Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

73 Pages « < 12 13 14 15 16 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 EPF DIVIDEND, EPF

views
     
Wedchar2912
post Jan 25 2023, 09:38 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,683 posts

Joined: Apr 2019
QUOTE(xander2k8 @ Jan 25 2023, 09:33 PM)
Won’t crash that fast because they can be more nimble and take faster action to take advantage of the markets πŸ€¦β€β™€οΈ

Tiering has to be set based on wages ceiling like CPF does
*
Funny lar you. 150 billion big issue and caused epf div to crash.
but massive withdrawal is no problem.

Joker lar you. Haha.
Wedchar2912
post Jan 25 2023, 10:04 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,683 posts

Joined: Apr 2019
QUOTE(HolyCooler @ Jan 25 2023, 09:49 PM)
Dude, do you really read what other people told you? KWSP did mention the 60k limit was due to taking into money laundering's consideration. But yet you are keep saying it is nothing about money laundering? It is really tough to communicate with you.
*
he is making things up as he goes.... can be quite entertaining if it is in kopitiam... smile.gif
Wedchar2912
post Jan 25 2023, 10:05 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,683 posts

Joined: Apr 2019
QUOTE(xander2k8 @ Jan 25 2023, 09:44 PM)
...
EPF CIO has said already money withdrawal is not issue πŸ€¦β€β™€οΈ

...
*
entertaining lar you... u expect him to say withdrawal is a big issue... please don't do that anymore because the previous gov was too stupid and made a fool of all of us?

funny lar you....
Wedchar2912
post Jan 25 2023, 10:08 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,683 posts

Joined: Apr 2019
QUOTE(HolyCooler @ Jan 25 2023, 10:04 PM)
The latest articled shared by someone mentioned 6.67 million employees have less than 10K.

You don't need to set the limit to be as high as 1mil, just setting it 20k or even as high as 100k will do, 6-10million or more people will be benefited.

Ok, let's say 100k will be enough to help lots of people, and your EPF amount is more than 100k which you will get lesser dividen % while those below 100k will get a far higher %, are you still Ok to have this tiered dividen? I ask this question cos i suspect you are "OK" with it due to you are not affected now. While you will be affected immediately, i wanna know if you will still say OK? Honestly.
*
you can have my full support to set the cap at 100K, if EPF forces any amount higher than 100K to be withdrawn out. I am sure those of us who already "made" it or in the "rich" category like what these chaps all say, will know what to do with the funds.

Lets see how much benefit the "poor" in EPF funds can benefit....
Wedchar2912
post Jan 25 2023, 10:12 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,683 posts

Joined: Apr 2019
QUOTE(Ramjade @ Jan 25 2023, 11:32 AM)
Actually my salary is capped. That's why I tell you I am kuli.

Earning risk free hundred thousands per year is not abusing the system? How is that not abusing the system?
That's is not abusing the system cause you are putting your money at risk. That's the price you pay.
*
How is it abusing the system when EPF forces me to keep on putting more and more money into EPF when I was working? I never asked to have my salary deducted into EPF? I didn't even want my salary to be deducted...

I think asking for a group to subsidize another group... now that is abusing the system... and we already have so many such schemes to subsidize so many things already.
Wedchar2912
post Jan 25 2023, 10:17 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,683 posts

Joined: Apr 2019
QUOTE(Ramjade @ Jan 25 2023, 10:11 PM)
For me I don't care about EPF much and it will never be my go to for retirement as all my retirement funds are overseas. If I can withdraw my EPF today I will do it in a heart beat and dump them overseas.

For me I feel RM100k is a bit low for Malaysians cause if you are earning RM3-8k (average Malaysian salary) you will hit RM100k. There's no doubt about it provided one never touch the EPF. But majority of people cannot reach RM1m in EPF on a RM3-8k salary unless they are high earners. I agree to help B40, M40 but not those T20 or T10 category. M40 more as govt hardly helps M40 and keep squeezing the M40. If RM100k I will not agree as majority of people won't be help. Heck maybe if don't want limit at RM1m, maybe RM500k onwards.
*
why not try run a simple excel calculation so that you understand how compounding works. 3K salary will have EPF amount reach 1 million by retirement. this assumes zero increment at all for the salary.
if salary is 8K, reach 1 million within 22 years of that salary.

lets not think 1 million is not achievable by most people... and that I mean anyone earning 3K and above starting today per month (ie fresh grad).
Wedchar2912
post Jan 25 2023, 10:27 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,683 posts

Joined: Apr 2019
QUOTE(Ramjade @ Jan 25 2023, 10:18 PM)
Er, not about you force to put money in. My point is those who use EPF as alternative to FD. If you already have a RM1m inside you can withdraw from EPF anytime if I am not wrong.

So basically if you already have RM1m, you can withdrawal the excess anytime. So technically you are not forced for salary deduction as you can just withdraw it out.
*
sure.... and that is also why I told you the gov can try what you suggested, and may as well drop the limit to 200K or even 100K since you suggested EPF should not be abused. why the special 1 million limit? EPF is only a part of retirement savings, and hence 200K is enough. EPF is not here to solve all your problems rite?

lets see how fast all the money disappear from EPF and see how successful the tiering system will be.
Wedchar2912
post Jan 25 2023, 10:30 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,683 posts

Joined: Apr 2019
QUOTE(Ramjade @ Jan 25 2023, 10:25 PM)
Here goes. Assuming EPF contribution for someone earning RM3000, EPF contribution by person is at RM300/month with employer contributing RM300 also = Rm600/month, EPF returns at 5%p.a and the person will be working for 30 years. At the end of 30 years, that person only have
RM480,952.87. No where near RM500k also.

Even if salary is RM5k with monthly contribution of RM500 + employer contribution of RM500 = RM1k/month, unable to reach RM1m in 30 years time.

Try it yourself.
https://www.investor.gov/financial-tools-ca...rest-calculator
*
you already got your data off. check your contribution amount first...
(also i was being sly in assuming the chap started work at 20 years old... so he got a few extra years... already so generous by assuming that idiot will never get any increment for his entire working life. That is completely a erroneous assumption).

This post has been edited by Wedchar2912: Jan 25 2023, 10:36 PM
Wedchar2912
post Jan 25 2023, 10:32 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,683 posts

Joined: Apr 2019
QUOTE(Ramjade @ Jan 25 2023, 10:30 PM)
Why RM1m? Cause based off the calculations I showed you RM1m is a number not many can reach. RM100k is a number everyone can reach.
*
is EPF here to solve everyone's problem?

btw, apparently 6.6 million could not even get to 10K rm.... tiering will solve that? oh no... 1 extra % div will solve all the poor people's problem. haha
Wedchar2912
post Jan 25 2023, 10:48 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,683 posts

Joined: Apr 2019
QUOTE(Ramjade @ Jan 25 2023, 10:36 PM)
It won't solve everything. But it will help them to have more cash upon retirment. Er I am not talking about a 1% increase in dividend. I am talking about extra 50%. Example if current rate is 5%p.a, those below RM1m should get 7.5%p.a while those with RM1m above gets 2.5%p.a
*
friend... I understand what you mean. But no way u can get 7.5% just by screwing those above 1 million, even if you set the rate to 0%. There is just not enough funds belonging to those above 1 million.

using the stats of active members (I can't find the stats for all members), funds belonging to those with more than 1 million rm is around 110 billion rm. Funds belonging to all active members below 1 milion is around 616 billion.
how is the div of 110 billion going to double the div of the 616 billion cohort?

have to aim much lower limit.

I think the edge also tried to do so and the difference of dividend is just 2% and that article had to set the limit to like 50 to 100K below and screwing everyone above that. If someone remembers the article, appreciate including it here.
And what will end up happening is everyone above the limit will just withdraw everything and we end up with the poor still in trouble, and worse, now we end up screwing the very M40 people you said you wanted to help. cos they cannot withdraw, while those with more than 1 million will surely withdraw.

edit: in a way, that's why pyramid scheme can only benefit the top... no "reverse" pyramid scheme can work for long term

This post has been edited by Wedchar2912: Jan 25 2023, 10:52 PM
Wedchar2912
post Jan 25 2023, 11:18 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,683 posts

Joined: Apr 2019
QUOTE(Ramjade @ Jan 25 2023, 10:59 PM)
Actually part of my aim when I retire would be help out at soup kitchen and dogs shelter. So yeah that's where my money will go to. If I can reach that level. But those are just dreams.
*
That is still a personal choice/decision as it is your money and you have every right to do what you want with your funds. most of us do give to charities and it is our decision.

but forcing the tiering into EPF is literally robbing Peter to pay Paul when both Peter and Paul contributed their fair share of funds into EPF. The choice been taken away from the member, whether he likes it or not, and that itself is not cool/ok.
Furthermore, Peter may feel slighted as to why he is subsidizing Paul, who has only 10K rm, just because the system thinks aum of 10K rm means need help. Paul, being 22 years old, just started working 2 months ago and that is why he has 10K rm there. Is that fair?

that's why previously (a while ago), I always said that EPF is not here to solve many of the social issues, because EPF is not the right platform. In fact, EPF is not able to solve these problems. These issues needed to be resolved elsewhere. ie: extra 2% pa on 10K rm for a person who is 65 years old and really had nothing else. So what? 200rm is not going to save him.... (I am not saying we should not save him, but how does 200rm help? )

This post has been edited by Wedchar2912: Jan 25 2023, 11:23 PM
Wedchar2912
post Jan 26 2023, 12:22 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,683 posts

Joined: Apr 2019
QUOTE(cute_boboi @ Jan 26 2023, 12:08 AM)
It's somewhere buried in earlier posts in this thread. I don't have the article, but I kept this picture for my reference.

For the fun of calculation, if the savings is >1M , take out 1% from it.
= (111,766,010,989+4,341,534,600)x1%
= 1,161,075,455.89
= 1.16B

In order for those below 1M to get extra 1%, it requires 8.2B
= (7,871,199,747+11,071,241,468+110,159,987,097+134,065,438,179+436,846,447,535+120,134,203,132)x1%
= 8,201,485,171.58
= 8.2B

^^ Definitely not enough, so perhaps the suggestion to set the limit at 100k or 200k is the right number.
Bear in mind the numbers below are from 2020 and many have withdraw hence it needs to drag the number nearer to 100k rather than 200k.

Re-calc below for the cut-off at 500k
= (120,134,203,132+111,766,010,989+4,341,534,600)x1%
= 2,362,417,487.21
= only 2.36B deducted

= (7,871,199,747+11,071,241,468+110,159,987,097+134,065,438,179+436,846,447,535)x1%
= 7,000,143,140.26
= requires 7.2B

^^ still not enough to cover.

Re-calc below for the cut-off at 100k
= (436,846,447,535+120,134,203,132+111,766,010,989+4,341,534,600)x1%
= 6,730,881,962.56
= 6.7B deducted

= (7,871,199,747+11,071,241,468+110,159,987,097+134,065,438,179)x1%
= 2,631,678,664.91
= 2.6B required

^^ ok, enough to cover. So 100k limit it is !

[attachmentid=11405473]
*
wow... tq tq... this is the best example to explain why tiering is not going to help anyone in reality... there is just not enough rich people for everyone below the realistic cutoff limit to leech off. and all for just 1% diff...
the low aum members just don't enough funds inside individually, while there are not enough high aum members to help everyone.

(then again, if cut off at 100K, the bottom 100K can get extra 2.5%. oh no, it does work. It is again the middle group to the rescue)

tq tq cute_boboi... rclxms.gif
Wedchar2912
post Jan 26 2023, 12:26 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,683 posts

Joined: Apr 2019
QUOTE(Ramjade @ Jan 26 2023, 12:21 AM)
Well let's put it this way. Higher FD and and cheaper interest rate on loans for those with priority banking. Now you don't hear those HNWI complaining. Its fair. Lower EPF returns with amount above RM1m and get access to cheaper loans and higher FDs.
*
Go blame the banks. It is not the government who is forcing the banks to do so. Also, need to ask why are banks doing it?... that is the bank's call... unless you are saying that capitalism is wrong and we should now even change the banking system to be a lot closer to socialism?

In fact, based on your example, EPF should give those above 1 million special bonus. There must be a reason why banks are doing it rite?

(I understand where you are coming from, but this is not a karma argument.... EPF is not here to balance out karma just cos the HNWI gets extra benefit from banks)

This post has been edited by Wedchar2912: Jan 26 2023, 12:27 AM
Wedchar2912
post Jan 26 2023, 02:00 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,683 posts

Joined: Apr 2019
QUOTE(prophetjul @ Jan 26 2023, 01:27 PM)
Yes.

Rm8280 EPF for a Rm3k per month salary for 35 years without increment gives Rm793,524 after 35 years @5% yield pa

https://www.calculator.net/investment-calcu...tit=0&x=74&y=25
*
hence we all should agree that 1 million in EPF is really nothing at all, if the aim is to have some decent retirement funds... just cos it is way too easy to get to 1 million provided the person is gainfully employed and stayed the course.
btw, people focus too much on how precise the math is (meant readers in general)... focus on what the math is trying to tell us. ie does it matter much to the 3K chap if he has 800K or 1 million at age 60? tongue.gif at least he has a decent amount of retirement funds in EPF and he should have more elsewhere.

Which brings to the point: EPF is not here to solve the social issue of poverty in Malaysia. The effort should be focused on how to have as many able people participate in the workforce/global market and be gainfully employed/earning income.

This post has been edited by Wedchar2912: Jan 26 2023, 02:04 PM
Wedchar2912
post Jan 26 2023, 02:34 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,683 posts

Joined: Apr 2019
QUOTE(Wolves @ Jan 26 2023, 02:21 PM)
I just went to use the calculator. I put in 0 investment and every month put 1k with 5% interest for 30 years. Go and do it and look at the money you get after 30 years. Almost 800k already. That's only 1k per month for 30 years. It's not that hard.

Another perspective. You just need to sell something that earn you rm10 per sale and only need 100k sales to get a million. You just need 274 sales a day for one year (365 days) to get more than 1 million. If you say earn rm10 too much.. then rm1 for 10 years la. 274 too much then 137 a day can? Rm1 earning, 137 sales for 20 years. Sell burger also can become millionaire easily if you work hard. And this is only purely sales. Not yet investment or compounding.
*
the problem obviously is that the said burger seller most probably spends all his profit (still better vs if he spends his revenue) to buy silly things like ipad or a nice car or on a 5 star overseas vacation, without even putting anything side (forget about putting into EPF because he is worried about LDHN going after him for not paying tax)... and then 30 years later demand subsidies from everyone for his lack of retirement funds.

sound familiar?
Wedchar2912
post Jan 26 2023, 04:45 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,683 posts

Joined: Apr 2019
QUOTE(Ramjade @ Jan 26 2023, 04:35 PM)
Avoid shariah account. Their returns have been poor Vs conventional account.

....

*
Also, shariah's account do not have minimum return guaranteed... which also implies that it is not capital protected. Very crucial this part. I've asked some shariah product developer before and they explained that guarantee for investment is technically not halal (I don't understand the religion reasoning and hence I took it at face value that it is not halal).

why the return seems always to lag the conventional version can be explained away with the standard CAPM model...

so if really keep money in EPF and one's believe allows it, keep it in conventional.
Wedchar2912
post Jan 26 2023, 08:42 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,683 posts

Joined: Apr 2019
QUOTE(xander2k8 @ Jan 26 2023, 06:17 PM)
No worries πŸ˜€
I agree with you as the RM has been depreciating since it is free floated hence will unlikely go below to 3.5 for now unless Malaysia has improved its credit rating to at least A πŸ€¦β€β™€οΈ
Because of the contracts is not compliant to musharakah or mudharabah

In essence when Shariah accounts invest in MGS it is already broken the Islamic contracts πŸ€¦β€β™€οΈ

The only way to fix it is that Shariah has to be invested in Malaysia Govt Sukuks which is non existent and not appealing to the broader markets for fixed income portion
*
bro, that is not the reason why the shariah epf version cannot give capital guarantee. Mudharabah and Musyarakah are just two concepts/contracts that are shariah compliant that allows profit sharing.
while I do not fully understand the rational, it maybe has to do with investment must carry risk etc.

Btw, don't simply say that the funds in the Shariah accounts invest in MGS. Unless you have proof, just don't simply talk. Because you can be deemed to be spreading unsubstantiated lies and it involves Islamic concepts/investments. If do not know, then don't say anything.

I know for a fact that there Islamic govies.... MGII... been around for many many years. and it is just slightly smaller in volume than traditional MGS govies. The shariah funds would invest in MGII instead of MGS obviously.
Wedchar2912
post Jan 28 2023, 12:10 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,683 posts

Joined: Apr 2019
QUOTE(Unkerpanjang @ Jan 28 2023, 10:34 AM)
Malaysia Retirement Reforms Required.

I wud propose they include the EPF forum seniors into select committee.

Compliance
Bro Prophetjul, Magika,  Wedchar,  MUM

Overseas Exposure
Ramjade, Xander, Cubalagi, MGM.

Open for other deserving nominees. National Service and/or Fair Market Compensation.
*
no chance in hell this will happen....

cos we are nobodies (ie not politicians, ex-goons, etc)... and we have brains.... tongue.gif

those in power need to stay in power and the simplest, although wrong way, method is to get the voters dependent on them.
Wedchar2912
post Jan 28 2023, 04:29 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,683 posts

Joined: Apr 2019
QUOTE(touristking @ Jan 28 2023, 04:21 PM)
Some politician spreading rumors EPF will go bankrupt and some people did rush to withdraw their money. Irresponsible politicians.

Some like Rafizi even says EPF should not increase investment in USA. I suppose he think EPF investing in Kampung better.

https://www.malaysiakini.com/news/395286
*
old news.... politicians cannot be 100% trusted... really need to throw a lot of salt at them. biggrin.gif

But like it or now, EPF must diversify out of Malaysia... our Malaysia financial system is just too small and EPF is not the only large fund in Malaysia (good thing too).
Malaysia's equity market cap is like 1.7 trillion ringgit, and the govies is also at the same type of size.

We cannot have EPF make up of 25% of entire equity and government debt market.

Well, the open secret is that EPF cannot go bankrupt as long as Malaysia government is around. ASN, PRS etc don't have this.
Wedchar2912
post Jan 28 2023, 05:08 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,683 posts

Joined: Apr 2019
QUOTE(touristking @ Jan 28 2023, 04:53 PM)
How about tax evaders? Nobody seem to pity the salaried workers who can't evade tax.
*
well... salaried employees make up the bulk of any population of any country...

just like pyramid schemes, in order for any scheme to work and benefit the select top few %, the said scheme has to "screw" the bulk of the people. Hence why the top half of the B40, the whole M40, and the bottom half of the T20 all feel the pinch.

we used to think millionaires are rich, but millionaires are the new grunts.

73 Pages « < 12 13 14 15 16 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0433sec    0.55    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 19th December 2025 - 06:29 AM