Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
107 Pages « < 56 57 58 59 60 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 SAMSUNG GALAXY S II Official thread V4, Best and Greatest Android now ?

views
     
ccm
post Jun 7 2011, 06:46 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
669 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: From Cheras Currently @ Kota Kinabalu


QUOTE(brotan @ Jun 7 2011, 04:39 PM)
me too. the autofocus / macro focus has same distance. no difference

is it software or hardware bug?
*
I think it might be a software bug


Added on June 7, 2011, 6:46 pm
QUOTE(Hianz @ Jun 7 2011, 03:12 PM)
you may try to use other camera software which possible to get close focusing..
*
I think other camera software might be able to solve this problem..
i haven't tried yet

This post has been edited by ccm: Jun 7 2011, 06:46 PM
kevink82
post Jun 7 2011, 06:50 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,134 posts

Joined: Apr 2008


http://sgpstore.co.kr/_data/old_attach/pro...ies_compare.jpg

Chart for hardness for sgp protector, they do scratch but its better the sp rather than ur screen.
ccm
post Jun 7 2011, 06:52 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
669 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: From Cheras Currently @ Kota Kinabalu


QUOTE(abuyon @ Jun 7 2011, 06:14 PM)
it's not our beloved samsung problem...it's only it's camera limitation...if you want more macro please and please use proper instrument eg DSLR or point and shoot digital camera..like the other guys said ...
just move backward and try focus the near object...u can always zoom it for what reason u want as it is 8MP....

please read this if you want further understanding.....

http://photo.net/learn/macro/
http://www.digital-photography-school.com/...al-camera-users

sensation vs samsung galaxy s2 camera photo comparison .... in the end...tepuk dada tanya selera....

http://www.techradar.com/news/phone-and-co...61874?artc_pg=3
*
my N95, storm, n73me, nexus one, nexus s, can perform focus on 2 inch away from an object..
Samsung galaxy S II cannot (maybe I am lacking of knowledge how to perform this)
I have searched around the Internet and just learnt most of the SGS2 users are having the same problem,
and they can't focus on QR barcode scanning also. I don't mean all, but most of the responding from the
thread showing the SGS2 users having the same problem.

problem I'm facing now, you can't focus an object on the distance of 2inch, but u can focus when u move
up to 4inch away. then what is the point of using macro mode or auto focus..?

next, moving backward and zoom on your object, you lose the quality. The result is totally different from
a camera that can perform close up mode / can be focus on near object.

I think you can try to test your SGS2, if you have one... and u will understand what i mean.


Added on June 7, 2011, 6:58 pmjust performed another test
your SGS2 battery got a QR barcode on it..
try use your SGS2 camera to perform a barcode scanning,
my SGS2 cannot scan ..
my Nexus S can ..
the QR on my SGS2 is just very blur..
even if u move far away, it becomes very small, unscannable..


This post has been edited by ccm: Jun 7 2011, 06:58 PM
ventrilocks
post Jun 7 2011, 07:00 PM

So Nyuh Shi Dae
*******
Senior Member
3,030 posts

Joined: Sep 2006
From: GGWP
QUOTE(kevink82 @ Jun 7 2011, 06:50 PM)
http://sgpstore.co.kr/_data/old_attach/pro...ies_compare.jpg

Chart for hardness for sgp protector, they do scratch but its better the sp rather than ur screen.
*
its weird..the scratch is inside the SP? i cant even feel it got scratch..
kevink82
post Jun 7 2011, 07:10 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,134 posts

Joined: Apr 2008


QUOTE(ventrilocks @ Jun 7 2011, 07:00 PM)
its weird..the scratch is inside the SP? i cant even feel it got scratch..
*
Never had that before weird, does ur sgp sp comes with warranty card? All the new ones have a serial number for original and nearly all is cover by their warranty so if its original and defect u can get a new one from them.

This is the new warranty serial to check if its real

Attached Image
abuyon
post Jun 7 2011, 07:18 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
131 posts

Joined: Sep 2006
user posted image
user posted image

using stock camera...

This post has been edited by abuyon: Jun 7 2011, 07:19 PM
ccm
post Jun 7 2011, 07:35 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
669 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: From Cheras Currently @ Kota Kinabalu


QUOTE(abuyon @ Jun 7 2011, 07:18 PM)
user posted image
user posted image

using stock camera...
*
hi.. can see the first picture is losing the quality.. if it is taken by proper focus nearer i believe through quality will be sharper.. the second picture is shooting far away already.. it is not like really close up..

if you have a spare battery , can you perform a focus on the QR on your battery sticker ?
thanks very much for helping me anyway .

brotan
post Jun 7 2011, 07:47 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,392 posts

Joined: Dec 2009
QUOTE(abuyon @ Jun 7 2011, 06:14 PM)
it's not our beloved samsung problem...it's only it's camera limitation...if you want more macro please and please use proper instrument eg DSLR or point and shoot digital camera..like the other guys said ...
just move backward and try focus the near object...u can always zoom it for what reason u want as it is 8MP....

bro,

point is, using normal focus or macro also same distance to get focus. if this is the case, whats the point of the macro focus mode? must be there for a reason
Assclown
post Jun 7 2011, 07:48 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
649 posts

Joined: Feb 2007
For those using SGP Ultra Crystal, is the oil-resistance worse than the naked screen ?
kevink82
post Jun 7 2011, 07:54 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,134 posts

Joined: Apr 2008


None is advertised as oil resistance, anti fingerprint and smudge can be easily wipe off thats all. Ultra crystal is bout same as naked screen.
ventrilocks
post Jun 7 2011, 08:08 PM

So Nyuh Shi Dae
*******
Senior Member
3,030 posts

Joined: Sep 2006
From: GGWP
QUOTE(kevink82 @ Jun 7 2011, 07:10 PM)
Never had that before weird, does ur sgp sp comes with warranty card? All the new ones have a serial number for original and nearly all is cover by their warranty so if its original and defect u can get a new one from them.

This is the new warranty serial to check if its real

Attached Image
*
unfortunately i share my SP with other member..SP also can claim warranty? laugh.gif

kevink82
post Jun 7 2011, 08:12 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,134 posts

Joined: Apr 2008


The serial is more for making sure its real, too many fake stuff on the market nowdays....
Assclown
post Jun 7 2011, 08:18 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
649 posts

Joined: Feb 2007
QUOTE(kevink82 @ Jun 7 2011, 07:54 PM)
None is advertised as oil resistance, anti fingerprint and smudge can be easily wipe off thats all. Ultra crystal is bout same as naked screen.
*
That is not true. The naked screen does have oleophobic coating which makes it similar to SGP Ultra Oleophobic. If I'm not mistaken, the naked screen deals with oil from fingers better than ultra crystal. Just need someone who have experience both to confirm.
kevink82
post Jun 7 2011, 08:26 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,134 posts

Joined: Apr 2008


Well i have 2 sg2 one with ultra crystal the other naked..... If you didnt really want someone opinion then y ask? Just wondering.....
ventrilocks
post Jun 7 2011, 08:36 PM

So Nyuh Shi Dae
*******
Senior Member
3,030 posts

Joined: Sep 2006
From: GGWP
i have both too..but using oleophobic..if my SP goes really bad will change to clear.. biggrin.gif
KiToRo
post Jun 7 2011, 08:36 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
42 posts

Joined: Oct 2004
just want to share with your guys...
sgs2 pic quality with 3264×2448 pixels while sensation with 3264×1840 pixels, this showing that sgs2 has higher pixels density compare sensation pic...thts y the pic size is so much diff...anyway...i still feel quality pic on sensation still look ok compare to sgs2...
kevink82
post Jun 7 2011, 08:41 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,134 posts

Joined: Apr 2008


For the sake of avoiding arguement heres a quick 2 min test, one with ultra crystal one without.

Attached Image
Attached Image

You can be the judge urself but i feel they r same......
Assclown
post Jun 7 2011, 08:48 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
649 posts

Joined: Feb 2007
QUOTE(kevink82 @ Jun 7 2011, 08:41 PM)
For the sake of avoiding arguement heres a quick 2 min test, one with ultra crystal one without.

Attached Image
Attached Image

You can be the judge urself but i feel they r same......
*
The one on the left seem to have much more smudges than the right.
kevink82
post Jun 7 2011, 08:49 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,134 posts

Joined: Apr 2008


Did u notice i swap them around in the 2 different pics? Its just the lighting.... hmm.gif though it was obvious with the cable on one of them but guess not lol

This post has been edited by kevink82: Jun 7 2011, 08:51 PM
Assclown
post Jun 7 2011, 08:55 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
649 posts

Joined: Feb 2007
QUOTE(kevink82 @ Jun 7 2011, 08:49 PM)
Did u notice i swap them around in the 2 different pics? Its just the lighting....  hmm.gif though it was obvious with the cable on one of them but guess not lol
*
I meant for the first pic. Btw, I've been using it for over a week without a Screen protector and my screen has never been smudged this bad. Your screen must have been striped off its coating.

107 Pages « < 56 57 58 59 60 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0176sec    0.46    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 6th December 2025 - 09:34 PM