Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Firewall

views
     
natakaasd
post Dec 18 2006, 07:22 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,188 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


I am still using ZA. Version 6.1. LOL. It might not be the latest, but it is stable. I can assure you.

Cheers!
natakaasd
post Dec 18 2006, 07:25 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,188 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


QUOTE("super macgyver")
of course u need to team up it with kaspersky too.


False again. AVs can't or rarely block Port Scans. And not to mention, infiltration can't be block without a firewall. Thirdly, you cannot monitor or control incoming or outgoing traffic Efficiently and Accurately.

Cheers!

This post has been edited by natakaasd: Dec 19 2006, 09:54 AM
natakaasd
post Dec 19 2006, 09:54 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,188 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


Sorry, typo. I wanted to have AVs(Anti-viruses), not AVS. Apologies.

Cheers!
natakaasd
post Dec 22 2006, 07:36 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,188 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


Built in Firewall for XP Pro is no that good, friend. It is only a very minimal portion of a firewall... Unless you really don't know what firewall to use, only you resort to WIN XP Built-In Firewall. Go Get One of these:-

1. Zone Alarm (No longer recommended by many LYN members now)
2. Outpost Firewall (Highly Recommended for Seasoned Users)
3. Sygate Firewall (Update-less.)

and a few more I can't remember....

Cheers!

natakaasd
post Dec 25 2006, 09:32 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,188 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


When essential programs can't run, Even testing only within 1 hour, the program is considered OR almost considered as malfunctioning. How can you use a firewall that does not allow you to even chat? ... Cheers...
natakaasd
post Jan 1 2007, 01:14 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,188 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


super macgyver, Don't you think that posting your MSN Address is rather inviting SPAM and BOTs? Hope you can edit accordingly. Just reminding. smile.gif Cheers!
natakaasd
post Jan 18 2007, 01:05 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,188 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


Having the Date "Back-Tracking" Does Not Work IF The Program has a "Anti-Date Tamper" Module programmed in it. I fiddled before on other programs. You put the date before its 30 Trial "Start Date", the program Locks up. You put the date one day before, it locks up too. No point wasting effort. Cheers!
natakaasd
post Jan 18 2007, 06:26 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,188 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


QUOTE
Cos "date locker" can't be activated when Outpost have it's own protection shield. =\

Clarify please. I believe we are missing something here. I don't think we understand each other, do we? smile.gif Cheers!
natakaasd
post Jan 22 2007, 11:00 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,188 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


QUOTE
*ahem*  tongue.gif
How should I put it...
I used a virtual "time stopper" or a date locker so to call it... And it doesn't work on outpost... I didn't try to disable the real time protection tho'''

Gonna try it now.

And I'm DL-ing PC Tools Firewall... Will report back if I decided to try that.  brows.gif


I am not surprise it didn't work. This guys in the Security Field have more ideas than any of us would. LOL. The idea of using dates to activate/deactivate programs has been a long expired idea. It is no wonder that our "amateur" methods of "playing around" it has been long patched.

I've tried various methods personally. And only one would work... Reformat the computer. tongue.gif Another method is to use InstallSpy or something of that sort. It will monitor ALL changes done to the computer after and installation. Then, either you Brute-Force Crack the code in the Registry, OR You Reverse-Engineer the Program. (NOW, THIS IS ILLEGAL IN MOST TIMES. I AM JUST CITING IT AS A METHOD. I HOLD NO DAMAGE CHARGES!!).

All in all, either you pay or *ahem*. For me, use the FREE alternative. What is the point of having it there and not using it? LOL. Cheers!

This post has been edited by natakaasd: Jan 22 2007, 11:02 AM
natakaasd
post Feb 1 2007, 09:54 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,188 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


Do some research. Goto Azureus wiki if you use it. It will tell you which port it uses. Same with Shareaza and other BT Clients/P2P Clients.

Google is your best friend.

Cheers!
natakaasd
post Apr 25 2007, 05:58 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,188 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


They will always use Hardware Firewalls. The reasoning is simple: They use multiple Switches and Routers. The Central Router(Top of the Router Pyramid) that is directly linked to the internet will have a hardware firewall integrated into it. Most Routers have a HF built in it.

Cheers!

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0267sec    0.28    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 3rd December 2025 - 07:54 AM