Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
4 Pages < 1 2 3 4 >Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography The Official Nikon Discussion thread V11, The Darth Vader troops !

views
     
hidden830726
post Sep 4 2011, 08:23 PM

Moko the Linaslayer
*******
Senior Member
2,847 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
QUOTE(piscesguy @ Sep 4 2011, 06:20 PM)
Just make sure u buy those lens come with Built-In motor.. smile.gif
*
AFS lens.
hidden830726
post Sep 4 2011, 08:49 PM

Moko the Linaslayer
*******
Senior Member
2,847 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
QUOTE(jianh @ Sep 4 2011, 08:36 PM)
Is there a way to differentiate this? With built-in motor and without built-in motor..
*
Nikon lens with motor, name always include "AFS"

hidden830726
post Sep 4 2011, 09:14 PM

Moko the Linaslayer
*******
Senior Member
2,847 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
Nikon sifu make FAQ la. easier for beginner.
hidden830726
post Sep 4 2011, 10:40 PM

Moko the Linaslayer
*******
Senior Member
2,847 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
QUOTE(vearn27 @ Sep 4 2011, 10:09 PM)
Well, get 24-70 altogether in your belt for your preparation to FX tongue.gif
*
24-70 good stuff.
hidden830726
post Sep 4 2011, 10:49 PM

Moko the Linaslayer
*******
Senior Member
2,847 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
QUOTE(vearn27 @ Sep 4 2011, 10:41 PM)
I bought the 17-55 instead of 24-70. 17-55 is much needed for me now because I'm still on DX laugh.gif
*
17-55 no VR, but still very very good lens

To cover 17-55 i rather use a 50mm prime and wide angle, 24-70 is good.


hidden830726
post Sep 4 2011, 11:06 PM

Moko the Linaslayer
*******
Senior Member
2,847 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
My point is, since a standard system will definitely include a wide angle lens, may as well, get 24-70 and 70-200 + prime, instead of getting 17-55. This apply to DX too.

17-55 is good, but for me, i rather spend that money for 24-70. But, if one have cash to burn, not a problem at all tho.

Since i no money to buy either, lets wait for 17-55, 24-70 VR, who knows they might release it soon.

This post has been edited by hidden830726: Sep 4 2011, 11:07 PM
hidden830726
post Sep 4 2011, 11:08 PM

Moko the Linaslayer
*******
Senior Member
2,847 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
QUOTE(sidewinderz @ Sep 4 2011, 11:07 PM)
forgot to mention the 24-120 F4 VR tongue.gif
*
This one seems good, F4 is sharp, not the girl F4 please.
hidden830726
post Sep 4 2011, 11:26 PM

Moko the Linaslayer
*******
Senior Member
2,847 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
well, to clarify, 17-55 is very good lens, i use it before. Like it

But if budget limited, i would rather spend on 24-70 and get wide angle to cover the wider length.

17-55 is not wide enough, especially on DX. One will still need at least 10-24. So instead of getting 10-24, 17-55, 70-200 which is overlapping and missing the length between 56-69mm, i would rather get 10-24, 24-70, 70-200.

Just my opinion. for lens planning.

This post has been edited by hidden830726: Sep 4 2011, 11:28 PM
hidden830726
post Sep 4 2011, 11:51 PM

Moko the Linaslayer
*******
Senior Member
2,847 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
On VR, VR is a plus for bth of the mentioned lens.

As for either 1755 or 2470 first, depends on needs I guess.
hidden830726
post Sep 4 2011, 11:56 PM

Moko the Linaslayer
*******
Senior Member
2,847 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
Hahaha I like the flash answer.

But if flash nt allow. Then VR will be handy.

There's a lot of if, better than none imo
hidden830726
post Sep 5 2011, 12:02 AM

Moko the Linaslayer
*******
Senior Member
2,847 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
D4 and no need to crazy pump iso.

D400 = My aim. BBB
hidden830726
post Sep 5 2011, 04:41 PM

Moko the Linaslayer
*******
Senior Member
2,847 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
QUOTE(gnome @ Sep 5 2011, 04:36 PM)
Dayummm why got alot of events in September one, nak antar lens to repair pon cannot since need to use it for the events laugh.gif
*
What event? Can share? Wanna join. Let's go

hidden830726
post Sep 5 2011, 07:47 PM

Moko the Linaslayer
*******
Senior Member
2,847 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
ok. he cool
hidden830726
post Sep 5 2011, 09:31 PM

Moko the Linaslayer
*******
Senior Member
2,847 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
QUOTE(zeero @ Sep 5 2011, 09:22 PM)
sifus... need some assistance. i'm gonna join the dslr bandwagon this week & have roughly made-up my mind & will be getting d5100.. made my decision due to the quality of the pics (more vivid compared to 550d). the only thing i am still not very clear now is the absence of the af motor for nikon body. what will i be missing? the standard kit provided (AF-S DX Nikkor 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR) has built-in autofocus motor, right? (silent wave motor). does this put this baby no  less better than 550d's autofocus system?  hmm.gif  hmm.gif
*
Well, i have been telling ppl this. One must choose between system first, either Nikon oR Canon or Sony, one cant just choose a camera system based on 2 camera spec. If 550d indeed better, does it make Canon better than Nikon in your context? Probably no.

It really depends to many factors, at least those simple factors, you got anyone, friends / relatives using DSLR, if yes, what system they using. You may want to use the same system so that u can 1) get their advice / teaching 2) share u lens 3) same wave length, 4) wont Argue about which system better (hahah) and some more technical stuff like lens availability, reputation etc. Canon vs Nikon comparison is all around the web.

IMO choose the system first then only pick the model.

No doubt if u pick Nikon, D5100 will be a good entry model. build in Motor, not the biggest concern, One get what u pay, D7000,which is the better camera and with build in motor also come with a more hefty price.

For starter, D5100 is good enough. Because at this time, one might not even sure if they really wanted DSLR, maybe M43/PNS suit u better. So no point making haste purchase for the best then sell your DSLR at garage section.

Just my 2 cents


Added on September 5, 2011, 9:32 pm
QUOTE(celciuz @ Sep 5 2011, 09:26 PM)
Nope, you don't loose anything with the kit lens 18-55. What you lose is D5100 is unable to auto focus with an old lens such as the 50mm f/1.8D (the nifty fifty). However, you can buy the newer 50mm which has SWM in it, D5100 no issue to auto focus with that lens.
*
Just to point out, although old lens usually cheaper, however most of the time, its quality is below the newer counterpart (although may not be significant)



This post has been edited by hidden830726: Sep 5 2011, 09:32 PM
hidden830726
post Sep 5 2011, 09:43 PM

Moko the Linaslayer
*******
Senior Member
2,847 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
If im new starter buying D5100, i rather buy body only and get 50mm1.8g (around RM650)

With 50mm 1.8g, its way sufficient to start.

Well, just my preference. Since i like streetphotography
hidden830726
post Sep 5 2011, 10:16 PM

Moko the Linaslayer
*******
Senior Member
2,847 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
QUOTE(zeero @ Sep 5 2011, 10:09 PM)
meaning, the kit lens provided IS ABLE to do autofocusing due to the built-in autofocus motor (similar to canon's system), right? i will only rugi cuz i won't be able to use older lens without built-in motor, right?
*
Ya

Its like this:

Motor (M), Body (B), Lens (L), Autofocus (A), Yes (Y) / No (N)

BMY + LMY = AY

BMN + LMY = AY

BMY + LMN = AY

BMN + LMN = AN

Lens with AFS infront = LMY

Old 50mm D = LMN
New 50mm g = LMY
AFS 18-55 Kit lens = LMY

So if D5100 = BMN
Because 18-55= LMY

BMN + LMY = AY


ok, i do this because im boring, tongue.gif

This post has been edited by hidden830726: Sep 5 2011, 10:17 PM
hidden830726
post Sep 6 2011, 08:25 AM

Moko the Linaslayer
*******
Senior Member
2,847 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
Well, why blur the important part which i want to see?

hahahahhaa
hidden830726
post Sep 6 2011, 07:24 PM

Moko the Linaslayer
*******
Senior Member
2,847 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
QUOTE(gnome @ Sep 6 2011, 07:02 PM)
How about wait for the 40mm macro from nikon? should be available very soon and should be less then 1k i think hmm.gif
*
40mm not good enough for real macro shot i believe, the new 40mm macro lens is suitable for maybe, food
hidden830726
post Sep 8 2011, 09:23 PM

Moko the Linaslayer
*******
Senior Member
2,847 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
I'm no sifu, but 18-200 seems suits u a lot.
hidden830726
post Sep 9 2011, 10:05 PM

Moko the Linaslayer
*******
Senior Member
2,847 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
QUOTE(iXora.ix @ Sep 9 2011, 09:54 PM)
there anyone going Toys Expo at Mid Vally tomorrow?
*kiddo
*
Got what to shoot? Showgirl?


Added on September 9, 2011, 10:07 pm
QUOTE(Agito666 @ Sep 9 2011, 08:53 PM)
some said filter is protect your lens some said this some said that...

1) someone said UV filter protect from sand too, depend on you haha...if you bring DSLR to beach, your lens sure got sand blow in one lor
2) some one said the lens got the UV coat, but once you use longer the coat will worn off, so better get a UV filter.
3) sometimes you not careful whack your lens with corner of table, the filter is the first one to crack/ block a bit.
4) some UV filter does affect image quality a lot
so depends on you. XD
*
I always scare that i will whack my lens, so im at least attached my lens with lens hood most of the time.

I dont have any UV / protective filter for my lens, which make me a bit worried too.

Should i?



This post has been edited by hidden830726: Sep 9 2011, 10:07 PM

4 Pages < 1 2 3 4 >Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0353sec    0.55    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 11th December 2025 - 05:53 PM