i already said is separate docs..which part is wrong..he said me talking nonsense..then i ask him to teach me..anything wrong?

lol... u sure you1 and 2 nearer to mrt station mou... considering those roads are not meant for human to walk on bro.... anything with direct linked trumps non direct link projects 10 times anytime....

The Difference between a Schedule and Annexure from a Technical Perspective
According to Black’s Law Dictionary:

an Appendix is “a supplementary document attached to the end of a writing.
an Annexure is “something that is attached, such as a document to a report”.
a Schedule is “a written list or inventory; esp., a statement that is attached to a document and that gives a detailed showing of the matters referred to in the document”.
From these defintions on a technical level:

a Schedule is not an integral part of the agreement as it “gives a detailed showing of the matters referred to in the document”.
an Appendix ‘supplements’ the agreement and is part of the agreement. It is an attachment that is invariably critical to the validity of the agreement.
an Annexure is a separate document from the agreement – a report.
On this understanding

if the attachment is critical to the validity of the agreement, the attachment should be referred to as an appendix.
if the attachment contains information that can be changed by a party to the agreement without effecting the validity of the agreement or without the need to vary an agreement, then the attachment should be referred to as an annexure.
The above explanation is on a technical level applied to the words used and their meanings.

From a Plain Language Perspective
However, for Andrew Weeks (one of our plain language gurus), one can (and should) look at this from a practical, plain language level. Common to an appendix, annexure or schedule is that they are all “attachments“. Therefore, you should refer to “Attachment 1” and not “Appendix 1” or “Annexure 1” and make it clear from the wording in the agreement whether they are intended to be an integral part of the agreement or not. One could also refer to a Schedule as a “list”.

The mere fact that an attachment was a self-standing document before the agreement was signed does not mean it necessarily always has that status in future, ie its legal significance can be ‘frozen’ at the moment the agreement is signed with it as an attachment (usually initialled). Changes to the original document (a copy of which was attached) then doesn’t usually change the agreement itself, unless this was clearly the intention.

Direct link... Private or common use.  Private only aster and parkland have.

there are such cases... no doubt... but as long as there is direct linked... its a plus point from investment point of view already... there are higher risks on similar cases on non direct linked projects too...

for a direct linked project... it can be good or bad... i prefer the good part as i think a good direct linked project can at least minimize accidents from cars or ongoing rush traffics....

Just for discussion sake, the Supreme Court has recognised that the law allows contracting out of the schedules in favour of purchasers, but not to their detriment.

see page 34 of attachment: "It would appear that only "contracting out" in favour of the weaker party — i.e. the purchaser — might be countenanced by the courts."

tats why i said add on schedule..to be exact annexure..

if the attachment contains information that can be changed by a party to the agreement without effecting the validity of the agreement or without the need to vary an agreement, then the attachment should be referred to as an annexure...

Yeah actually I noticed that now a lot new mid range developments all set their standard to 5 ft already. It’s really not a very wide corridor but what to expect for a 400-600k freehold property with direct linked bridge? Nothing comes perfect. If want high end finishing then can consider for Velocity or other much more expensive properties. Couldn’t complain much for the price compare to the others. Still think it’s consider reasonable. Not like we’re going to camping along the corridor 😂

Should have some loan rejected unit, cancel booking, developer reserve unit. Dun bliv on 100% sold in current market

U must at least have a car to stay in TG n must be able to tahan the high traffic flow, illegal parking right in front, behind, left n right of the condo. Btw is there any banks in TS right now? U can easily found few banks near to B11.

KFC is the main factor for you to buy a house? Then you have plenty of choices in your list! No doubt KFC is finger licking good 😂

So hard for you to justify your statement that B11 is ULU PLACE, when this area got aeon, banks, eateries, KK mart, fast foods, and almost everything, oh ya, n the recent trending milk tea shops near to C180. If u not familiar with this place, better dun comment much n make yourself embarrassed.

actually whats you guys definition of ulu? lol.... far from KLCC? or because the area is dead? if is the latter.... the C180 traders square are like 10 times more vibrant than most of old cheras KL townships.... if its about distance... then nothing to argue.... distance cant be change unless u build flyover direct highway to KLCC....

flat ka... some rumawip also 11ft bro...   

How high is E9? I went to U3 showroom. 9.5 ft may sounds low but actual feel is quite high & comfortable. Nothing comes perfect. If you really looking for high ceiling might as well just go for the Rumah WIP as you mentioned. But how about Rumah WIP's quality & facilities. Sure not everything can meet your requirements too right? Choices are yours. Since you're an agent sure got many lubang what... 

pls make urself clear before comment..9.5ft is clear ceiling height which mean the height u can measure after the unit completed..
i really speechless abt the way u comment..

5 feet corridor will pose as danger during fire evacuation, due to narrow corridor, evacuation time will slow down.

9.5 ft is floor slab to ceiling slab lah. What left 8.5 ft? 1 ft go where?

He meant 8.5 is after putting in tiles or laminate flooring isit... But for 1 ft?

9ft la...After tile... Where got so thick tiles.. 1-2cm only la