Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
Inspira vs Forte, Which is better value for money?
|
khusyairi
|
Jun 25 2013, 02:00 PM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(ruffstuff @ Jun 25 2013, 01:54 PM) No. Because they simply dont have any 2.0, and they have 1.6 turbocharged for the same amount of power. Proton campro replacement is NFE 1.2, 1.4, 1.8. NA and turbocharged. This is not include the Petronas 1.8/2.0. That engine is not in schedule for mass market. Campro 1.6 CFE not powerful like 2.0L engine. Still can feel lack of power. What to expect from 138hp engine. If 10 years ago, maybe yes.. Current 2.0L NA engine can give no less 150hp. Some Korean car engine that being said inferior tech can give 160-170hp. Somemore CVT not a proper mate wt CFE. This post has been edited by khusyairi: Jun 25 2013, 02:01 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
khusyairi
|
Jun 25 2013, 02:25 PM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(kimsim @ Jun 25 2013, 02:07 PM) Actually I like my Sylphy at low Hp, but in high torque Engine type: MR20DE 1,997cc, 4-cylinder electronic fuel injection system (ECCS), DOHC with CVTC, balancer shaft and drive-by-wire technology Max. Power: 131hp @ 5,200rpm Max. Torque: 191Nm @ 4,400rpm Just slightly accleerate on up hill only, never feel the lack power of CVT. 10 years old tech engine. not being use anymore in new sylphy 2013 due to low hp.
|
|
|
|
|
|
khusyairi
|
Jun 25 2013, 02:48 PM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(kimsim @ Jun 25 2013, 02:42 PM) Ya correct the high specs in 1.8L only. Dual C-CVT and pure drive CVT. For me I was still prefer the current 2.0L over than smaller 1.8L for fuel economy. That's why I would suggest ppl buy Inspira 2.0L rather than get CFE. True. Usually bigger cc will give better feel & power. Same also wt Merc 2.0 kompressor. I still think 2.4 cc Accord better. I dont like turbo lag..
|
|
|
|
|