like urs before? u cursed him?

Tested 70-200 VRII on D7000 yesterday. It definitely a lovely lens but kinda too tele on APS-C. Will be much exciting on FX for sure

Wide open? Awesome bokeh 

Btw, which is the best 50mm 1.4? Nikkor or Sigma? 80-200 is just too heavy for me right now. Moving all the time

bokeh is quite nice, somehow most of the slr lenses has LoCA when comes to big wide open.

its fake and could damage the camera. how to spot?
check the warranty card. he claim that this item direct import from china,
so he might conned -,-

Thinking of:

16-85 or 17-55 second hand

anyone know what is the minimum length of the original nikon tripod. This one is give this year during mid valley nikon fair.

any other tripod is smaller size compact that can be use for travel?
Pls gv some recommendation.

Thanks

I see, looks like it's gonna be the 85 f/1.4G then. It's RM4650 here in Kota Bharu

oh i tot he using D700 pulak

why lah jump to same grade

i feel "the same" grade as its lie on the category
because both of them can produce nice photo.

mean while 60D has vary angle lcd , very handy 

Anyone here own nikon F2.8 70-200 vrII... how is the quality?? i am considering...

On the 2nd pic, at a glance I thought she has a long arm pit hair...

Second girl looks fantastic..

The f/4 is about time.
I bought lenses that were already 10 years old. Now it's already close to 15 years old.
Nice.  Could not join some of my friends down in Malacca last weekend as I was in Singapore instead.
60D is 1.6x crop body.
You should just abandon the idea of getting an FX body and get whatever Nokia replaces the N8.
Not bad. Is this stitched? I miss HK.

Yeah actually just using it for protection, but don't want it to affect the picture quality
How much is Hoya HD 77mm btw?

p/s correction; It's actually Kenko MC 

wanna asking. why you prefer Zeiss?

It's the coating I'm after. If you learn up on the history books, it is Zeiss who invented and pioneered the multi-coating technology. It's comparable to Hoya HD and B+W, but some have said that the Zeiss T* coating is better than the Hoya HD by a tiny bit (I have no idea how they tested that), and it's smudge-resistant as well, making cleaning much easier.

i hate that review. its wrong in a way. the UV filter scoring should be taken off as today digital sensor has no affect from UV. when that taken off, its obviously the B+W light transmission will boost the point for B+W pawning hoya. not to mention B+W coating has way to reduce haze in the air where Hoya tak ada. and B+W is by a company that make glass as long as zeiss and leica.

i hate that review because many hoya fanboys uses it to boost their ego.

Yeah, I too have 77mm XS-Pro UV (non-Nano) and it is so difficult to clean

It's said that the Nano version will be easier to clean, it is?

The Nano-coat version come in latter version / batch replacing the previous one. When I bought my 77mm XS-Pro UV, M'sia still yet to has Nano-coat version stock. Anyway, from what I could sum up from their official website, it seems that the Nano-coat only helps in easier cleaning whilst the rest performance remained the same.

Seriously... you wash the filter with soap?

It could be possible because when scrubbing the filter, possibly there would be rough particle which may scratch it. That's why when using LENSPEN to clean the filter, 1st step is to use the brush to sweep away any particles on the filter before scrubbing it with the carbon tip. Same goes with car, we spray water from top down to wash away rough particles before starting to scrub with soap otherwise it may scratch the car.