Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography Micro Four Thirds (m43) User Thread V6

views
     
GameFr3ak
post Nov 29 2014, 02:50 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,849 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
From: Your Location
QUOTE(mingyuyu @ Nov 29 2014, 01:02 AM)
but if it's about ISO then you can't do much, the limitation of a body does matters a lot with that.

I think it's about that price? I wish m4/3 can come out with cheaper UWA lenses like how Canon did with their APSC (10-18mm, a fantastic lens costing below rm1k).
*
Yeah. My preferred shots are usually bright landscapes/architecture with an UWA. Followed by random unique things that I see while I'm traveling but most of the time E-pl3's sensor is too weak, so I have to jack up the ISO a lot.


QUOTE(sadaniel @ Nov 29 2014, 02:28 AM)
Get samyang uwa lens for cheap. But it's fixed focal length and manual focus but great quality nonetheless.
*
I've checked previously I think the cheap ones are all fisheye lens. Or you're suggesting to use it with a fisheye fix?

QUOTE(BOTAK_WAI @ Nov 29 2014, 08:55 AM)
i agree with you that 14-42 is abit narrow. but u can try to shoot in 3:2 or 16:9 aspect ratio to see if you like the result.
well said.  thumbup.gif
no choice, e-pl3 with kit lens i need to jack up till iso-3200 while shooting in dark. (some more i only use low noise filter  sweat.gif )

no matter u choose to upgrade body or lens first, you will not get it wrong either. if you have a good deal, just take it.  icon_rolleyes.gif
*
I tried it, it's still not wide enough for my taste.

Examples of panny 7-14mm. sad.gif
user posted image
user posted image

QUOTE(bobds78 @ Nov 29 2014, 11:00 AM)
Agree 100%, if its a fantastic deal,  why pass it by?
*
lol after looking at shots with 7-14mm... The other side of me is fighting to get the lens instead...
GameFr3ak
post Dec 1 2014, 02:05 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,849 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
From: Your Location
QUOTE(67zai @ Dec 1 2014, 11:52 AM)
Ive used 7-14mm b4, the distortion and sharpness at corner is unbearable
*
aiyo ... now add more in to my dilemma............
GameFr3ak
post Dec 15 2014, 01:56 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,849 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
From: Your Location
QUOTE(jloi @ Dec 1 2014, 04:03 PM)
I enjoy shooting with 714 though. IMHO the distortion actually enhance some dramatic effect to sky and cloud laugh.gif
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

*
Those are some really nice photos! Exactly the kinda feel that I wanted to capture. Which I mostly can't with 14-42mm. I've seen some pics with oly 9mm F8 cap lens. What do you guys think?
GameFr3ak
post Dec 15 2014, 11:35 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,849 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
From: Your Location
QUOTE(jloi @ Dec 15 2014, 10:11 AM)
I have 9mm f8 bcl i think it is good for its price and good alternate for wide angle lens, of course thats it if you dont mind the fish eye distortion
*
The reason why I'm interested in this 9mm FE is that the distortion isn't as extreme as others, and also of course, the price! drool.gif Now, I wonder where I could get it and how much in retail shops...
GameFr3ak
post Dec 27 2014, 12:14 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,849 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
From: Your Location
Olympus E-PL3
OLYMPUS M.14-42mm F3.5-5.6 II R
ƒ/6.3
14.0 mm
1/160
320 iso

user posted image

This post has been edited by GameFr3ak: Dec 27 2014, 12:14 AM
« Next Oldest · Photography, Digital Imaging & Video · Next Newest »
 

4 Pages « < 2 3 4Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
 0.0662sec    0.62    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 21st December 2025 - 08:52 PM
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Removal Request
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025  IPS, Inc.