Auto ISO always selects 1600 zzz. Too aggressive IMO.

Long Shan Temple by ixeo, on Flickr

Fishes by ixeo, on Flickr

Taipei 101 by ixeo, on Flickr
Critics, suggestions welcomed.
Micro Four Thirds (m43) User Thread V5, Panasonic & Olympus Mirrorless System!
|
|
Feb 3 2013, 05:57 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,354 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
EPM-2 w/kit lens. Haven't taken pictures with a proper camera in the last 10 years...Kit lens is also pretty piss poor..IMO. Quickly learned that I need a smaller lens, and a faster lens as well. Panny 14mm and 25mm here I come.
Auto ISO always selects 1600 zzz. Too aggressive IMO. ![]() Long Shan Temple by ixeo, on Flickr ![]() Fishes by ixeo, on Flickr ![]() Taipei 101 by ixeo, on Flickr Critics, suggestions welcomed. |
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 3 2013, 11:43 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,862 posts Joined: Mar 2011 |
|
|
|
Feb 8 2013, 08:05 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,862 posts Joined: Mar 2011 |
QUOTE(Jason @ Feb 3 2013, 05:57 AM) EPM-2 w/kit lens. Haven't taken pictures with a proper camera in the last 10 years...Kit lens is also pretty piss poor..IMO. Quickly learned that I need a smaller lens, and a faster lens as well. Panny 14mm and 25mm here I come. kitlens is ok..but i feel the pana have better build than the oly..if you love to do landscape i would suggest to get a uwa..i like uwa for landscape cos of the distortion..the only downside m43 uwa is so damn xpensive compare to dslr version..the other option is fisheye like samyang..however imho the uwa is versatile compared to fisheye..Auto ISO always selects 1600 zzz. Too aggressive IMO. ![]() Long Shan Temple by ixeo, on Flickr ![]() Fishes by ixeo, on Flickr ![]() Taipei 101 by ixeo, on Flickr Critics, suggestions welcomed. |
|
|
Feb 8 2013, 09:09 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
402 posts Joined: Jul 2007 From: KL |
totally agreed with kenery.
|
|
|
Feb 8 2013, 10:34 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
659 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: PNG / PJ |
QUOTE(suadrif @ Jan 27 2013, 11:56 AM) hi guys G2 is actually very good for videography, since it (if I'm correct) has the audio jack, so you can jack in external microphone for the best audio performance.i am not sure if this is the right place to ask. but i would like to know, the offer below is worth for money or not? consider i am beginner Panasonic DSLR 44% Offer ![]() |
|
|
Feb 8 2013, 10:54 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,862 posts Joined: Mar 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 8 2013, 02:09 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
402 posts Joined: Jul 2007 From: KL |
QUOTE(carbonytte @ Feb 8 2013, 10:34 AM) G2 is actually very good for videography, since it (if I'm correct) has the audio jack, so you can jack in external microphone for the best audio performance. The superb video quality is GH2. If the price is for GH2 definitely worth.QUOTE(kenary820 @ Feb 8 2013, 10:54 AM) hope tamron & sigma come out with line up..practically we are paying for precision glass and the build..but the glass on uwa is much smaller then the ff glass..think its a ripoff in the name of lightness hehe.. hahaha agreed. I always wish to have one, but its really too exp. |
|
|
Feb 8 2013, 03:52 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,354 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(kenary820 @ Feb 8 2013, 08:05 AM) kitlens is ok..but i feel the pana have better build than the oly..if you love to do landscape i would suggest to get a uwa..i like uwa for landscape cos of the distortion..the only downside m43 uwa is so damn xpensive compare to dslr version..the other option is fisheye like samyang..however imho the uwa is versatile compared to fisheye.. Agreed, the Panasonic 7-14mm is really good lens, and the pricing reflects that. Too rich for my blood! I don't use UWA so often. We need some competition from Sigma and Tamron to drive the price down. |
|
|
Feb 8 2013, 07:54 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,862 posts Joined: Mar 2011 |
QUOTE(Jason @ Feb 8 2013, 03:52 PM) Agreed, the Panasonic 7-14mm is really good lens, and the pricing reflects that. Too rich for my blood! I don't use UWA so often. We need some competition from Sigma and Tamron to drive the price down. tamron are known for making sharp lens for a low price..and sigma better build + coating. I would not hesitate pairing sigma 1020 on m43 for long exposure shot. wish the auto adaptor from kipon available now. |
|
|
Feb 10 2013, 12:23 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,862 posts Joined: Mar 2011 |
Weekend spam..cannot afford uwa, alternatively 4 photo stitch to make a panorama.
![]() Sungai Sarawak by m.s.@.n., on Flickr |
|
|
Feb 12 2013, 07:42 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,862 posts Joined: Mar 2011 |
I'm impress what 14mm can do. The wide & short focus characteristic do handy. Just photo of cat at home.
![]() Little kitty..meoooww by m.s.@.n., on Flickr ![]() Little kitty..again by m.s.@.n., on Flickr |
|
|
Feb 12 2013, 12:25 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
161 posts Joined: Jun 2007 |
Planning to jump ship.. From Nikon dslr to mirrorless camera as now I don't have time to make money using my dslr.. Can't found thread for other brand Nikon/canon mirrorless coz I saw Nikon j1/v1 quite cheap..
|
|
|
Feb 12 2013, 04:57 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,354 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(pakutekan @ Feb 12 2013, 12:25 PM) Planning to jump ship.. From Nikon dslr to mirrorless camera as now I don't have time to make money using my dslr.. Can't found thread for other brand Nikon/canon mirrorless coz I saw Nikon j1/v1 quite cheap.. you in wrong thread boss. this is for micro 43rds. recommend you look at the Olympus OMD EM5 as a DSLR replacement. Lens lineup more mature for m43rd. If you got the money, go get Fuji system and their delicious lens. |
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 12 2013, 06:06 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
161 posts Joined: Jun 2007 |
Still comparing between Olympus pen.. Panasonic gf..Sony nex.. But not the high end model la. just for fun.. Shoot family event.. Vacation.. Etc..
|
|
|
Feb 14 2013, 04:21 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
97 posts Joined: Jan 2009 |
can somebody advise me on where to get m.zuiko second hand lens?
|
|
|
Feb 14 2013, 11:20 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
40 posts Joined: Feb 2013 |
![]() ![]() my amateur attempt at Macro photography ... comments & critics are welcome taken with E-PL3 using Olympus 12-50mm f/3.5-6.3 EZ M.Zuiko Digital ED This post has been edited by bengkai: Feb 14 2013, 11:26 PM |
|
|
Feb 18 2013, 03:53 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,354 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Feb 19 2013, 04:00 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
161 posts Joined: Jun 2007 |
now considering to get used pen E-pl1 with 14-42mm lens + underwater casing (i want to used for scuba) for rm1800.. is it ok?
|
|
|
Feb 19 2013, 07:58 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,862 posts Joined: Mar 2011 |
QUOTE(pakutekan @ Feb 19 2013, 04:00 AM) now considering to get used pen E-pl1 with 14-42mm lens + underwater casing (i want to used for scuba) for rm1800.. is it ok? why dont consider pns like sony rx100. some quote better DR. anyway are you looking forward to expand your lens and maybe add light for your underwater setup. I guess that what are the things to consider. Is 1442 meet your criteria. Check on flickr if any underwater photo that you like taken with oly +1442. If yes go for it, everything else more or less about skills + composition. |
|
|
Feb 19 2013, 09:22 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
97 posts Joined: Jan 2009 |
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0247sec
0.73
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 12th December 2025 - 06:54 PM |