SV i7 still havnt arrive here most of the shops... ZZZZZ.. juz checked an hour ago....

Bro, where is the Acer road show? I saw the banner near Taman Selera Tanjung there. And until when? I feel like going.

A8 is powerful is it? I'm newbie to this AMD Llano stuffs, still cant really get used with all these codenames

any 12" model can i expect?

Parkson.. juz back from thr.. My eyes pain... Wash eyes... But the show girl thr.... Too bad... xD.... hahahahahahahaha... until when? not sure bro... i went thr one hour ago after MAc D... Oh well? A8? A8 Check this out..
A8 +
AMD Radeon HD 6620G 1GB DDR3
(400 Radeon Cores, 444MHz)

AMD Radeon HD 6630M 1GB DDR3
(480 Radeon Cores, 485MHz/1.6GHz Core/RAM clocks)

Dual Radeon HD 6690G2 (Asymmetrical CrossFire)

=D

---

Added on July 10, 2011, 4:56 pmnot sure, but 14" i think yes...

This post has been edited by simon3041: Jul 10 2011, 04:56 PM

Wah, what did I missed?

Any other llano-powered laptops now apart from the Asus A43Ta?

Details of asus K43TA similar to A43TA just the codename is different with AMD A6-3400M processor

Asus K43T

This post has been edited by ridzOe: Jul 10 2011, 06:46 PM

wah wah.... i inactive a while oli.. so much news!!!????

lolx...

A8....quad core... 1.8ghz turbo core to 2.6ghz....

if they enter a8 highest end into mahresia.!!!

Im still abit confused about Llano and SB now...
So meaning if want more work than entertainment = intel SB
want more gaming and entertainment such as graphic "intensive" app = Llano? The naming of the AMD chips are making me go @.@

You forget to add in the word "budget" haha
If one is not tight on budget, Intel's would still be better

Oh!!! Okok, thanks sifu T.J.!! Well, now i think im abit clearer though still not very familiar with AMD's new Llano

well...i show the Llano's pic here also..haha..the further news pls read on :
http://www.anandtech.com/show/4444/amd-lla...-apu-a8-3500m/2

---

Added on July 10, 2011, 10:49 pmwell..i'm actually waiting for super budget Llano dual core + no OS laptop build..then can save the extra $$ to throw in a SSD..kekekezz

i think with the SSD, it will gives more superior experience then a quad-core based laptop..

(p/s: i juz like most of the laptop users where 80% of the time, we utilize our laptop for web browsing,watch movie and office work )

This post has been edited by siaokialeong: Jul 10 2011, 10:49 PM

+1

WTH? the review mentioned they able to use the laptop for 6 hours with 6-cell batt, screen brightness 70%, power mode : balance, wifi-on & refresh website every 1 min..i reli doubt on this and at the same time hope that this is real @@

yup even anandtech also mentioned about the low power consumption of the oem laptop they reviewed.

how much will it cost? very tempting the specs.

i guess its RM1849... check from http://my.asus.com/Static_WebPage/Product_Guide/

lolx..i didn't hope it will be 6 hours, if for average use, the batt can last up to 4 hours, i'll be damn super happy + satisfy edi XDD

---

Added on July 10, 2011, 11:39 pmwait la...hehe..wait for the dual core + NO OS build..hehe..by then, i think we can have the laptop with SSD hardisk at around RM2k, THE REAL affordable & decent-performance laptop..woohoo XDD

This post has been edited by siaokialeong: Jul 10 2011, 11:41 PM

DV6Z are coming !!!
Must grab one.. How much do you guy expected ?
according to news its starting at $650= RM2K ?

LINK

This post has been edited by Effy92: Jul 11 2011, 09:29 AM

the underlying principle is the same, except that AMD took a real long time to implement it, while Intel took a little shortcut...

back when AMD acquired ATi in 2006, AMD already proposed Fusion to be the next big thing... but it was not easy merging a CPU with a GPU, particularly when GPU refreshes much quicker than CPU, so it takes time for the 2 departments to work with 1 another...

Intel has an easier time since they practically refreshes the graphic adapter together with the CPU... new CPU = new mobo chipset = new graphic adapter.... in Westmere (1st gen Core i) they merely put the CPU and GPU in the same die and connect each other with DMI, so technically the 2 are still separate from one another... it's only in Sandy Bridge that Intel merges the GPU into the CPU (the GPU can access the L3 cache of the CPU), so that's sth that is similar to AMD's APU...

so the main difference would be that the graphic on Fusion is base off the Radeon graphic that we re familiar with and thus programs and games will work as they should on other rigs with dedicated Radeon graphic as long as the driver is written correctly... as for Sandy Bridge, it does offer quite a lot of raw performance (as integrated graphic), but problem is that Intel is not too keen on updating the driver, thus not being able to perform at the max potential...

and most importantly, price...

oic , thanks for the explanation , understand more adi .