Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
7 Pages < 1 2 3 4 5 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Peugeot 408 Owners/ Fans Thread, Motion & Emotion

views
     
zweimmk
post Feb 21 2013, 08:57 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
512 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(EP6CDTM @ Feb 20 2013, 10:04 PM)
if i've got spare parking space at home and the pricing is right

I'll bring this DS4 home too
*
QUOTE(jacksonkua @ Feb 20 2013, 08:50 PM)
Tentative OTR price for DS Line are as below:-

DS4 - (Dsign version) Auto - RM164,990.
DS4 - (Dsport version) Manual - RM170,990.
DS5 - Auto - RM195,990.

Let see....
*
If those prices from jacksonkua is correct, then they are after a niche type of buyer.
zweimmk
post Feb 21 2013, 10:23 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
512 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(EnergyAnalyst @ Feb 21 2013, 09:59 AM)
40k of many PREMIUM and Award winning stuff man, hence the price (read:  "Both cars evoke expertise, style and technology inscribed with the DNA of innovation and distinction," said Naza Group joint group executive chairman SM Nasarudin SM Nasimuddin)

The Citroen DS5, which was named "Family Car of the Year" by the UK's Top Gear magazine

The Citroen DS4, which was named the "Most Beautiful Car of the Year" at the Auto Bild 2011 Design Award

http://www.malaysia-chronicle.com/index.ph...feb-26&Itemid=3
*
So I take it that you will either sell your 408 for the DS4/DS5 or buy it outright then? Award winning car is right up your alley isn't it? When can we hear the good news from you? brows.gif
zweimmk
post Feb 21 2013, 10:50 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
512 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(EnergyAnalyst @ Feb 21 2013, 10:32 AM)
You have read my mind, how did u do that? but just off the mark a tiny bit, Am looking for SUV to replace my Mrs. Car. Citroen and Pug will make a cute couple, very aptly for cute couples like us.  icon_idea.gif  icon_rolleyes.gif
*
Good hope to hear the good news from you in say a month to 6 months from now depending on stocks or waiting list if any thumbup.gif
zweimmk
post Feb 21 2013, 11:08 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
512 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(EnergyAnalyst @ Feb 21 2013, 11:01 AM)
SUV lah fren, belum launched lagi
*
Oops my bad, lets hope they being the air cross here then
zweimmk
post Feb 25 2013, 10:54 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
512 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(EnergyAnalyst @ Feb 25 2013, 09:52 AM)
I hope the new Citroen 3S is allowing our Pug service there too since Glenmarie is always booked to the teeth full and it will be a while before the Citroen 3s is going to pick up service crowd, Me think, else it will be an utterly waste of space.?
*
At best, you can have both marques utilizing the same building, but it has to have 2 separate entrance/exits, 2 separate owners lounge, 2 separate service counters and 2 separate workshops for both marques. But they will never allow Peugeot owners to service their cars in a Citroen service center or vice versa, irregardless of how underutilized a service center is.

It's a good idea no doubt, but from a marketing perspective, it would be a disaster for them.
zweimmk
post Feb 25 2013, 11:08 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
512 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(EnergyAnalyst @ Feb 25 2013, 10:56 AM)
So for Audi/VW, they practise the same clear division of turf?
*
It's the same for any marque. It will still be clearly divided even if the marques share the same building.

Toyota and Lexus utilize a lot of common parts and car platform, but imagine if Lexus owners could service their cars in a Toyota Service center or vice versa. How would that look?
zweimmk
post Feb 25 2013, 11:39 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
512 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(EnergyAnalyst @ Feb 25 2013, 11:24 AM)
Actually unlike VW/Adui, Toyota /Lexus, where there is a clear division of which is mass market brand, which is premium/prestige brand, the dvidion between Citroen and Peugeot is not that clear. Iused to think Citroen is the more premium/prestige but the recnet announcement by Peugeot seemed to say otherwise

Please read this
http://www.paultan.org/2013/02/14/reports-...-upscale-brand/

I have posted this earlier.
*
Already discussed this awhile back in the Citroen chit chat corner before you posted that. You can read that thread for more info if you want. There are some good points made there.

The most interesting thing is what do they mean by upscaling the Peugeot brand?

1. Do they intend to create an entirely new brand entity to cater to the lower income groups? Thus positioning Peugeot into the middle segment and Citroen into the high line or...
2. Do they intend to position Citroen in the middle segment and move Peugeot into the high line
3. Increase the price of Peugeot cars?
etc. etc.

Too many different possibilities but we can only speculate on their current intentions for now on how they intend to go about doing that.
zweimmk
post Feb 25 2013, 11:57 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
512 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(EnergyAnalyst @ Feb 25 2013, 11:46 AM)
That is Precisely why when we have a chance, ask lor, no harm asking, even if we may not get straight answer first, but once it becomes a FAQ everywhere, then PSA through Nasim needs to make it clearer lor. And in time, we will find out, but if we stop asking or requesting or demanding, no action mah.

I have suugested this in the Peugeot 408 post instead of citroen's because i knwo Citroen now has no one to ask, with Puggies, we have someone we can ask liao.
*
PSA needs to be more clear with their marque positioning. I agree with you that they aren't very clear when it comes to the division of brands. It seems like both marques also cater to the mass market at the same time. Then there is the high end Citroen DS line to tackle higher income groups.

Personal viewpoint is that Citroen is more high end compared to Peugeot, but like you, the recent news is making me confused on which is supposed to be the premium brand now.
zweimmk
post Feb 26 2013, 02:27 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
512 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(EnergyAnalyst @ Feb 26 2013, 02:07 PM)
Hi guys, sorry to change the subject, just a quick question/survey...
I read somewhere that when your car is stationery at the traffic light waiting for green light, changing gear to N (neutral) is an advisable way to preserve longevity of your gearbox/prevent wear and tear. Is everyone here  doing that?  Some quarters said it is not good to do it, as if you are not careful, you end up hurting it more when you don't give it anough time to engage when your lights turn green and you hastily switch it to D,?!

I know my NA gear is 4 speeder AL4 while Turbo is AT6, but from how I understand it, that doing it is advisable for any car (but I have read this sometime back, so not sure it apply for those DSGs too), Any Feedback?
*
When I had my Corolla Altis, I always put my gear in N when going downhill (actually that's a very bad thing to do) and N when I'm stopped at traffic. Hastily switching over to D or not will not have an issue with the longevity. Personal experience after 4 years of ownership. Assuming that the PUG408NA uses the same Toyota Aisin 4 speeder, then it should follow the same logic as well.

In my current ride, I was told not to put the gear into N at all while at a traffic light, just leave it as D to preserve the DSG gearbox longevity. No idea how true this is, but since I've seen a few people talk about doing this, I figured it was better to just follow.
zweimmk
post Feb 26 2013, 02:52 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
512 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(jfcheong @ Feb 26 2013, 02:37 PM)
Was reading an article earlier this morning, It's regarding DCT and DSG. The article commented that DSG was designed for the Euro traffic condition (urban and highway). Not like Malaysia, traffic jam everywhere. The high traffic condition does cause the wear n tear of the DSG as frequent gear change.
Is this the reason that do not engage to N while in stationary for DSG?
*
Not a damn clue actually, lol! But I suspect it would be the case now that you mentioned it. So far I've read 2 cases of DSG gearbox overheating but I often wonder if it has anything to do with the hill hold function causing the problem rather than the mechatronic unit.

In start stop or low speed traffic jams, the gearbox hardly goes above 3rd gear, even going from 2nd gear to 3rd gear is rare occurrence unless there's enough room to accelerate. DSG gearboxes are also truly adaptive. Mine has already adapted to my driving style, that 2nd gear DSG jerkiness/drag is now barely noticeable unless you really pay very close attention to it. The downside is that it takes about 5 months or so before the DSG programming starts to have any noticeable change
zweimmk
post Feb 28 2013, 09:42 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
512 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(EP6CDTM @ Feb 28 2013, 09:23 AM)
other competitors from japan are not great either  blush.gif
*
That's true.

Have you seen their drive for the speakers? It's no bigger than a 20 cent coin, and the cone itself is made from paper, you're lucky if it's plastic. Damn lucky if it's made of MDF material, lol.

Most C-segment Japanese cars have really awful audio systems. Even the latest Camry audio system is quite nasty, but the ones powering the D-segments K5 and the new Mazda 6 are both quite good.
zweimmk
post Mar 1 2013, 12:02 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
512 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(RON408 @ Mar 1 2013, 11:36 AM)
Just sharing....

Trip to Karak from Gombak (BHP petrol station just after Toll Plaza)

Speed approximately 130km/h to 150km/h.

During driving got snap pic as attached:
[attachmentid=3326534] [attachmentid=3326535]

MFD show 8.5L/100m  thumbup.gif

Enjoy my driving...... lalalalalalala  cool2.gif
After reach Bentong Toll Plaza, i slowing down my driving speed approximately 110km/h to 120km/h due wet road surface and  sharp cornering. (Takut jugak lah kalau overturn  doh.gif )

Arrived at destination. Snap pic as attached :

[attachmentid=3326541]

MFD show 7.9L/100m  thumbup.gif
FC getting better. Current mileage 9500km. Booked for service on 6th March.  rclxm9.gif
*
That's not the way you tell how good your car FC is. The MFD isn't accurate. The best way is to do it like what I do. Record down your mileage (total km travelled on trip A for example) when you fill up your empty petrol tank. Note down the total amount of fuel bought (total liters) and enter both figures into fuelly (www.fuelly.com), and you will know exactly what kind of mileage your car is doing.
zweimmk
post Mar 4 2013, 08:41 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
512 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(EnergyAnalyst @ Mar 4 2013, 07:00 AM)
Not at all surprising. Even the JD Powers survey scored the Germans poorly. MINI which is part of BMW doesn't give a surprising result either. Only Jaguar, Porsche, Mercedes did very well. BMW made some gains in the latest study and is now placed above the industrial average. Audi also showed an improvement but is still under the industrial average.

http://autos.jdpower.com/ratings/quality-press-release.htm

Moral of the story: If you want a reliable and dependable car with the least amount of problems, go Japanese! tongue.gif
zweimmk
post Mar 4 2013, 01:09 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
512 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(EnergyAnalyst @ Mar 4 2013, 10:01 AM)
(The UK Reliability index takes into account all factors of a repair, the cost of the parts and the frequency of failures - The Average of all cars is 100 which means that if the figure for the car you are looking at has a higher than average index (118) it indicates that that car is less reliable than the average, if however there is a lower than average index (60) the reliability is better.

Rank/ Make and Model/ Reliability Index
1. Daihatsu  26.00
2. Suzuki  39.00
3. Honda  40.00
4. Chevrolet  69.00
5. Toyota  69.00
6. Hyundai  75.00
7. Lexus  82.00
8. Mazda  88.00
9. Ford  90.00
10. SKODA  91.00
11. Mitsubishi  94.00
12. Subaru  95.00
13. Citroen  98.00
14. Nissan  98.00
15. Kia  99.00
16. Peugeot  99.00
17. Fiat  100.00
18. Daewoo  103.00
19. Smart  119.00
20. Seat  122.00
21. Vauxhall  123.00
22. SsangYong  134.00
23. Volkswagen  134.00
24. Renault  138.00
25. Mini  141.00
26. ROVER  152.00
27. Saab  161.00
28. Volvo  162.00
29. BMW  170.00
30. MG  184.00
31. Jaguar  184.00
32. Mercedes-Benz  213.00
33. Audi  225.00
34. Chrysler  227.00
35. Jeep  242.00
36. Alfa Romeo  248.00
37. Porsche  299.00
38. LANDROVER

Korean scoring not bad in OVERALL Reliability Index, french Citroen & Peugeot doing better than Germans (except Renault, ranked 24th, below VW, ranked 23rd)
*
Wow! Look at the top 10 marques! 6 out of 10 are Japanese, 2 belongs to the American, 1 is Korean and the final is a VW subsidiary brand.

Truthfully, many VW owners have also complained about the drop in VW quality. In their drive to become the world no.1 car manufacturer by volume, no doubt they have let slip on some quality issues. But their volume of cars sold also easily 2x/3x/4x even compared to some of their continental rivals. If the manufacturing defect is set at 0.05% of the total volume of cars sold, that number would also scale accordingly to their total volume of cars sold. Hence, the result is nothing new nor surprising at all.

Oddly enough, SKODA sits in the top 10, that's quite unexpected considering that its DNA is essentially VW.

Sad but true, if you wanted something reliable and dependable - The Japanese are still the ones to look at.
zweimmk
post Mar 4 2013, 01:25 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
512 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(SKYjack @ Mar 4 2013, 11:50 AM)
Quite surprised to find Pug more reliable than BMW,Volov and VW according to the list posted by EnergyAnalyst. Had a BMW E39 before this pug, not so high electronics,found it reliable but high maintenance!
*
Despite poor scores, I doubt it would stop you from buying another BMW if you were financially able to right? biggrin.gif
zweimmk
post Mar 4 2013, 02:56 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
512 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(EnergyAnalyst @ Mar 4 2013, 01:52 PM)
Do u mean that you find it comfotable that Skoda is 10th place and VW is 23rd place? Also, would consumer find it acceptable that in their(VW's) drive to become the world no.1 car manufacturer by volume, no doubt they have let slip on some quality issues. But their volume of cars sold also easily 2x/3x/4x even compared to some of their continental rivals. 'If the manufacturing defect is set at 0.05% of the total volume of cars sold, that number would also scale accordingly to their total volume of cars sold. Hence, the result is nothing new nor surprising at all.', Can VW even use that as a sorry excuse for their poorer reliability performance?

Yes, granted that you have the dough to buy a bimmer, an Audi, would you not seeing this turn your attention to say, Mercedes?

I mean honest doesn't this bother you?

http://www.reliabilityindex.com/reliability/search/339

score 162 for Passat

http://www.reliabilityindex.com/reliability/search/234

score 147 for Pug 407 (the predecessor of 508)

http://www.reliabilityindex.com/reliability/search/64

score 142 for Citroen C5

http://www.reliabilityindex.com/reliability/search/95

score 62 for Ford Mondeo

(The UK Reliability index takes into account all factors of a repair, the cost of the parts and the frequency of failures - The Average of all cars is 100 which means that if the figure for the car you are looking at has a higher than average index (118) it indicates that that car is less reliable than the average, if however there is a lower than average index (60) the reliability is better.)

No Japs, no Korean, just see how Passat stacked against Pug and Ford, You can accept this!?

shakehead.gif
*
I find it very surprising that Skoda is actually in the top 10 list instead of VW. Otherwise, I'm not bothered.

The more reliable the car is, the better. But if I were to buy a car solely based on that decision alone, I wouldn't have bought the Passat last year. I would have just opted to go for the Camry instead. If you had followed the 2012 New Toyota Camry thread, it was one of the few issues I was agonizing over when I decided to look for a new ride last year.

So why did you buy a P408NA in the first place if you wanted a reliable and dependable ride? The more obvious choice are the Japanese isn't it? They are no.1 when it comes to reliability and dependability.

As a consumer, I buy a car, I expect it to work when I use it. If problem happens, I expect them to fix the problem when I bring it to them and honor the warranty. I can moan and b**** about it all I want too, but the important thing is to get it fixed in a reasonable time frame and then I'd be satisfied. Throw in some free service vouchers or discount for my troubles and I would be even happier.

What I say about VW quality dropping due to their drive to become no.1 is just an opinion on my part. But you can probably put 1 and 1 together based on the number of automotive news that's circulating about them and you would also come to the same reasonable conclusion as well. In reality, they would never admit any drop in quality either for obvious reasons. Like it or not, they are outselling all of their continental rivals and doing so with very healthy profit as well. You can draw your on conclusion why that is the case.

Btw, I'm done my homework when I bought my car, and I'm fully prepared to deal with it whatever that may or may not happen. But in the meantime, I will just enjoy my car, doesn't have to get anymore complicated than that biggrin.gif
zweimmk
post Mar 4 2013, 03:15 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
512 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(EnergyAnalyst @ Mar 4 2013, 03:07 PM)
good for you ! i just tot that we will expect better reliability from VW than what I can sum up now as below average and people paying so much for it (least in Msia they do).
*
You can draw your own conclusion. The best answer I can give you is that the criteria we use when it comes to buying cars is different.

Btw, all cars in Malaysia are overpriced sad.gif Hopefully the upcoming election will do something about that thumbup.gif

This post has been edited by zweimmk: Mar 4 2013, 03:40 PM
zweimmk
post Mar 4 2013, 04:02 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
512 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(EnergyAnalyst @ Mar 4 2013, 03:42 PM)
If I am VW, this is what I will say, VW is always at the forefront of introducing new and innovative/premium tech at more affordable price with our models, e.g. the 7 speed DSG, The TSI engine, etc...

While every efforts have been made to better control the quality and performance of these new technology while keeping it within reach of our owners, there are always constant resurfacing challenges in ensuring 100% reliability in view of rapid pace of such technology advancement.

How does that sounds? whistling.gif
*
Sounds good actually thumbup.gif

As an owner, the only thing I really care about is that they honor my warranty claims and fix my problems in a reasonable time frame. That's all.

Btw, if money wasn't an issue, I wouldn't buy a VW and go for more premium makes such as Audi/BMW/Mercedes biggrin.gif


zweimmk
post Mar 4 2013, 08:49 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
512 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(SKYjack @ Mar 4 2013, 08:28 PM)
Not so soon la bro. But am eying the X1 turbo diesel perhaps 3 years time. 508GT also serious contender,but prefer an SUV for it's versatility!
*
By that time there would be much better cars la bro. As it is, the hybrid A6 is already looking highly desirable and at a price that you wouldn't need to sell a kidney just to buy. Just imagine the kind of cars we will get in 3 to 4 years time biggrin.gif
zweimmk
post Mar 6 2013, 09:42 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
512 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(EnergyAnalyst @ Mar 6 2013, 09:38 AM)
Dunno, just did the first 10k km service last month 15th Feb. I hope it is JUST the battery....sincerely I do.  Still waiting for tow truck....
*
I'm confused. Are you waiting on the tow truck for your car now or is someone else's car waiting for a tow truck?

7 Pages < 1 2 3 4 5 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0533sec    0.70    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 21st December 2025 - 06:39 AM