It's somewhere buried in earlier posts in this thread. I don't have the article, but I kept this picture for my reference.
For the fun of calculation, if the savings is >1M , take out 1% from it.
= (111,766,010,989+4,341,534,600)x1%
= 1,161,075,455.89
= 1.16B
In order for those below 1M to get extra 1%, it requires 8.2B
= (7,871,199,747+11,071,241,468+110,159,987,097+134,065,438,179+436,846,447,535+120,134,203,132)x1%
= 8,201,485,171.58
= 8.2B
^^ Definitely not enough, so perhaps the suggestion to set the limit at 100k or 200k is the right number.
Bear in mind the numbers below are from 2020 and many have withdraw hence it needs to drag the number nearer to 100k rather than 200k.
Re-calc below for the cut-off at 500k
= (120,134,203,132+111,766,010,989+4,341,534,600)x1%
= 2,362,417,487.21
= only 2.36B deducted
= (7,871,199,747+11,071,241,468+110,159,987,097+134,065,438,179+436,846,447,535)x1%
= 7,000,143,140.26
= requires 7.2B
^^ still not enough to cover.
Re-calc below for the cut-off at 100k
= (436,846,447,535+120,134,203,132+111,766,010,989+4,341,534,600)x1%
= 6,730,881,962.56
= 6.7B deducted
= (7,871,199,747+11,071,241,468+110,159,987,097+134,065,438,179)x1%
= 2,631,678,664.91
= 2.6B required
^^ ok, enough to cover. So 100k limit it is !
[attachmentid=11405473]
wow... tq tq... this is the best example to explain why tiering is not going to help anyone in reality... there is just not enough rich people for everyone below the realistic cutoff limit to leech off. and all for just 1% diff...
the low aum members just don't enough funds inside individually, while there are not enough high aum members to help everyone.
(then again, if cut off at 100K, the bottom 100K can get extra 2.5%. oh no, it does work. It is again the middle group to the rescue)
tq tq cute_boboi...