errors i got before is gone now
not a bad burning in session for today
TEAM Xtreem BH-5
|
|
Oct 3 2005, 10:42 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,372 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Sydney - Australia |
3.3v 250Mhz...
errors i got before is gone now not a bad burning in session for today |
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 4 2005, 02:05 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
835 posts Joined: Sep 2004 From: LYP@Bintang Walk |
|
|
|
Oct 4 2005, 10:52 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,372 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Sydney - Australia |
it's on the first post
thing i changed is twtr is 2 instead of 1 now.. twtr of 1 topped out at about 242-245mhz.. had to loosen it to 2 to get higher |
|
|
Oct 4 2005, 01:09 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
320 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: The lower desert in the Great Southwest, USA |
Those are really nice babyelf. You probably have as much good ram as anyone. I hope those continue to improve and someone in US starts selling them!
|
|
|
Oct 4 2005, 02:29 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,372 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Sydney - Australia |
Thanks Coop..
yea hopefully.. they are famous in taiwan they just launched a new website as well www.teamgroup.com.tw |
|
|
Oct 4 2005, 11:18 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,372 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Sydney - Australia |
burned in the ram a bit today
256 gave me errors before.. 257 gave me more error but this is 256 now This post has been edited by babyelf: Oct 5 2005, 01:48 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 5 2005, 01:51 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,372 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Sydney - Australia |
w00t still a 4mhz increase per V now..
3.5V |
|
|
Oct 5 2005, 01:54 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,372 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Sydney - Australia |
w00t
3.6v |
|
|
Oct 5 2005, 03:21 PM
|
|
VIP
15,903 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Miri |
why not just let it burn at 3.5V?
|
|
|
Oct 5 2005, 03:27 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
195 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: KL |
nice nice nice........ !!!!
a better altenative to twinmos sp............ but hopefully cheaper than ocz goldVX. |
|
|
Oct 5 2005, 03:29 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
694 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Oct 5 2005, 03:38 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,372 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Sydney - Australia |
i usually let it run until the errors go away at a certain speed and voltage..
here is 3.7v.. it's still going this is about the price of Value VX.. Gold VX is much more expensive This post has been edited by babyelf: Oct 5 2005, 03:50 PM |
|
|
Oct 5 2005, 04:56 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,372 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Sydney - Australia |
10 minutes into test 8 now
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 5 2005, 06:40 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,372 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Sydney - Australia |
32M
|
|
|
Oct 5 2005, 09:26 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,311 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Puchong/Deep Beach |
nice one bro...my ocz vx value could never reach that speed with that setting...got 265@2225@3.6~3.7 but the setting not as tight as yours...i have to loosen up the setting a bit...this TEAM stuff seems to be a very good buy
any bulker??? This post has been edited by remysix: Oct 5 2005, 09:28 PM |
|
|
Oct 5 2005, 11:28 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,372 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Sydney - Australia |
lol yea.. added to my collection.. when i finish testing might take the UCCC out to play next
|
|
|
Oct 6 2005, 06:33 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,277 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: Penang |
looks like a sweet pair of rams
regards, aaron |
|
|
Oct 6 2005, 07:49 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,372 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Sydney - Australia |
really sweet
2.59v 200mhz 2-2-2-5 |
|
|
Oct 7 2005, 06:24 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,311 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Puchong/Deep Beach |
bro...just curious...can u get the same result wif diff proc...last time, using my 3200+ E3...i can hit 265@2225 memtest stable...but know when i used this 3000+ E6...only 260...not even 261 without getting errors in memtest...i think this is one of the cons of having mem controller build-in the proc...changing the proc might give u diff result...
This post has been edited by remysix: Oct 7 2005, 06:25 AM |
|
|
Oct 7 2005, 10:02 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,372 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Sydney - Australia |
QUOTE(remysix @ Oct 7 2005, 06:24 AM) bro...just curious...can u get the same result wif diff proc...last time, using my 3200+ E3...i can hit 265@2225 memtest stable...but know when i used this 3000+ E6...only 260...not even 261 without getting errors in memtest...i think this is one of the cons of having mem controller build-in the proc...changing the proc might give u diff result... yea.. memory controller plays a very big role on ram clocking..and another thing that will affect ram clocking is temps.. lower temps will clock ram higher.. cooler memory controller will go really high looking forward to my phase change unit soon.. should be sweet |
| Change to: | 0.0216sec
1.03
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 1st December 2025 - 04:55 AM |