QUOTE(theanswer @ Jun 13 2013, 04:21 PM)
true. more gadget..more electronics. that's why T&H is reliable..because less gadget means less problems.
Nvm la, those people rich enough to dump the car VW Australia finally recalls, ... followed by Audi
|
|
Jun 13 2013, 05:08 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
413 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 13 2013, 07:23 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
15,022 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Damansara Jaya/Bandar Utama |
QUOTE(theanswer @ Jun 13 2013, 04:21 PM) true. more gadget..more electronics. that's why T&H is reliable..because less gadget means less problems. Not true at all. Even T&H cars full of electronics nowadays....especially Hybrids...got a computer under the car boot or something (which explains most hybrid car boot damn small)...But small gadgets problem...can live without...if things like auto wiper, auto aircond spoil...no problem. Just use your hand to set lah. But gearbox problem...nothing can do.This post has been edited by Matrix: Jun 13 2013, 07:24 PM |
|
|
Jun 13 2013, 08:10 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
512 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(Matrix @ Jun 13 2013, 04:10 PM) Agreed with innovations. ..but must weight risk and returns. Dsg is not new...started in 1980 . There are something which simply doesn't works and should be dumped. ...Malaysian buyers pay high prices for cars...almost 100k at least for these dsg cars...in the end, gets a lemon which can't sell, too expensive to fix, We know that for better fuel efficiency and emissions then dual clutch is the way of the future. The question is - is it an inherent design flaw with VW DSG design or component problem? Whatever it is, it is a hurdle that manufacturers need to overcome and there's only so much data you can gather in a simulated environment. or worst. ...can't fix at all going by the feedback of some owners. I m not saying other gearbox tech has no failure rates, It just that DSG failure is a question of when rather than "if". If it isn't VW then it would be someone else. It's unfortunate but it is a process which they have to go through in order to improve upon existing designs. |
|
|
Jun 13 2013, 08:31 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
15,022 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Damansara Jaya/Bandar Utama |
QUOTE(zweimmk @ Jun 13 2013, 08:10 PM) We know that for better fuel efficiency and emissions then dual clutch is the way of the future. The question is - is it an inherent design flaw with VW DSG design or component problem? Whatever it is, it is a hurdle that manufacturers need to overcome and there's only so much data you can gather in a simulated environment. Yeah...in the meantime, for us Malaysian, unless you are really rich and don't mind living with a piece of junk which cost you RM100K(+RM25k bank interest) which can't move after a few years while still serving loans....i think we should stay away and let the rich gwei loh be the guinea pig themselves.....If it isn't VW then it would be someone else. It's unfortunate but it is a process which they have to go through in order to improve upon existing designs. |
|
|
Jun 13 2013, 09:15 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
367 posts Joined: Apr 2012 |
QUOTE(feelfree @ Jun 13 2013, 03:01 PM) According to VW, the DSG gearbox will only defect in certain country such as Asia because of the humid and hot weather plus heavy traffic, eg. traffic jam, hump, traffic lights, that's mean the DGS gearbox cannot withstand those start stop traffic condition. The problem now is what kind of method VW will use to repair the DSG problem? Will they just repair back the DSG and redesign the whole DSG gearbox? This is a clear admission the DSG gb is faulty. If it is unbale to operate under certain conditions,then it is a faulty product. It certainly needs further development. The call backs are a testament to it's defect. As callbacks are numerous and in different countries, fixing the gb with the same designed parts is unsatisfactory. It only delays occurrence of the same problem. Research and redesigned of the defective parts is necessary. VW owns a duty of care to customers. If by use of VW products a customer is endangered,VW will be liable to legal action. These sorts of legal actions may be rare in Bolehland,at least buyers beware! |
|
|
Jun 13 2013, 10:21 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,024 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Kajang |
QUOTE(Matrix @ Jun 13 2013, 07:23 PM) Not true at all. Even T&H cars full of electronics nowadays....especially Hybrids...got a computer under the car boot or something (which explains most hybrid car boot damn small)...But small gadgets problem...can live without...if things like auto wiper, auto aircond spoil...no problem. Just use your hand to set lah. But gearbox problem...nothing can do. hybrid is one thing. my example based on vios (90k) vs forte (90+k)..or honda accord (150k) vs pug 508 (155k). |
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 14 2013, 09:42 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
15,022 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Damansara Jaya/Bandar Utama |
QUOTE(theanswer @ Jun 13 2013, 10:21 PM) hybrid is one thing. my example based on vios (90k) vs forte (90+k)..or honda accord (150k) vs pug 508 (155k). Those gadgets are non-critical features...spoilt already, car still can work. No biggie. Except maybe the safety features like VSC, TSC, VAS, 6 AIRBAGS blah blah....which involves more electronics and sensors....eventually even T&H will also have to include all these safety features as it's becoming standard globally....Even Preve got more safety features than a T&H.... |
|
|
Jun 14 2013, 01:35 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
544 posts Joined: Jan 2009 |
QUOTE(Matrix @ Jun 14 2013, 09:42 AM) Those gadgets are non-critical features...spoilt already, car still can work. No biggie. Except maybe the safety features like VSC, TSC, VAS, 6 AIRBAGS blah blah....which involves more electronics and sensors....eventually even T&H will also have to include all these safety features as it's becoming standard globally....Even Preve got more safety features than a T&H.... In Europe 6 airbags were pretty much standard in entry level C segment cars in 2002. Accord and Camry elsewhere come with 6-10 airbags as standard, and have done so for a long time.Btw. the most reliable Toyota is supposed to be the Prius... their most advanced car. Also, seriously, the brake failures, stuck accelerators etc. that constantly plague Toyota are IMHO way worse. This issue is mostly a problem with reliability and can cost dearly later. They shouldn't be life threatening. |
|
|
Jun 14 2013, 04:10 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,141 posts Joined: Oct 2012 |
to put things in perspective.
Here is the recalls of all makers http://autos.aol.com/info/recall/ Among others are: Chrysler To Recall 630,000 SUVs Worldwide, o6-06-2013 Nissan Recalls 841,000 Vehicles, 23 May 2013 Chrysler Recalls Almost A Half Million Jeeps, 13-05-2013 Honda Recall Affects 205,000 Vehicles, 19-04-2013 Air Bag (made by Japan Takata Group) Recall Affects 3.4 Million Cars From Several Automakers: Toyota, Honda and Nissan .11 Apr 2013 Hyundai and Kia Recall 1.9 Million Vehicles,3 Apr 2013 Honda Recalls Nearly 250,000 Vehicles Over Brake Issue, 14-03-2013 Subaru of America is recalling more than 47,000 cars and SUVs,07-03-2013 Ford is recalling 230,000 minivans,07-03-2013 BMW Recalling Nearly 570,000 Cars, 19-02-2013 Toyota Recalls 1.29 Million Vehicles For Air Bags, Wipers,30 Jan 2013 Honda Issues Major Recall For Airbag Problem (748,000 vehicles), 18-1-2013 |
|
|
Jun 14 2013, 04:12 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,141 posts Joined: Oct 2012 |
you can read all about it if you have time. But if you would like to know the nasty ones, here is top 5 top notorious recall of all time by popular mechanics
http://www.popularmechanics.com/cars/news/...4345725#slide-1 |
|
|
Jun 14 2013, 04:16 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
14 posts Joined: Jan 2013 |
no french???
|
|
|
Jun 14 2013, 04:24 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,141 posts Joined: Oct 2012 |
|
|
|
Jun 14 2013, 04:26 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
14 posts Joined: Jan 2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 14 2013, 04:31 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,141 posts Joined: Oct 2012 |
QUOTE(EP6CDTM @ Jun 14 2013, 04:26 PM) I am pretty sure there is recalls for French & Italian cars too, but in the biggers scheme of thing, since the numbers are smaller in comparisons to The American, Japanese and Germans, it becomes very tiny puny barely audible little 'pops' Just wonder Indian cars got recall ? or Chinese even? |
|
|
Jun 14 2013, 04:57 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
544 posts Joined: Jan 2009 |
QUOTE(EnergyAnalyst @ Jun 14 2013, 04:24 PM) French cars ? what do you expect? not selling in USA since 1980s, staying put in Europe , never really mass produced per se for the rest of the world. Until China... PSA is on position 6 or so of the worlds biggest car makers though.But yes, they too issue recalls, of course. Maybe just not recently... Italian car makers too. Chinese I'd be sceptical... QUOTE A notorious internal memo at Ford indicated that better protecting the fuel tank would cost about $11 per Pinto over its production run, but that it would be cheaper for the company to pay settlements for injuries and deaths from the resulting fires instead. While there has been a legal controversy about the memo's meaning and context ever since, its revelation was devastating. The Pinto has been a prime example of coldhearted corporate calculation ever since. Read more: 5 Most Notorious Recalls of All Time - Popular Mechanics Follow us: @PopMech on Twitter | popularmechanics on Facebook Visit us at PopularMechanics.com |
|
|
Jun 14 2013, 05:17 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,141 posts Joined: Oct 2012 |
QUOTE(kadajawi @ Jun 14 2013, 04:57 PM) not according to Forbesnot even in top 10 also according to brands http://www.mbaskool.com/fun-corner/top-bra...ml?limitstart=0 |
|
|
Jun 14 2013, 05:17 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,141 posts Joined: Oct 2012 |
QUOTE(kadajawi @ Jun 14 2013, 04:57 PM) not according to Forbeshttp://www.forbes.com/sites/joannmuller/20...ding-automaker/ not even in top 10 also according to brands http://www.mbaskool.com/fun-corner/top-bra...ml?limitstart=0 http://news.drive.com.au/drive/motor-news/...0420-1xc14.html The above show these for 2012 Forbes’ top car makers for 2012 Volkswagen – 17 Toyota – 25 Daimler – 37 Ford – 44 Honda – 59 BMW – 61 General Motors – 63 Nissan – 85 Hyundai – 96 Volvo – 183 Renault – 187 SAIC – 232 Kia – 253 Fiat – 314 Tata – 348 Dongfeng Motor Group – 450 Peugeot – 458 Suzuki – 514 Isuzu – 721 Fuji Heavy Industries (Subaru) – 805 Mahindra and Mahindra – 918 Mitsubishi – 1046 Mazda – 1055 Porsche – 1056 BYD – 1266 Great Wall Motors – 1476 Huayu Automotive – 1779 This post has been edited by EnergyAnalyst: Jun 14 2013, 05:22 PM |
|
|
Jun 14 2013, 06:13 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
544 posts Joined: Jan 2009 |
QUOTE(EnergyAnalyst @ Jun 14 2013, 05:17 PM) not according to Forbes That's weird. Every source is saying something different... one even had Ford behind other brands, despite the arcticle claiming they have produced more cars?!http://www.forbes.com/sites/joannmuller/20...ding-automaker/ not even in top 10 also according to brands http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automotive_in...By_manufacturer But at least for 2011 PSA was on the 7th spot, Renault 9th. |
|
|
Jun 14 2013, 06:34 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
512 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(kadajawi @ Jun 14 2013, 06:13 PM) That's weird. Every source is saying something different... one even had Ford behind other brands, despite the arcticle claiming they have produced more cars?! The top 5 positions are dominated by VW, GM, Toyota, Ford and Hyundai. But look at the gap between Toyota and Hyundai and then Hyundai and Ford. That's how much numbers these manufacturers are pushing. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automotive_in...By_manufacturer But at least for 2011 PSA was on the 7th spot, Renault 9th. 0.05% defect rate for Hyundai is definitely not the same number as 0.05% defect rate for Toyota or VW. |
|
|
Jun 14 2013, 10:11 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,141 posts Joined: Oct 2012 |
QUOTE(kadajawi @ Jun 14 2013, 06:13 PM) That's weird. Every source is saying something different... one even had Ford behind other brands, despite the arcticle claiming they have produced more cars?! Forbes does not define largest purely by sales number but if u only want to look at production output . This is 2012 situation :http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automotive_in...By_manufacturer But at least for 2011 PSA was on the 7th spot, Renault 9th. And I must caution u : time has changed. The top 3 are still VW or Toyota or GM all three making output in excess of 8 mil (Toyota claimed 9.9 m) and I am not surprise with their recovery after the devastating tsunami and earthquake of 2011. Then the next 3 spots i.e. seat no. 4 , 5 and 6 belongs to Hyundai-Kia or Ford and Nissan with output level of 5-7mil output each or thereabouts, e.g. Nissan made 4.889 mil, Hyundai-Kia at 7.12 mil and Ford a bit less at 5.67 mil The remaining 4 spots gets interesting as it is where the 3 mil to 4 mil makers all stands a chance. Fiat-Chrysler was a little over 4 mil at 4.2 mil took seat 7. Honda also about 4 mil so seat 8 is taken Can the French take 9 & 10? Afraid not, why ? the no 1 car maker in China SAIC that owns MG with output 3.6 mil took seat no. 9 2012 happened to be a bad year for PSA where output drop from 3.5 mil to 2.97mil so out they go from top 10 because another Chinese Dongfeng with 3.2 mil makes more so sit at last spot 10. I must add it was a bad year for Renault too as output 2012 was just 2.6 mil. This post has been edited by EnergyAnalyst: Jun 22 2013, 12:12 AM |
| Change to: | 0.0236sec
0.51
5 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 21st December 2025 - 05:43 AM |