord better.
I dont like turbo lag..
SUSkimsim
post Jun 25 2013, 02:53 PM

Let Me ❤️ You
*******
Senior Member
5,847 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
From: Malaysia 🇲🇾


QUOTE(khusyairi @ Jun 25 2013, 02:48 PM)
True. Usually bigger cc will give better feel & power.
Same also wt Merc 2.0 kompressor. I still think 2.4 cc Accord better.
I dont like turbo lag..
*
Agree with you.

One day got money, I will collect Cefiro 3.0 V6 wow
jayraptor
post Jun 28 2013, 11:47 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
115 posts

Joined: Apr 2013
QUOTE(edison1437 @ Jun 25 2013, 08:35 AM)
honestly I doubt your statements laugh.gif
*
hi edison1437 & ironthomas,

There is local owners organised club that organise racing at Sepang racetrack. Forgot what club, looks like Forte club vs Lancer club vs Inspira club vs Civic club. You can find them pitting against each other in Civic FD, Lancer, Forte, Inspira. I think that club should have expanded further to include Elantra and new Civic. At that time, never seen Inspira win much for standard NA engine category.

Without VSC, for FF car with multi-link rear, if the back is not heavy enough and lack the real wide stance to counter the weight distribution in front, it will go into understeer when hard cornering at over certain speed limit eg. 100km/h or 120km/h. Forte 2.0L despite torsion beam, the VSC prevents it from understeer allowing it to take hard corner at higher speed than Inspira.

The Lancer/Inspira CVT ATF fluid change maintenance is correct, you can check with SC if you doubted my comment. When Inspira introduced, the original Lancer could still sell mainly because many of the parts in Inspira are not MMC made. Check RV for Lancer, it is still ok though not as strong as back then reason being people buy it for its better suspension, handling and build quality. If Inspira handling and quality are somewhere close to Lancer, it could have defeated Lancer like how Perdana RM80k killed off Galant RM110k in 1994.


kcng,

Refer N-brand defensive driving course held in 2007/2008 and you'll understand what people talking here. All the N-brand models participated at that time failed the handling part and went into understeer dangerously. THis is due to poor suspension setup and no VSC. Having flat side stance, only bent by less than 5 degree angle on the spring.

This post has been edited by jayraptor: Jun 29 2013, 12:09 AM
jayraptor
post Jun 29 2013, 12:23 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
115 posts

Joined: Apr 2013
QUOTE(khusyairi @ Jun 25 2013, 02:48 PM)
True. Usually bigger cc will give better feel & power.
Same also wt Merc 2.0 kompressor. I still think 2.4 cc Accord better.
I dont like turbo lag..
*
hi khusyairi,

Turbolag only happens in older wastegate turbocharger. Turbolag means the exhaust gas pressure suddenly not enough to spin the turbine when there's sudden deceleration or abrupt sudden brake and then floor the pedal again. The newer type such as VGT and twinscroll turbocharger came up with low pressure and high pressure mode to eliminate lag.

If you meant sluggish at lower speed eg. turbocharger activates only from 1600rpm, at less than 1600rpm that is at 800-1599rpm would rely on the engine own strength to pull. The Merc 200kompressor is actually powered by 1.8L engine and its kerb weight at >1500kg. Like that sure engine feels weaker when turbo not activated.

If you look at Mondeo 2.0T, its 2.0L engine itself generate torque 200Nm on its own therefore, it is not a problem even if its VGT turbocharger activate at 4000rpm onwards. As long as the engine itself is not too small for the chassis weight, you won't feel weak at low end.

-------------------------------------------------------------

kimsim,

You said Sylphy at low Hp, but in high torque

Engine type: MR20DE 1,997cc, 4-cylinder electronic fuel injection system (ECCS), DOHC with CVTC, balancer shaft and drive-by-wire technology
Max. Power: 131hp @ 5,200rpm
Max. Torque: 191Nm @ 4,400rpm
Just slightly accleerate on up hill only, never feel the lack power of CVT.

As khusyairi said, that is 10 years ago tech engine. New Sentra 2013 don't use that. Even US Sentra MR20DE engine with EGR tuned to >140ps. You need to park the Sylphy on steep slope like certain part of Cameron Highland or Genting Highland with a Forte 2.0 next to you. Then both start to move up from zero, you'll find the Sylphy sluggish like it's struggling to move a bit. Try with reverse as well, it'll be worse.
edison1437
post Jun 29 2013, 08:08 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
819 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: Moon's Dark Side
QUOTE(jayraptor @ Jun 28 2013, 11:47 PM)
hi edison1437 & ironthomas,

There is local owners organised club that organise racing at Sepang racetrack. Forgot what club, looks like Forte club vs Lancer club vs Inspira club vs Civic club. You can find them pitting against each other in Civic FD, Lancer, Forte, Inspira. I think that club should have expanded further to include Elantra and new Civic. At that time, never seen Inspira win much for standard NA engine category.

Without VSC, for FF car with multi-link rear, if the back is not heavy enough and lack the real wide stance to counter the weight distribution in front, it will go into understeer when hard cornering at over certain speed limit eg. 100km/h or 120km/h. Forte 2.0L despite torsion beam, the VSC prevents it from understeer allowing it to take hard corner at higher speed than Inspira.

The Lancer/Inspira CVT ATF fluid change maintenance is correct, you can check with SC if you doubted my comment. When Inspira introduced, the original Lancer could still sell mainly because many of the parts in Inspira are not MMC made. Check RV for Lancer, it is still ok though not as strong as back then reason being people buy it for its better suspension, handling and build quality. If Inspira handling and quality are somewhere close to Lancer, it could have defeated Lancer like how Perdana RM80k killed off Galant RM110k in 1994.
kcng,

Refer N-brand defensive driving course held in 2007/2008 and you'll understand what people talking here. All the N-brand models participated at that time failed the handling part and went into understeer dangerously. THis is due to poor suspension setup and no VSC. Having flat side stance, only bent by less than 5 degree angle on the spring.
*
honestly i dunno what should i reply you other than " doh.gif "
babyryn
post Jun 29 2013, 08:51 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
17 posts

Joined: Apr 2012
From: Ipoh
QUOTE(MeToo @ Jun 24 2013, 03:53 PM)
ANything but proton la... i read in this forum that inspira is 99% local, infact most Lancer owners claim that's true! If Inspira is same as Lancer, why would people go buy lancer and pay 30~40k more?! THey are not stupid la.

As for the inspira/Campro engine..... I was standing there when this picture was taken.... so i can confirm its not photochopped
*
Wake up la dude. Its not 99% local parts la! Most lancer owner said that coz they bought at expensive and feel butthurt. Alot of parts are still from japan, only those make up and some accessories is assembly local by proton. Those lancer selling 120k last time when inspira is not launched. Inspira can be sold cheaper alot is because is made in malaysia and and those parts inside inspira is re-make locally. Do you know that inspira 2012 still have the hot hair blow equipped? Those lancer try to trade in and see, their tears will come out anytime.
For your engine quote, inspira never use campro engine, all are mitsu engine. Dont be fooled by other ppl, there's agreement when they get the lancer from mitsu and convert to proton, the engine is not allowed to be modified by proton and reselling locally. If the engine is campro, alot of people will suffering because of the thirsty campro engine.
WilliamHoo
post Jun 29 2013, 09:00 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
7 posts

Joined: Mar 2012


TS

care to sexplain wat criteria in choosing ur ride?

Power
Gadgets
Handling
FC
The Looks
The Brand????
Value For Money

in term of Spirited Driving for me
Inspira Rulessssssss
just my personal opinion

Troll mode-OFF


lol

babyryn
post Jun 29 2013, 09:01 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
17 posts

Joined: Apr 2012
From: Ipoh
QUOTE(jayraptor @ Jun 29 2013, 12:23 AM)
hi khusyairi,

Turbolag only happens in older wastegate turbocharger. Turbolag means the exhaust gas pressure suddenly not enough to spin the turbine when there's sudden deceleration or abrupt sudden brake and then floor the pedal again. The newer type such as VGT and twinscroll turbocharger came up with low pressure and high pressure mode to eliminate lag.

If you meant sluggish at lower speed eg. turbocharger activates only from 1600rpm, at less than 1600rpm that is at 800-1599rpm would rely on the engine own strength to pull. The Merc 200kompressor is actually powered by 1.8L engine and its kerb weight at >1500kg. Like that sure engine feels weaker when turbo not activated.

If you look at Mondeo 2.0T, its 2.0L engine itself generate torque 200Nm on its own therefore, it is not a problem even if its VGT turbocharger activate at 4000rpm onwards. As long as the engine itself is not too small for the chassis weight, you won't feel weak at low end.

-------------------------------------------------------------

kimsim,

You said Sylphy at low Hp, but in high torque

Engine type: MR20DE 1,997cc, 4-cylinder electronic fuel injection system (ECCS), DOHC with CVTC, balancer shaft and drive-by-wire technology
Max. Power: 131hp @ 5,200rpm
Max. Torque: 191Nm @ 4,400rpm
Just slightly accleerate on up hill only, never feel the lack power of CVT.

As khusyairi said, that is 10 years ago tech engine. New Sentra 2013 don't use that. Even US Sentra MR20DE engine with EGR tuned to >140ps. You need to park the Sylphy on steep slope like certain part of Cameron Highland or Genting Highland with a Forte 2.0 next to you. Then both start to move up from zero, you'll find the Sylphy sluggish like it's struggling to move a bit. Try with reverse as well, it'll be worse.
*
Not sure of sylphy but forte 2.0 is underpowered as well. Never tried sylphy yet but tried accord 2.0, civic 2.0, inspira 2.0, camry 2.0, altis 1.8 are still much better than forte 2.0. Forte is a real disappointed car. Even 1.6 then 4at failed, then new 6at still failed.. Suggest better forte tutup kilang
kcng
post Jun 29 2013, 09:13 AM

~ Or@ng Giler ~
********
Senior Member
17,566 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: FFK Division - Klang



QUOTE(jayraptor @ Jun 28 2013, 11:47 PM)
hi edison1437 & ironthomas,

There is local owners organised club that organise racing at Sepang racetrack. Forgot what club, looks like Forte club vs Lancer club vs Inspira club vs Civic club. You can find them pitting against each other in Civic FD, Lancer, Forte, Inspira. I think that club should have expanded further to include Elantra and new Civic. At that time, never seen Inspira win much for standard NA engine category.

Without VSC, for FF car with multi-link rear, if the back is not heavy enough and lack the real wide stance to counter the weight distribution in front, it will go into understeer when hard cornering at over certain speed limit eg. 100km/h or 120km/h. Forte 2.0L despite torsion beam, the VSC prevents it from understeer allowing it to take hard corner at higher speed than Inspira.

The Lancer/Inspira CVT ATF fluid change maintenance is correct, you can check with SC if you doubted my comment. When Inspira introduced, the original Lancer could still sell mainly because many of the parts in Inspira are not MMC made. Check RV for Lancer, it is still ok though not as strong as back then reason being people buy it for its better suspension, handling and build quality. If Inspira handling and quality are somewhere close to Lancer, it could have defeated Lancer like how Perdana RM80k killed off Galant RM110k in 1994.
kcng,

Refer N-brand defensive driving course held in 2007/2008 and you'll understand what people talking here. All the N-brand models participated at that time failed the handling part and went into understeer dangerously. THis is due to poor suspension setup and no VSC. Having flat side stance, only bent by less than 5 degree angle on the spring.
*
WAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAH
u, off all people trying to tell me what is going on here?

AHAHAHAHAH

please la even Forte with VSC prevent understeer and able to corner harder?
are u sure what junk u spewing out?
HAAHAHAHAAHAH...

oh god...
wat a nice saturday morning joke....
i would love to take YOUR particular forte and try since u say can prevent understeer and corner harder and higher speed....
thumbup.gif icon_idea.gif rclxms.gif
BlackWoods
post Jun 29 2013, 09:58 AM

Dark Knight
*******
Senior Member
2,152 posts

Joined: Jun 2012
I would vouch for Forte, as I'm always skeptical on Proton's quality.
stinger82
post Jun 29 2013, 01:46 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
288 posts

Joined: Feb 2008


QUOTE(jayraptor @ Jun 29 2013, 12:23 AM)
As khusyairi said, that is 10 years ago tech engine. New Sentra 2013 don't use that. Even US Sentra MR20DE engine with EGR tuned to >140ps. You need to park the Sylphy on steep slope like certain part of Cameron Highland or Genting Highland with a Forte 2.0 next to you. Then both start to move up from zero, you'll find the Sylphy sluggish like it's struggling to move a bit. Try with reverse as well, it'll be worse.
*
i suggest you to even try to sit in a sylphy.

its cvt is tuned to be aggressive. it feels very powerful.

and dont ask someone to do a slope test. dont tell me you done it, because obviously you never stepped in a sylphy before.

doh.gif and no, your slope test is not the way to test power. if 2.0 is sluggish, i think 660 kancil will explode on the spot.



This post has been edited by stinger82: Jun 29 2013, 01:48 PM
vinorgouki
post Jun 29 2013, 04:27 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
120 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


u are running out of time.
http://paultan.org/2013/06/28/suzuki-jimny...ira-discount-2/
dares
post Jun 29 2013, 05:03 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
834 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
QUOTE(kcng @ Jun 29 2013, 09:13 AM)
WAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAH
u, off all people trying to tell me what is going on here?

AHAHAHAHAH

please la even Forte with VSC prevent understeer and able to corner harder?
are u sure what junk u spewing out?
HAAHAHAHAAHAH...

oh god...
wat a nice saturday morning joke....
i would love to take YOUR particular forte and try since u say can prevent understeer and corner harder and higher speed....
thumbup.gif  icon_idea.gif  rclxms.gif
*
Ayam tot VSC actually cut engine power when activated.....so in fact when you corner til VSC light come out you will actually slow down.

Deswai ppl turn off the thing when tracking hmm.gif
shinjun
post Jun 29 2013, 06:46 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,247 posts

Joined: Jan 2007


QUOTE(dares @ Jun 29 2013, 05:03 PM)
Ayam tot VSC actually cut engine power when activated.....so in fact when you corner til VSC light come out you will actually slow down.

Deswai ppl turn off the thing when tracking  hmm.gif
*
VSC stands for " Very Stable Cornering" feature. When activated, it will stabilize you car and automatically accelerate through the corner faster. It can provide stability that is better than 4WD car.

If you switch it off during tracking then you are doomed.
SUSjolokia
post Jun 29 2013, 09:50 PM

So Hot It Burns..!!!
*******
Senior Member
3,274 posts

Joined: May 2013


QUOTE(shinjun @ Jun 29 2013, 06:46 PM)
VSC stands for  " Very Stable Cornering" feature. When activated, it will stabilize you car and automatically accelerate through the corner faster. It can provide stability that is better than 4WD car.

If you switch it off during tracking then you are doomed.
*
Toyoda should have employed u to be their copywriter, Vehicle Stability Control sound so difficult to understand, Very Stable Cornering or Very Safe Cornering, surely uncle auntie also understand, lol.......

BTW u r pulling the fellow leg, when u said it's Very Stable Cornering aren't U... ???
spring onion
post Jun 30 2013, 12:15 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,087 posts

Joined: Apr 2013
QUOTE(jayraptor @ Jun 25 2013, 12:44 AM)
More cars on the road means more spare parts as well as spare part supplier will bring in more spare parts.

Compared Forte 2.0L vs Inspira 2.0L, these 2 are still exact match as the new K3 Cerato will be sold under Japanese C-segment range.

Forte is Korean made but DNA for its engine & tech from MMC, reliability & durability proven. Spare parts also cheap and highly available. Handling could beat Inspira with help from VSC. Maintenance is also cheaper using conventional 6AT that has stronger gears for startup from idle. FC wise, Forte wins by at least 0.3km/L city driving difference.
Kerb weight 1293kg (lighter due to torsion beam)
0-100km/h 9.8s

Inspira is using Lancer chassis, detuned GL engine + standard CVT JATCO gearbox with smaller gears. Other than these, the rest of the parts are built by P1. The suspension is not the same as in Lancer GT. What I dislike about CVT, ATF fluid change not exceeding 60,000km interval and have to pay RM400.
Kerb weight 1335kg
0-100km/h 10.5s

Verdict is, go test drive both kawkaw and check which 1 do you prefer. Personally I love the Lancer GT but I like the Forte now. Dun like Inspira as the bumpers, steering and some of the non-ori MMC parts seems cheap.
*
bro, inspira 2.0p is like total 95% imported from mitsu la, you sure or not? is the mivec engine then what for they detune it?
spring onion
post Jun 30 2013, 12:23 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,087 posts

Joined: Apr 2013
QUOTE(babyryn @ Jun 29 2013, 08:51 AM)
Wake up la dude. Its not 99% local parts la! Most lancer owner said that coz they bought at expensive and feel butthurt. Alot of parts are still from japan, only those make up and some accessories is assembly local by proton. Those lancer selling 120k last time when inspira is not launched. Inspira can be sold cheaper alot is because is made in malaysia and and those parts inside inspira is re-make locally. Do you know that inspira 2012 still have the hot hair blow equipped? Those lancer try to trade in and see, their tears will come out anytime.
For your engine quote, inspira never use campro engine, all are mitsu engine. Dont be fooled by other ppl, there's agreement when they get the lancer from mitsu and convert to proton, the engine is not allowed to be modified by proton and reselling locally. If the engine is campro, alot of people will suffering because of the thirsty campro engine.
*
1.6 and 1.8 version are campro actually
babyryn
post Jun 30 2013, 12:48 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
17 posts

Joined: Apr 2012
From: Ipoh
QUOTE(spring onion @ Jun 30 2013, 12:23 AM)
1.6 and 1.8 version are campro actually
*
Since when inspira got 1.6? 1.8 mitsu la dude
selinix
post Jun 30 2013, 12:56 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
7,343 posts

Joined: May 2005

QUOTE(jayraptor @ Jun 25 2013, 12:44 AM)
More cars on the road means more spare parts as well as spare part supplier will bring in more spare parts.

Compared Forte 2.0L vs Inspira 2.0L, these 2 are still exact match as the new K3 Cerato will be sold under Japanese C-segment range.

Forte is Korean made but DNA for its engine & tech from MMC, reliability & durability proven. Spare parts also cheap and highly available. Handling could beat Inspira with help from VSC. Maintenance is also cheaper using conventional 6AT that has stronger gears for startup from idle. FC wise, Forte wins by at least 0.3km/L city driving difference.
Kerb weight 1293kg (lighter due to torsion beam)
0-100km/h 9.8s

Inspira is using Lancer chassis, detuned GL engine + standard CVT JATCO gearbox with smaller gears. Other than these, the rest of the parts are built by P1. The suspension is not the same as in Lancer GT. What I dislike about CVT, ATF fluid change not exceeding 60,000km interval and have to pay RM400.
Kerb weight 1335kg
0-100km/h 10.5s

Verdict is, go test drive both kawkaw and check which 1 do you prefer. Personally I love the Lancer GT but I like the Forte now. Dun like Inspira as the bumpers, steering and some of the non-ori MMC parts seems cheap.
*
so you willing to pay rm30-40k more for a better quality bumper and original MMC parts.. thumbup.gif
shinjun
post Jun 30 2013, 01:13 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,247 posts

Joined: Jan 2007


QUOTE(jolokia @ Jun 29 2013, 09:50 PM)
Toyoda should have employed u to be their copywriter, Vehicle Stability Control sound so difficult to understand, Very Stable Cornering or Very Safe Cornering, surely uncle auntie also understand, lol.......

BTW u r pulling the fellow leg, when u said it's Very Stable Cornering aren't U...  ???
*
I don't wanna work with Toyoda. LOL brows.gif

Anyway, Lagi Stable Lagi Best! thumbup.gif
Yong_5290
post Jun 30 2013, 01:16 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
152 posts

Joined: Nov 2009
TS , i would suggest Exora bold . Many people here doesnt even read or understand the topic starter and what he needs . Got genius fella saying torsion beam with VSC can corner kaw kaw . So TS , if u want to put 4 adult in a car and corner kaw kaw , pls give
my friend a call . He's a ING insurance agent . Good service too . f***ing LOLX at those replies
piumiu
post Jun 30 2013, 09:17 AM

I see you.
*******
Senior Member
3,174 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
From: Wonderland


QUOTE(MeToo @ Jun 24 2013, 04:53 PM)
ANything but proton la... i read in this forum that inspira is 99% local, infact most Lancer owners claim that's true! If Inspira is same as Lancer, why would people go buy lancer and pay 30~40k more?! THey are not stupid la.

As for the inspira/Campro engine..... I was standing there when this picture was taken.... so i can confirm its not photochopped
*
What rubbish are you talking about. I own one. Go die please. '
Local content 99%? laugh.gif

Even women have better understanding in car than you. whistling.gif

This post has been edited by piumiu: Jun 30 2013, 09:18 AM
edison1437
post Jun 30 2013, 10:41 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
819 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: Moon's Dark Side
QUOTE(piumiu @ Jun 30 2013, 09:17 AM)
What rubbish are you talking about. I own one. Go die please. '
Local content 99%?  laugh.gif

Even women have better understanding in car than you.  whistling.gif
*
MeTooyou lose to a women whistling.gif whistling.gif
ledtechn
post Jun 30 2013, 10:49 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
60 posts

Joined: Jun 2011
fwd car+vsc/esp.i dont think its gonna give u very big different..unless if it is a rear wheel drive car.and summore the power is just from a 2.0 liter NA engine.i would say it gives a very minimal effect during cornering.

This post has been edited by ledtechn: Jun 30 2013, 10:49 AM
K3nnYkl82
post Jun 30 2013, 12:22 PM

NewBie
*******
Senior Member
2,479 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mars
QUOTE(spring onion @ Jun 30 2013, 12:23 AM)
1.6 and 1.8 version are campro actually
*
See... 1.8 campro!
who says inspira no campro
dadurtyz
post Jun 30 2013, 12:25 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
658 posts

Joined: May 2006
From: Melaka



From viva to forte to inpila to vsc and boring torsion beam, really need to vroom2 in family car?
WilliamHoo
post Jun 30 2013, 12:44 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
7 posts

Joined: Mar 2012


QUOTE(Yong_5290 @ Jun 30 2013, 01:16 AM)
TS , i would suggest Exora bold . Many people here doesnt even read or understand the topic starter and what he needs . Got genius fella saying torsion beam with VSC can corner kaw kaw . So TS , if u want to put 4 adult in a car and corner kaw kaw , pls give
my friend a call . He's a ING insurance agent . Good service too . f***ing LOLX at those replies
*
Zzz

this is one of the example

Exora....BOLD
is it in the TS consideration list


LOLX
Yong_5290
post Jun 30 2013, 06:36 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
152 posts

Joined: Nov 2009
QUOTE(WilliamHoo @ Jun 30 2013, 12:44 PM)
Zzz

this is one of the example

Exora....BOLD
is it in the TS consideration list
LOLX
*
Nope , its not in his list . I mention 'suggest' instead of 'choose' from ts option.
Anyway TS, if u always carry many people , the preve or exora with turbo will be good for you as you get plenty of torque at low RPM , which is very needed to move heavy things . Otherwise you will feel sluggish
x0x
post Jul 1 2013, 12:11 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
92 posts

Joined: Jul 2007
From: Jerusallem, Palestine

TS better ask in serious kopitiam else u want bring ur unker to sepang trackday
TSimwhoiam
post Jul 1 2013, 02:50 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
202 posts

Joined: Apr 2007
From: Chelas



QUOTE(WilliamHoo @ Jun 29 2013, 09:00 AM)
TS

care to sexplain wat criteria in choosing ur ride?

Power
Gadgets
Handling
FC
The Looks
The Brand????
Value For Money

in term of Spirited Driving for me
Inspira Rulessssssss
just my personal opinion

Troll mode-OFF
lol
*
Sorry for being gone for sometimes guys

I don't really mind about the brand actually, that's why Proton is in my consideration

Things i look for in my future ride:
+First and foremost, value for money.
+Then comfortable to transport 3-4 people (once in a week or two, weekend family car)
+One i could use for a very long time (not planning to change car in 10 years maybe)
+Good amount of room for rear seat and boot
+preferably sedan car (i'm somewhat a sucker for looks too)
+Safe ride
+gadgets are good, i'd love if they had a lot gadgets installed but these could be installed after the car is purchased. Gadgets i'd want to have would be Navigator and Reverse cam
edison1437
post Jul 1 2013, 08:11 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
819 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: Moon's Dark Side
QUOTE(imwhoiam @ Jul 1 2013, 02:50 AM)
Sorry for being gone for sometimes guys

I don't really mind about the brand actually, that's why Proton is in my consideration

Things i look for in my future ride:
+First and foremost, value for money.
+Then comfortable to transport 3-4 people (once in a week or two, weekend family car)
+One i could use for a very long time (not planning to change car in 10 years maybe)
+Good amount of room for rear seat and boot
+preferably sedan car (i'm somewhat a sucker for looks too)
+Safe ride
+gadgets are good, i'd love if they had a lot gadgets installed but these could be installed after the car is purchased. Gadgets i'd want to have would be Navigator and Reverse cam
*
RM69k after discount for 2.0E inspira
yesterday suppose the last day
maybe you should check with the SA?
dvinez
post Jul 1 2013, 08:38 AM

Limited Edition
******
Senior Member
1,475 posts

Joined: Dec 2006
From: Paradise



wow 69k, thats cheap, good buy if can get that price.
TSimwhoiam
post Jul 1 2013, 09:40 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
202 posts

Joined: Apr 2007
From: Chelas



QUOTE(edison1437 @ Jul 1 2013, 08:11 AM)
RM69k after discount for 2.0E inspira
yesterday suppose the last day
maybe you should check with the SA?
*
Wow... that's extremely good price. Is that the one shown by one of the reply here? Autofest Penang?

Yesterday i did gave one of the forummer dealer a call and asked about 2.0P. Didn't hear him saying anything about the 2.0E selling at that price.

Probably i should ask him later. Thanks for the info.
edison1437
post Jul 1 2013, 10:42 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
819 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: Moon's Dark Side
QUOTE(imwhoiam @ Jul 1 2013, 09:40 AM)
Wow... that's extremely good price. Is that the one shown by one of the reply here? Autofest Penang?

Yesterday i did gave one of the forummer dealer a call and asked about 2.0P. Didn't hear him saying anything about the 2.0E selling at that price.

Probably i should ask him later. Thanks for the info.
*
yes at DRB auto fest. Honestly if my financial allow i dont mind getting another manual rclxms.gif
people might say i crazy thou whistling.gif
a few fella at inspira thread already booked either 2.0E or the 1.8MT
WilliamHoo
post Jul 3 2013, 12:11 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
7 posts

Joined: Mar 2012


QUOTE(imwhoiam @ Jul 1 2013, 02:50 AM)
Sorry for being gone for sometimes guys

I don't really mind about the brand actually, that's why Proton is in my consideration

Things i look for in my future ride:
+First and foremost, value for money.
+Then comfortable to transport 3-4 people (once in a week or two, weekend family car)
+One i could use for a very long time (not planning to change car in 10 years maybe)
+Good amount of room for rear seat and boot
+preferably sedan car (i'm somewhat a sucker for looks too)
+Safe ride
+gadgets are good, i'd love if they had a lot gadgets installed but these could be installed after the car is purchased. Gadgets i'd want to have would be Navigator and Reverse cam
*
I think u just made your choice if u managed to get the DRB discounted Inspira

Thumbs up

u can have lotsa gadgets with ur new found ride

ASC
AFS
KOS

wat is that?
Come TT

u know where to find us

WilliamHoo
post Jul 3 2013, 12:13 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
7 posts

Joined: Mar 2012


those are not aftermarket gadgets yo

u will be amazed


EnochKeng
post Jul 3 2013, 05:12 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
34 posts

Joined: Apr 2008
From: Johor Bahru


QUOTE(K3nnYkl82 @ Jun 30 2013, 12:22 PM)
See... 1.8 campro!
who says inspira no campro
*
1.8 Campro do exist, but in a hovercraft.
silentown
post Jul 3 2013, 05:38 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
3 posts

Joined: Sep 2012
just asking,in term cost for service and maintanance,which one more cost effective..
edison1437
post Jul 3 2013, 05:59 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
819 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: Moon's Dark Side
QUOTE(silentown @ Jul 3 2013, 05:38 PM)
just asking,in term cost for service and maintanance,which one more cost effective..
*
they are C-segment to me about the same
nzh0920
post Jul 3 2013, 06:10 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
83 posts

Joined: May 2011


QUOTE(WilliamHoo @ Jul 3 2013, 12:13 AM)
those are not aftermarket gadgets yo

u will be amazed
*
im sorry, u are inspira sales man ka?
edison1437
post Jul 3 2013, 06:19 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
819 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: Moon's Dark Side
QUOTE(nzh0920 @ Jul 3 2013, 06:10 PM)
im sorry, u are inspira sales man ka?
*
you worse inspira con-man whistling.gif
jayraptor
post Jul 3 2013, 09:28 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
115 posts

Joined: Apr 2013
QUOTE(babyryn @ Jun 29 2013, 09:01 AM)
Not sure of sylphy but forte 2.0 is underpowered as well. Never tried sylphy yet but tried accord 2.0, civic 2.0, inspira 2.0, camry 2.0, altis 1.8 are still much better than forte 2.0. Forte is a real disappointed car. Even 1.6 then 4at failed, then new 6at still failed.. Suggest better forte tutup kilang
*
I doubt you even try and compare these cars properly. FYi, I tried them all with 5 full size adults onboard with proper measurement and calculation in torque test aka with load + cargo and see how much the strength deteriorated. Forte 2.0 is not underpowered yet it proven stronger than Civic FD2 2.0.

Forte is proven successful worldwide. Only bunch of marketing staff here would prevent any facts on better cars from going public. The 1 that should close production are the non-qualified C & D segment that are meant for 3rd nation. Only Globally accepted cars should be allowed to bring in.

If what you said is true about Lancer, its RV would have drop like flies long ago. However it did not and remain healthy despite existence of Inspira. Fact is Inspira is just using Lancer chassis and less ingredient Lancer GL with non-MMC suspension handling and build quality.
winkiedilwy
post Jul 3 2013, 09:56 PM

Imma farting carrots.
*******
Senior Member
2,343 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
From: Place known for existence of men.


Well, no matter what engine you choose, CVT ruins almost everything. Unless you wanted to end up in a manual Inspira, the 6-speed in the Forte is quite nice tho.

But I still cannot brain why the new Cerato so expensive...
kcng
post Jul 3 2013, 09:59 PM

~ Or@ng Giler ~
********
Senior Member
17,566 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: FFK Division - Klang



QUOTE(jayraptor @ Jul 3 2013, 09:28 PM)
I doubt you even try and compare these cars properly. FYi, I tried them all with 5 full size adults onboard with proper measurement and calculation in torque test aka with load + cargo and see how much the strength deteriorated. Forte 2.0 is not underpowered yet it proven stronger than Civic FD2 2.0.

Forte is proven successful worldwide. Only bunch of marketing staff here would prevent any facts on better cars from going public. The 1 that should close production are the non-qualified C & D segment that are meant for 3rd nation. Only Globally accepted cars should be allowed to bring in.

If what you said is true about Lancer, its RV would have drop like flies long ago. However it did not and remain healthy despite existence of Inspira. Fact is Inspira is just using Lancer chassis and less ingredient Lancer GL with non-MMC suspension handling and build quality.
*
Forte 2.0 stronger then FD 2.0

u gotta be kidding me man...
drool.gif drool.gif

either that or u are a successful troll
drool.gif drool.gif
babyryn
post Jul 3 2013, 10:42 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
17 posts

Joined: Apr 2012
From: Ipoh
QUOTE(jayraptor @ Jul 3 2013, 09:28 PM)
I doubt you even try and compare these cars properly. FYi, I tried them all with 5 full size adults onboard with proper measurement and calculation in torque test aka with load + cargo and see how much the strength deteriorated. Forte 2.0 is not underpowered yet it proven stronger than Civic FD2 2.0.

Forte is proven successful worldwide. Only bunch of marketing staff here would prevent any facts on better cars from going public. The 1 that should close production are the non-qualified C & D segment that are meant for 3rd nation. Only Globally accepted cars should be allowed to bring in.

If what you said is true about Lancer, its RV would have drop like flies long ago. However it did not and remain healthy despite existence of Inspira. Fact is Inspira is just using Lancer chassis and less ingredient Lancer GL with non-MMC suspension handling and build quality.
*
Well you may find forte 2.0 better with they way you test it but i did find it lack of response and delivery of power very slow yet underpowered. You said forte 2.0 is more powerful than 2.0 civic i doubt that.. I am not sure how you test both but from my side, the 2.0 is extremely underpowered and not even comparable to civic.
jayraptor
post Jul 3 2013, 10:50 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
115 posts

Joined: Apr 2013
QUOTE(babyryn @ Jul 3 2013, 10:42 PM)
Well you may find forte 2.0 better with they way you test it but i did find it lack of response and delivery of power very slow yet underpowered. You said forte 2.0 is more powerful than 2.0 civic i doubt that.. I am not sure how you test both but from my side, the 2.0 is extremely underpowered and not even comparable to civic.
*
Civic 1.8/2.0 engine lacks torque badly. The FD2 2.0L only rely on more aerodynamic design and lower height to achieve 0-100km/h in 9.2s. The newer Civic 2.0 shredded 100kg on lighter chassis to come up with 0.1s better.

You seems to be looking at 0-100km/h to determine underpower. Forte 2.0 could hit 100km/h in 9.8s with 6AT while the older 4AT gets 10.5s. Whatever underpower you say is opposed to not just my evaluation but also Edmunds' report. Also, there are almost no Forte 2.0 test unit available, wonder where do you get to test that in the first place. Unless you owned 1 or you have some1 that owned 1 willing to let you try it. Probably you took the 1.6SX to assume then that is not right.

Forte 2.0
output 156ps@6200rpm
torque 194Nm@4300rpm

Civic 2.0 FD2
output 155ps@6500rpm
torque 188Nm@4500rpm

Civic 2.0S 2013
output 155ps@6500rpm
190Nm@4300rp

The Accord 2.0 G7/G8 are fitted with Civic FD2 and new Civic engine respectively. THe acceleration fell from 9.2s to 12s. Compared to Sonata/Optima with the same Theta engine could achieve 10.8s, deteriorated only by 1s. The torque matters.

This post has been edited by jayraptor: Jul 3 2013, 10:56 PM
dvinez
post Jul 3 2013, 11:10 PM

Limited Edition
******
Senior Member
1,475 posts

Joined: Dec 2006
From: Paradise



macam proton say, drive it to believe it.

sometime some really talk based on their believe.
if u say 2.0 forte is underpowered i can accept, maybe u drive a much better or much powerful car before.
but if you say it is extremely underpowered, i wonder what you compare it to, lol. hmm.gif

same segment, power delivery got difference, but not until extreme difference. biggrin.gif
got some more clever, compare power delivery of car from different cc/segment. wub.gif

for me that 1-2 secs not really matter, most important is i like that car, wont regret and get bored looking at it everyday.
edison1437
post Jul 3 2013, 11:17 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
819 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: Moon's Dark Side
QUOTE(jayraptor @ Jul 3 2013, 10:50 PM)
Civic 1.8/2.0 engine lacks torque badly. The FD2 2.0L only rely on more aerodynamic design and lower height to achieve 0-100km/h in 9.2s. The newer Civic 2.0 shredded 100kg on lighter chassis to come up with 0.1s better.

You seems to be looking at 0-100km/h to determine underpower. Forte 2.0 could hit 100km/h in 9.8s with 6AT while the older 4AT gets 10.5s. Whatever underpower you say is opposed to not just my evaluation but also Edmunds' report. Also, there are almost no Forte 2.0 test unit available, wonder where do you get to test that in the first place. Unless you owned 1 or you have some1 that owned 1 willing to let you try it. Probably you took the 1.6SX to assume then that is not right.

Forte 2.0
output 156ps@6200rpm
torque 194Nm@4300rpm

Civic 2.0 FD2
output 155ps@6500rpm
torque 188Nm@4500rpm

Civic 2.0S 2013
output 155ps@6500rpm
190Nm@4300rp

The Accord 2.0 G7/G8 are fitted with Civic FD2 and new Civic engine respectively. THe acceleration fell from 9.2s to 12s. Compared to Sonata/Optima with the same Theta engine could achieve 10.8s, deteriorated only by 1s. The torque matters.
*
i seriously doubt this will take much effect at the speed you said
stinger82
post Jul 3 2013, 11:18 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
288 posts

Joined: Feb 2008


QUOTE(jayraptor @ Jul 3 2013, 09:28 PM)
I doubt you even try and compare these cars properly. FYi, I tried them all with 5 full size adults onboard with proper measurement and calculation in torque test aka with load + cargo and see how much the strength deteriorated. Forte 2.0 is not underpowered yet it proven stronger than Civic FD2 2.0.

Forte is proven successful worldwide. Only bunch of marketing staff here would prevent any facts on better cars from going public. The 1 that should close production are the non-qualified C & D segment that are meant for 3rd nation. Only Globally accepted cars should be allowed to bring in.

If what you said is true about Lancer, its RV would have drop like flies long ago. However it did not and remain healthy despite existence of Inspira. Fact is Inspira is just using Lancer chassis and less ingredient Lancer GL with non-MMC suspension handling and build quality.
*
so, lancer and civic failed everywhere......

thanks for sharing.
K3nnYkl82
post Jul 3 2013, 11:27 PM

NewBie
*******
Senior Member
2,479 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mars
QUOTE(jayraptor @ Jul 3 2013, 09:28 PM)
I doubt you even try and compare these cars properly. FYi, I tried them all with 5 full size adults onboard with proper measurement and calculation in torque test aka with load + cargo and see how much the strength deteriorated. Forte 2.0 is not underpowered yet it proven stronger than Civic FD2 2.0.

Forte is proven successful worldwide. Only bunch of marketing staff here would prevent any facts on better cars from going public. The 1 that should close production are the non-qualified C & D segment that are meant for 3rd nation. Only Globally accepted cars should be allowed to bring in.

If what you said is true about Lancer, its RV would have drop like flies long ago. However it did not and remain healthy despite existence of Inspira. Fact is Inspira is just using Lancer chassis and less ingredient Lancer GL with non-MMC suspension handling and build quality.
*
U heard from ur cousin or fren or neighbour that it was a Lancer GL? whistling.gif
jnick
post Jul 3 2013, 11:28 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
403 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
From: Johor/KL


QUOTE(stinger82 @ Jul 3 2013, 11:18 PM)
so, lancer and civic failed everywhere......

thanks for sharing.
*
Yes.
Civic less wind drag already failed.
Apatah lagi lancer.....

Oh ya, Inspira using lancer "reject" stuff to build it seems.
Wondering what is the meaning of rebadge nowadays.

jnick
post Jul 3 2013, 11:29 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
403 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
From: Johor/KL


QUOTE(K3nnYkl82 @ Jul 3 2013, 11:27 PM)
U heard from ur cousin or fren or neighbour that it was a Lancer GL? whistling.gif
*
Mention before. His name Alex.
nzh0920
post Jul 3 2013, 11:32 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
83 posts

Joined: May 2011


QUOTE(jayraptor @ Jul 3 2013, 10:50 PM)
Civic 1.8/2.0 engine lacks torque badly. The FD2 2.0L only rely on more aerodynamic design and lower height to achieve 0-100km/h in 9.2s. The newer Civic 2.0 shredded 100kg on lighter chassis to come up with 0.1s better.

You seems to be looking at 0-100km/h to determine underpower. Forte 2.0 could hit 100km/h in 9.8s with 6AT while the older 4AT gets 10.5s. Whatever underpower you say is opposed to not just my evaluation but also Edmunds' report. Also, there are almost no Forte 2.0 test unit available, wonder where do you get to test that in the first place. Unless you owned 1 or you have some1 that owned 1 willing to let you try it. Probably you took the 1.6SX to assume then that is not right.

Forte 2.0
output 156ps@6200rpm
torque 194Nm@4300rpm

Civic 2.0 FD2
output 155ps@6500rpm
torque 188Nm@4500rpm

Civic 2.0S 2013
output 155ps@6500rpm
190Nm@4300rp

The Accord 2.0 G7/G8 are fitted with Civic FD2 and new Civic engine respectively. THe acceleration fell from 9.2s to 12s. Compared to Sonata/Optima with the same Theta engine could achieve 10.8s, deteriorated only by 1s. The torque matters.
*
wow, look at the figure can know the car power or not d laugh.gif rclxms.gif notworthy.gif
edison1437
post Jul 3 2013, 11:36 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
819 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: Moon's Dark Side
suddenly so many people kambing
Xabi14Alonso
post Jul 4 2013, 12:10 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
1 posts

Joined: Nov 2011
....
SUSMatrix
post Jul 4 2013, 12:42 AM

King of Char Siew!
********
Senior Member
15,022 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Damansara Jaya/Bandar Utama


QUOTE(EnochKeng @ Jul 3 2013, 05:12 PM)
1.8 Campro do exist, but in a hovercraft.
*
What hovercraft...It's in UFO lah.

Attached Image
shelby_yong
post Jul 4 2013, 03:11 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
550 posts

Joined: Jun 2009


QUOTE(nzh0920 @ Jul 3 2013, 11:32 PM)
wow, look at the figure can know the car power or not d  laugh.gif  rclxms.gif  notworthy.gif
*
he can read the car brochure
mercury99
post Jul 4 2013, 08:30 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
58 posts

Joined: Oct 2012


QUOTE(MeToo @ Jun 24 2013, 03:53 PM)
ANything but proton la... i read in this forum that inspira is 99% local, infact most Lancer owners claim that's true! If Inspira is same as Lancer, why would people go buy lancer and pay 30~40k more?! THey are not stupid la.

As for the inspira/Campro engine..... I was standing there when this picture was taken.... so i can confirm its not photochopped
*
QUOTE(piumiu @ Jun 30 2013, 09:17 AM)
What rubbish are you talking about. I own one. Go die please. '
Local content 99%?  laugh.gif

Even women have better understanding in car than you.  whistling.gif
*
QUOTE(edison1437 @ Jun 30 2013, 10:41 AM)
MeTooyou lose to a women whistling.gif  whistling.gif
*
metoo epic fail rclxms.gif rclxms.gif rclxms.gif rclxms.gif
mercury99
post Jul 4 2013, 08:33 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
58 posts

Joined: Oct 2012


QUOTE(jayraptor @ Jul 3 2013, 10:50 PM)
Civic 1.8/2.0 engine lacks torque badly. The FD2 2.0L only rely on more aerodynamic design and lower height to achieve 0-100km/h in 9.2s. The newer Civic 2.0 shredded 100kg on lighter chassis to come up with 0.1s better.

You seems to be looking at 0-100km/h to determine underpower. Forte 2.0 could hit 100km/h in 9.8s with 6AT while the older 4AT gets 10.5s. Whatever underpower you say is opposed to not just my evaluation but also Edmunds' report. Also, there are almost no Forte 2.0 test unit available, wonder where do you get to test that in the first place. Unless you owned 1 or you have some1 that owned 1 willing to let you try it. Probably you took the 1.6SX to assume then that is not right.

Forte 2.0
output 156ps@6200rpm
torque 194Nm@4300rpm

Civic 2.0 FD2
output 155ps@6500rpm
torque 188Nm@4500rpm

Civic 2.0S 2013
output 155ps@6500rpm
190Nm@4300rp

The Accord 2.0 G7/G8 are fitted with Civic FD2 and new Civic engine respectively. THe acceleration fell from 9.2s to 12s. Compared to Sonata/Optima with the same Theta engine could achieve 10.8s, deteriorated only by 1s. The torque matters.
*
dude are you a 15 y/o keyboard warrior? do you have a driving license? have you driven any of those cars before?

your statements are based on the figures on sheet. but real life would present an entirely new perspective. if you don't know, there's a thing called gear ratios. these determine how much power the engine transmit to the wheels.

please wait a few years then go test drive both cars ya.
edison1437
post Jul 4 2013, 08:50 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
819 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: Moon's Dark Side
QUOTE(mercury99 @ Jul 4 2013, 08:33 AM)
dude are you a 15 y/o keyboard warrior? do you have a driving license? have you driven any of those cars before?

your statements are based on the figures on sheet. but real life would present an entirely new perspective. if you don't know, there's a thing called gear ratios. these determine how much power the engine transmit to the wheels.

please wait a few years then go test drive both cars ya.
*
not only gear ratio but wheel size and width also play a part then accelerate
mercury99
post Jul 4 2013, 08:59 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
58 posts

Joined: Oct 2012


both about the same size
edison1437
post Jul 4 2013, 09:10 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
819 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: Moon's Dark Side
QUOTE(mercury99 @ Jul 4 2013, 08:59 AM)
both about the same size
*
civic = 215/45 R17
lancer = 215/45 R18

not the same leh sweat.gif
mercury99
post Jul 4 2013, 09:36 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
58 posts

Joined: Oct 2012


QUOTE(edison1437 @ Jul 4 2013, 09:10 AM)
civic = 215/45 R17
lancer = 215/45 R18

not the same leh sweat.gif
*
he's talking abt civic and forte la
edison1437
post Jul 4 2013, 09:40 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
819 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: Moon's Dark Side
QUOTE(mercury99 @ Jul 4 2013, 09:36 AM)
he's talking abt civic and forte la
*
paiseh mata sepek tongue.gif
joefbi
post Jul 4 2013, 11:43 AM

joefbi a.k.a roketx
*******
Senior Member
2,558 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
From: Rawang


if u do a poll im sure inspira wins
edison1437
post Jul 4 2013, 12:27 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
819 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: Moon's Dark Side
QUOTE(joefbi @ Jul 4 2013, 11:43 AM)
if u do a poll im sure inspira wins
*
campro can win forte?
helven
post Jul 4 2013, 04:07 PM

Doko Online
*****
Senior Member
919 posts

Joined: Oct 2009


In lowyat.net sure Inspira > all

edison1437
post Jul 4 2013, 04:46 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
819 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: Moon's Dark Side
QUOTE(helven @ Jul 4 2013, 04:07 PM)
In lowyat.net sure Inspira K5 > all
*
korekted

This post has been edited by edison1437: Jul 4 2013, 04:47 PM
dvinez
post Jul 4 2013, 04:52 PM

Limited Edition
******
Senior Member
1,475 posts

Joined: Dec 2006
From: Paradise



now inspira win all yo, 60K only for 2012 car, if book before 7th!
joefbi
post Jul 4 2013, 05:01 PM

joefbi a.k.a roketx
*******
Senior Member
2,558 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
From: Rawang


QUOTE(edison1437 @ Jul 4 2013, 12:27 PM)
campro can win forte?
*
what is the problem with campro...
psycho1
post Jul 4 2013, 05:02 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
37 posts

Joined: Jan 2009


QUOTE(dvinez @ Jul 4 2013, 04:52 PM)
now inspira win all yo, 60K only for 2012 car, if book before 7th!
*
sounds awesome. is it for 2.0? would like to go check it out....
dvinez
post Jul 4 2013, 05:08 PM

Limited Edition
******
Senior Member
1,475 posts

Joined: Dec 2006
From: Paradise



refer here https://forum.lowyat.net/topic/2867333
MeToo
post Jul 4 2013, 06:08 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,336 posts

Joined: May 2009
QUOTE(nzh0920 @ Jul 3 2013, 11:32 PM)
wow, look at the figure can know the car power or not d  laugh.gif  rclxms.gif  notworthy.gif
*
What's the problem with that?

I know a guy who can know the tyre grip/performance based on looking at the thread design.

I also know a guy who knows the HP of a car by smelling the exhaust.

I also know a guy who know how much HP an extractor will add by looking at the welding.
MeToo
post Jul 4 2013, 06:11 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,336 posts

Joined: May 2009
QUOTE(piumiu @ Jun 30 2013, 09:17 AM)
What rubbish are you talking about. I own one. Go die please. '
Local content 99%?  laugh.gif

Even women have better understanding in car than you.  whistling.gif
*
Aiyor ... you women driver ma... owning one doesnt mean u actually took the car apart and check if each part is JDM or CDM or Made in Malaysia right?

I already provided photo evidence of the Campro engine jor lah... picture speaks a thousand word!


QUOTE(edison1437 @ Jun 30 2013, 10:41 AM)
MeTooyou lose to a women whistling.gif  whistling.gif
*
QUOTE(mercury99 @ Jul 4 2013, 08:30 AM)
metoo epic fail  rclxms.gif  rclxms.gif 
*
Woi Woi! mad.gif mad.gif

Women driver how they know?! No facts to back up what they say also! vmad.gif
mercury99
post Jul 4 2013, 06:15 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
58 posts

Joined: Oct 2012


QUOTE(MeToo @ Jul 4 2013, 06:11 PM)
Aiyor ... you women driver ma... owning one doesnt mean u actually took the car apart and check if each part is JDM or CDM or Made in Malaysia right?

I already provided photo evidence of the Campro engine jor lah... picture speaks a thousand word!
Woi Woi!  mad.gif  mad.gif

Women driver how they know?! No facts to back up what they say also!  vmad.gif
*
tak tau malu still wanna challenge her sigh.. go dig a hole and bury yourself pls whistling.gif
MeToo
post Jul 4 2013, 06:31 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,336 posts

Joined: May 2009
QUOTE(mercury99 @ Jul 4 2013, 06:15 PM)
tak tau malu still wanna challenge her sigh.. go dig a hole and bury yourself pls  whistling.gif
*
OT :

cry.gif cry.gif

Lu jaga this Friday TT! I introduce you to Mr. Gangster JNick! vmad.gif

mercury99
post Jul 4 2013, 06:33 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
58 posts

Joined: Oct 2012


QUOTE(MeToo @ Jul 4 2013, 06:31 PM)
OT :

cry.gif  cry.gif

Lu jaga this Friday TT! I introduce you to Mr. Gangster JNick! vmad.gif
*
lol i dont normally go for TTs. only twice so far hehe. and i already met jnick, quite a nice fella hahaha
piumiu
post Jul 6 2013, 12:30 AM

I see you.
*******
Senior Member
3,174 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
From: Wonderland


QUOTE(MeToo @ Jul 4 2013, 07:11 PM)
Aiyor ... you women driver ma... owning one doesnt mean u actually took the car apart and check if each part is JDM or CDM or Made in Malaysia right?

I already provided photo evidence of the Campro engine jor lah... picture speaks a thousand word!
Woi Woi!  mad.gif  mad.gif

Women driver how they know?! No facts to back up what they say also!  vmad.gif
*
Do you even know the engine model no? laugh.gif
Only men can be better in cars? Did you took apart your car?
What super car are you driving? yawn.gif
jnick
post Jul 6 2013, 01:03 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
403 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
From: Johor/KL


QUOTE(piumiu @ Jul 6 2013, 12:30 AM)
Do you even know the engine model no?  laugh.gif
Only men can be better in cars? Did you took apart your car?
What super car are you driving?  yawn.gif
*
Good one.....

Hahahahaha...... So true with what you are saying.
mytmnet
post Jul 6 2013, 01:06 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
133 posts

Joined: May 2008


QUOTE(MeToo @ Jul 4 2013, 06:11 PM)
Aiyor ... you women driver ma... owning one doesnt mean u actually took the car apart and check if each part is JDM or CDM or Made in Malaysia right?

I already provided photo evidence of the Campro engine jor lah... picture speaks a thousand word!
Woi Woi!  mad.gif  mad.gif

If I put your dad photo at my face you will call me dad as you really don't know what is Campro engine tongue.gif
You better open a Gen2 / Persona bonnet and see what a Campro look like rclxms.gif

BTW, women driver can know many things icon_rolleyes.gif
edison1437
post Jul 6 2013, 08:12 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
819 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: Moon's Dark Side
QUOTE(piumiu @ Jul 6 2013, 12:30 AM)
Do you even know the engine model no?  laugh.gif
Only men can be better in cars? Did you took apart your car?
What super car are you driving?  yawn.gif
*
totally agree nod.gif
MeToo just a fella own a paria datsun whistling.gif
botack
post Jul 6 2013, 08:57 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
349 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
From: Puchong/Sunway/Subang Jaya/Shah Alam/Klang


QUOTE(edison1437 @ Jul 6 2013, 08:12 AM)
totally agree nod.gif
MeToo just a fella own a paria datsun  whistling.gif
*
You look metoo no up?? He sold his datsun edi..now he drive aventador...brows.gif
mikehuan
post Jul 6 2013, 09:58 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
6,160 posts

Joined: May 2008
QUOTE(mercury99 @ Jul 4 2013, 06:33 PM)
lol i dont normally go for TTs. only twice so far hehe. and i already met jnick, quite a nice fella hahaha
*
You haven't met me yet.

/Knucklecrack
K3nnYkl82
post Jul 6 2013, 10:08 AM

NewBie
*******
Senior Member
2,479 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mars
QUOTE(botack @ Jul 6 2013, 08:57 AM)
You look metoo no up?? He sold his datsun edi..now he drive aventador...brows.gif
*
Aventador which is made from korea right?
the one same cost with a porshe exhaust system right?
unknownhammie
post Jul 6 2013, 10:51 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
399 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
From: Hell


lmao.... LOL !!!!
jnick
post Jul 6 2013, 11:07 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
403 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
From: Johor/KL


QUOTE(mytmnet @ Jul 6 2013, 01:06 AM)
If I put your dad photo at my face you will call me dad as you really don't know what is Campro engine tongue.gif
You better open a Gen2 / Persona bonnet and see what a Campro look like rclxms.gif

BTW, women driver can know many things  icon_rolleyes.gif
*
He got another car but still on the ship....

Couldn't open up to see the engine. Forgive him plz.
edison1437
post Jul 6 2013, 11:37 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
819 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: Moon's Dark Side
QUOTE(jnick @ Jul 6 2013, 11:07 AM)
He got another car but still on the ship....

Couldn't open up to see the engine. Forgive him plz.
*
when he sees the car also no use la need to ask a girl that knows better than him go and see whistling.gif
mikro
post Jul 6 2013, 11:47 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
486 posts

Joined: Dec 2005
From: Subang Jaya


boy buy inspira, girl buy forte
jayraptor
post Jul 6 2013, 10:12 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
115 posts

Joined: Apr 2013
QUOTE(mercury99 @ Jul 4 2013, 08:33 AM)
dude are you a 15 y/o keyboard warrior? do you have a driving license? have you driven any of those cars before?

your statements are based on the figures on sheet. but real life would present an entirely new perspective. if you don't know, there's a thing called gear ratios. these determine how much power the engine transmit to the wheels.

please wait a few years then go test drive both cars ya.
*
You didn't read properly, mentioned clearly in comment that already performed torque test on all these cars in real driving. Seems more like you can't accept facts instead. The Forte 2.0 is 1 of best C-segment for price range below RM130k but NAZA placed no effort in marketing for not having even 1 test unit end up not many knows its true capability.

Lancer is best car when it came out in '07 and until today, its handling is still good enough to beat many C-segments. Inspira at the other hand, is not a direct clone but just mere using the chassis with much P1 parts. Only the engine & gearbox are ori from Lancer GL.


edison1437,
Besides aerodynamic, height of the car could determine acceleration. If you have a C-segment car height 1395mm with aerodynamic body having only 136horsepower 4AT gearbox could propel to 100km/h in just 10s.

Haven't you go find out that local raceclub where you can find them pitting against each other at Sepang? Rather than you just blindly doubt here and there, I already provided you hints where to start looking and see for yourself.
SUSmechanicalKB
post Jul 6 2013, 10:15 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
577 posts

Joined: Apr 2012
QUOTE(imwhoiam @ Jun 24 2013, 03:17 PM)
I am planning to sell my VIVA to get a more fitting car for my small family (4 adults).

After much research on the forum and some sites,
My budget would allow me to look at a few options, and i have narrowed down to the following

1. KIA Forte 1.6 SX - ~85k (non local brand, low interest (1.68% or 1.88%), good amount of equipment)
2. PROTON Inspira 2.0 Premium - ~92k (good discount around 7k, good amount of equipment)
3. PROTON Inspira 1.8 Manual - ~78k (good discount around 7k, way cheaper than above after discount)

Hope the sifus here are able to give more insight on which to get and why?
*
FORTE has the BEST resale value and the most high tech for your immediate money. Always buy Korean

K3nnYkl82
post Jul 6 2013, 10:16 PM

NewBie
*******
Senior Member
2,479 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mars
QUOTE(jayraptor @ Jul 6 2013, 10:12 PM)
You didn't read properly, mentioned clearly in comment that already performed torque test on all these cars in real driving. Seems more like you can't accept facts instead. The Forte 2.0 is 1 of best C-segment for price range below RM130k but NAZA placed no effort in marketing for not having even 1 test unit end up not many knows its true capability.

Lancer is best car when it came out in '07 and until today, its handling is still good enough to beat many C-segments. Inspira at the other hand, is not a direct clone but just mere using the chassis with much P1 parts. Only the engine & gearbox are ori from Lancer GL.
edison1437,
Besides aerodynamic, height of the car could determine acceleration. If you have a C-segment car height 1395mm with aerodynamic body having only 136horsepower 4AT gearbox could propel to 100km/h in just 10s.

Haven't you go find out that local raceclub where you can find them pitting against each other at Sepang? Rather than you just blindly doubt here and there, I already provided you hints where to start looking and see for yourself.
*
can explain what is lancer gl?

jayraptor
post Jul 6 2013, 10:33 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
115 posts

Joined: Apr 2013
QUOTE(K3nnYkl82 @ Jul 6 2013, 10:16 PM)
can explain what is lancer gl?
*
Lancer GL is a lower spec variant of Lancer GT/EX with more normal car suspension (softer, smaller & lighter) meant for comfort rather than handling. It is sold in other countries. You can refer Singapore Lancer 1.5GL and I think they have it in Thailand. The engine top is slightly different from our Lancer GT with less. Do not mix up with the earlier Lancer GL that was phased out as it was known as GLS elsewhere.

Lancer 2.0GT:
output 155ps@6000rpm
torque 199Nm@4250rpm

Inspira 2.0:
150ps@6000rpm
197Nm@4250rpm

Spot the difference?
edison1437
post Jul 6 2013, 10:35 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
819 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: Moon's Dark Side
QUOTE(jayraptor @ Jul 6 2013, 10:33 PM)
Lancer GL is a lower spec variant of Lancer GT/EX with more normal car suspension (softer, smaller & lighter) meant for comfort rather than handling. It is sold in other countries. You can refer Singapore Lancer 1.5GL and I think they have it in Thailand. The engine top is slightly different from our Lancer GT with less. Do not mix up with the earlier Lancer GL that was phased out as it was known as GLS elsewhere.

Lancer 2.0GT:
output 155ps@6000rpm
torque 199Nm@4250rpm

Inspira 2.0:
150ps@6000rpm
197Nm@4250rpm

Spot the difference?
*
thanks sifu fnf's jeremy clarkson laugh.gif

This post has been edited by edison1437: Jul 6 2013, 10:37 PM
K3nnYkl82
post Jul 6 2013, 10:35 PM

NewBie
*******
Senior Member
2,479 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mars
QUOTE(jayraptor @ Jul 6 2013, 10:33 PM)
Lancer GL is a lower spec variant of Lancer GT/EX with more normal car suspension (softer, smaller & lighter) meant for comfort rather than handling. It is sold in other countries. You can refer Singapore Lancer 1.5GL and I think they have it in Thailand. The engine top is slightly different from our Lancer GT with less. Do not mix up with the earlier Lancer GL that was phased out as it was known as GLS elsewhere.

Lancer 2.0GT:
output 155ps@6000rpm
torque 199Nm@4250rpm

Inspira 2.0:
150ps@6000rpm
197Nm@4250rpm

Spot the difference?
*
please go to mitsubishi malaysia site and tell me isit 155 or 150ps now whistling.gif


-EDITED-

Incase you lazy go surf ..

Attached Image

and the link ..

Lancer GT Malaysia

Now .. would you mind explaining what is Lancer GL again ?

This post has been edited by K3nnYkl82: Jul 6 2013, 11:37 PM
jnick
post Jul 6 2013, 11:59 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
403 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
From: Johor/KL


QUOTE(jayraptor @ Jul 6 2013, 10:33 PM)
Lancer GL is a lower spec variant of Lancer GT/EX with more normal car suspension (softer, smaller & lighter) meant for comfort rather than handling. It is sold in other countries. You can refer Singapore Lancer 1.5GL and I think they have it in Thailand. The engine top is slightly different from our Lancer GT with less. Do not mix up with the earlier Lancer GL that was phased out as it was known as GLS elsewhere.

Lancer 2.0GT:
output 155ps@6000rpm
torque 199Nm@4250rpm

Inspira 2.0:
150ps@6000rpm
197Nm@4250rpm

Spot the difference?
*
To be honest I respect your courage....

Well... Where u get the fact about lancer GL?


jayraptor
post Jul 7 2013, 12:27 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
115 posts

Joined: Apr 2013
QUOTE(K3nnYkl82 @ Jul 6 2013, 10:35 PM)
please go to mitsubishi malaysia site and tell me isit 155 or 150ps now whistling.gif
-EDITED-

Incase you lazy go surf ..

Attached Image

and the link ..

Lancer GT Malaysia

Now .. would you mind explaining what is Lancer GL again ?
*
Not sure what is MMC here up to at the moment. From what I know, Lancer 2.0GT from 2007 until the last time I still follow up with them, the tuning for GT and later EX has always been output 155ps@6000rpm and torque 199Nm@4250rpm.

jnick,
Details on Lancer GL I got it from overseas ofcourse. Not here. In fact, MMC in that country sells 1.5GLX, 2.0GL/GLS/GT that they even have heightened suspension variant with overall height from 1490mm up to 1505mm.
K3nnYkl82
post Jul 7 2013, 12:31 AM

NewBie
*******
Senior Member
2,479 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mars
QUOTE(jayraptor @ Jul 7 2013, 12:27 AM)
Not sure what is MMC here up to at the moment. From what I know, Lancer 2.0GT from 2007 until the last time I still follow up with them, the tuning for GT and later EX has always been output 155ps@6000rpm and torque 199Nm@4250rpm.

jnick,
Details on Lancer GL I got it from overseas ofcourse. Not here. In fact, MMC in that country sells 1.5GLX, 2.0GL/GLS/GT that they even have heightened suspension variant with overall height from 1490mm up to 1505mm.
*
Then from where you got your info that inspira is a copy of lancer gl?
do u even know what the diff between the so call lancer gl and lancer gt?
or u read broucher and put it together ? whistling.gif
K3nnYkl82
post Jul 7 2013, 12:45 AM

NewBie
*******
Senior Member
2,479 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mars
QUOTE(jayraptor @ Jun 25 2013, 12:44 AM)
Inspira is using Lancer chassis, detuned GL engine + standard CVT JATCO gearbox with smaller gears. Other than these, the rest of the parts are built by P1. The suspension is not the same as in Lancer GT. What I dislike about CVT, ATF fluid change not exceeding 60,000km interval and have to pay RM400.
Kerb weight 1335kg
0-100km/h 10.5s

Verdict is, go test drive both kawkaw and check which 1 do you prefer. Personally I love the Lancer GT but I like the Forte now. Dun like Inspira as the bumpers, steering and some of the non-ori MMC parts seems cheap.
*
I am interested on where u find ur facts seriously..
detune lancer gl engine. Does that means lancer GT and lancer GL having a different engine?
CVT jatco with smaller gears... Whats the benefit and where u get the info.
the rest of the parts are build by proton.. And u got this from?
absorbers and spring yes.. This one by proton
jayraptor
post Jul 7 2013, 12:47 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
115 posts

Joined: Apr 2013
QUOTE(K3nnYkl82 @ Jul 7 2013, 12:31 AM)
Then from where you got your info that inspira is a copy of lancer gl?
do u even know what the diff between the so call lancer gl and lancer gt?
or u read broucher and put it together ? whistling.gif
*


I am interested on where u find ur facts seriously..
detune lancer gl engine. Does that means lancer GT and lancer GL having a different engine?
CVT jatco with smaller gears... Whats the benefit and where u get the info.
the rest of the parts are build by proton.. And u got this from?
absorbers and spring yes.. This one by proton
Since when I say copy? Stated clearly earlier, P1 got license from MMC to build Inspira using Lancer GL chassis, engine + gearbox with local parts. When Inspira launched in 2011, Lancer EX/GT engine output/torque still superior. They are using the same engine block.

The JATCO CVT gearbox with 6speed gear ratio = 2.349~0.394 and reverse gear 1.750.
Comparing to other makes first gear:
Altis - 2.847
Civic - 2.666
Mazda 3 - 3.620
Elantra/Forte - 4.162

Always start with small gear turn big gear. The bigger the first gear, the easier engine to turn the axle. Earlier, manual gearbox is stronger than auto gearbox because of larger first few gears. Manual begins with >3.0 while auto starts with 2.x. Current technology, auto first few gears could go as big as its manual counterpart and now grew even bigger that could be fitted in pickup trucks.



This post has been edited by jayraptor: Jul 7 2013, 12:56 AM
K3nnYkl82
post Jul 7 2013, 12:52 AM

NewBie
*******
Senior Member
2,479 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mars
QUOTE(jayraptor @ Jul 7 2013, 12:47 AM)
Since when I say copy? Stated clearly earlier, P1 got license from MMC to build Inspira using Lancer GL chassis, engine + gearbox with local parts. When Inspira launched in 2011, Lancer EX/GT engine output/torque still superior. You got your info only from brochure?
*
For your info.. I do remap for inspria and lancer.. And the info u got from the website and from wherever is all out of date. Since 2011, due to emission control, mitsubishi has detune the car and inspira roll out with the latest mapping from mitsu. I even got a fren driving a 2011 comes with the same inspira map totally!
And do u actually know what is the difference between lancer GL and GT ? (local market we have lancer GT GLS and Ex) GLS and EX were discon.
And dont mind explaining to me what is the different in terms of chassis for lancer GT and GL if u dun mind, coz u looks convince GT and GL have different chassis
K3nnYkl82
post Jul 7 2013, 01:01 AM

NewBie
*******
Senior Member
2,479 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mars
Sorry not trying to says inspira same as lancer gt. But ur facts are missleading..

No doubt lancer gt have much better craftmanship but at a more premium price for sure.

As for engine. 4B11 only one variant and the output is control by the ecu. No differences in terms of engine. And its the same gearbox from jatco for all lancer or inspira variant.
The diff between lancer gls and gt is only the trim. Chassis is the same. Lancer gt fitted with sports abosrber n sprig with anti roll bar. As for GLs it is meant for comfort hence no anti roll bar. Inspira comes with a smaller anti roll bar compare GT. Infact due to low volume most of the parts are direct order from mitsubishi. (fitting might be not as good as lancer)
I can even list out what are the parts localize..
And do u think with sales volume so low, jatco will customize smaller gear for u?
jayraptor
post Jul 7 2013, 01:02 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
115 posts

Joined: Apr 2013
QUOTE(K3nnYkl82 @ Jul 7 2013, 12:52 AM)
For your info.. I do remap for inspria and lancer.. And the info u got from the website and from wherever is all out of date. Since 2011, due to emission control, mitsubishi has detune the car and inspira roll out with the latest mapping from mitsu. I even got a fren driving a 2011 comes with the same inspira map totally!
And do u actually know what is the difference between lancer GL and GT ? (local market we have lancer GT GLS and Ex) GLS and EX were discon.
And dont mind explaining to me what is the different in terms of chassis for lancer GT and GL if u dun mind, coz u looks convince GT and GL have different chassis
*


Sorry not trying to says inspira same as lancer gt. But ur facts are missleading..

No doubt lancer gt have much better craftmanship but at a more premium price for sure.

As for engine. 4B11 only one variant and the output is control by the ecu. No differences in terms of engine. And its the same gearbox from jatco for all lancer or inspira variant.
The diff between lancer gls and gt is only the trim. Chassis is the same. Lancer gt fitted with sports abosrber n sprig with anti roll bar. As for GLs it is meant for comfort hence no anti roll bar. Inspira comes with a smaller anti roll bar compare GT. Infact due to low volume most of the parts are direct order from mitsubishi. (fitting might be not as good as lancer)
I can even list out what are the parts localize..
And do u think with sales volume so low, jatco will customize smaller gear for u?
You replied too soon before I could edit my comment in replying to your second comment.

In '07, from what I could recall, the Lancer GL has beige interior, smaller rims around 16" and minus the skirting and spoiler at RM107k while GT at RM112k before revised to RM115k then RM117k and finally in '09 to RM123k. No difference on engine at that time. EX is a GT without bodykit & smaller rims selling at RM115k while GT at RM123k.

The overseas variant, other than detuned engine in GL, it has smaller lighter multi-link rear. Also, they have more variants on interior colour, not just black.

No, the gearbox gears are standard. That CVT gearbox model from JATCO with moveable face begins at 2.3 ratio, the next is around 1.2, and so on with the 6th at 0.394 size.

This post has been edited by jayraptor: Jul 7 2013, 01:05 AM
K3nnYkl82
post Jul 7 2013, 01:06 AM

NewBie
*******
Senior Member
2,479 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mars
QUOTE(jayraptor @ Jul 7 2013, 01:02 AM)
You replied too soon before I could edit my comment in replying to your second comment.

In '07, from what I could recall, the Lancer GL has beige interior, smaller rims around 16" and minus the skirting and spoiler at RM107k while GT at RM112k before revised to RM115k then RM117k and finally in '09 to RM123k. No difference on engine at that time. EX is a GT without bodykit & smaller rims selling at RM115k while GT at RM123k.

The overseas variant, other than detuned engine in GL, it has smaller lighter multi-link rear. Also, they have more variants on interior colour, not just black.
*
Multilink were never smaller infact 2.0 2.4 or 1.8 all the same. There are two types of rear arm only. FOr front wheel drive only or for rear wheel drive as well. Got hole for the drive shaft to pass thru. The anti roll bar yes. GT has a 20mm. Ex n gls doesnt.
Local market beige for gls and ex . Black for gt.

Those ratio in CVT are just VIRTUAL GEARS. Control by software! Lolz

And please do go compare the gear urself again. Its both running the same gearbox code. u can check proton edar website against mitsubishi australia (they got stated the ratio there) he virtual gears

This post has been edited by K3nnYkl82: Jul 7 2013, 01:09 AM
jayraptor
post Jul 7 2013, 01:24 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
115 posts

Joined: Apr 2013
QUOTE(K3nnYkl82 @ Jul 7 2013, 01:06 AM)
Multilink were never smaller infact 2.0 2.4 or 1.8 all the same. There are two types of rear arm only. FOr front wheel drive only or for rear wheel drive as well. Got hole for the drive shaft to pass thru. The anti roll bar yes. GT has a 20mm. Ex n gls doesnt.
Local market beige for gls and ex . Black for gt.

Those ratio in CVT are just VIRTUAL GEARS. Control by software! Lolz

And please do go compare the gear urself again. Its both running the same gearbox code. u can check proton edar website against mitsubishi australia (they got stated the ratio there) he virtual gears
*
I am using less technical explanation. Less item in the whole rear suspension aka smaller & eventually lighter.

CVT gearbox is using moveable face to represent gears. Not virtual but using reels to enlarge/reduce size of moveable face on the drive gear. Ofcourse, the same CVT gearbox is fitted in Lancer GL/GT/GLS and Inspira. The steel belt is there holding the drive and driven moveable face and allowing them to move within limit.

What makes CVT sluggish is it takes time for the moveable face to add/reduce the reels to represent 1st, 2nd, 3rd,...6th gears upshift/downshift. Conventional gearbox is still mechanical, you want first gear, shift and engage. 2nd, 3rd, etc, the mechanism just release, disengage/engage the gears therefore more responsive.

Back then, they find it difficult to come up with more gears in conventional AT & would become heavy so they come up with CVT at lower cost. Now that they could build 6AT, 7AT and 8AT and with dual clutch + smooth shifting, CVT is loosing popularity. Audi once turned to CVT and they now revert back to conventional AT for reliability & lower maintenance.

This post has been edited by jayraptor: Jul 7 2013, 01:26 AM
K3nnYkl82
post Jul 7 2013, 01:35 AM

NewBie
*******
Senior Member
2,479 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mars
QUOTE(jayraptor @ Jul 7 2013, 01:24 AM)
I am using less technical explanation. Less item in the whole rear suspension aka smaller & eventually lighter.

CVT gearbox is using moveable face to represent gears. Not virtual but using reels to enlarge/reduce size of moveable face on the drive gear. Ofcourse, the same CVT gearbox is fitted in Lancer GL/GT/GLS and Inspira. The steel belt is there holding the drive and driven moveable face and allowing them to move within limit.

What makes CVT sluggish is it takes time for the moveable face to add/reduce the reels to represent 1st, 2nd, 3rd,...6th gears upshift/downshift. Conventional gearbox is still mechanical, you want first gear, shift and engage. 2nd, 3rd, etc, the mechanism just release, disengage/engage the gears therefore more responsive.

Back then, they find it difficult to come up with more gears in conventional AT & would become heavy so they come up with CVT at lower cost. Now that they could build 6AT, 7AT and 8AT and with dual clutch + smooth shifting, CVT is loosing popularity. Audi once turned to CVT and they now revert back to conventional AT for reliability & lower maintenance.
*
What less rear suspension item are u trying to says?
What is in lancer GT rear suspension tat inspira dun have?
absorber? Is diff made by proton
Spring? Is diff made by proton
Anti roll bar? Is smaller on inspira

So what is in the lancer rear suspension tat isnt in inspira?

And your claim most of the parts are localize. Can give example ? whistling.gif

And if u have not been driving cvt before the gear shift are infinite when u r in D.. When u push it tp manual only it move to 1st 2nd 3rd ratio. Specified location on the con. Thats why they call it virtual. If u put in D. U floor it.. The rpm will stay at max and the infinite gear ratio within the specify range will do the work. Not necessary 1,2,3,4,5,6 of the virtual gear numbers

This post has been edited by K3nnYkl82: Jul 7 2013, 01:37 AM
jayraptor
post Jul 7 2013, 01:47 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
115 posts

Joined: Apr 2013
QUOTE(K3nnYkl82 @ Jul 7 2013, 01:35 AM)
What less rear suspension item are u trying to says?
What is in lancer GT rear suspension tat inspira dun have?
absorber? Is diff made by proton
Spring? Is diff made by proton
Anti roll bar? Is smaller on inspira

So what is in the lancer rear suspension tat isnt in inspira?

And your claim most of the parts are localize. Can give example ? whistling.gif

And if u have not been driving cvt before the gear shift are infinite when u r in D.. When u push it tp manual only it move to 1st 2nd 3rd ratio. Specified location on the con. Thats why they call it virtual. If u put in D. U floor it.. The rpm will stay at max and the infinite gear ratio within the specify range will do the work. Not necessary 1,2,3,4,5,6 of the virtual gear numbers
*
Hard to describe, you just jack both cars up and compare and see for yourself. Next, get both to Sepang racetrack and try to take hard corner at 80km/h, 100km/h, 110km/h, 120km/h and so on until you can't perform the turn. Then you'll know what I'm talking about.

About the localised parts, you ask yourself the difference between Wira 1.6GLI and Lancer 1.6GL '93 other than the outside wraparound, what are the localised parts inside. Ofcourse they use local ingredient to mould the parts. Whatelse. The suspension, it is from P1 tuned by Lotus as claim. Not from MMC.

Ofcourse I have been driving CVT. You paddleshift to 1,2,3,4,5 or 6, the CVT gearbox moveable face will still enlarge and shrink the size to represent the gears you shift to anyway. I am talking about the activity in the CVT gearbox. CVT use moveable face to represent gears as fulcrum/medium for the crankshaft to driveshaft moving the axles. Conventional AT has physical gears as fulcrum/medium for driveshaft.

Main point is, Lancer is still alive today because it has something that Inspira don't and that is why RV of Lancer still ok. Else, Lancer would have wind up and got killed by Inspira like how Wira killed Lancer and Perdana killed Galant in 1994.

This post has been edited by jayraptor: Jul 7 2013, 01:50 AM
K3nnYkl82
post Jul 7 2013, 01:52 AM

NewBie
*******
Senior Member
2,479 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mars
QUOTE(jayraptor @ Jul 7 2013, 01:47 AM)
Hard to describe, you just jack both cars up and compare and see for yourself. Next, get both to Sepang racetrack and try to take hard corner at 80km/h, 100km/h, 110km/h, 120km/h and so on until you can't perform the turn. Then you'll know what I'm talking about.

About the localised parts, you ask yourself the difference between Wira 1.6GLI and Lancer 1.6GL '93 other than the outside wraparound, what are the localised parts inside. Ofcourse they use local ingredient to mould the parts. Whatelse. The suspension, it is from P1 tuned by Lotus as claim. Not from MMC.

Ofcourse I have been driving CVT. You paddleshift to 1,2,3,4,5 or 6, the CVT gearbox moveable face will still enlarge and shrink the size to represent the gears you shift to anyway. I am talking about the activity in the CVT gearbox. CVT use moveable face to represent gears as fulcrum/medium for the crankshaft to driveshaft moving the axles. Conventional AT has physical gears as fulcrum/medium for driveshaft.
*
Lolz u are damn good man. Serious. At first u says less thing less weight. When ask u what the thing u says hard to describe! Lolz.. If u says lancer gt connering better that I can accept .. But u says less thing! Lolz

OHh.. Wira a lot of localize part means inspira also.. Good .. Means u make up the story of localize part with ur experience with wira 1993 1.6!!! Bravo!!

For me, mainpoint of lancer still alive is ppl believe japan workmanship is better than proton interms of assembly. And lots of ppl lost faith from proton. Not due to the car itself but the brand. If it was a perodua inspira. Lancer sales would have gone down fully. And the most important local ppl thinking.

Sorry, I know the car inside out. Im serious.. I drive one. and its a inspira with much higher spec than the local lancer Gt can have. And its way cheaper. I dont speak base on what I cannot describe or what I listen from others or base on wira 1.6 experience.

Edited--
in fact the whole dashboard is from mitsu. (except the ornament and the airbag cover). Parts only fitting done by the proton.
go find a inspira open up the dashboard to look for proton logo ya. The lastest batch arm console were localize the dashboard remains.

This post has been edited by K3nnYkl82: Jul 7 2013, 02:04 AM
nzh0920
post Jul 7 2013, 02:04 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
83 posts

Joined: May 2011


QUOTE(jayraptor @ Jul 7 2013, 01:47 AM)
Hard to describe, you just jack both cars up and compare and see for yourself. Next, get both to Sepang racetrack and try to take hard corner at 80km/h, 100km/h, 110km/h, 120km/h and so on until you can't perform the turn. Then you'll know what I'm talking about.

About the localised parts, you ask yourself the difference between Wira 1.6GLI and Lancer 1.6GL '93 other than the outside wraparound, what are the localised parts inside. Ofcourse they use local ingredient to mould the parts. Whatelse. The suspension, it is from P1 tuned by Lotus as claim. Not from MMC.

Ofcourse I have been driving CVT. You paddleshift to 1,2,3,4,5 or 6, the CVT gearbox moveable face will still enlarge and shrink the size to represent the gears you shift to anyway. I am talking about the activity in the CVT gearbox. CVT use moveable face to represent gears as fulcrum/medium for the crankshaft to driveshaft moving the axles. Conventional AT has physical gears as fulcrum/medium for driveshaft.

Main point is, Lancer is still alive today because it has something that Inspira don't and that is why RV of Lancer still ok. Else, Lancer would have wind up and got killed by Inspira like how Wira killed Lancer and Perdana killed Galant in 1994.
*
what is that?? whistling.gif
K3nnYkl82
post Jul 7 2013, 02:15 AM

NewBie
*******
Senior Member
2,479 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mars
QUOTE(nzh0920 @ Jul 7 2013, 02:04 AM)
what is that??  whistling.gif
*
He didnt even know proton had an agreement with mitsu back then hence mitsu stop galant and lancrr locally. The agreement stop few years back. Then only mitsu brought back the lancer cedia. Not even the lancer CK series.. Lolzzz
Must be assumption again whistling.gif
nzh0920
post Jul 7 2013, 02:33 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
83 posts

Joined: May 2011


QUOTE(K3nnYkl82 @ Jul 7 2013, 02:15 AM)
He didnt even know proton had an agreement with mitsu back then hence mitsu stop galant and lancrr locally. The agreement stop few years back. Then only mitsu brought back the lancer cedia. Not even the lancer CK series.. Lolzzz
Must be assumption again whistling.gif
*
he famous of sinkal@n on autoworld mah ,people called him jayCRAPtor on AW, so u know why now laugh.gif whistling.gif whistling.gif
http://forum.autoworld.com.my/index.php?sh...c=101298&st=140

his hobby is like to bash other car makes so that will make his small korean pathetic forte 1.6 looks good ,

lolz.....
laugh.gif laugh.gif laugh.gif laugh.gif laugh.gif

This post has been edited by nzh0920: Jul 7 2013, 02:35 AM
david_ngcw
post Jul 7 2013, 08:06 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
14 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: KualaLumpur


Wah this fellow geng lo...
I think he is butt hurt cause he bought a 4 gear forte...

And going everywer to cucuk people.

My brother is driving a 6 gear forte, he and his members don't cucuk other makes this way. They only always say that they have all the bell and whistle that other cars don't have only...

At least he accept the pros and cones of their car and other cars...

Jay you got no better thing to do or you are banned from your forte group due to too much skl, no wer to release then you go cucuk other cars in forums.

Get a life man
jnick
post Jul 7 2013, 10:41 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
403 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
From: Johor/KL


Lol n lol....

Kenny why the Q&A feel like one kind.
U ask question but ppl answer differently yet wall of text and pull figure on it. Yet is not answering.

From engine, gearbox to suspension less part.
Just a basher or hear say from "Alex" ?

No offence to "j", if u share a right info, it's ok. When it goes to the wrong way, u might need accept it. We not just an Inspira owner that only drive the car A to B, ESP the copycat avatar.

WilliamHoo
post Jul 7 2013, 12:18 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
7 posts

Joined: Mar 2012


jayCRAPtor

nice nick
lol

u seriously are full of Crap

do enjoy your 4AT Forte
very very fast Kereta Sukan on papers
WilliamHoo
post Jul 7 2013, 12:25 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
7 posts

Joined: Mar 2012


JayCraptor

ppl ask to balik kampung makan pisang
u migrated to Lyn???
lol
mikehuan
post Jul 7 2013, 12:49 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
6,160 posts

Joined: May 2008
QUOTE(WilliamHoo @ Jul 7 2013, 12:25 PM)
JayCraptor

ppl ask to balik kampung makan pisang
u migrated to Lyn???
lol
*
QUOTE
Jayraptor's Awesome Facts are based on “my friend”, “my foreman”, “my colleagues” or some car magazines. Posts like an essay for an exam, but never with proven facts.

K3nnYkl82
post Jul 7 2013, 01:22 PM

NewBie
*******
Senior Member
2,479 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mars
QUOTE(mikehuan @ Jul 7 2013, 12:49 PM)

*
He insist inspira is base on lancer gl not gt chassis. Ask hom what is the different in chassis he change topic. Said suspension diff. Ask him what is missing he says hard to describe... Lolzz

ironfolic
post Jul 7 2013, 04:24 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: May 2012
This remind me 1 of my friend told me my Inspira piston is actually make from proton. He got the information from his cousin work in proton. notworthy.gif Campro piston can fit mivec ah? LOL...He is my friend friend la. No really know him and he bought a forte because got mivec.. thumbup.gif
dares
post Jul 7 2013, 04:56 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
834 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
QUOTE(K3nnYkl82 @ Jul 7 2013, 01:22 PM)
He insist inspira is base on lancer gl not gt chassis. Ask hom what is the different in chassis he change topic. Said suspension diff. Ask him what is missing he says hard to describe... Lolzz
*
Err...going on and on and on about acceleration, cornering speed, suspension and handling. Padahal sendiri drives a 4AT Forte, which excels in none of the above aspects.

YET, is an expert in all of those things especially when it comes to competing car makes. rclxms.gif rclxms.gif

Waiting for his big brother CM98 to chime in and lend him a hand nod.gif
K3nnYkl82
post Jul 7 2013, 06:26 PM

NewBie
*******
Senior Member
2,479 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mars
QUOTE(dares @ Jul 7 2013, 04:56 PM)
Err...going on and on and on about acceleration, cornering speed, suspension and handling. Padahal sendiri drives a 4AT Forte, which excels in none of the above aspects.

YET, is an expert in all of those things especially when it comes to competing car makes.  rclxms.gif  rclxms.gif

Waiting for his big brother CM98 to chime in and lend him a hand  nod.gif
*
I did ask where he got the info that inspira is a license copy of thr lancer GL but not the GT.
Also asked the difference in terms of chassis of lancer GT and GL (he answer rear suspension setup, which obviously is not the chassis)
then he claim inspira rear suspension less thing than GT, ask him what is missing? Cannot describe!
kudos!
nzh0920
post Jul 7 2013, 08:34 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
83 posts

Joined: May 2011


QUOTE(dares @ Jul 7 2013, 04:56 PM)
Err...going on and on and on about acceleration, cornering speed, suspension and handling. Padahal sendiri drives a 4AT Forte, which excels in none of the above aspects.

YET, is an expert in all of those things especially when it comes to competing car makes.  rclxms.gif  rclxms.gif

Waiting for his big brother CM98 to chime in and lend him a hand  nod.gif
*
wah, he got 2.3mil u still dare to mess with him biggrin.gif
TSimwhoiam
post Jul 7 2013, 10:01 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
202 posts

Joined: Apr 2007
From: Chelas



Hey guys.. Sorry for the trouble... Eventually i ditch both and go for Preve.

Thanks for all the input.

I will close this topic as its purpose is already served.

Once again, thanks guys

Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0963sec    0.38    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 13th December 2025 - 03:24 PM