Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Micro Four Thirds (m43) User Thread V5, Panasonic & Olympus Mirrorless System!

views
     
bengkai
post Feb 14 2013, 11:20 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
40 posts

Joined: Feb 2013


user posted image


user posted image



my amateur attempt at Macro photography ... comments & critics are welcome

taken with E-PL3 using Olympus 12-50mm f/3.5-6.3 EZ M.Zuiko Digital ED

This post has been edited by bengkai: Feb 14 2013, 11:26 PM
bengkai
post Feb 25 2013, 08:15 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
40 posts

Joined: Feb 2013


QUOTE(NISMOgan @ Feb 20 2013, 09:23 PM)
i`m not an expert at all but I feel your flash are too much?
arent the samyang 8mm for m43? why you wanna get an adapter? or you are planning to get a non m43?
*
yeah bro NISMOgan you are right. I intend to get the Macro Arm Light later. Now no more budget.
bengkai
post Feb 25 2013, 08:17 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
40 posts

Joined: Feb 2013


QUOTE(tcm7782 @ Feb 24 2013, 01:27 AM)
no flash use
user posted image
P1130174 by tcm7782, on Flickr

user posted image
P1130175 by tcm7782, on Flickr

user posted image
P1130177 by tcm7782, on Flickr

user posted image
P1130189 by tcm7782, on Flickr

user posted image
P1130194 by tcm7782, on Flickr

user posted image
P1130195 by tcm7782, on Flickr
*
Bro tcm ... are you using a macro lens? Mind telling me what equipment u use.
bengkai
post Feb 26 2013, 07:02 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
40 posts

Joined: Feb 2013


QUOTE(tcm7782 @ Feb 26 2013, 09:52 AM)
GX-1 + 45mm F2.8 macro
user posted image
P1130209 by tcm7782, on Flickr

user posted image
P1130212 by tcm7782, on Flickr
*
WOW ... impressive macro photos, I wish I could afford the lens.
bengkai
post Feb 27 2013, 05:59 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
40 posts

Joined: Feb 2013


QUOTE(kenary820 @ Feb 27 2013, 03:12 PM)
you can buy raynox attach on you kitlens or old manual macro lens at lesser cost to enjoy macro photography..so far I haven't come across ET for m43.
*
Kenary - sorry newbie here, what is ET?
bengkai
post Feb 28 2013, 08:40 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
40 posts

Joined: Feb 2013


QUOTE(kenary820 @ Feb 27 2013, 03:12 PM)
you can buy raynox attach on you kitlens or old manual macro lens at lesser cost to enjoy macro photography..so far I haven't come across ET for m43.
*
Kenary - i was considering the raynox but in the opted to buy the Olympus 12-50mm lens as it has a macro capability though not on 1:1. Will the raynox give a better macro shot?
bengkai
post Mar 2 2013, 12:09 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
40 posts

Joined: Feb 2013


QUOTE(reno7 @ Feb 28 2013, 11:05 AM)
What lens do u have now? For me raynox+40-150mm give better magnification over the 12-50mm macro mode. I have both lens...
*
oh really. i have the 40-150mm lens too as its part of the twin kit lens package with e-pl3. darn then i have wasted money on buying the 12-50mm. okie my question is if i use the 40-150mm + raynox 250, do i need to do manual focus?

appreciate your input.
bengkai
post Mar 2 2013, 12:13 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
40 posts

Joined: Feb 2013


QUOTE(kenary820 @ Feb 28 2013, 12:44 PM)
depend on what you plan too shoot and where you plan to bring your foot. for butterfly thats more thn enough. for smaller subject such as spider you might consider longer lens. I have raynox 250 which need very close distance, i think less than obe feet. if you thinking buying 40-150mm I might suggest getting raynox 150. All I can say 40-150 + raynox250  you can get more magnification than using macro lens like 100mm on crop sensor. My advice buy the raynox 150 or 250, learn how to use then decide later if you need longer lens. I think you can ge 40-150 used around rm350-500. The next thing you need to consider is your lighting..but dat something to discuss later till you get your raynox and share your test shot hehe..Goodluck.
*
i have the 40-150mm lens too. i thought the 12-50mm will give me a better macro picture than 40-150mm + raynox 250. what type of lighting should i get?

thanks for your feedback.
bengkai
post Mar 2 2013, 12:22 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
40 posts

Joined: Feb 2013


i just shot this just now with the 12-50mm. crop with Viewer 2.

user posted image
bengkai
post Mar 3 2013, 09:48 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
40 posts

Joined: Feb 2013


QUOTE(reno7 @ Mar 2 2013, 11:08 PM)
user posted image
Cricket by RenoVal, on Flickr

I took this macro shot using the 12-50mm @43mm macro and with +8 step up filter.
*
reno - thanks for your feedback. your shot look great. is +8 step up filter same as close up filter +8? which brand shall i go for or you can recommend a place for me to get it. also if i used the 12-50mm lens with +8 filter can i still use AF?

this shot look great.

This post has been edited by bengkai: Mar 3 2013, 10:05 AM
bengkai
post Mar 3 2013, 09:50 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
40 posts

Joined: Feb 2013


QUOTE(kenary820 @ Mar 2 2013, 11:58 PM)
[/spoiler]

Bro this look soft, not sure if its focus point or magnification, but its look like more on the focusing issue. I wondering why choose the ant as subject? too small lah..I suggest bigger subject, bigger than a peanut smile.gif

bigger subject..PPed to my taste smile.gif

user posted image
*
kenary - haha i wanna test how good is the macro capability of the 12-50mm. well i guess i still have a lot to learn for photography.
bengkai
post Mar 3 2013, 11:56 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
40 posts

Joined: Feb 2013


QUOTE(reno7 @ Mar 3 2013, 10:24 AM)
Tks.. Yup its the same.. Just get any brand will do... Im just using cheap brand china made Greene L rm30 only hehehe... I bought online at mudah.. U can also find at any camera shop.. AF is not a problem at all.. But must use flash to get sharp and crisp picture.. Kit flash is enough.. smile.gif
*
thanks again.

also sometime i think my macro shot is not as vibrant as you guys, its due to camera type. I am having E-PL3.
bengkai
post Mar 3 2013, 06:34 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
40 posts

Joined: Feb 2013


QUOTE(tcm7782 @ Mar 3 2013, 01:08 PM)
same same here nod.gif
*
thanks guys. i shoot in JPEG + RAW format. Somehow i am lousy in post processing, a lot to learn. Hopefully will improve as time goes by.
bengkai
post Mar 3 2013, 10:00 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
40 posts

Joined: Feb 2013


QUOTE(kenary820 @ Mar 3 2013, 08:13 PM)
One reason to shoot in raw is its uncompress file. In jpeg each time you pp or transfer the file somehow you quality will degrade. One disadvantage of raw is the size. It eat up the storage, of course another reason to use raw is white balance. Nevertheless recently I read jpeg nowaday are very good should be forgotten at all. I believe no matter how good your sooc photo..pp still required at least level curve adjustment..its just personal opinion..peace!  notworthy.gif  notworthy.gif
*
level curve adjustment??? sound like rocket scientist haha
bengkai
post Mar 10 2013, 10:09 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
40 posts

Joined: Feb 2013


QUOTE(kenary820 @ Mar 10 2013, 09:31 PM)
weekend spam..

user posted image
I am a bee by m.s.@.n., on Flickr

user posted image
I am a bee by m.s.@.n., on Flickr

user posted image
Wasp by m.s.@.n., on Flickr

user posted image
Wasp by m.s.@.n., on Flickr

user posted image
Da B.O.S.S. by m.s.@.n., on Flickr

user posted image
Da B.O.S.S (Look into the eye) by m.s.@.n., on Flickr
*
nice ...

Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0258sec    0.39    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 10th December 2025 - 07:28 PM