Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
125 Pages « < 45 46 47 48 49 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography The Official Nikon Discussion Thread Ver.14, Nikon D4 $6000 only

views
     
Klesk
post Feb 13 2012, 05:16 PM

...
*******
Senior Member
3,469 posts

Joined: Jan 2003



QUOTE(celciuz @ Feb 13 2012, 08:59 AM)
Yeap! Its the WaterWorld Live Show at USS. Awesome biggrin.gif... Love the effects. Lucky was sitting at the splash free zone -.- else sure kena spray like siao in the beginning LOL.
*
hey CY i see lately you took landscape pictars with polarizers. which one do you use?
hidden830726
post Feb 13 2012, 05:20 PM

Moko the Linaslayer
*******
Senior Member
2,847 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
Quick Q,

I need a new bag, prefer backpack, not really sure what to get so thought to get some advice here. Recommend me backpack that can fit the following and potential additional gears.

1) D5100 with batt grip with 17-55 2.8 attached.
2) 105mm 2.8 Vr
3) SB700 x 2
4) Some filters and cleaning kit.

Thanks.
celciuz
post Feb 13 2012, 05:20 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(Klesk @ Feb 13 2012, 05:16 PM)
hey CY i see lately you took landscape pictars with polarizers. which one do you use?
*
Did not use CPL for my recent landscape shots. Some are real blue sky, some went through PP to recover the blue sky out of the white sky laugh.gif
hidden830726
post Feb 13 2012, 05:22 PM

Moko the Linaslayer
*******
Senior Member
2,847 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
QUOTE(vearn27 @ Feb 13 2012, 02:22 PM)
Not reconsider, get Nikon's Speedlight or save up until you could afford one than settling with 3rd party unit.
*
Agree with this, save more for Nikon.
vearn27
post Feb 13 2012, 05:22 PM

Doink! Doink! Doink!
*******
Senior Member
7,284 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Hong Kong / Malaysia




QUOTE(Klesk @ Feb 13 2012, 05:16 PM)
hey CY i see lately you took landscape pictars with polarizers. which one do you use?
*
PS.

PS stands for Photoshop.

laugh.gif
celciuz
post Feb 13 2012, 05:25 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(vearn27 @ Feb 13 2012, 05:22 PM)
PS.

PS stands for Photoshop.

laugh.gif
*
The sky was there, but some shots is limited by the dynamic range of the sensor. So I had to recover it and the mask it smile.gif

One of the example... the original shot sky was pure white as I need to expose the pool nicely... but when recover I am able to get the details back.
user posted image
WaterWorld Live Show, The Lost World by CY Pixels, on Flickr
goldfries
post Feb 13 2012, 05:28 PM

40K Club
Group Icon
Forum Admin
44,415 posts

Joined: Jan 2003




if hobbyists, I'd say go Yong Nuo / Nissin. smile.gif Unless you have deep pockets, sure go the SB700 / 900. in fact SB700 also very good already, or find used SB600.
Andy214
post Feb 13 2012, 05:29 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,308 posts

Joined: Nov 2004


QUOTE(menmissed @ Feb 13 2012, 05:07 PM)
Im using d5100. Actually my target is sb-600/700. 900 is too far from my range and i don think my d5100 need that kind of top class flashgun, so i just try to look for 3rd party.
Can sb600 satisfy a normal user (friends n family, portraits, vacation)?
Besides, i still need to get a DX portraits lens (35mm).

canon is really good for calculator.
*
For normal use, SB600/700 is good enough. If can, try to go for SB700.

As with others, I would strongly suggest to go for Nikon Speedlight. Don't skim on the money, you'll be using it for very long time anytime, think long term. It's not something that got short lifespan, and it's a quality product. Although many people may think Flash is very expensive, but actually Flash is a very powerful tool and if you read on what it can do and so on, it's NOT just a flash light.... It's so much more; when you get it, read through the manual and see what it do and what's it's capable of doing. I know people who willing to pay thousands for a branded bag and have no complain, but complain a speedlight is expensive and question the value of it. Amazing.
Tony Stark
post Feb 13 2012, 05:37 PM

Jarvis where are you?
******
Senior Member
1,883 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
is it really worth it to go for the 14-24? or shud i just settle down with the 16-35?

haiz..everyday got problem to think sweat.gif
ComradeZ
post Feb 13 2012, 05:56 PM

Feelwayoveryourhead
******
Senior Member
1,460 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Shah Alam


QUOTE(celciuz @ Feb 13 2012, 05:25 PM)
The sky was there, but some shots is limited by the dynamic range of the sensor. So I had to recover it and the mask it smile.gif

One of the example... the original shot sky was pure white as I need to expose the pool nicely... but when recover I am able to get the details back.
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

*
Really really nice landscape of the place. I went there actually late last year and I got to say. The place and the scenery are magical thumbup.gif

I really like the part where the plane just broke into the set laugh.gif

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

celciuz
post Feb 13 2012, 06:00 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(Tony Stark @ Feb 13 2012, 05:37 PM)
is it really worth it to go for the 14-24? or shud i just settle down with the 16-35?

haiz..everyday got problem to think sweat.gif
*
Just grab the 14-24! There's nothing else to upgrade for UWA =P Unlike the 16-35 you might itch to upgrade to the 14-24 in future, like me >_<

QUOTE(ComradeZ @ Feb 13 2012, 05:56 PM)
Really really nice landscape of the place. I went there actually late last year and I got to say. The place and the scenery are magical  thumbup.gif

I really like the part where the plane just broke into the set  laugh.gif

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

*
Hehe, I guess only people who has been there will know what I mention tongue.gif
Tony Stark
post Feb 13 2012, 06:03 PM

Jarvis where are you?
******
Senior Member
1,883 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
QUOTE(celciuz @ Feb 13 2012, 06:00 PM)
Just grab the 14-24! There's nothing else to upgrade for UWA =P Unlike the 16-35 you might itch to upgrade to the 14-24 in future, like me >_<
*
will it be alot of difference? i know in price there is tongue.gif

saw some reviews and yes the 14-24 is better (barrel distortion, light falloff, bla bla)..but is it worth it? really considering it now icon_question.gif
Isepunye
post Feb 13 2012, 06:07 PM

world famous isepunye
*******
Senior Member
2,537 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
From: Bangi


QUOTE(menmissed @ Feb 13 2012, 05:07 PM)
Im using d5100. Actually my target is sb-600/700. 900 is too far from my range and i don think my d5100 need that kind of top class flashgun, so i just try to look for 3rd party.
Can sb600 satisfy a normal user (friends n family, portraits, vacation)?
Besides, i still need to get a DX portraits lens (35mm).

canon is really good for calculator.
*
even di622 can give satisfaction. or even SB910 also can give satisfaction.

u dont think ur D5100 need top gun flashgun? well its depends on the user. for me, only SB700 and SB900 can satisfy me at the moment. else, err nope. own SB600 but not reli like the tilt. dats all
ComradeZ
post Feb 13 2012, 06:08 PM

Feelwayoveryourhead
******
Senior Member
1,460 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Shah Alam


QUOTE(Tony Stark @ Feb 13 2012, 06:03 PM)
will it be alot of difference? i know in price there is tongue.gif

saw some reviews and yes the 14-24 is better (barrel distortion, light falloff, bla bla)..but is it worth it? really considering it now  icon_question.gif
*
like a wise man said to me once. "The more expensive the item, the more better it is" brows.gif if you got the dough then why the wait. All I can sum up if I had the money to upgrade is this smiley sweat.gif whistling.gif thumbup.gif
Isepunye
post Feb 13 2012, 06:11 PM

world famous isepunye
*******
Senior Member
2,537 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
From: Bangi


QUOTE(Tony Stark @ Feb 13 2012, 06:03 PM)
will it be alot of difference? i know in price there is tongue.gif

saw some reviews and yes the 14-24 is better (barrel distortion, light falloff, bla bla)..but is it worth it? really considering it now  icon_question.gif
*
hand on try la than u be amazed by the lens!
celciuz
post Feb 13 2012, 06:26 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(Tony Stark @ Feb 13 2012, 06:03 PM)
will it be alot of difference? i know in price there is tongue.gif

saw some reviews and yes the 14-24 is better (barrel distortion, light falloff, bla bla)..but is it worth it? really considering it now  icon_question.gif
*
14-24 at f/2.8 seems sharper than my 16-35 at f/4! That shows how much sharper that lens is... and distortion control is superb as well.
Tony Stark
post Feb 13 2012, 06:44 PM

Jarvis where are you?
******
Senior Member
1,883 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
QUOTE(Isepunye @ Feb 13 2012, 06:11 PM)
hand on try la than u be amazed by the lens!
*
bro jgn lupa our date! tongue.gif

QUOTE(celciuz @ Feb 13 2012, 06:26 PM)
14-24 at f/2.8 seems sharper than my 16-35 at f/4! That shows how much sharper that lens is... and distortion control is superb as well.
*
sounds convincing enough. thanks sifu notworthy.gif
dvlzplayground
post Feb 13 2012, 08:01 PM

Web developer Nadzim.com
*******
Senior Member
7,916 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: Kuala Lumpur


user posted image

using my gf's D60 with kit lens only ;P

anyway, who's in miri here? got nikon club event at grand old lady. anyone joining?
menmissed
post Feb 13 2012, 09:06 PM

-- ® --
******
Senior Member
1,340 posts

Joined: Dec 2005
From: here


QUOTE(Andy214 @ Feb 13 2012, 05:29 PM)
For normal use, SB600/700 is good enough. If can, try to go for SB700.

As with others,  I would strongly suggest to go for Nikon Speedlight. Don't skim on the money, you'll be using it for very long time anytime, think long term. It's not something that got short lifespan, and it's a quality product. Although many people may think Flash is very expensive, but actually Flash is a very powerful tool and if you read on what it can do and so on, it's NOT just a flash light.... It's so much more; when you get it, read through the manual and see what it do and what's it's capable of doing. I know people who willing to pay thousands for a branded bag and have no complain, but complain a speedlight is expensive and question the value of it. Amazing.
*
Thats what my gal always tell me. omg..

QUOTE(Isepunye @ Feb 13 2012, 06:07 PM)
even di622 can give satisfaction. or even SB910 also can give satisfaction.

u dont think ur D5100 need top gun flashgun? well its depends on the user. for me, only SB700 and SB900 can satisfy me at the moment. else, err nope. own SB600 but not reli like the tilt. dats all
*
ok. let me just make up my mind on sb700 + a portraits 35mm.

omg.. $$ sweat.gif
Str33tBoY
post Feb 13 2012, 09:13 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,874 posts

Joined: Dec 2005
From: Malacca



if 16-35 can go F2.8 like canon...
it will be a perfect wide lens...

125 Pages « < 45 46 47 48 49 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0161sec    0.62    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 15th December 2025 - 04:29 AM