Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
125 Pages < 1 2 3 4 5 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 ACCA V7, Global Body for Professional Accountants

views
     
yunice5889
post Jun 29 2011, 12:34 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
9 posts

Joined: Jun 2011
hello,i need some help here...

I would like to know the teaching styles,attributes & weaknesses of all the lecturers stated below...i know all of them are good lecturers but i would like to know more detail abt their teaching styles so that i can know which lecturer teaching style is more suitable to myself as all of them have different teaching style...

F5 Ian Lim VS Andrew Pang

P3 Parmindar Vs Philip Woo



Kindly please give advise,will going to register soon since the new semester is going to commence.Thanks smile.gif
student2
post Jun 29 2011, 02:39 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
71 posts

Joined: Sep 2010
QUOTE(yunice5889 @ Jun 29 2011, 12:34 AM)
hello,i need some help here...

I would like to know the teaching styles,attributes & weaknesses of all the lecturers stated below...i know all of them are good lecturers but i would like to know more detail abt their teaching styles so that i can know which lecturer teaching style is more suitable to myself as all of them have different teaching style...

F5 Ian Lim VS Andrew Pang

P3 Parmindar Vs Philip Woo

Kindly please give advise,will going to register soon since the new semester is going to commence.Thanks smile.gif
*
I have never been to their classes but from what i gather from other posters and websites;

F5 Ian Lim Vs Andrew Pang

Both specializes and concentrate alot on calculation; less emphasis on theory. Theory part studied independently.

Both are more or less similar.

P3 Parminder vs Philip Woo

Apparently Parminder is somewhat of a deity for this subject. Posters commented that he has good IT knowledge and this paper has IT elements.

Philip Woo specializes more on P1. Alot of IRL examples due to his practical experience. Keeps class lively. But his notes are scrappy.

Another person who is always mentioned for P3 is Michael Mainwairing. It seems that he has a condensed 100 pages notes that can cover the entire syllabus. He teaches less nowadays and only for IRC classes if i'm not mistaken.

Hope this helps.

This post has been edited by student2: Jun 29 2011, 03:01 AM
Miss Lam
post Jun 29 2011, 08:50 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
3 posts

Joined: Jun 2007


Is the Business Research Module (BRM) compulsory?
Hello everyone -

Just a little update on a development on a college in the Klang Valley (let’s use the term SC to refer to it).

SC has made the BRM module COMPULSORY for its current batch of F7,8,9 student, at a price of RM1,200.

What does it mean to have the module COMPULSORY? Will students be BARRED from taking the ACCA exams if they do not take the module with SC?

Some of my findings:

1. It is the RIGHT of students to take their exams regardless of the demands of the tuition provider
2. The official ACCA website provides a list of the ACCA papers that can be taken for the exams: BRM is NOT ON THE LIST. It is an OPTIONAL service that a tuition provider can offer
3. If you need some more clarification, call ACCA Malaysia at 03-2713 5051. Ask them:
- Is the BRM COMPULSORY? Or JUST ENCOURAGED to develop ‘critical thinking skills’?
- What is the repercussion of not taking the module as far as your course completion is concerned? (NONE!)- Take down the name of the person and if they say that the BRM is compulsory, complain to ACCA UK: info@accaglobal.com

I think SC creating fear in students to JUST MAKE MONEY? mad.gif

It also bundled the OBU mentoring together with the BRM.

Personally I think it is their right to do business, but not in a way that cows students in submission with HALF TRUTHS...[cool.gif

OBU has stated that students HAVE A RIGHT TO BE MENTORED BY ANYONE OF THEIR CHOICE! [cool.gif

In light of these developments, critically think of what SC is saying to students! Your call!


nothingz
post Jun 29 2011, 09:11 AM

6 Stars General
*******
Senior Member
2,757 posts

Joined: Jan 2007


anyone has P6 MYS books ornotes for sale, please PM me
YH90
post Jun 29 2011, 10:34 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
606 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
QUOTE(Miss Lam @ Jun 29 2011, 08:50 AM)
Is the Business Research Module (BRM) compulsory?
Hello everyone  -

Just a little update on a development on a college in the Klang Valley (let’s use the term SC to refer to it).

SC has made the BRM module COMPULSORY for its current batch of F7,8,9 student, at a price of RM1,200.

What does it mean to have the module COMPULSORY? Will students be BARRED from taking the ACCA exams if they do not take the module with SC?

Some of my findings:

1. It is the RIGHT of students to take their exams regardless of the demands of the tuition provider
2. The official ACCA website provides a list of the ACCA papers that can be taken for the exams: BRM is NOT ON THE LIST. It is an OPTIONAL service that a tuition provider can offer
3. If you need some more clarification, call ACCA Malaysia at 03-2713 5051. Ask them:
- Is the BRM COMPULSORY? Or JUST ENCOURAGED to develop ‘critical thinking skills’?
- What is the repercussion of not taking the module as far as your course completion is concerned? (NONE!)- Take down the name of the person and if they say that the BRM is compulsory, complain to ACCA UK: info@accaglobal.com

I think  SC creating fear in students to JUST MAKE MONEY?   mad.gif

It also bundled the OBU mentoring together with the BRM.

Personally I think it is their right to do business, but not in a way that cows students in submission with HALF TRUTHS...[cool.gif

OBU has stated that students HAVE A RIGHT TO BE MENTORED BY ANYONE OF THEIR CHOICE! [cool.gif

In light of these developments, critically think of what SC is saying to students! Your call!
*
Its very obvious you are talking about Sunway. And I agree, they are brainwashing their students to make even more money. Previously they introduced some Business Communication Skills that isn't about communication, they thought elementary english in these classes. Luckily for me, it was free of charge but the students after that are required to pay for such courses.

The BRM if I'm not mistaken is to help students know more about researching, referencing, etc. for their OBU thesis. More money later on if they opt for their OBU.

Students just have to know what are their rights and not simply give in to the college's demands.
Xeniouz
post Jun 29 2011, 12:18 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
88 posts

Joined: May 2010
Anyone have info regarding P4 David Meow and P5 Chang Shew Leng?
muppet
post Jun 29 2011, 12:42 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
114 posts

Joined: Jun 2011
From: Selangor

david meow and chang shew leng both teach in kasturi.

david meow is a cfa lecturer. acca should be sap sap water for him. recommended.


Added on June 29, 2011, 1:25 pmthe main page list is not updated. my friend say andrew pang got lung problem. he rest for 1 year only start back. ian lim k or not?

This post has been edited by muppet: Jun 29 2011, 01:25 PM
TSnotmycupoftea
post Jun 29 2011, 02:00 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
444 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
From: Kuala Lumpur
QUOTE(muppet @ Jun 29 2011, 12:42 PM)
david meow and chang shew leng both teach in kasturi.

david meow is a cfa lecturer. acca should be sap sap water for him. recommended.


Added on June 29, 2011, 1:25 pmthe main page list is not updated. my friend say andrew pang got lung problem. he rest for 1 year only start back. ian lim k or not?
*
yes I know he has lung problem, but if u check the timetable of KSA KL and KSA PJ, he is still teaching. only teach less.

KSA PJ P1-P7

KSA KL F4-F9
blurramen
post Jun 29 2011, 02:00 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
30 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
Anyone has Mc Orange timetable n fee structure july 2011?
I was trying to assess this page
http://www.ebook-pdf.co.uk/pdf/mc-orange-m...-july-2011.html
but i guess our gov blocked us...no internet freedom.
muppet
post Jun 29 2011, 02:12 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
114 posts

Joined: Jun 2011
From: Selangor

QUOTE(notmycupoftea @ Jun 29 2011, 02:00 PM)
yes I know he has lung problem, but if u check the timetable of KSA KL and KSA PJ, he is still teaching. only teach less.

KSA PJ P1-P7

KSA KL F4-F9
*
i dunno. my friend say last time he also like that say he teach. then halfway change to ms. shew leng. say he lung problem.
AgoNi
post Jun 29 2011, 03:09 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
62 posts

Joined: Apr 2010


QUOTE(yunice5889 @ Jun 29 2011, 01:34 AM)
hello,i need some help here...

I would like to know the teaching styles,attributes & weaknesses of all the lecturers stated below...i know all of them are good lecturers but i would like to know more detail abt their teaching styles so that i can know which lecturer teaching style is more suitable to myself as all of them have different teaching style...

F5 Ian Lim VS Andrew Pang

P3 Parmindar Vs Philip Woo

Kindly please give advise,will going to register soon since the new semester is going to commence.Thanks smile.gif
*
i attend Ian lim and Andrew pang classes before...
if your basic is good enuf then u can go for Andrew pang because he teaching very fast one...quite alot of my fren also don't understand what he teaching...can't catch up..must study very very hard yourself lorh...i attend his class abt 3 months..after that move to Ian lim.Ian lim teaching style more systematic...not too fast or too slow.As my basic not very OK..after he thought me everything bcome OK if compare with Andrew pang. However,this depends on different ppl~


I know Philip Woo is the best lecturer in this paper...parmindar im not vy sure

hope this helps u
Xeniouz
post Jun 29 2011, 03:56 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
88 posts

Joined: May 2010
QUOTE(muppet @ Jun 29 2011, 12:42 PM)
david meow and chang shew leng both teach in kasturi.

david meow is a cfa lecturer. acca should be sap sap water for him. recommended.


Added on June 29, 2011, 1:25 pmthe main page list is not updated. my friend say andrew pang got lung problem. he rest for 1 year only start back. ian lim k or not?
*
Ian Lim is very strong in calculation area.. As for the theory part you will have to pick up on your own because he spends a lot of time on calculations.. Overall, he is a recommended lecturer..
muppet
post Jun 29 2011, 04:46 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
114 posts

Joined: Jun 2011
From: Selangor

QUOTE(Xeniouz @ Jun 29 2011, 03:56 PM)
Ian Lim is very strong in calculation area.. As for the theory part you will have to pick up on your own because he spends a lot of time on calculations.. Overall, he is a recommended lecturer..
*
thank you veri much! i will sign up ian lim class and let you all know good onot. thumbup.gif
student2
post Jun 29 2011, 07:15 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
71 posts

Joined: Sep 2010
QUOTE(Xeniouz @ Jun 29 2011, 12:18 PM)
Anyone have info regarding P4 David Meow and P5 Chang Shew Leng?
*
No disrespect but I won't recommend Chang Shew Leng.

She has a faux accent which irritates the hell out of you.

Practically reads off her own notes and no IRL examples.

Often cite examples relating to her family.

Thumbs down for me.
tzxsean
post Jun 29 2011, 07:41 PM

Lonely Driver
*******
Senior Member
5,608 posts

Joined: Jan 2010


QUOTE(student2 @ Jun 29 2011, 07:15 PM)
No disrespect but I won't recommend Chang Shew Leng.

She has a faux accent which irritates the hell out of you.

Practically reads off her own notes and no IRL examples.

Often cite examples relating to her family.

Thumbs down for me.
*
spencer oso use his daily life or family life
to give examples for the subjects

but i dun see anything wrong with tat
funny as hell even he doing tat
hurly
post Jun 29 2011, 08:01 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
169 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
QUOTE(student2 @ Jun 29 2011, 07:15 PM)
No disrespect but I won't recommend Chang Shew Leng.

She has a faux accent which irritates the hell out of you.

Practically reads off her own notes and no IRL examples.

Often cite examples relating to her family.

Thumbs down for me.
*
this is regarding another paper or inP5? because I was in her class in F1, she's like that but I thought as you go higher her style changes?
student2
post Jun 29 2011, 09:28 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
71 posts

Joined: Sep 2010
QUOTE(tzxsean @ Jun 29 2011, 07:41 PM)
spencer oso use his daily life or family life
to give examples for the subjects

but i dun see anything wrong with tat
funny as hell even he doing tat
*
I think if you use your daily life as examples its ok or even with family life.

But it should be relevant shouldn't it?

Ideally you would want a lecturer who can provide some practical examples for you to relate to the subject at hand and also to improve your commercial knowledge.

Ie. What does your mother in law's favourite food or husband's daily got to do with the subject at hand?

It's ok if you use it to crack a joke or two to light up the class but the thing is, it is not funny nor insightful.

I believe a certain unique character is required for humour. Some people is just not funny no matter how hard they try. Trust me on this.

Sorry for being harsh on her or anything; but this is just my personal and honest opinion. If you are fine with her then you could always thumbs up for her.

Cheers.


Added on June 29, 2011, 9:30 pm
QUOTE(hurly @ Jun 29 2011, 08:01 PM)
this is regarding another paper or inP5? because I was in her class in F1, she's like that but I thought as you go higher her style changes?
*
I'm sorry i was not refering to P5. I was just quoting the lecturer. If what you say is true; then she can have my benefit of doubt.

This post has been edited by student2: Jun 29 2011, 09:32 PM
yunice5889
post Jun 29 2011, 10:32 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
9 posts

Joined: Jun 2011
QUOTE(student2 @ Jun 29 2011, 02:39 AM)
I have never been to their classes but from what i gather from other posters and websites;

F5 Ian Lim Vs Andrew Pang

Both specializes and concentrate alot on calculation; less emphasis on theory. Theory part studied independently.

Both are more or less similar.

P3 Parminder vs Philip Woo

Apparently Parminder is somewhat of a deity for this subject. Posters commented that he has good IT knowledge and this paper has IT elements.

Philip Woo specializes more on P1. Alot of IRL examples due to his practical experience. Keeps class lively. But his notes are scrappy.

Another person who is always mentioned for P3 is Michael Mainwairing. It seems that he has a condensed 100 pages notes that can cover the entire syllabus. He teaches less nowadays and only for IRC classes if i'm not mistaken.

Hope this helps.
*
Thanks very much on the comment...it help rclxms.gif
Xeniouz
post Jun 29 2011, 11:08 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
88 posts

Joined: May 2010
QUOTE(student2 @ Jun 29 2011, 09:28 PM)
I think if you use your daily life as examples its ok or even with family life.

But it should be relevant shouldn't it?

Ideally you would want a lecturer who can provide some practical examples for you to relate to the subject at hand and also to improve your commercial knowledge.

Ie. What does your mother in law's favourite food or husband's daily got to do with the subject at hand?

It's ok if you use it to crack a joke or two to light up the class but the thing is, it is not funny nor insightful.

I believe a certain unique character is required for humour. Some people is just not funny no matter how hard they try. Trust me on this.

Sorry for being harsh on her or anything; but this is just my personal and honest opinion. If you are fine with her then you could always thumbs up for her.

Cheers.


Added on June 29, 2011, 9:30 pm

I'm sorry i was not refering to P5. I was just quoting the lecturer. If what you say is true; then she can have my benefit of doubt.
*
P5 involves some calculations. I don't think she would read off her own calculations. Personality problems does not really matter to me. I'm only concerned about whether she would cover the whole syllabus or not. At the end of the day students themselves have to work hard to achieve what they want.

This post has been edited by Xeniouz: Jun 29 2011, 11:44 PM
yunice5889
post Jun 29 2011, 11:19 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
9 posts

Joined: Jun 2011
QUOTE(AgoNi @ Jun 29 2011, 03:09 PM)
i attend Ian lim and Andrew pang classes before...
if your basic is good enuf then u can go for Andrew pang because he teaching very fast one...quite alot of my fren also don't understand what he teaching...can't catch up..must study very very hard yourself lorh...i attend his class abt 3 months..after that move to Ian lim.Ian lim teaching style more systematic...not too fast or too slow.As my basic not very OK..after he thought me everything bcome OK if compare with Andrew pang. However,this depends on different ppl~
I know Philip Woo is the best lecturer in this paper...parmindar im not vy sure

hope this helps u
*
U means Philip Woo is the best lecturer for P3? bcz as i gather on other comment most only comment that he is good in P1 but P3 seldom he the comment on him... blink.gif

125 Pages < 1 2 3 4 5 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0186sec    0.50    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 9th December 2025 - 01:28 AM