I did reply someone with the same thought as yours:
http://forum.lowyat.net/topic/2486682/+100"very good analysis.. HOWEVER.. i think there is something missed out which "the right type of property for the right type of market" ..
Generally, I only see 2 types of properties in Cyber..
1) highend condos and landed props that worth > 800k
2) property cater for short term staying (SoXo, studio) and student market.. (e.g. The Place, dpulse, ARC)
But for those cater for general mass (2storey DSL, >1000sqft apartment/condo) are less.. and these are the biggest market segment for Cyberjaya working population, young adults, family, ppl who gonna start a family.. that is why properties surrounding cyberjaya are still prefered choice of many due to cheaper and bigger home... Amenity is just part of the story... IMHO, price vs build up also part of house buyers consideration..
All the landed props in Cyber are of highend which is pretty much beyond reach of majority of cyberjaya working adults.. are there working adults buy SOHO n studio for own stay? mostly i heard are for investment.. renting this pigeon holes could cost 1/3 of average working adults in Cyberjaya..
Thus IMHO, SK, Puchong, Serdang, Kajang etc still remain top pick due to its more affordable house, more variety, pay less for more build up compare to cyber..
p/s: for other prime location like KL n PJ, ppl willing to pay more for less space due to its amenities.. but i dont see the same for cyberjaya at this moment..
my 2c"
This pretty much reminds me the situation in China... there are plenty of demand for houses there, with the amount of population, houses are not enough... by using your "house to population ratio", China should be shortage of houses, but why are there still plenty of empty units?
Plenty of ghost cities with empty highrise apartments, but on ground level, citizens are still squeezing 5 families renting in 1 house.. The product (more specifically "price tag") did not meet its demand...
my 2c.. cheers..
In fact, I like Damansara the most.
Our house at Sri Damansara costs RM 800k, even an old house at Kepong costs RM 600k. It is hard to simply tie the working population to house price. If u ask how many working & staying at Kepong, how can the house there be affortable? It is like DesaPark City 15 years ago. Today, Kepong address has DesaPark City, Sunway SPK, & tonnes of condo development.
If Eco Glades building at Damansara, it will cost me > RM 2 M which is double.
Don't forget Malaysia government is building 1 Malaysia home, it will costs > RM 300k and it is never cheap. If even the government is building and selling expensive, what can the developer do loh?