Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

10 Pages « < 2 3 4 5 6 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 TEAM Xtreem BH-5

views
     
ah_khoo
post Dec 10 2005, 08:30 AM

- No Action Talk Only -
Group Icon
Elite
8,103 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Tanah Lot @ Dungun, Terengganu.


no pics but this is what i get, juz started to play w/ 'em yesterday... sweat.gif

2.6V > 200MHz

2.7V > 209Hz

2.8V > 217MHz

2.9V > 223MHz

still burnin... smile.gif

any tip guys? 223MHz w/ 2.9V is not so impressive... blush.gif

Below is my DRAM settings:

Dram Frequency Set (MHz) : 166
Command Per Clock (CPC) : Enabled
CAS Latency Control (Tcl) : 2.0
RAS# to CAS# Delay (Trcd) : 02
Min RAS# active time (Tras) : 05
Row Precharge Time (Trp) : 02
Row Cycle Time (Trc) : 08
Row Refresh cyc time (Trfc) : 17
Row to Row delay (Trrd) : 03
Write Recovery Time (Twr) : 02
Write to Read delay (twtr) : 02
Read to Write delay (Trwt) : 02
Refresh Period (Tref) : 166MHz 1.95us
Write CAS Latency (Twcl) : 01 Bus Clock
DRAM Bank Interleave : N/A

DQS Skew Control : Auto
DQS Skew Value : 0
DRAM Drive Strength : Normal
DRAM Data Strength : 50% reduction
Max Async Latency : 7.0 Nano Seconds
DRAM Response Time : N/A
Read Preamble Time : 5.0 Nano Seconds
IdleCycle Limit : 16 Cycles
Dynamic Counter : Disable
R/W Queue Bypass : 16x
Bypass Max : 07x
32 Byte Granularity : Disable


This post has been edited by ah_khoo: Dec 10 2005, 10:09 AM
tAmp0i
post Dec 10 2005, 10:44 AM

The name is Poi
*******
Senior Member
2,825 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Miri



Nice. Got them running at 2.9v 225MHz more or less, and 230MHz gave thousands of error.... Tested that one stick actually can't keep up with the other, resulting in 240MHz 3.1v MemTest free while the bad gave also thousands of error
ah_khoo
post Dec 10 2005, 10:59 AM

- No Action Talk Only -
Group Icon
Elite
8,103 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Tanah Lot @ Dungun, Terengganu.


QUOTE(tAmp0i @ Dec 10 2005, 10:44 AM)
Nice. Got them running at 2.9v 225MHz more or less, and 230MHz gave thousands of error.... Tested that one stick actually can't keep up with the other, resulting in 240MHz 3.1v MemTest free while the bad gave also thousands of error
*
225MHz gimme instant reboot, 223MHz ok for bout 20Mins of blend test in go sp2004, memtest of windows version gimme instant error, even @ 200MHz... doh.gif

will try again tonite. pls share d result guys... biggrin.gif
tAmp0i
post Dec 10 2005, 11:08 AM

The name is Poi
*******
Senior Member
2,825 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Miri



Khoo. Try this settings....

Dram Frequency Set (MHz) : 200MHz
Command Per Clock (CPC) : Enabled
CAS Latency Control (Tcl) : 2.0
RAS# to CAS# Delay (Trcd) : 02
Min RAS# active time (Tras) : 05
Row Precharge Time (Trp) : 02
Row Cycle Time (Trc) : 07
Row Refresh cyc time (Trfc) : 12
Row to Row delay (Trrd) : 02
Write Recovery Time (Twr) : 02
Write to Read delay (twtr) : 01
Read to Write delay (Trwt) : 01
Refresh Period (Tref) : Auto
Write CAS Latency (Twcl) : 01 Bus Clock
DRAM Bank Interleave : Enable

DQS Skew Control : Auto
DQS Skew Value : 0
DRAM Drive Strength : Normal4 (8) --> Normal3 (6)
DRAM Data Strength : Level3 --> Level2 --> Level1
Max Async Latency : 7.0 Nano Seconds
DRAM Response Time : Normal
Read Preamble Time : 5.0 Nano Seconds
IdleCycle Limit : 16 Cycles
Dynamic Counter : Enable
R/W Queue Bypass : 16x
Bypass Max : 07x
32 Byte Granularity : Disable

Might be different bios giving different results. I'm on 704-2BTA, yellow slots
ah_khoo
post Dec 10 2005, 11:22 AM

- No Action Talk Only -
Group Icon
Elite
8,103 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Tanah Lot @ Dungun, Terengganu.


QUOTE(tAmp0i @ Dec 10 2005, 11:08 AM)
Khoo. Try this settings....

Dram Frequency Set (MHz) : 200MHz
Command Per Clock (CPC) : Enabled
CAS Latency Control (Tcl) : 2.0
RAS# to CAS# Delay (Trcd) : 02
Min RAS# active time (Tras) : 05
Row Precharge Time (Trp) : 02
Row Cycle Time (Trc) : 07
Row Refresh cyc time (Trfc) : 12
Row to Row delay (Trrd) : 02
Write Recovery Time (Twr) : 02
Write to Read delay (twtr) : 01
Read to Write delay (Trwt) : 01
Refresh Period (Tref) : Auto
Write CAS Latency (Twcl) : 01 Bus Clock
DRAM Bank Interleave : Enable

DQS Skew Control : Auto
DQS Skew Value : 0
DRAM Drive Strength : Normal4 (8) --> Normal3 (6)
DRAM Data Strength : Level3 --> Level2 --> Level1
Max Async Latency : 7.0 Nano Seconds
DRAM Response Time : Normal
Read Preamble Time : 5.0 Nano Seconds
IdleCycle Limit : 16 Cycles
Dynamic Counter : Enable
R/W Queue Bypass : 16x
Bypass Max : 07x
32 Byte Granularity : Disable

Might be different bios giving different results. I'm on 704-2BTA, yellow slots
*
thanx bro, i'm on 166 divider coz i dun have a higher multi... sad.gif

Drive and data strength diff too in nf3u, dunno how to interprete 'em . doh.gif

will try it out & update u guys here. wink.gif
gengstapo
post Dec 10 2005, 11:24 PM

Retired enthusiast
********
All Stars
10,688 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
QUOTE(ah_khoo @ Dec 10 2005, 10:59 AM)
225MHz gimme instant reboot, 223MHz ok for bout 20Mins of blend test in go sp2004, memtest of windows version gimme instant error, even @ 200MHz...  doh.gif

will try again tonite. pls share d result guys...  biggrin.gif
*
me too but, manage to fiXX it tongue.gif
my BE-5 chipset can works wif AUTO(most value) setting. suddenly, i load default setting my BIOS, then this BE-5 working juz fine. currently burnin/ stress this 2gb kit at 220Mhz x11, 1:1, 2-3-3-5. runnin' dual channel, 1T, LDT=4x, vcore=1.4, vdimm=2.6 brows.gif

ps :
pass 32mb calc.
pass 3dmark05
pass pcmark05
will update screenie soon

thanks bro babyelf 4 such nice RAms thumbup.gif

This post has been edited by gengstapo: Dec 11 2005, 01:18 AM
ah_khoo
post Dec 11 2005, 10:29 AM

- No Action Talk Only -
Group Icon
Elite
8,103 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Tanah Lot @ Dungun, Terengganu.


This is wat i get, any higher gimme thousands of errors in memtest. Not usin booster thou, onboard vdimm limit to 3.0V (3.2V max in bios) since my +3.3V rail is really weak(3.13V). Hopefully things will get well after i put my booster on. sad.gif

user posted image

thanx gengstapo, I'll try out ya method too. wink.gif
gsan
post Dec 11 2005, 10:52 AM

Electrical RF Engineer
*******
Senior Member
2,471 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

ah_khoo,

too bad that your psu limited the onboard vdimm. still haven't get the booster? i tot you got it now.
gengstapo
post Dec 11 2005, 11:25 AM

Retired enthusiast
********
All Stars
10,688 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
hurmm.. i found tat my BE-5 can max stable at 1:1 wif 220HTT(2-3-3-5) doh.gif
towards this value will keep-on restarting/ BOOTing

at 5:6, highest can go currently at 260HTT(2-3-3-5)

still looking for best setting haihzz.. mebe took about this whole day to tweek sweat.gif

This post has been edited by gengstapo: Dec 11 2005, 11:26 AM
ah_khoo
post Dec 11 2005, 11:36 AM

- No Action Talk Only -
Group Icon
Elite
8,103 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Tanah Lot @ Dungun, Terengganu.


QUOTE(gsan @ Dec 11 2005, 10:52 AM)
ah_khoo,

too bad that your psu limited the onboard vdimm. still haven't get the booster? i tot you got it now.
*
I got it ledi, but left it in jb last few days, 4got to bring it here... doh.gif

QUOTE(gengstapo @ Dec 11 2005, 11:25 AM)
hurmm.. i found tat my BE-5 can max stable at 1:1 wif 220HTT(2-3-3-5) doh.gif
towards this value will keep-on restarting/ BOOTing

at 5:6, highest can go currently at 260HTT(2-3-3-5)

still looking for best setting haihzz.. mebe took about this whole day to tweek sweat.gif
*
it takes more than juz few days to get d best outa ram, mebe weeks for me... sweat.gif

This post has been edited by ah_khoo: Dec 11 2005, 11:39 AM
tAmp0i
post Dec 11 2005, 12:07 PM

The name is Poi
*******
Senior Member
2,825 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Miri



TEAM BH-5 owners. Anyone managed to get memtest free > 260MHz, Vdimm and what's your week i'll like to know.... smile.gif
nas
post Dec 11 2005, 12:48 PM

Apple Convert
******
Senior Member
1,662 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(gengstapo @ Dec 11 2005, 11:25 AM)
hurmm.. i found tat my BE-5 can max stable at 1:1 wif 220HTT(2-3-3-5)  :x
towards this value will keep-on restarting/ BOOTing

at 5:6, highest can go currently at 260HTT(2-3-3-5)

still looking for best setting haihzz.. mebe took about this whole day to tweek  :sweat:
*
hi, how high can your be-5 go with loose timings without the divider?
gengstapo
post Dec 11 2005, 03:33 PM

Retired enthusiast
********
All Stars
10,688 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
QUOTE(nas @ Dec 11 2005, 12:48 PM)
hi, how high can your be-5 go with loose timings without the divider?
*
havent tried wif loose timming(& i dont like it)
wif 2-3-3-5 highest can get 280HTT x 9multi. downclock to ddr333 brows.gif
vdimm at 2.6 while vcore at 1.6

i oso tried last nite wif 1:1 setting but timming loosen 3-4-4-10, can boot at 280HTT x 10multi.. but aint stable. mebe need to be tweek summore

wat u think??

This post has been edited by gengstapo: Dec 11 2005, 03:35 PM
e-jump
post Dec 11 2005, 03:41 PM

┐( ¯3¯)┌
*******
Senior Member
4,784 posts

Joined: Sep 2004
From: MY



so, the be-5 behavior is more like bh-5/6 or tccd/uccc ?
[voltage, timing...]
gengstapo
post Dec 11 2005, 03:49 PM

Retired enthusiast
********
All Stars
10,688 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
QUOTE(e-jump @ Dec 11 2005, 03:41 PM)
so, the be-5 behavior is more like bh-5/6 or tccd/uccc ?
[voltage, timing...]
*
for me its more alike to be TCCD/ TCC5 becoz higher HTT need loose timming but lower voltage tongue.gif
ah_khoo
post Dec 14 2005, 09:46 AM

- No Action Talk Only -
Group Icon
Elite
8,103 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Tanah Lot @ Dungun, Terengganu.


after addin some juice on 'em, mine give less errors in memtest. smile.gif

currently on 235MHz, 3.2V BIOS set... biggrin.gif

need some more tweakin i guess... wink.gif

how bout u guys? blink.gif
rlhc17
post Dec 14 2005, 02:02 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
835 posts

Joined: Sep 2004
From: LYP@Bintang Walk



QUOTE(tAmp0i @ Dec 11 2005, 12:07 PM)
TEAM BH-5 owners. Anyone managed to get memtest free > 260MHz, Vdimm and what's your week i'll like to know.... smile.gif
*
mine Team BH-5 highest memtest stable 258fsb 3.7V

soulfly
post Dec 14 2005, 02:20 PM

revving towards 10,000 rpm
Group Icon
VIP
15,903 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Miri



QUOTE(gengstapo @ Dec 11 2005, 03:49 PM)
for me its more alike to be TCCD/ TCC5 becoz higher HTT need loose timming but lower voltage  tongue.gif
*
I think it looks more like D5 instead of TCCD/TCC5
TSbabyelf
post Dec 14 2005, 07:42 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,372 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Sydney - Australia

for BH5 mosfet cooling (beside jp17 jumper) is very important on the DFI..

read to write will only work up to 250 or so at 1.. after that you will need 2..

i'll be bringing one rig back and will probably meet up with someone and try his pair and see how it goes..
gsan
post Dec 25 2005, 05:12 PM

Electrical RF Engineer
*******
Senior Member
2,471 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

for the DRAM Drive Strength & DRAM Data Strength,

which is tighter? 8/3 or 7/1... i mean higher value is tight or loose?

10 Pages « < 2 3 4 5 6 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0228sec    0.62    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 2nd December 2025 - 06:03 AM