Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
126 Pages « < 31 32 33 34 35 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography The Official Nikon Discussion Thread Ver.16

views
     
f5calvin
post Jun 27 2012, 11:15 AM

starsssss
Group Icon
Elite
1,557 posts

Joined: Dec 2011


QUOTE(amduser @ Jun 27 2012, 11:09 AM)
D5100 la tongue.gif

Look like some mis focus there, or could be the limitation of crop sensor

Taken with d5100 35mm 1.8g
user posted image
DSC_4212 by K_S16, on Flickr
*
did u change ur sharpness setting? mine was at 2. now bumped to 7..urs?
Everdying
post Jun 27 2012, 11:17 AM

Two is One and One is None.
Group Icon
Staff
30,735 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
2 is too low.
most ppl recommend to bump it to 6 or 7.
celciuz
post Jun 27 2012, 11:17 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
I just noticed... your D700 and D5100 pics are on different lens le o_O Problem with that 24-70?
f5calvin
post Jun 27 2012, 11:22 AM

starsssss
Group Icon
Elite
1,557 posts

Joined: Dec 2011


QUOTE(Everdying @ Jun 27 2012, 11:17 AM)
2 is too low.
most ppl recommend to bump it to 6 or 7.
*
i din notice that earlier since i jz started photography a month ago..n that was the third day since i got my dslr..lol..

QUOTE(celciuz @ Jun 27 2012, 11:17 AM)
I just noticed... your D700 and D5100 pics are on different lens le o_O Problem with that 24-70?
*
nothin wrong with the lens..checked..cz i used the lens on D700 on that day too..crispy and sharp.
Everdying
post Jun 27 2012, 11:24 AM

Two is One and One is None.
Group Icon
Staff
30,735 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
started a month ago and already own D5000 and D700?
Agito666
post Jun 27 2012, 11:26 AM

10k Club
Group Icon
Elite
11,861 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
From: Bangalasia
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


this consider sharp or not? tongue.gif

----
@everdying the scary face avatar O_O
people rich mah, 1 month straight D700 and D5100 ....you mad bro? unsure.gif whistling.gif
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


This post has been edited by Agito666: Jun 27 2012, 11:27 AM
f5calvin
post Jun 27 2012, 11:27 AM

starsssss
Group Icon
Elite
1,557 posts

Joined: Dec 2011


QUOTE(Everdying @ Jun 27 2012, 11:24 AM)
started a month ago and already own D5000 and D700?
*
Ur face is terrifying..lol.. D700 belongs to my uncle..Lens also his..haha,.


Added on June 27, 2012, 11:29 am
QUOTE(Agito666 @ Jun 27 2012, 11:26 AM)
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


this consider sharp or not?  tongue.gif

----
@everdying the scary face avatar O_O
people rich mah, 1 month straight D700 and D5100 ....you mad bro?  unsure.gif  whistling.gif
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

*
lol..as i said it wasnt mine..bt it was so poisoning tryin out those lenses..and those body..automatically it made d5100 feel like toy camera..mainly bcz of the weight..
anyway, that shot wasnt shooting human skin, cant tell..bt of course it's impressive..haha.

This post has been edited by f5calvin: Jun 27 2012, 11:29 AM
amduser
post Jun 27 2012, 11:35 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,542 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


QUOTE(f5calvin @ Jun 27 2012, 11:15 AM)
did u change ur sharpness setting? mine was at 2. now bumped to 7..urs?
*
I shoot raw, i dont think lightroom can read the settings, and i forget what picture setting i use sweat.gif
f5calvin
post Jun 27 2012, 11:40 AM

starsssss
Group Icon
Elite
1,557 posts

Joined: Dec 2011


QUOTE(amduser @ Jun 27 2012, 11:35 AM)
I shoot raw, i dont think lightroom can read the settings, and i forget what picture setting i use  sweat.gif
*
u could check ur setting now..?
Andy214
post Jun 27 2012, 11:49 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,308 posts

Joined: Nov 2004


QUOTE(f5calvin @ Jun 27 2012, 11:07 AM)
yeah they hv the same sensor..AF isn't a problem..
both photos are in jpeg, not edited..no sharpening or softening done..
yeah, the sharpening for d5100 is low..so now i made it higher like other models. haven't tried a portrait since i sharpen it..
n also i din try to shoot in RAW either..will try one day.
*
JPEG have default sharpening. Is both having the similar sharpening in the preset?

Just now didn't check EXIF, so I thought both from same camera, now that mmhodnor posted the EXIF, I have some additional thoughts:

1. As above, do check the sharpening on the D700 body.
2. Is it using the same lens or does your body have back/front focus issue? How you can test is, try using a tripod and shoot in liveview; Is it tack sharp now? Or still same?

f5calvin
post Jun 27 2012, 12:10 PM

starsssss
Group Icon
Elite
1,557 posts

Joined: Dec 2011


QUOTE(Andy214 @ Jun 27 2012, 11:49 AM)
JPEG have default sharpening. Is both having the similar sharpening in the preset?

Just now didn't check EXIF, so I thought both from same camera, now that mmhodnor posted the EXIF, I have some additional thoughts:

1. As above, do check the sharpening on the D700 body.
2. Is it using the same lens or does your body have back/front focus issue? How you can test is, try using a tripod and shoot in liveview; Is it tack sharp now? Or still same?
*
D700 has higher sharpenin value..i think it's 6 or 7.. I dun think there's any front or back focus issue cz i tried shooting a measuring tape..
Andy214
post Jun 27 2012, 12:24 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,308 posts

Joined: Nov 2004


QUOTE(f5calvin @ Jun 27 2012, 12:10 PM)
D700 has higher sharpenin value..i think it's 6 or 7.. I dun think there's any front or back focus issue cz i tried shooting a measuring tape..
*
Is it accurate?
If you have time, try this.
Put the camera on tripod or something steady, zoom to 70mm @ f/2.8, place an object as close as possible to the closest focusing distance (e.g. a logo on a cup).
Shoot through viewfinder and again using LiveView and compare both results. Is both result similar or the LiveView is tack sharp?

Oh yes, I forgot. There's also Noise Reduction.
DX body vs FX Body, the noise level and detail will be different. On D700, the ISO800 is better than D5100/D7000. Moreover, the sample for the D700 is using 70-200mm.

This post has been edited by Andy214: Jun 27 2012, 12:24 PM
amduser
post Jun 27 2012, 12:46 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,542 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


QUOTE(f5calvin @ Jun 27 2012, 11:40 AM)
u could check ur setting now..?
*
Camera not with me now tongue.gif

Later i go home check la
f5calvin
post Jun 27 2012, 12:54 PM

starsssss
Group Icon
Elite
1,557 posts

Joined: Dec 2011


QUOTE(Andy214 @ Jun 27 2012, 12:24 PM)
Is it accurate?
If you have time, try this.
Put the camera on tripod or something steady, zoom to 70mm @ f/2.8, place an object as close as possible to the closest focusing distance (e.g. a logo on a cup).
Shoot through viewfinder and again using LiveView and compare both results. Is both result similar or the LiveView is tack sharp?

Oh yes, I forgot. There's also Noise Reduction.
DX body vs FX Body, the noise level and detail will be different. On D700, the ISO800 is better than D5100/D7000. Moreover, the sample for the D700 is using 70-200mm.
*
i'll check it out..btw, i dun have that lens with me right now..

i did this jz now.:
user posted image
DSC_0175crop by Calvin Kohlz, on Flickr

is this backfocusing/front focusing? i suppose there's a lil backfocusing.. i focused on the black dot.. it's an image of a tree trunk.. captured from upwards
kit lens, cropped.

This post has been edited by f5calvin: Jun 27 2012, 01:25 PM
amduser
post Jun 27 2012, 02:07 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,542 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


this guy selling his 35mm 1.8g for 580 only
http://forum.lowyat.net/topic/2403972
Everdying
post Jun 27 2012, 02:08 PM

Two is One and One is None.
Group Icon
Staff
30,735 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(amduser @ Jun 27 2012, 02:07 PM)
this guy selling his 35mm 1.8g for 580 only
http://forum.lowyat.net/topic/2403972
*
ok la, i seen it as low as RM550.
guess slowly dropping due to 50mm 1.8G tongue.gif
amduser
post Jun 27 2012, 02:09 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,542 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


omg....that time i get is around 750, rugi la sad.gif
Everdying
post Jun 27 2012, 02:09 PM

Two is One and One is None.
Group Icon
Staff
30,735 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(f5calvin @ Jun 27 2012, 12:54 PM)
i'll check it out..btw, i dun have that lens with me right now..

i did this jz now.:

is this backfocusing/front focusing? i suppose there's a lil backfocusing.. i focused on the black dot.. it's an image of a tree trunk.. captured from upwards
kit lens, cropped.
*
the easiest way that some ppl use to test is to line up batteries diagonally from each other.
http://phototipsandsips.blogspot.com/2011/...focus-test.html
Andy214
post Jun 27 2012, 02:18 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,308 posts

Joined: Nov 2004


QUOTE(f5calvin @ Jun 27 2012, 12:54 PM)
i'll check it out..btw, i dun have that lens with me right now..

i did this jz now.:
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


is this backfocusing/front focusing? i suppose there's a lil backfocusing.. i focused on the black dot.. it's an image of a tree trunk.. captured from upwards
kit lens, cropped.
*
Handheld? If handheld with shallow DOF, it's not easy to get accurate result.
What I did test before is using tripod or put the body on table or that is doesn't move.
I tested shooting and compare both Viewfinder shot and ViewFinder, the result is consistent no matter how many times I tried, and it's done with good lighting, so I'm using lowest ISO.
The difference is very minimal, the service personnel were not able to tell the difference, but because of too small difference, they won't adjust it and advice to use the in camera adjustment (which unfortunately not available for D5100)

Well, that's when you get very close to your subject and the DOF is shallow. The minor back/front focusing will be noticeable. If you shoot from further distance, then it's less of a problem because the more area will be in focus.
f5calvin
post Jun 27 2012, 02:24 PM

starsssss
Group Icon
Elite
1,557 posts

Joined: Dec 2011


QUOTE(Andy214 @ Jun 27 2012, 02:18 PM)
Handheld? If handheld with shallow DOF, it's not easy to get accurate result.
What I did test before is using tripod or put the body on table or that is doesn't move.
I tested shooting and compare both Viewfinder shot and ViewFinder, the result is consistent no matter how many times I tried, and it's done with good lighting, so I'm using lowest ISO.
The difference is very minimal, the service personnel were not able to tell the difference, but because of too small difference, they won't adjust it and advice to use the in camera adjustment (which unfortunately not available for D5100)

Well, that's when you get very close to your subject and the DOF is shallow. The minor back/front focusing will be noticeable. If you shoot from further distance, then it's less of a problem because the more area will be in focus.
*
YEah handheld..anyway it's fine with me..sooner or later also will be upgrading so no worries.. thumbup.gif

126 Pages « < 31 32 33 34 35 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0265sec    1.00    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 18th December 2025 - 06:35 AM