QUOTE(bobds78 @ Nov 28 2014, 11:02 PM)
The body or lens first argument is seen like the chicken & egg analogy but to me, a lens is more important than the body (no, i don't intend to start a war here no no

) simply because a lens is more useful than the body it is attached to, just like those cult manual focus lenses of yester years that is still capable of fetching unbelievable prices because of their unique characteristics, irrespective of which body they are mounted to.
A better body only when you have progressed beyond what your current camera body can allow, for example, you want to shoot low light, a newer body will definitely gives a better advantage than an old body, or probably you want faster shutter speed for fast-action shots, a newer body will most always gives you better speed than your old one, so on & so forth.
No harm getting a newer body if you find a fantastic deal though.
QUOTE(mingyuyu @ Nov 28 2014, 11:25 PM)
agreed, i was stuck between em1+1442 or em10+1240, end up go for the second one. no regret so far, the 1240 is a fantastic lens and very nice to use. can't say the same thing if I went for the 1442 though, since a lens affect an image more than a body does (other than high ISO and focus tracking).
I totally understand that a good body doesn't mean much without good lens. I've often suffer quite a lot when it's getting dark while traveling. Most shots requires me to jack up the ISO a lot to get a usable image but the noise is very apparent.
Another point is that an UWA lens costs a bomb. Cheapest 7-14 is at least RM2k right?