QUOTE(realjazzcoke @ Apr 12 2013, 12:47 PM)
Maybe to me yes kua

. coz after the 808 PureView rise, the 920 pureview was d fall, not up to its name lolz. Although it goes on separated path of PureView (hence phased 2) when asked. Still they cant shake the image quality from 808 when compared (From the sifus, not me

). It was the milestone on mobile imaging quality!
PureView on the 808 is the only reason for it to "rise", as people around no longer interest in the OS, the specs, ecosystem...etc... Even Nokia will not go further for Symbian. The rise marks the beginning for PureView, but the end to Symbian.
Nice one!

Although they want to call it Phase 2, but it is not actually correct, as Phase 2 should include Phase 1. But this is more like a different Phase.
Most likely the reason is they can't include Phase 1 because they adopted WP and due to WP limitation and they NEED to come out with a PureView Lumia to help market their WP, so they have to leave out Phase 1. Imagine if they waited and today Nokia will have nothing much special to promote about the L920.
Phase 1 is the one that's actually amazing. The current so called "Phase 2" is OK, it's especially good for those who love to take static objects (things that doesn't move because Optical Stabilizer can't help when your subject moves), but this "Optical Stabilizer" technology you can see other manufacturer's already beginning to overtake it or come close in just short time, but Phase 1, there's simply no competition.
Phase 1 lack of Shutter Speed control, if they allow this, then it will be easier to take less blurred photo due to shake.
I would love to see the PROPER Phase 2 PureView, which includes Phase 1.
Hope the next Lumia will actually have it, but then Damian already left.