QUOTE(GameSky @ Dec 18 2006, 02:24 PM)
super macgyver: False, they..using outdated engine means you're more vulnerable to worms, port scan, trojan attacks "/..
Firewall
|
|
Dec 18 2006, 05:21 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
19,322 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 18 2006, 07:22 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,188 posts Joined: Nov 2005 |
I am still using ZA. Version 6.1. LOL. It might not be the latest, but it is stable. I can assure you.
Cheers! |
|
|
Dec 18 2006, 07:25 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,188 posts Joined: Nov 2005 |
QUOTE("super macgyver") of course u need to team up it with kaspersky too. False again. AVs can't or rarely block Port Scans. And not to mention, infiltration can't be block without a firewall. Thirdly, you cannot monitor or control incoming or outgoing traffic Efficiently and Accurately. Cheers! This post has been edited by natakaasd: Dec 19 2006, 09:54 AM |
|
|
Dec 18 2006, 07:53 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
19,322 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(natakaasd @ Dec 18 2006, 07:25 PM) QUOTE("super macgyver") of course u need to team up it with kaspersky too. False again. Avs can't or rarely block Port Scans. And not to mention, infiltration can't be block without a firewall. Thirdly, you cannot monitor or control incoming or outgoing traffic Efficiently and Accurately. Cheers! 1.Outpost 2.KIS 3.Comodo http://www.firewallleaktester.com/termination.php |
|
|
Dec 19 2006, 09:54 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,188 posts Joined: Nov 2005 |
Sorry, typo. I wanted to have AVs(Anti-viruses), not AVS. Apologies.
Cheers! |
|
|
Dec 22 2006, 12:57 AM
|
![]()
Junior Member
10 posts Joined: Aug 2005 |
guys
i'm using the built in firewall from winxp pro |
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 22 2006, 07:36 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,188 posts Joined: Nov 2005 |
Built in Firewall for XP Pro is no that good, friend. It is only a very minimal portion of a firewall... Unless you really don't know what firewall to use, only you resort to WIN XP Built-In Firewall. Go Get One of these:-
1. Zone Alarm (No longer recommended by many LYN members now) 2. Outpost Firewall (Highly Recommended for Seasoned Users) 3. Sygate Firewall (Update-less.) and a few more I can't remember.... Cheers! |
|
|
Dec 22 2006, 09:08 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
9,257 posts Joined: Aug 2005 From: Not so sure myself Status: 1+3+3=7 |
QUOTE(natakaasd @ Dec 22 2006, 08:36 AM) Built in Firewall for XP Pro is no that good, friend. It is only a very minimal portion of a firewall... Unless you really don't know what firewall to use, only you resort to WIN XP Built-In Firewall. Go Get One of these:- IMHO,1. Zone Alarm (No longer recommended by many LYN members now) 2. Outpost Firewall (Highly Recommended for Seasoned Users) 3. Sygate Firewall (Update-less.) and a few more I can't remember.... Cheers! Built in WinXPPro Firewall:
Tho' I'm BT-ing and not using any firewall atm |
|
|
Dec 22 2006, 12:45 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,381 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: meow meow |
Outpost is my pick "/...
though I no longer use it...Windows Firewall |
|
|
Dec 22 2006, 06:01 PM
|
|
VIP
1,271 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Terengganu |
Press relase, taken from :
http://www.agnitum.com/news/outpost-firewa...nation-test.php Outpost was the only one of 13 software firewalls to pass all 38 tests conducted by Guillame Kaddouch, an expert in computer security who operates the security web site firewallleaktester.com. Test results are available on Kaddouch's website at http://www.firewallleaktester.com/termination.php QUOTE In the wild malware often choose to terminate the security software in the system they are running on, instead of trying to use complex methods to circumvent them. QUOTE Self-defense or self-protection features have become a requirement for any security software solution to be taken seriously as some malicious applications like viruses, Trojans and spyware can disable or shut down security software in order to give themselves the freedom to steal information or whatever payload they have been programmed to activate. In the summary (the winner) :
This post has been edited by keyz: Dec 22 2006, 06:02 PM |
|
|
Dec 22 2006, 06:05 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,381 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: meow meow |
Though Outpost is not user friendly, especially for newbies...but the protection is way better than ZA "/
|
|
|
Dec 22 2006, 08:24 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
9,257 posts Joined: Aug 2005 From: Not so sure myself Status: 1+3+3=7 |
The level of anti-leak protection for Outpost is rated good while Comodo is excellent... =/
http://www.matousec.com/projects/windows-p...sts-results.php It's basically two side of a coin, it's almost impossible to find a firewall which has no weakness/perfect. |
|
|
Dec 24 2006, 11:10 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
9,257 posts Joined: Aug 2005 From: Not so sure myself Status: 1+3+3=7 |
Downloading and trying Comodo Firewall now. Will give feedbacks after this.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 25 2006, 01:12 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
9,257 posts Joined: Aug 2005 From: Not so sure myself Status: 1+3+3=7 |
Update - Comodo serves it's job. Not bad. NO problems so far... Besides my cFosSpeed detect 2 active connections only whereas last time it usually at least 30+
|
|
|
Dec 25 2006, 01:36 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
19,322 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Dec 25 2006, 06:35 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
9,257 posts Joined: Aug 2005 From: Not so sure myself Status: 1+3+3=7 |
QUOTE(super macgyver @ Dec 25 2006, 02:36 PM) line calibrating software... Update - I take back what I'd said... It screwed my msn... no matter how I allow it it still won't connect... and... the protection changed from Effective to BAD... I dunno what the heck happened... Might as well stick back to Outpost Firewall Pro |
|
|
Dec 25 2006, 07:09 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
19,322 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(eXPeri3nc3 @ Dec 25 2006, 06:35 PM) line calibrating software... Update - I take back what I'd said... It screwed my msn... no matter how I allow it it still won't connect... and... the protection changed from Effective to BAD... I dunno what the heck happened... Might as well stick back to Outpost Firewall Pro |
|
|
Dec 25 2006, 09:32 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,188 posts Joined: Nov 2005 |
When essential programs can't run, Even testing only within 1 hour, the program is considered OR almost considered as malfunctioning. How can you use a firewall that does not allow you to even chat? ... Cheers...
|
|
|
Dec 25 2006, 09:56 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
9,257 posts Joined: Aug 2005 From: Not so sure myself Status: 1+3+3=7 |
QUOTE(super macgyver @ Dec 25 2006, 08:09 PM) Reply as belowQUOTE(natakaasd @ Dec 25 2006, 10:32 PM) When essential programs can't run, Even testing only within 1 hour, the program is considered OR almost considered as malfunctioning. How can you use a firewall that does not allow you to even chat? ... Cheers... Well said. Couldn't put it in another better phrase.Just a note, I can kill Comodo with task manager. I can't kill Outpost with task manager. |
|
|
Dec 29 2006, 12:03 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,514 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
Hello guys. I have a problem here. I'm using Sygate Personal Firewall Pro now. I notice that my Sygate takes a very long time to load if my LAN connection is on when I boot my PC. But when I don't switch on my LAN connection during the PC startup, Sygate loads very quickly. In the end, I can only switch on my LAN connection after Sygate loads. Does anyone know why? Thanks.
|
| Change to: | 0.0208sec
0.43
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 28th November 2025 - 04:46 AM |