Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
9 Pages < 1 2 3 4 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Inspira vs Forte, Which is better value for money?

views
     
monocle
post Jun 24 2013, 09:05 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,645 posts

Joined: Jun 2012
QUOTE(Matrix @ Jun 24 2013, 08:30 PM)
TS: Go test drive lar...ask here no use....Everyone will be bias. LOL.

IMO, Forte must get 2.0....Forte 1.6 really sucks in power...legarthic like my old KIA Sephia....car too big and power too little....you will be ownz by Viva's on the road.

After testing Forte and Inspira...i bought Inspira, now 2 years+...thumbup.gif...still loving my Inspira.
*
To be honest, inspira is a much nicer car to drive compare to forte..
MR_alien
post Jun 24 2013, 09:23 PM

Mr.Alien on the loss
*******
Senior Member
3,581 posts

Joined: Oct 2007
From: everywhere in sabah



for me...inspira all the way
depending on what transmission u like, thn u go for whichever
mostly is CVT if u plan to drive on weekdays
edison1437
post Jun 24 2013, 10:29 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
819 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: Moon's Dark Side
QUOTE(K3nnYkl82 @ Jun 24 2013, 05:13 PM)
Forte for sure.. Need to ask ah kuai meh?
*
i know a fella own both rclxms.gif rclxms.gif
theanswer
post Jun 24 2013, 11:12 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,024 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: Kajang


QUOTE(imwhoiam @ Jun 24 2013, 06:00 PM)
I think the 1.6 SX variant only comes with 2 airbags, the driver and front passenger airbag. The 6 airbags only available in 2.0 SX model. That's what the NAZA KIA SA told me.
*
ah sorry..read it wrong. but 1.6 sx still got esp right?
JBSwagger
post Jun 24 2013, 11:49 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
1 posts

Joined: Apr 2013
From: Refer to name


Too many Forte on the road already. Sick of this car, like Vios and Maimee.

Seldom see Inspira, so go get one manual or better if got R3 spec.
jayraptor
post Jun 25 2013, 12:44 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
115 posts

Joined: Apr 2013
QUOTE(JBSwagger @ Jun 24 2013, 11:49 PM)
Too many Forte on the road already. Sick of this car, like Vios and Maimee.

Seldom see Inspira, so go get one manual or better if got R3 spec.
*
More cars on the road means more spare parts as well as spare part supplier will bring in more spare parts.

Compared Forte 2.0L vs Inspira 2.0L, these 2 are still exact match as the new K3 Cerato will be sold under Japanese C-segment range.

Forte is Korean made but DNA for its engine & tech from MMC, reliability & durability proven. Spare parts also cheap and highly available. Handling could beat Inspira with help from VSC. Maintenance is also cheaper using conventional 6AT that has stronger gears for startup from idle. FC wise, Forte wins by at least 0.3km/L city driving difference.
Kerb weight 1293kg (lighter due to torsion beam)
0-100km/h 9.8s

Inspira is using Lancer chassis, detuned GL engine + standard CVT JATCO gearbox with smaller gears. Other than these, the rest of the parts are built by P1. The suspension is not the same as in Lancer GT. What I dislike about CVT, ATF fluid change not exceeding 60,000km interval and have to pay RM400.
Kerb weight 1335kg
0-100km/h 10.5s

Verdict is, go test drive both kawkaw and check which 1 do you prefer. Personally I love the Lancer GT but I like the Forte now. Dun like Inspira as the bumpers, steering and some of the non-ori MMC parts seems cheap.
shelby_yong
post Jun 25 2013, 01:34 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
550 posts

Joined: Jun 2009


QUOTE(jayraptor @ Jun 25 2013, 12:44 AM)
More cars on the road means more spare parts as well as spare part supplier will bring in more spare parts.

Compared Forte 2.0L vs Inspira 2.0L, these 2 are still exact match as the new K3 Cerato will be sold under Japanese C-segment range.

Forte is Korean made but DNA for its engine & tech from MMC, reliability & durability proven. Spare parts also cheap and highly available. Handling could beat Inspira with help from VSC. Maintenance is also cheaper using conventional 6AT that has stronger gears for startup from idle. FC wise, Forte wins by at least 0.3km/L city driving difference.
Kerb weight 1293kg (lighter due to torsion beam)
0-100km/h 9.8s

Inspira is using Lancer chassis, detuned GL engine + standard CVT JATCO gearbox with smaller gears. Other than these, the rest of the parts are built by P1. The suspension is not the same as in Lancer GT. What I dislike about CVT, ATF fluid change not exceeding 60,000km interval and have to pay RM400.
Kerb weight 1335kg
0-100km/h 10.5s

Verdict is, go test drive both kawkaw and check which 1 do you prefer. Personally I love the Lancer GT but I like the Forte now. Dun like Inspira as the bumpers, steering and some of the non-ori MMC parts seems cheap.
*
bro u are rite rclxms.gif rclxms.gif
i didnt know that inspira was detuned no wonder i lose to vios...
TS... see my siggy for the answer
-w@kau--
post Jun 25 2013, 01:39 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
183 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
From: Klang Bukit Tinggi


Preve ~
SUSkimsim
post Jun 25 2013, 06:17 AM

Let Me ❤️ You
*******
Senior Member
5,847 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
From: Malaysia 🇲🇾


QUOTE(JBSwagger @ Jun 24 2013, 11:49 PM)
Too many Forte on the road already. Sick of this car, like Vios and Maimee.

Seldom see Inspira, so go get one manual or better if got R3 spec.
*
Bro you prefer which state?

In JB town really hardly to see Forte on the road an not like Myvi or Vios.

I believe after 3 yrs Forte will be outdated and much ppls would bother it.

Due to Korean tech improved as fast than JDM specs.
Just like Samsung S1 to S3 as short preiod only.



This post has been edited by kimsim: Jun 25 2013, 06:25 AM
edison1437
post Jun 25 2013, 08:35 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
819 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: Moon's Dark Side
QUOTE(jayraptor @ Jun 25 2013, 12:44 AM)
More cars on the road means more spare parts as well as spare part supplier will bring in more spare parts.

Compared Forte 2.0L vs Inspira 2.0L, these 2 are still exact match as the new K3 Cerato will be sold under Japanese C-segment range.

Forte is Korean made but DNA for its engine & tech from MMC, reliability & durability proven. Spare parts also cheap and highly available. Handling could beat Inspira with help from VSC. Maintenance is also cheaper using conventional 6AT that has stronger gears for startup from idle. FC wise, Forte wins by at least 0.3km/L city driving difference.
Kerb weight 1293kg (lighter due to torsion beam)
0-100km/h 9.8s

Inspira is using Lancer chassis, detuned GL engine + standard CVT JATCO gearbox with smaller gears. Other than these, the rest of the parts are built by P1. The suspension is not the same as in Lancer GT. What I dislike about CVT, ATF fluid change not exceeding 60,000km interval and have to pay RM400.
Kerb weight 1335kg
0-100km/h 10.5s

Verdict is, go test drive both kawkaw and check which 1 do you prefer. Personally I love the Lancer GT but I like the Forte now. Dun like Inspira as the bumpers, steering and some of the non-ori MMC parts seems cheap.
*
honestly I doubt your statements laugh.gif
Deja Vu
post Jun 25 2013, 09:01 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,863 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
TS,
Go test drive both if possible.

My vote goes to Inspira 1.8M->Inspira 2.0P -> current Forte 1.6EX/SX, mainly b'coz
- steering feel is too numb
- dash design vs exterior's kinda mismatched (ala Korean interior vs European skin)
theanswer
post Jun 25 2013, 09:14 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,024 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: Kajang


handling wise forte is so-so only. inspira is better. but forte still a good car.
kcng
post Jun 25 2013, 10:40 AM

~ Or@ng Giler ~
********
Senior Member
17,566 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: FFK Division - Klang



QUOTE(jayraptor @ Jun 25 2013, 12:44 AM)
More cars on the road means more spare parts as well as spare part supplier will bring in more spare parts.

Compared Forte 2.0L vs Inspira 2.0L, these 2 are still exact match as the new K3 Cerato will be sold under Japanese C-segment range.

Forte is Korean made but DNA for its engine & tech from MMC, reliability & durability proven. Spare parts also cheap and highly available. Handling could beat Inspira with help from VSC. Maintenance is also cheaper using conventional 6AT that has stronger gears for startup from idle. FC wise, Forte wins by at least 0.3km/L city driving difference.
Kerb weight 1293kg (lighter due to torsion beam)
0-100km/h 9.8s

Inspira is using Lancer chassis, detuned GL engine + standard CVT JATCO gearbox with smaller gears. Other than these, the rest of the parts are built by P1. The suspension is not the same as in Lancer GT. What I dislike about CVT, ATF fluid change not exceeding 60,000km interval and have to pay RM400.
Kerb weight 1335kg
0-100km/h 10.5s

Verdict is, go test drive both kawkaw and check which 1 do you prefer. Personally I love the Lancer GT but I like the Forte now. Dun like Inspira as the bumpers, steering and some of the non-ori MMC parts seems cheap.
*
HOLY S.H.I.T....

VSC can make your car handling godlike...
thumbup.gif thumbup.gif notworthy.gif notworthy.gif

i am beyond words to describe the next level of facepalmsu....
zweimmk
post Jun 25 2013, 10:49 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
512 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(kcng @ Jun 25 2013, 10:40 AM)
HOLY S.H.I.T....

VSC can make your car handling godlike...
thumbup.gif  thumbup.gif  notworthy.gif  notworthy.gif

i am beyond words to describe the next level of facepalmsu....
*
Didn't VSC make our test golf stick to the line?
kcng
post Jun 25 2013, 10:53 AM

~ Or@ng Giler ~
********
Senior Member
17,566 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: FFK Division - Klang



QUOTE(zweimmk @ Jun 25 2013, 10:49 AM)
Didn't VSC make our test golf stick to the line?
*
our golf has much higher chassis capability and better ESP tuning compared to a forte...
but then again we are just going in circles literally so there is not much ESP intervening works needed apart from just braking the inner wheel...

now try it again on multiple corners that require frequent weight transfers like B-roads or in Sepang..
i overshoot 3 corners in sepang even with ESP...
ph34r.gif

not to mention our golf is running on aluminium arm link and its independent suspension all round... compared to a errrr torsion beam on a regular road car...

if u are talking megane, different story all together la..
drool.gif drool.gif

This post has been edited by kcng: Jun 25 2013, 10:56 AM
gheyfriend
post Jun 25 2013, 11:18 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
281 posts

Joined: Jun 2011
when u wana buy car n consider so many technical stuff such as vsc, vtc, atc, abc...better stick to viva la..here all proton driver but in their heart, they wish to drive other car
SUSkimsim
post Jun 25 2013, 11:24 AM

Let Me ❤️ You
*******
Senior Member
5,847 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
From: Malaysia 🇲🇾


Back to proton saga 1st batch lah.

No ABS, no airbag, no EDB, No ESP, no VSC, no front impact bar, all don't have but still can find everywhere.
hafizi01
post Jun 25 2013, 11:41 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
32 posts

Joined: Jan 2009
either both will do.. if u r a kind of guy who like to drive a manual trans, go with inspira 1.8(m).. quite good imo.. hwever, look wise, eventho i really like to keep my trans in manual mode, i will choose forte 2.0 instead.. still, it's a matter of perspective.. lain orang, lain mata, lain hati..
kcng
post Jun 25 2013, 11:46 AM

~ Or@ng Giler ~
********
Senior Member
17,566 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: FFK Division - Klang



QUOTE(gheyfriend @ Jun 25 2013, 11:18 AM)
when u wana buy car n consider so many technical stuff such as vsc, vtc, atc, abc...better stick to viva la..here all proton driver but in their heart, they wish to drive other car
*
yup sad die me sir...
my proton got no DVVT sir...
no lagi best lagi power tagline also sir....
cry.gif cry.gif
ironthomas
post Jun 25 2013, 12:20 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Nov 2012
QUOTE(jayraptor @ Jun 25 2013, 12:44 AM)
More cars on the road means more spare parts as well as spare part supplier will bring in more spare parts.

Compared Forte 2.0L vs Inspira 2.0L, these 2 are still exact match as the new K3 Cerato will be sold under Japanese C-segment range.

Forte is Korean made but DNA for its engine & tech from MMC, reliability & durability proven. Spare parts also cheap and highly available. Handling could beat Inspira with help from VSC. Maintenance is also cheaper using conventional 6AT that has stronger gears for startup from idle. FC wise, Forte wins by at least 0.3km/L city driving difference.
Kerb weight 1293kg (lighter due to torsion beam)
0-100km/h 9.8s

Inspira is using Lancer chassis, detuned GL engine + standard CVT JATCO gearbox with smaller gears. Other than these, the rest of the parts are built by P1. The suspension is not the same as in Lancer GT. What I dislike about CVT, ATF fluid change not exceeding 60,000km interval and have to pay RM400.
Kerb weight 1335kg
0-100km/h 10.5s

Verdict is, go test drive both kawkaw and check which 1 do you prefer. Personally I love the Lancer GT but I like the Forte now. Dun like Inspira as the bumpers, steering and some of the non-ori MMC parts seems cheap.
*
I actually got a friend told me Inspira engine is make from Proton. His cousin work in Proton told him that and the suspension also from proton. That why he bought himself a Forte that is actually using MMC. That what he told me la. thumbup.gif Maybe ur right!

9 Pages < 1 2 3 4 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0290sec    0.50    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 14th December 2025 - 06:51 PM