QUOTE(Kinitos @ Sep 23 2011, 10:52 PM)
Paid those professional fund manager so much fees, still losing ?
They're not selling to protect your capital bcos its your money not their money. Share value drop and still charging management fees doing nothing , keeping asking you're top up, average down so that there is more capital to charge 1.5%, sooner or later almost all your capital will be eaten by them
Kinitos - i think in the equity funds' prospectus, U'll notice that each fund has a minimum required holdings of equities, thus some funds & fund managers just cant "move" once the hit their minimum. Then again, i may be out of caffeine when i read them prospectus

Added on September 24, 2011, 7:17 amQUOTE(howszat @ Sep 24 2011, 01:05 AM)
Ahhh, now you are making sense...
The FM can analyze stocks for those who neither have the time or the knowledge. The FM can see and take advantage of opportunities that the average investor can never get a whiff of. The FM can also avoid stocks that seem attractive to the average investor but is actually quite risky. The FM can also achieve a level of diversification that the individual cannot achieve. The FM can also reach markets and sectors that the average investor doesn't know about. And the better liquidity.
In addition to Howzat's post above, personally i use mutual funds just because:
a. EPF allows me to take out $ that i cant touch or leverage on until i retire
b. Useful for shotgun approach to several countries' funds (ie. countries' equities which i'm unfamiliar with but want some exposure)
c. Long term effective cost of "trading" - ie. cost of (1 time 3% or 5.5% service charges) + SWITCHING between bond & equity funds in the long run (think EPF years K, like 10s & 20s)is much much lower than my stocks' in/out costs
d. Thus, to me it's like outsourcing the actual planting/sowing operations of a farm but personally reap and keep the produce by reviewing each of my transactions' net profit/loss at least monthly.
Those are the reasons why i'm paying PM the moolah of 3% or 5.5% + yearly mgt fees. Er.. i'm bluffing - i pay less coz either i nego with my old agent OR now i'm my best customer

BTW, those that buy, do DCA and go zzz for 20 years or so - look at the stats for PIX's 10years CAGR returns (bad & good ending dates lar) - generally hovering around 7%pa to 9%pa. Ok mar - much better than FD, as long as U go zzz and not sell/buy crazily. PIX = Index fund, well, PM's version lar coz it aint a TRUE BLUE index fund per se hehe.
Again, that's just one approach out of "millions" - your mileage (time, attention, level of expertise/experience) may vary
This post has been edited by wongmunkeong: Sep 24 2011, 07:19 AM