why not just let it burn at 3.5V?
TEAM Xtreem BH-5
|
|
 Oct 5 2005, 03:21 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
VIP
15,903 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Miri   
|
|
Quote|
|
|
|
|
Oct 12 2005, 03:33 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
VIP
15,903 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Miri
|
I believe that is what he means
since he can do memtest stable, some tweaking to the memory timings will make things more stable. these extra memory timings are actually related to the memory controller, not just the memory module. |
|
|
Dec 14 2005, 02:20 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
VIP
15,903 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Miri
|
QUOTE(gengstapo @ Dec 11 2005, 03:49 PM) for me its more alike to be TCCD/ TCC5 becoz higher HTT need loose timming but lower voltage I think it looks more like D5 instead of TCCD/TCC5  |
|
|
Jan 2 2006, 12:50 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
VIP
15,903 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Miri
|
QUOTE(tAmp0i @ Dec 28 2005, 12:27 AM) From your screenie it shows that your rails are pretty high especially +12v. SmartGuardian showing 12.48 and i'm quite sure that it could be 12.7v / 12.8v. Should watch for that.... agreed.... higher doesn't always good. u might hurt other components that use +12v rail... creating unecessary heat etc. |
|
|
Jan 3 2006, 03:13 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
|
VIP
15,903 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Miri
|
QUOTE(babyelf @ Jan 3 2006, 01:27 PM) kbsao!! did DDR640 / 320Mhz with his pair of TEAM TCCD at 2.7v.. busy lately so he haevn't got the chance of trying it out higher.. I believe he not only had the best TCCD, but also awesome good memory controller i brought my 3000+ Venice with an awesome memory controller back.. will try one of the TEAM TCCD from the next batch..  |
|
|
Jan 3 2006, 04:53 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
|
VIP
15,903 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Miri
|
a 'not so good' memory controller is
- not very flexible with divider options - overclocking capability does not perform up to average like others |
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 5 2006, 04:06 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
|
VIP
15,903 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Miri
|
faulty = cannot run at all
cacat = cannot run at default speed/setting.... should request for RMA |
|
|
Apr 19 2006, 08:49 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
|
VIP
15,903 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Miri
|
QUOTE(Hungry_Wolf @ Mar 17 2006, 11:06 PM) i found out bh5 don like other divider except 1:1... *hint* advanced memory timings |
|
|
Oct 28 2006, 10:52 AM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
|
VIP
15,903 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Miri
|
try boot with one stick first. then go to bios... and change the CPC to disabled. shutdown, then add another stick... then boot.
|
|
|
Oct 28 2006, 11:12 AM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
|
VIP
15,903 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Miri
|
so i guess you already tried clearing the cmos as well?
|
|
|
Nov 1 2006, 06:00 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
|
VIP
15,903 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Miri
|
DoubleClick is also one of the distributor.
|
| Change to: |  0.0220sec
 0.39
 7 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 30th November 2025 - 03:13 AM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.