Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

34 Pages « < 12 13 14 15 16 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 2 GB the way of the future?

views
     
jarofclay
post Dec 10 2005, 06:31 AM

Klipsch Addict
Group Icon
VIP
2,068 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Ipoh / Penang / PJ


I had the same problems like you even though I am on SLI. Therefore, I just upgraded from 1GB to 2GB RAM and now, all those annoying pauses are away.

The best though, is to run 2 sticks of 1GB so that your A64's (I presume it's AMD) memory controller would attain 1T and better stability. I tried to run 4 sticks (1gb x 2 and 512mb x2) and it would hang from time to time.

QUOTE(yyteik @ Dec 9 2005, 02:26 PM)
hang 0.5sec then cont play.....

so if like dat... it's better for just 2 hyper-x or put in 4 of the rams together??
*
yyteik
post Dec 10 2005, 05:54 PM

..::Upgraded::..
******
Senior Member
1,172 posts

Joined: Oct 2004
From: 7th Heaven
wow.. on sli but still hang like mine...
the more the merrier u saying izzit>???

i don have 2 stick of 1b..

i only have 2 stick of hyper-x and 2 stick of KVR..
ShinAsuka
post Dec 10 2005, 10:21 PM

I ♥ Sanae
*******
Senior Member
3,274 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: Melacca ~NendoSlave~
hohoho just got my OCZ ram
2GB thumbup.gif
nas
post Dec 11 2005, 01:11 PM

Apple Convert
******
Senior Member
1,663 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


Hi, which ram is better for the 2gb kit? BE-5 or UCCC? Or more specifically:

1. 2gb kit at 2-3-2-5 BE-5 and
2. 2gb kit at 2.5-4-4-8 UCCC

Both are rated at PC3200 DDR400. I'm looking at max overclock it can achieve at 3-4-4-8. The first has tighter timings but don't know if it would run out of steam at lower speeds whereas the second starts of with modest timings but end up at??

Any feedback is much appreciated smile.gif

This post has been edited by nas: Dec 11 2005, 01:11 PM
ShinAsuka
post Dec 11 2005, 10:33 PM

I ♥ Sanae
*******
Senior Member
3,274 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: Melacca ~NendoSlave~
i was wondering
i set my pagefile to 0mb liao
den y still got page file usage? blink.gif

This post has been edited by ShinAsuka: Dec 12 2005, 06:05 AM
jsnkok
post Dec 13 2005, 09:30 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
345 posts

Joined: Apr 2005
From: Kajang
QUOTE(nas @ Dec 11 2005, 01:11 PM)
Hi, which ram is better for the 2gb kit? BE-5 or UCCC? Or more specifically:

1. 2gb kit at 2-3-2-5 BE-5 and
2. 2gb kit at 2.5-4-4-8 UCCC

Both are rated at PC3200 DDR400. I'm looking at max overclock it can achieve at 3-4-4-8. The first has tighter timings but don't know if it would run out of steam at lower speeds whereas the second starts of with modest timings but end up at??

Any feedback is much appreciated  smile.gif
*
BE-5 can do 2-3-2-5 up til abt 210-ish.. then u hav to use 2.5-3-2-5... usually for 250++ u need 3-3-2-5 or looser....

for UCCC it maxes abt 260++ at 3-x-x-x.. not really sure abt the timings.. and also need some luck for good sticks haha biggrin.gif
jinaun
post Dec 13 2005, 11:39 AM

where are my stars???
Group Icon
Elite
6,139 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
all talks abt going to 2GB... i guess in 2006+ all will be talking on going to 4GB using FB-DIMM...

cheers.. by 2010... 8GB standard?

crazy... but.. why not.. more is better.. rite?
n305er
post Dec 13 2005, 04:22 PM

Please Save the trees!
*******
Senior Member
4,427 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: - PENANG -



QUOTE(jinaun @ Dec 13 2005, 11:39 AM)
all talks abt going to 2GB... i guess in 2006+ all will be talking on going to 4GB using FB-DIMM...

cheers.. by 2010... 8GB standard?

crazy... but.. why not.. more is better.. rite?
*
And I thought just a few years ago, 8MB EDO SIMM Ram Modules were overkill. By 2010, it should be about 32GB or 64GB...


ShinAsuka
post Dec 13 2005, 10:59 PM

I ♥ Sanae
*******
Senior Member
3,274 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: Melacca ~NendoSlave~
QUOTE(jsnkok @ Dec 13 2005, 09:30 AM)
BE-5 can do 2-3-2-5 up til abt 210-ish.. then u hav to use 2.5-3-2-5... usually for 250++ u need 3-3-2-5 or looser....

for UCCC it maxes abt 260++ at 3-x-x-x.. not really sure abt the timings.. and also need some luck for good sticks haha biggrin.gif
*
BE-5 here
250 @ 2.5-3-2-5
TSbossnass15
post Dec 14 2005, 12:23 AM

Veni, Vidi, Vici
******
Senior Member
1,188 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


240 @ 3-4-410 here yawn.gif
mystvearn
post Dec 14 2005, 12:57 AM

...
*******
Senior Member
6,639 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: "New Castle"



512 MB

There are a few situations where having just 512 MB system memory in your computer can be enough.

* If you run your games at low quality settings (small texture size) because you have an outdated CPU and graphics card, or because you prefer FPS over visual quality.
* If you only use one application at a time.
* If it is your grandmother's computer.

If you are buying a new computer, even if it's a laptop, opt for more than 512 MB - you will never regret it.
1 GB

Indeed, 1 GB of system memory will most likely be enough for the average user and for people.

* It will allow you to play new games at their highest quality settings, given that you have an adequate processor and a powerful graphics solution.
* You won't have to shut down non-critical applications when you want to play a game.
* You can (accidentally) press the Windows button while in a game without dying from a stroke during the seconds it takes to read Windows back into system memory from the swap file.
* If you go from 512 MB to 1 GB, you will notice the difference all the time. Starting up Photoshop while working with Word, an Internet browser, e-mail client and Acrobat Reader will go so much faster, and switching between the applications is a breeze.

2 GB

Still there are situations where more than 1 GB is what you want.

* If you are a professional user, you might need more than 1 GB for really heavy applications.
* If you intend to do heavy multitasking, especially if you have more than one CPU or CPU core. Running RAM intensive games such as World of Warcraft, downloading files via high speed FTP or encrypted protocols, Bittorrent or any P2P program; decompressing large archives and playing large size video files in a window or on second monitor all at the same time can max out your system memory pretty fast - if your CPU can handle it.

http://www.tomshardware.com/2005/12/13/how...eed/page12.html
TSbossnass15
post Dec 14 2005, 10:34 PM

Veni, Vidi, Vici
******
Senior Member
1,188 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


actually i'm not really impressed when i upgraded to 2 gig the way i was when i went from 512 to a gig. yawn.gif
dreamkiller
post Dec 15 2005, 05:17 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
283 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(ShinAsuka @ Dec 11 2005, 10:33 PM)
i was wondering
i set my pagefile to 0mb liao
den y still got page file usage? blink.gif
*
heh, one to answer ma! blink.gif i'm having the same problem too


ShinAsuka
post Dec 15 2005, 05:20 PM

I ♥ Sanae
*******
Senior Member
3,274 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: Melacca ~NendoSlave~
yalo no solution yet
stupiak windows tongue.gif
MacDaNife
post Dec 15 2005, 05:38 PM

Adrenalina Italiana
******
Senior Member
1,737 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(bossnass15 @ Dec 14 2005, 10:34 PM)
actually i'm not really impressed when i upgraded to 2 gig the way i was when i went from 512 to a gig.  yawn.gif
*
Wanna trade with me then? 2 gigs sounds pretty sweet to me.... notworthy.gif
jsnkok
post Dec 15 2005, 09:00 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
345 posts

Joined: Apr 2005
From: Kajang
QUOTE(dreamkiller @ Dec 15 2005, 05:17 PM)
heh, one to answer ma! blink.gif  i'm having the same problem too
*
Attached Image

u mean the PF thing shown in the Task Manager? thats the total ram being used as pagefile since u have already disable the harddisk for paging... the comp need somewhere to store temporary data.. rite?
^aMnESiA^
post Dec 26 2005, 03:13 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
218 posts

Joined: Dec 2005
From: Scheol



but afterall dude , still worth to invest into 2GB of high performance ram
seriously worth it ..no more lagging ^^
jsnkok
post Dec 26 2005, 05:37 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
345 posts

Joined: Apr 2005
From: Kajang
haha good to you then... noticing some improvements from 2GB......
simon82
post Dec 27 2005, 12:24 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
567 posts

Joined: Nov 2004

Just upgraded from 512MB to 1GB...yesterday...
From what I'd experience (for one day), I really can notice the differences... It's much more smoother now... smile.gif



simon82
post Dec 27 2005, 12:27 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
567 posts

Joined: Nov 2004

Now, I might even consider 2GB... smile.gif

34 Pages « < 12 13 14 15 16 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0191sec    0.40    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 22nd December 2025 - 08:52 AM