Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
5 Pages < 1 2 3 4 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

> Military Thread V9, Happy birthday Malaysia & ATM ke 50 & 80

views
     
ayanami_tard
post May 15 2013, 02:53 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
40 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
From: under the moonlight
QUOTE(cks2k2 @ May 14 2013, 07:17 PM)
i remember reading it would take PLA roughly 3 days or so to defeat TW military and effectively conquer the island.
*
just call the 2nd artillery to level the whole island. that's if the politburo goes full retard
ayanami_tard
post May 15 2013, 11:28 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
40 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
From: under the moonlight
belum bertugas dah kena kutuk

hishamuddin is a good leader. even though he has few hi-profile antics (that keris thing,and suruh terroriz to resign),but i have confident he can carry on the duty.

QUOTE(yinchet @ May 15 2013, 11:26 PM)
credit to totttis @ PP
user posted image
*
big fella gets big muthafarking gun (FN SLR)
ayanami_tard
post May 16 2013, 11:08 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
40 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
From: under the moonlight
QUOTE(KYPMbangi @ May 16 2013, 09:47 PM)
We totally shud have marine corps
*
buat apa?
ayanami_tard
post May 17 2013, 02:06 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
40 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
From: under the moonlight
QUOTE(heavyduty @ May 16 2013, 10:04 PM)
gile huduh helmet armoured crewman
*
kinda wondered why the pendekar crew got the soviet style helmet, crew from other armored vehicle used the western cvc helmet
ayanami_tard
post May 19 2013, 11:28 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
40 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
From: under the moonlight
look count for shyt in warfare
ayanami_tard
post May 20 2013, 07:19 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
40 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
From: under the moonlight
do you know that a 16-inch cannon battleship has armor that can (or rather, should) withstand 16 inch shell
ayanami_tard
post May 22 2013, 11:26 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
40 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
From: under the moonlight
QUOTE(noavatar @ May 22 2013, 05:32 PM)
user posted image
*
i just love how russian media conveniently used F-22 as the target. hell even the french used F-22 as target as well
ayanami_tard
post May 23 2013, 12:03 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
40 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
From: under the moonlight
it's all about keeping the price down. the US approach to F-22 is to start from scratch, by developing from new canvas.new engine, new radar, new computer system,etc.

what the russian did is by using existent technology and refine it. the russian benefitted from their parallel aircraft development,which some of its system predates the airframe itself(TVC-capable engine, IRST, AESA-capable radar,etc). all they have to do is to design an airframe with stealth capability and put existing equipment in it

what i foresee in the future is that only 4 country that are capable to produce their own fighter;US of A, russia, japan and china. other country will rely on JV, akin to eurfighter typhoon.

South Korea already have strong military ties with Turkiye, while the french are considering joint effort with brazil. india will always be india; a fiasco
ayanami_tard
post May 24 2013, 11:47 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
40 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
From: under the moonlight
QUOTE(cks2k2 @ May 24 2013, 09:36 AM)
why do we even need dokdo/mistral class ship for? not like we have a lot of attack helis to begin with.
*
ganti kd inderapura

then again, when u used kancil b4(suddenly burnt to ashes), and has growing family and you could afford to buy better car, would you still gonna buy another kancil? maybe u could buy viva or myvi(them indon makassar class, or french foundre class) but it's better to upgrade to alza(thus the dokdo)

but then again i have no problem at all if malaysia go the viva/myvi route. small car is better than no car at all
ayanami_tard
post May 25 2013, 02:55 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
40 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
From: under the moonlight
it's cheap (in some place 10 ringgit can get u one and some ammo)

.....................

btw

http://qz.com/86988/spain-just-spent-680-m...that-cant-swim/

One of Spain’s largest defense splurges may also be one of its most embarrassing. After spending nearly one-third of a $3 billion budget to build four of the world’s most advanced submarines, the project’s engineers have run into a problem: the submarines are so heavy that they would sink to the bottom of the ocean.

Miscalculations by engineers at Navantia, the construction company contracted to build the S-80 submarine fleet, have produced submarines that are each as much as 100 tonnes (110 US tonnes) too heavy. The excess weight sounds paltry compared to the 2,000-plus tonnes (2,205 US tonnes) that each submarine weighs, but it’s more than enough to send the submarines straight to the ocean’s floor.


ayanami_tard
post May 25 2013, 02:58 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
40 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
From: under the moonlight
QUOTE(yinchet @ May 25 2013, 03:41 AM)
tbh we don really need dokdo class.
LDP will be more beneficial for our fleet addition.
unless we really does have huge budget for our military then I dun mind having 1. laugh.gif
*
i also don't mind the RMN get the smaller LPD (like the makassar class),but we should buy more than a single ship. perhaps 3
ayanami_tard
post May 25 2013, 07:25 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
40 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
From: under the moonlight
i'd prefer if they form a proper task group.lead ship, escort ship, surveillence aircraft, support ship, and sub
ayanami_tard
post May 26 2013, 03:52 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
40 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
From: under the moonlight
QUOTE(noavatar @ May 26 2013, 04:43 AM)
user posted image
*
did abram used 125mm round?
ayanami_tard
post May 26 2013, 04:17 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
40 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
From: under the moonlight
then why did they advertise the round with an abram on the background? laugh.gif
ayanami_tard
post May 28 2013, 12:08 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
40 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
From: under the moonlight
it will improve their night fighting capabilities somewhat

i'm not joking. you can't shoot shiz if you can't see your enemy (besides 1 military grade nvg can buy you like 100 of these lamps)
ayanami_tard
post May 28 2013, 02:42 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
40 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
From: under the moonlight
QUOTE(noavatar @ May 28 2013, 12:08 PM)
everytime there's decommissioned assets they get excited
*
when the US wanna retire C-27Js the filipino practially cummed on the spot


QUOTE(kerolzarmyfanboy @ May 28 2013, 03:12 PM)
i think Phillipine tgh terdesak sgt nk tunjuk power kt Taiwan and China tuh..i prefer submarines rather than aircraft carriers though..this Spain carrier can carry modern naval aircraft like F-18? dun want to be like Thai navy, carrier too small, can only carry V/STOL aircraft..harrier is obsolete nowadays..while F-35 is goddamn expensive..
*
they can't even get their shyt together

granted they really need a large amphibious vessel to carry marines and equipments to one of it's isles, but still there's tons of cheaper alternatives out there.
ayanami_tard
post May 28 2013, 03:07 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
40 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
From: under the moonlight
QUOTE(KYPMbangi @ May 28 2013, 03:48 PM)
The very reason they retire the aircraft is due to high operation cost than a C-130 hercules,
sure they want that?
*
if they get it free then why not? besides it's slightly larger than CN-235 and has part commonality with C-130. less logistic headache
ayanami_tard
post May 30 2013, 11:34 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
40 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
From: under the moonlight
if want COIN then Mi-35 gotta be the best solution.


ayanami_tard
post May 31 2013, 05:40 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
40 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
From: under the moonlight
QUOTE(bai1101 @ May 31 2013, 11:46 AM)
want to ask what the main purpose of small canon on navy ship? anti small ship/boat?
*
multipurpose weapon; anti ship, offshore bombardment,etc

besides kinda stupid and wasteful to blow a pirate dhow with ASM missile.
ayanami_tard
post Jun 4 2013, 12:11 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
40 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
From: under the moonlight
mmg confirm prfag gonna bahan our pendekar again after this whistling.gif

QUOTE(lcy851031 @ Jun 3 2013, 08:38 PM)
Reactive armor plates, When some shell/rocket (especially RPG) hit that "brick", the brick will be triggered to self explosion, use this explosion force to deflect the incoming projectile. After one use, the tank area that covered with the reactive armor plates will no longer be protected by reactive armor (since the brick had exploded)

Nowadays, some RPG warheads had tandem warheads to pre-trigger the reactive armor to explode early, making it less effective at countering RPG.
*
newer model plates are designed to defeat these kind of warhead, and sometimes the plates are being being stacked on top of another

some tanks are also equipped with slat and plate armor to increase survivability in urban area, such the TUSK upgrade for M1A1/2

5 Pages < 1 2 3 4 > » 
Bump Topic Topic ClosedOptions New Topic
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.1144sec    0.24    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 1st December 2025 - 12:48 AM