i have no solution for the messed up education system, it takes political will, that is all.........
but therefore the facts remains.....
1. there is a difference between 1st and 3rd world unis....
2. the difference relates to quality issues, which is how selection of students are made, curriculum, minimum standards, daring to fail people if indicated etc......
3. therefore when one graduates from a well known 1st world uni, the immediate assumption is, this is a godd student, who was selected by merit, and has undergone good training, have survived strict exams, and now is a competent doctor (or whatever profession)......in the msian context, he of course has rich parents or has a scholarship, but that is beside the point, without being qualified, he would NOT have got in......
4. when confronted with a 3rd world graduate, questions immediately crops up in one's mind: was this person selected on real merit, or based on quotas? or he has rich parents who paid for a place? was he sufficiently good enough to justify his selection? did he pass all his exams? was the school instructed to pass him (you will be surprised)? did he receive good training? was there enough lecturers? ........so many doubts and questions.....
do you understand?
This post has been edited by limeuu: Aug 9 2008, 05:53 PM
University AIMST University Unofficial LYN Thread, New life. New beat. New Campus.
Aug 9 2008, 05:51 PM
Quote
0.0343sec
0.87
6 queries
GZIP Disabled