Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
124 Pages « < 98 99 100 101 102 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

> Military Thread V8, Ops Daulat

views
     
atreyuangel
post Apr 17 2013, 12:43 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
406 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: 3°50'**.**"N - 103°16'**.**"E



QUOTE(kerolzarmyfanboy @ Apr 17 2013, 11:48 AM)
we invited the RAF's Typhoon to do exercise with us eh..now i'm very sure the RMAF is going to pick EF..uhh i want rafale.. sad.gif
*
The RAF have annual exercise with RMAF,
at very least twice a year, the difference is this 3 years they bring the typhoon instead of Harrier or Tornado

QUOTE(faizyusof94 @ Apr 17 2013, 12:10 PM)
i see..no ammunition on their pylons when they fly..shooting blanks??
*
They are testing their sensor and simulation
unlike Rafale, half of typhoon capability is still myth as it is only on Paper!
wanvadder
post Apr 17 2013, 03:16 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
94 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
From: Tristram



[Infographic] Breakdown of the U.S. Air Force stand down


The colors used in the infographic are: White, for Combat Mission Ready units; Grey for Basic Mission Capable units; Red for grounded units.

user posted image

azriel
post Apr 17 2013, 04:10 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
4 posts

Joined: Jan 2012
QUOTE
International military spending drops slightly

Written by defenceWeb/SIPRI
Tuesday, 16 April 2013 10:42

World military expenditure totalled US$1,75 trillion in 2012, a fall of half a percent in real terms since 2011, according to figures released by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI).

The fall, the first since 1998, was driven by major spending cuts in the United States and Western and Central Europe, as well as in Australia, Canada and Japan. The reductions were substantially offset by increased spending in Asia, Eastern Europe, the Middle East, North Africa and Latin America.
China, the second largest spender in 2012, increased its expenditure by 7,8 percent ($11,5 billion). Russia, the third largest spender, increased its expenditure by 16 percent ($12,3 billion).

Despite the drop the global total was still higher in real terms than the peak near the end of the cold war.

“We are seeing what may be the beginning of a shift in the balance of world military spending from rich Western countries to emerging regions, as austerity policies and the drawdown in Afghanistan reduce spending in the former, while economic growth funds continuing increases elsewhere,” said Dr Sam Perlo-Freeman, director of SIPRI’s military expenditure and arms production programme.

“However the US and its allies are still responsible for the great majority of world military spending. NATO members together spent a trillion dollars.”

The US: wars ending, cuts biting

In 2012 the United States’ share of world military spending went below 40 percent for the first time since the collapse of the Soviet Union. A declining trend that began in 2011 accelerated in 2012, with a drop in US military spending of six percent in real terms to $682 billion.

The decline is mostly the result of reduced war spending, which fell from $159 billion in the 2011 financial year to $115 billion in 2012 and is set to continue its downward course, with only $87 billion requested for 2013.

US military spending in 2012 was also projected to be $15 billion lower than previously planned as a result of cuts to the Department of Defence linked to the 2011 Budget Control Act. The bulk of cuts under this legislation will begin this year.

A wider slowdown

Austerity policies also caused falls in military spending in most of Europe last year. Since the 2008 global financial crisis, 18 of the 31 countries in the EU or European NATO have cut military spending by more than 10 percent in real terms.

Even in parts of the world where spending has increased, the effects of the economic crisis can still be seen: slowing economic growth in emerging regions has led to slower rates of growth in military spending. Only the Middle East and North Africa increased the rate of military spending between 2003/09 and 2009/12.

The average annual rate of military spending increase in Asia, for instance, has halved from seven percent per year in 2003/09, to 3,4 percent per year in 2009/12. The slow-down was most dramatic in Central and South Asia, where military spending was growing by an average of eight percent per year in 2003/09, but by only 0,7 percent a year since 2009 and actually fell in 2012 by 1,6 percent.

“All indications are that world military spending is likely to keep falling for the next two to three years at least until NATO completes its withdrawal from Afghanistan at the end of 2014. Spending in emerging regions will probably go on rising so the world total will probably bottom out after that,” Perlo-Freeman said.

Regional developments

Military expenditure in Asia and Oceania rose by 3,3 percent in 2012. Large increases were seen in Vietnam, where tensions with China are prompting major naval purchases, and in Indonesia. Military spending in India decreased by 2,8 percent.

Military spending increased sharply across North Africa, by 7,8 percent in real terms, the result of ongoing military modernisation and concern over terrorist groups in the Sahel. Military spending in sub-Saharan Africa fell by 3,2 percent.

Military spending in the Middle East rose by 8,4 percent in 2012. The largest percentage increase worldwide in 2012 was by Oman (a 51 percent rise). Saudi Arabia increased spending by 12 percent. Spending by Iran, Qatar, Syria and the United Arab Emirates is unknown.

In Latin America military spending increased by 4,2 percent in 2012. The largest increases were Paraguay (43 percent) and Venezuela (42 percent). The increasing role of the military in combating drug cartels pushed Mexico’s spending up by 9,7 percent.

Military spending in Eastern Europe increased by 15,3 percent in 2012, the largest regional increase. Besides Russia, Ukraine also increased its spending substantially - by 24 per cent.

Sipri notes all percentage increases and decreases are expressed in real terms at constant 2011 prices.


source

This post has been edited by azriel: Apr 17 2013, 04:11 PM
azriel
post Apr 17 2013, 04:37 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
4 posts

Joined: Jan 2012
QUOTE(noavatar @ Apr 16 2013, 12:06 PM)
Displacement -  2,365 tonnes

Dimensions
Length: 105.11 m
Beam: 14.02 m
Maximum Draft: 3.7 m
*
Another view of the latest Sigma PKR 10514 version/configuration:

user posted image


kerolzarmyfanboy
post Apr 17 2013, 07:33 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
575 posts

Joined: Feb 2013
what happen to the RM27bil that was supposed to fund the last NGPV program? surely all are not wasted on trying to save the late PSC corporation rite..must have some leftover's money..
vuvuuzela
post Apr 17 2013, 07:48 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
12 posts

Joined: Jun 2010


QUOTE(kerolzarmyfanboy @ Apr 17 2013, 07:33 PM)
what happen to the RM27bil that was supposed to fund the last NGPV program? surely all are not wasted on trying to save the late PSC corporation rite..must have some leftover's money..
*
There is no such thing as 27 billion . AFAIK goverment only able to spend 6 pv instead of 27 ..... goverment never spent that money to save psc ...instead psc dock being auction by swiss bank as result of bankruptcy....for sake of our national security ...govt told boustead to take over psc instead being sold to foreign company.
faizyusof94
post Apr 17 2013, 07:54 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
94 posts

Joined: Jan 2012
From: Bagan Ajam,Penang


QUOTE(atreyuangel @ Apr 17 2013, 12:43 PM)
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

They are testing their sensor and simulation
unlike Rafale, half of typhoon capability is still myth as it is only on Paper!
*
what are those myth? hmm.gif
atreyuangel
post Apr 17 2013, 08:06 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
406 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: 3°50'**.**"N - 103°16'**.**"E



QUOTE(faizyusof94 @ Apr 17 2013, 07:54 PM)
what are those myth?  hmm.gif
*
hahah just kidding,
most of Typhoon capability are still untested, the plane is still not 100 at their full capability!

hafizushi
post Apr 17 2013, 08:30 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
28 posts

Joined: Aug 2010


is there any future mbt project for ATM? tbf 48 tank quite small in numbers
azriel
post Apr 17 2013, 08:47 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
4 posts

Joined: Jan 2012
QUOTE
2013/04/17 19:45 KST

Boeing wins $1.6 bln contract for S. Korean attack helicopter fleet

By Kim Eun-jung

SEOUL, April 17 (Yonhap) -- South Korea on Wednesday selected Boeing's AH-64E Apache Guardian to replace its aging Army helicopters, the Defense Acquisition Procurement Administration (DAPA) said.

   Under the 1.8 trillion won (US$1.6 billion) contract, U.S. firm Boeing will supply 36 Apache Guardians for Army battalions by 2018, along with training and logistical support, DAPA said.

   Boeing's Apache competed with the American firm Bell's AH-1Z Cobra and the Turkish Aerospace Industry's T-129B. The South Korean Army first made the procurement request in 2008.

"The heavily-armed attack helicopters will replace aging helicopters deployed by the Army to counter threats by North Korean military's armored units and deter provocations," Baek Yoon-hyeong, DAPA spokesman, said in a briefing.

   The four-blade, twin-engine attack helicopter, known as the "tank killer", is armed with a 30-millimeter M230 Chain Gun, and can carry a mixture of AGM-114 Hellfire missiles and Hydra 70 rocket pods.

   The announcement came as Seoul awaits Pentagon's approval for an additional attack-reconnaissance squadron as South Korean seeks to improve its combat capability before regaining wartime operational control from Washington in December 2015.

   In June 2012, Gen. James Thurman, the commander of Combined Forces Command, asked the U.S. government to provide more military support to South Korea, including a plan to deploy 24 additional Apache attack helicopters here. During a January visit to Seoul, U.S. Army Chief of Staff General Ray Odierno said his government will make a decision soon.

   On Wednesday, the DAPA also picked Korea Aerospace Industries (KAI) as the preferred bidder to build helicopters for the Marine Corps' landing maneuver operations.

  KAI is South Korea's sole aircraft maker which developed the Korean Utility Helicopter (KUH) called Surion.

  Under the deal, KAI will make the Marine Corps model KUH and deliver a total of 40 helicopters to them by 2023, the DAPA said.

  The Marine Corps has long sought to have its own choppers, but the plan has been delayed due to budgetary constraints. The procurement request took on new urgency after North Korea launched two deadly provocations in the tensely guarded western sea in 2010, killing a total of 50 South Koreans.

   The Joint Chiefs of Staff last year approved the Marine's request to buy helicopters for their landing operations in border islands, which face heavily-armed North Korean forces just across the maritime border.

   The Surion utility helicopter made its maiden flight in March 2010, and entered full-scale production in 2012. About 200 Surions have been ordered to replace aging military helicopters in the next few years.


source

This post has been edited by azriel: Apr 17 2013, 08:48 PM
kerolzarmyfanboy
post Apr 17 2013, 08:53 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
575 posts

Joined: Feb 2013
QUOTE(azriel @ Apr 17 2013, 08:47 PM)
Apache Guardian? newer version than Apache Longbow?
meedoot
post Apr 17 2013, 09:09 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
3 posts

Joined: Nov 2012
QUOTE(kerolzarmyfanboy @ Apr 17 2013, 07:53 PM)
Apache Guardian? newer version than Apache Longbow?
*
US Army fields first AH-64E Apache Guardian helicopter




The US Army's 1-229th Attack Reconnaissance Battalion (ARB) has fielded the first AH-64E Apache attack helicopter during a ceremony at Gray Army Airfield within Joint Base Lewis-McChord in Washington, US.

Eight out of 24 helicopters were received by the battalion, since January 2013, and all are scheduled to be operational by the end of April this year.

Known as Guardian, the new heavily-armed helicopter features more powerful, fuel-efficient T700-GE-701D engines, enhanced rotor blade technology, as well as advanced electronics, and is designed to replace the army's existing AH-64D Longbow model helicopters.

Other features include improved drive system and sensor enhancements, improved handling and performance, as well as the ability to hover at 6,000ft with a full mission payload, providing pilots with more control during high-altitude operations.

Commenting on the helicopter, 1-229th Attack Reconnaissance Battalion commander lieutenant colonel Geoffrey Crawford said it would increase the battalion's lethality and survivability, while also improving its ability to support ground forces.
"The increased power will now allow us to stay on the objective longer and with more ammunition."

"The increased power will now allow us to stay on the objective longer and with more ammunition," Crawford added.

With a combat speed of around 189mph, the helicopter, which was formerly known as AH-64D Block III, can turn faster and tighter in challenging environments, and also provide pilots with options to remotely operate nearby unmanned aerial vehicles/systems.

In addition, 1-229th ARB maintenance test pilot chief warrant officer 3 Richard Crabtree said: "They can view UAV camera feeds, adjust their flight path and launch missiles at targets spotted by the UAV."

The battalion flight crews are scheduled to conduct familiarisation training using the actual aircraft and AH-64E flight simulators at Joint Base Lewis-McChord, in addition to training in preparation for upcoming rotations to the Army's National Training Center (NTC) later this year.

http://www.army-technology.com/news/newsus...dian-helicopter
azriel
post Apr 17 2013, 09:11 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
4 posts

Joined: Jan 2012
QUOTE(kerolzarmyfanboy @ Apr 17 2013, 08:53 PM)
Apache Guardian? newer version than Apache Longbow?
*
The AH-64D Block III Apache Longbow has a new designation now called the AH-64E Guardian.

QUOTE
U.S. Army AH-64E Is Now the ‘Guardian’

Less than three months after U.S. Army representatives announced that the former “Apache Block III” attack helicopter would be re-designated as the AH-64 “Echo,” the service has officially tied a nickname to the alpha-numeric designation.

On Tuesday, Jan. 8, 2013, representatives from the U.S. Army’s Apache Project Office informed Boeing Company representatives of the new service nickname for the AH-64E will be “Guardian.” The announcement was made during the Team Apache annual government-industry meeting at the Boeing facility in Arlington, Va.


source

This post has been edited by azriel: Apr 17 2013, 09:30 PM
heavyduty
post Apr 17 2013, 09:45 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
127 posts

Joined: Aug 2010


QUOTE(hafizushi @ Apr 17 2013, 08:30 PM)
is there any future mbt project for ATM? tbf 48 tank quite small in numbers
*
PT-91M crews are still considered greenhorns.the training doctrine isn't matured yet so giving them expensive toys would be a waste

asas kukuh dulu baru boleh upgrade
epul
post Apr 17 2013, 11:13 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
397 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
From: MIaw-Miaw
QUOTE(heavyduty @ Apr 17 2013, 09:45 PM)
PT-91M crews are still considered greenhorns.the training doctrine isn't matured yet so giving them expensive toys would be a waste

asas kukuh dulu baru boleh upgrade
*
KIta kasi piling foundation baik punya sebelum bina bangunan tinggi menggunung. Kalo takdaq piling senang bangunan tu runtuh.
faizyusof94
post Apr 17 2013, 11:26 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
94 posts

Joined: Jan 2012
From: Bagan Ajam,Penang


i don't see any rafale flying here..where are they??
wanvadder
post Apr 17 2013, 11:30 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
94 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
From: Tristram



Try to ID these

user posted image


heavyduty
post Apr 18 2013, 12:02 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
127 posts

Joined: Aug 2010


QUOTE(epul @ Apr 17 2013, 11:13 PM)
KIta kasi piling foundation baik punya sebelum bina bangunan tinggi menggunung. Kalo takdaq piling senang bangunan tu runtuh.
*
yes.they need to know what a tank can and can't do on south east asian type soil

masa Adnan baru sampai dulu,banyak mana 'turtled' sebab crew nak test limit
noavatar
post Apr 18 2013, 02:04 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Mar 2013


Rheinmetall Delivers Gladius Soldier System

user posted image

user posted image


Rheinmetall formally transferred its new IdZ-ES future soldier system to the German Bundeswehr on 7 March 2013. Short for “Infanterist der Zukunft – Erweitertes System” or “Future Soldier – Expanded System”, IdZ-ES is also known as the “Gladius”.

Moves by the German Bundeswehr to equip its infantry forces with the state-of-the-art Gladius soldier system are gathering pace. In January 2013, the Düsseldorf, Germany-based Rheinmetall Group was awarded an order to supply a further sixty systems. The procurement programme began in 2012 with an initial order of thirty systems, enough to equip 300 troops.

This follow-up order is worth €84 million, and encompasses equipment for 60 infantry sections with a total of 600 soldiers.

Delivery of the new systems will take place in two lots consisting of thirty systems each, the first one in the middle of 2013, another at the end of the year. This will ensure that the next two contingents of Bundeswehr troops due to deploy to Afghanistan will receive the new equipment well in advance.

As planned, the Bundeswehr is currently taking delivery of the thirty Gladius systems it ordered in 2012. The troops will have until June 2013 to train with the new system before going to Afghanistan.

Developed by Rheinmetall and originally known as “Infanterist der Zukunft (IdZ 2)” or “Future Soldier”, Gladius is the most advanced system of its kind anywhere. Its introduction is a major step forward for the Bundeswehr, which will significantly improve the overall operational effectiveness of German infantry units while simultaneously enhancing the survivability of individual soldiers.

An expanded set of capabilities

Gladius substantially exceeds the capabilities of previous infantry systems used by the Bundeswehr, especially with regard to networkability, command and control, and combat effectiveness. Reflecting the heightened requirements profile of the user as well as incorporating knowledge gained during comprehensive testing and in the field, Gladius is essentially a new, highly advanced system.

A prominent feature of the Gladius system is the holistic design approach that takes full account of the complex operational requirements levied on modern soldier systems. Gladius is intended first and foremost to bring the 10-man infantry section and its vehicle into the network-enabled operational loop. This network, consisting of reconnaissance, command and control components, and weapons, enables rapid exchange of information as well as shared situational awareness as the basis for planning and conducting operations.

The individual soldier receives all relevant data concerning the tactical situation, the position of friendly forces, the mission, and system status. It includes a GPS and an inertial navigation system as well as a magnetic compass, facilitating reliable orientation on the ground.

Improved ergonomics and superb protection

Equally impressive are the system’s ergonomic features, especially with regard to weight reduction, miniaturization and improved integration of individual components. The modular battle dress uniform, body armour and harness system provide excellent protection from detection in the visual and infrared spectrum as well as from the weather – even in extreme climate zones – and especially from biological and chemical agents. Flame-retardant equipment and vector protection round out the system’s high level of protection. The system is integrated into an “electronic backbone” that contains the radio, core computer, batteries and GPS module.

Read more:
http://www.rheinmetall-defence.com/en/rhei...etails_3072.php
http://www.defencetalk.com/rheinmetall-del.../#ixzz2QkELubvU




kerolzarmyfanboy
post Apr 18 2013, 03:34 AM

On my way
****
Junior Member
575 posts

Joined: Feb 2013
QUOTE(wanvadder @ Apr 17 2013, 11:30 PM)
Try to ID these

user posted image
*
1) A-10 Thunderbolt
2) A-6 Intruder
3) F-22 Raptor
4) Predator
5) F/A-18
6) no idea..
7) UH-60 Blackhawk
8 and 9 don't know..but i think one of them is C-130H biggrin.gif

124 Pages « < 98 99 100 101 102 > » 
Bump Topic Topic ClosedOptions New Topic
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.3160sec    0.49    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 3rd December 2025 - 11:29 AM