Just want to know..how about chance of whimsyshire level at highest mf +100 with nv..is it any chance to drop better item like act1,2,3 or 4? or is it good place for farming?

MF gives you higher chance, it has been proven by studies published. Blizzard also already published in game guide that MF affects affix quanitity of rare.
The problem is there is no finding that Act 3 has higher base affix count. The only study that is ever proven is that Act 3 has high drop chance of ilvl 63, and that's all. I'm in the camp that Act 3 drops have the same standard affix tier and lower Acts.

As a statistically pointless anecdote, I have been farming Act 3 regularly yet my earnings far lags behind my friend who farms Act 1 with 250MF, a factor of 10 to 1.

If you're still interested, a Reddit post is up for ongoing studies on the effects of MF on Affix count, probably on Goblins.

Do you understand what is probability? Guarantee =/= higher chance   

MF gives you higher chance, it has been proven by studies published. Blizzard also already published in game guide that MF affects affix quanitity of rare.
The problem is there is no finding that Act 3 has higher base affix count. The only study that is ever proven is that Act 3 has high drop chance of ilvl 63, and that's all. I'm in the camp that Act 3 drops have the same standard affix tier and lower Acts.

As a statistically pointless anecdote, I have been farming Act 3 regularly yet my earnings far lags behind my friend who farms Act 1 with 250MF, a factor of 10 to 1.

If you're still interested, a Reddit post is up for ongoing studies on the effects of MF on Affix count, probably on Goblins.

CONCLUSION: Fuuck Act 3, just farm Act 1 or 2 with 200+MF

Meh.Cant find any study on affix count, just this
http://www.diablofans.com/topic/57939-ongo...stical-insight/

Even if there were any study, Im 100% sure that they will find higher act have higher base affix drop rate,
unless blizzard dev are total morons and somehow make them the same across all acts.

I was just thinking randomly.

We are assuming that the %'age chance for multiple affixes from act3 vs act1 mobs is the same. What if it is different?

What I mean is this. We know that MF doesn't affect proportion of ilvl 63 items. However as per this thread, it affects the chance of getting higher number of affixes.

We are assuming that an act 1 elite has the same base %'age chance of dropping 6 affix as an act 3 elite. What if it's different?

The idea that base affix increases by act is the assumption that should be questioned, not the other way round.

Toe-Mah-Toe vs To-Mey-Do. Whichever way you want to look at it, has there been any announcement by the blue's confirming it either way? If it's not confirmed by blues, what makes you so sure that an act 3 mob has exactly the same base chance of dropping a 6-affix rare vs an act 1 mob?

i've found some gear in act1 with 7 affixes (although the most recent being a ilevel 57 tbh...)

yesterday i did act1,2,3,4 inferno.... killed all bosses with 5 buff. all junk 340+ mf buffed

lol. im pretty sure its bliz controlling the economy.

And what makes you think it doesn't? The burden of proof is yours.
The blizzard drop rate info reveal only shows ilvl rate differences, and there have been no new finding towards base affix rates being different. In the absence of any new leads, it is scientifically correct to assume all things being equal.
Again, the burden of proof is yours.

*shrug* I'm just throwing out some possibilities. Personally I don't care either way since I farm only Act 1 & Act 2 cos I can't be arsed to die multiple times in Act 3/4 (and I'm lazy to gearswitch). Doesn't matter to me if you decide to dismiss the possibility outright just because "Blizzard hasn't said so."

Take this thread for example. Bliz only revealed that MF affects # of affixes like what, 3 or 4 days ago. So if someone came up with this theory 2-3 weeks ago, I suppose you would have also dismissed it outright "because Blizzard has not said anything about it?" If the entire community takes this stance we would still be wondering how exactly armor and resistance affect total damage reduction.