Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

34 Pages « < 14 15 16 17 18 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 2 GB the way of the future?

views
     
jarofclay
post Jan 9 2006, 08:02 AM

Klipsch Addict
Group Icon
VIP
2,068 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Ipoh / Penang / PJ


Just a little feedback.

My 2 x 1GB Mushkin UCCC chip only runs stably on my system with 2T command rate; no matter what the CAS, TRAS etc settings that I've tried. Whenever set to 1T, it cannot take me over 255MHz and will auto restart if I set the VDIMM to anything higher than 2.6V.

Sometimes, it's not a hard rule that if you run 2 pcs or less RAM, your system would be able to address the RAM at 1T. It depends also on your mobo and the Memory Controller on your CPU. It seems that my Winchester might not be up to par.... unless someone else has tried the same memory modules I have on their Winchesters.... I will only then attribute this issue to this Abit mobo.

The hard fast rule is: The larger the memory modules, the harder your system has to run to keep it at the same timing as smaller modules.
jarofclay
post Jan 9 2006, 08:03 AM

Klipsch Addict
Group Icon
VIP
2,068 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Ipoh / Penang / PJ


Thanks for the correction... smile.gif

QUOTE(ikanayam @ Jan 8 2006, 09:56 PM)
It's not buffer memory. It's virtual memory addresses. I don't think the memory is actually used.
*
ShinAsuka
post Jan 9 2006, 08:05 AM

I ♥ Sanae
*******
Senior Member
3,274 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: Melacca ~NendoSlave~
QUOTE(jarofclay @ Jan 9 2006, 08:02 AM)
Just a little feedback.

My 2 x 1GB Mushkin UCCC chip only runs stably on my system with 2T command rate; no matter what the CAS, TRAS etc settings that I've tried. Whenever set to 1T, it cannot take me over 255MHz and will auto restart if I set the VDIMM to anything higher than 2.6V.

Sometimes, it's not a hard rule that if you run 2 pcs or less RAM, your system would be able to address the RAM at 1T. It depends also on your mobo and the Memory Controller on your CPU. It seems that my Winchester might not be up to par.... unless someone else has tried the same memory modules I have on their Winchesters.... I will only then attribute this issue to this Abit mobo.

The hard fast rule is: The larger the memory modules, the harder your system has to run to keep it at the same timing as smaller modules.
*
izzit?
den i will try mine on 2T
cos mine cannot go over 250mhz
sidewinderz
post Jan 9 2006, 08:23 AM

Long Live UV!!!
*******
Senior Member
3,966 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur



QUOTE(ShinAsuka @ Jan 9 2006, 08:05 AM)
izzit?
den i will try mine on 2T
cos mine cannot go over 250mhz
*
but in terms of performance wise, 255mhz on 1T is much better than 270mhz on 2T...
Survivor
post Jan 9 2006, 08:32 AM

I will survive...
*****
Senior Member
795 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


hmm...just made my transition from 512MB Kingston HyperX to 2G Kingston Value...though RAM quality has downgraded, but the RAM quantity has upgraded...and i am pretty satisfied with the end result...really appreciate the smoothness! smile.gif
jarofclay
post Jan 9 2006, 08:51 AM

Klipsch Addict
Group Icon
VIP
2,068 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Ipoh / Penang / PJ


But it gives me more satisfaction coz it shows that the RAM is good for 270. I've not tried higher but it seems to hang occasionally at 280, so I guess I still have headroom to 275. tongue.gif

Actually, the part I dun like is that @ 1T, it is not stable coz the VDIMM is stuck at 2.6V. Don't ask me why this happened; it just did.

QUOTE(sidewinderz @ Jan 9 2006, 08:23 AM)
but in terms of performance wise, 255mhz on 1T is much better than 270mhz on 2T...
*
adri4n
post Jan 9 2006, 03:19 PM

Running in Circles... Going No Where
******
Senior Member
1,850 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


what to do what to do .. i used memtest to test my ram .. then i found out error after the scanning...any remedies ?

jarofclay
post Jan 9 2006, 03:35 PM

Klipsch Addict
Group Icon
VIP
2,068 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Ipoh / Penang / PJ


Lower the FSB/HTT or use more relaxing timings.

QUOTE(adri4n @ Jan 9 2006, 03:19 PM)
what to do what to do .. i used memtest to test my ram .. then i found out error after the scanning...any remedies ?
*
goldfries
post Jan 9 2006, 03:38 PM

40K Club
Group Icon
Forum Admin
44,415 posts

Joined: Jan 2003




MORE RAM is always the way of the future.

i remember those days when i play with 640k memory on config sys just to get a game running and with like 7 different configs for various purpose.
jinaun
post Jan 9 2006, 03:42 PM

where are my stars???
Group Icon
Elite
6,139 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(goldfries @ Jan 9 2006, 03:38 PM)
MORE RAM is always the way of the future.

i remember those days when i play with 640k memory on config sys just to get a game running and with like 7 different configs for various purpose.
*
hhaa... u used quarterdeck memory menager thing or dos's memmaker?

or manually hand edit config.sys and autoexec.bat?
Eoma
post Jan 9 2006, 06:58 PM

- ,. -
Group Icon
Elite
4,603 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ


QUOTE(jinaun @ Jan 9 2006, 03:42 PM)
hhaa... u used quarterdeck memory menager thing or dos's memmaker?

or manually hand edit config.sys and autoexec.bat?
*
memmaker 6. I had to free up 630k just for Falcon 3.0.
goldfries
post Jan 12 2006, 11:37 PM

40K Club
Group Icon
Forum Admin
44,415 posts

Joined: Jan 2003




QUOTE(jinaun @ Jan 9 2006, 03:42 PM)
hhaa... u used quarterdeck memory menager thing or dos's memmaker?

or manually hand edit config.sys and autoexec.bat?
*
manually hand edit config.sys and autoexec.bat

you know la, those C:\> copy con config.sys then when type finish press F6 and enter blabalblabla.
ShinAsuka
post Jan 13 2006, 02:46 AM

I ♥ Sanae
*******
Senior Member
3,274 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: Melacca ~NendoSlave~
huhuhu just now tried resize an image to 3metres X 1metre with 300res
the photoshop ate 1gb ram tongue.gif
songhan89
post Jan 13 2006, 12:45 PM

-Hankerchizf-
******
Senior Member
1,104 posts

Joined: Sep 2004
From: NUS,Singapore



QUOTE(ShinAsuka @ Jan 13 2006, 02:46 AM)
huhuhu just now tried resize an image to 3metres X 1metre with 300res
the photoshop ate 1gb ram tongue.gif
*
my maximum was 900mb physical usage, 1GB pagefile tongue.gif
ShinAsuka
post Jan 13 2006, 01:03 PM

I ♥ Sanae
*******
Senior Member
3,274 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: Melacca ~NendoSlave~
QUOTE(songhan89 @ Jan 13 2006, 12:45 PM)
my maximum was 900mb physical usage, 1GB pagefile  tongue.gif
*
since closed the virtual mem edy of cos all use the physical ram lo tongue.gif
MacDaNife
post Jan 13 2006, 08:13 PM

Adrenalina Italiana
******
Senior Member
1,737 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
I'm using a pair of these and they work very well at 1T. FEAR now does not lag even during the crowded fire fights. Am replaying the game as a result of this upgrade!

user posted image
jarofclay
post Jan 14 2006, 03:05 PM

Klipsch Addict
Group Icon
VIP
2,068 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Ipoh / Penang / PJ


Yeah, those RAMs were tested and developed for DFI boards, lucky you. I am not having too much luck with my Mushkin UCCC. I've just changed from a Winchester 3500+ to a Venice 3000+ but still have to run at 2T.
e-jump
post Jan 14 2006, 04:13 PM

┐( ¯3¯)┌
*******
Senior Member
4,784 posts

Joined: Sep 2004
From: MY



any ballistix 2gb user here?
well, just checking...
i will soon gonna go for 2Gb.. but still yet to decide to go for uccc or be-5
i know -5B D owns all, but the price tag sweat.gif

since be-5 n uccc works well at 2.7~2.8v, which can go higher at loose timing? [thru my googling, i only manage to see be-5 doing 3-3-3-x, thus ending slower than uccc]

p/s: im looking for something that can do 275++ with the budget of rm900 sweat.gif

This post has been edited by e-jump: Jan 14 2006, 05:03 PM
ShinAsuka
post Jan 14 2006, 04:18 PM

I ♥ Sanae
*******
Senior Member
3,274 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: Melacca ~NendoSlave~
my ram normally uses 2.8V
which is the max i can set with my current mobo
lets say if i change my mobo and can increase until 3.0V or something
will it allow my to OC more? tongue.gif
irenic
post Jan 14 2006, 07:14 PM

extr3me n3wbie
*******
Senior Member
7,338 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Cybercity of Cyberjaya


QUOTE(e-jump @ Jan 14 2006, 04:13 PM)
any ballistix 2gb user here?
well, just checking...
i will soon gonna go for 2Gb.. but still yet to decide to go for uccc or be-5
i know -5B D owns all, but the price tag sweat.gif

since be-5 n uccc works well at 2.7~2.8v, which can go higher at loose timing? [thru my googling, i only manage to see be-5 doing  3-3-3-x, thus ending slower than uccc]

p/s: im looking for something that can do 275++ with the budget of rm900 sweat.gif
*
i'm using ballistix pc4000 2gb kit..

currently my friend is rendering his final year project using maya at my pc. it eats 1915mb.. only 85mb free ram left yawn.gif

34 Pages « < 14 15 16 17 18 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0222sec    1.32    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 22nd December 2025 - 02:20 PM