QUOTE(carloz28 @ Apr 8 2012, 11:40 PM)
If you are amazed at this amount of fans, I'll bet you'll get a cardiac arrest by the number of anti KK fans in every worldwide LFC forums.
There is not a single LFC forum I do not know is not calling for KK's head at the moment.
I never said there was no other fans calling for his head but the scousers certainly know how to look at the bigger picture. There's always going to be a group that thinks he isn't the right man but some people are just not giving him enough credit.There is not a single LFC forum I do not know is not calling for KK's head at the moment.
QUOTE(carloz28 @ Apr 8 2012, 11:40 PM)
Did enough? What is "enough" really? Just because we have 24 shots and 5 on target means we deserved to win? As long as the opponent did a "little weeny beeny" more than us, then you lose. Don't use attempts on goal as a yardstick to measure our "deservability" to win a game. If our offense does not work, surely their defence is working better than our unit. You can shoot 24 times towards the goalmouth and get a single goal while the opponent can shoot 5 times and yet score a single goal.
This is called conversion rate mate. Villa's conversion rate is better than Liverpool yesterday, and it is all it takes for them to nick a point. You can lead QPR 2-0 until the third quarter but conceded 3 goals at the end because QPR did "more" than Liverpool in the fourth quarter. And you think we deserve to win in every game we lost??? Dun be silly, "Deserve to win" is only a statement used by managers in post match conference to mask their ineptitude.
Enough for me is we created enough chances to score more goals than opposition. Aston Villa had a good first half, no doubt but other than defending really well and scoring from their only effort on target, there was nothing else.This is called conversion rate mate. Villa's conversion rate is better than Liverpool yesterday, and it is all it takes for them to nick a point. You can lead QPR 2-0 until the third quarter but conceded 3 goals at the end because QPR did "more" than Liverpool in the fourth quarter. And you think we deserve to win in every game we lost??? Dun be silly, "Deserve to win" is only a statement used by managers in post match conference to mask their ineptitude.
That's because we are too wasteful with the ball and opponents are more clinical. I don't know if it's down to luck or what but we hit the woodwork four times yesterday - Kuyt's shot after Given saved it, Suarez's header, Bellamy's volley and Agger's header but Luis scored from the rebound. Kuyt missed a sitter as well.
I know whether a team deserves it or not is irrelevant in football but don't you think it is a little bit retarded that we continue to miss chances after chances, game after game, but oppositions score from their only attack? And then you get Man United who gets a penalty week in, week out. Something is wrong.
Now, tell me, is that Kenny's fault? (Defensively maybe but the attack would and should have softened the blow of conceding).
Yeah, we have the lowest conversion rate in the Premier League and I'm pretty sure we are dead last. I remember Suarez had like 10 shots himself on goal against Norwich but he failed to score and we drew the game. Kenny's fault for buying a player who doesn't take his chances in that game?
Yes, we led 2-0 with like 13 minutes left and the team just switched off which IMO, was very unlike Liverpool. God knows what happened but I don't think Kenny told the players to chill out. So based on your statement ... AC Milan didn't deserve to win the Champions League in 2005 because we had one hell of a 6 minutes of match time?
You're right that the phrase 'Deserved to win' is used to mask a manager's ineptitude but it performances of that particular game gives a good enough impression of something positive to take into the next game. Would you have prefered it if we just lost 3-0? Since 3-2 and a 3-0 defeat is a defeat.
QUOTE(carloz28 @ Apr 8 2012, 11:40 PM)
Well, you are right to some degree. Kenny doesn't control a player's brain or actions and neither can KK do stuff like mind control, voodoo etc...so i guess you are right in that sense It's beyond KK's control if a player misses a penalty or get sent off for doing stupid things on the pitch . A manager is NOT directly responsible for a player's action on the pitch but UNFORTUNATELY he is directly responsible for his team and the outcome/results of the a match. You can blame a striker for missing a penalty but you can't blame the striker for losing the match.
Again, you are assessing things from an individual aspect but not as team. If all the fans have the same logic as you, then the footballing world will not have so many sacked managers. We wont have this thing call the sack race for managers. All a club needs to do is change the players to turn their luck around and the manager gets to keep his job.. But then again, why most clubs sack and change the manager whenevere they are facing a slump I wonder???
For the second paragraph, it isn't the same because Kenny Dalglish has shown what he is capable of with his managerial honours with Liverpool pre-Premier League and with Blackburn in the Premier League. IMO, that is enough to give him at least one more season and also especially since after what he has contributed to the club as a person as well.
The likes of Andres Villas-Boas, Claudio Ranieri, Carlo Ancelotti at Chelsea or Mark Hughes and Sven Erikson at City were sacked because they failed to deliver what the owner wanted. That may also be the case for Kenny but the difference is, they do not have a history that warrants them another chance. While Ancelotti did win Champions League trophies, it was always said that Abrahimovic were stupid to sack him especially since he won the double in the first season.
But for example, Roy Hodgson, while I was willing to give him chances, he made us play some of the most painful football in terms of performances. He continued to say the wrong things over and over again in interviews and even insulted the fans. Kenny and Rafa knew what to fight for and gave us some good football. That is why, IMO, they are/were both wanted by the majority but there's definitely a group who do/did not want them.
QUOTE(carloz28 @ Apr 8 2012, 11:40 PM)
And this problem alone is the reason behind the crisis we are facing now. There you go, you just answered the question you asked all anti KK fans. What's the point of playing well in the first half of league and performing disastrously in the second half? You will still end up in mid table. Just like all man u fans like to taunt us, whats the point of doing a double over your bitter rivals but lost the title to them eventually?
QUOTE(carloz28 @ Apr 8 2012, 11:40 PM)
Again, a manager can pick the perfect tactic but still lose a game because he puts the wrong player in the position. It seems that from your argument, you are also pointing the loss of key players as the cause of weak tactical selection? So are you blaming injuries and suspensions now? Which manager does not have to cope with injuries of their key players?
Ok i give you the benefit of the doubt. Maybe you are insinuating that the players selected to fill the gap of these players are incapable of executing the tactics selected by the manager. What do you mean "nothing much he can do"? He's damn well responsible for making these substitute players play to his expectations..Depth of squad my fren, and last time i checked it's the manager's duty to make sure he has enough depth in his squad.
Maybe one don't have to change the players. Just need to change one guy.
Depth of squad issues won't be solved in one season, my friend unless he's going to spend another 50-100 million in last summer's window but you don't exactly want to bring in 10 players into your squad at one go. He had to get rid of the deadwoods last season and probably has to do the same this season. Right now, if he sells the 'crap' players most refer to - Carroll, Henderson, Downing and Adam, he just has to buy another four and our strength in depth won't improve. That's replacing, not exactly improving. Improving is we maybe keep Carroll, Downing, Henderson and Adam as squad players and buy quality in the summer. It took Wenger and Ferguson to have these adequate players at their disposal because I think it's unlikely they were selling every season (except the crap players of course). Mancini arrive at the club with previous managers already buying the "squad players" for him.
QUOTE(carloz28 @ Apr 8 2012, 11:40 PM)
Enough la, I think your constant defence of King Kenny has reached a level that your counter argument no longer starts to make sense to me.
Wished I had seen this before so I didn't have to spend my time replying above.QUOTE(ALeUNe @ Apr 9 2012, 12:27 AM)
Added on April 9, 2012, 12:35 am
You are wrong.
If it is Roy Hodgson in the same position, he would have sacked many months ago.
Likerwise, Rafa Benitez (under the previous club owner).
Why criticism? Poor results. Poor signings. Poor job.
No one made him a scapegoat.
inance/news/newsid=1661038.html]http://www.uefa.com/uefa/management/financ...id=1661038.html[/url]
Made us play some of the shittiest football I've ever seen Liverpool play.
He insulted the fans who protested against the owners and that man's 'famous European away' win is against Trabzonspor rather than 'Barcelona at Nou Camp' under Rafa.
He publicly criticised Glen Johnson. Told Pepe Reina to stop distrubing the ball but kick it long and be more English.
He frozed out Daniel Agger and all his pre- and post- match interviews were disgraceful as hell. Said "I won't say Fernando Torres won't leave" when there were rumours of him going to United but Rafa and Kenny would say 'No, he is not for sale'.
Woy Hodgson continued to ass-kissed Ferguson and was always happy with a point even at home and said we played our best of the season when the Bitters beat us 2-0 at Goodison Park where we were utterly dreadful.
Apr 9 2012, 09:21 AM

Quote
0.0644sec
0.39
7 queries
GZIP Disabled