Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
126 Pages « < 18 19 20 21 22 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 -= myforte - naza kia forte owners club =- V11, Leaves You Speechless

views
     
GrantHue
post Jun 4 2011, 11:53 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Apr 2011
From: Malaysia, Selangor


QUOTE(DaBestOne @ Jun 4 2011, 11:15 PM)
u mean naza and kia forte model is exactly the same? so what r the differences between these two? sorry.. noob here..  sweat.gif
*
KIA is the brand name like TOYOTA, NISSAN , HONDA.. and the NAZA is a company that bring in this brand into Malaysia.. Can you get it buddy?
ferrari38
post Jun 5 2011, 12:22 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
23 posts

Joined: May 2011


hi to all bro.
just would like to check with your whether the servicing cost of 2.0 same with 1.6?
or does it big difference?
anyone has the price list?
thanks!
GuyM
post Jun 5 2011, 12:52 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,787 posts

Joined: Jul 2007
QUOTE(behkokhong @ Jun 4 2011, 12:04 AM)
huhu... today js changed to Falken Ziex 912 and trade in my stock Kumho tyre (mileage is 33k, yr of usage is 1 yr) top up with rm 660 for 4 pcs tyre, i think is a gd deal!!! hehe... initially plan to use the 215/50/R17, but price different is alot (need to top up with RM 9XX), therefore using back the same size. Falken tyre is quiter and softer. Overall comment is satisfied with what i'm purchased!  tongue.gif

Hi guys, hope this link might help you for tyre info with tyre review reference,
http://www.tyrereviews.co.uk/Tyre/
*
U gonna regret changing to this 912, i have used this 215/45/18 size, its horrible, should have spend a bit more for PS3 at least
1malaysia^
post Jun 5 2011, 01:20 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: May 2011
have anyone change the type +rim from 17 inch to 16? how the spare tyre?
Underhill
post Jun 5 2011, 01:29 AM

This too shall pass
****
Senior Member
567 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
My one week old Forte started to squeak already, it comes from the dashboard biggrin.gif
GrantHue
post Jun 5 2011, 08:26 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Apr 2011
From: Malaysia, Selangor


QUOTE(Underhill @ Jun 5 2011, 01:29 AM)
My one week old Forte started to squeak already, it comes from the dashboard biggrin.gif
*
Buddy, you can send back your car to SC.. Have some part inside the dashboard din't lock well..
enson1985
post Jun 5 2011, 11:39 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
313 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: Selangor


QUOTE(Underhill @ Jun 5 2011, 01:29 AM)
My one week old Forte started to squeak already, it comes from the dashboard biggrin.gif
*
It looks like recent forte owners are having tis issues. There are quite a number of owners raise up tis issue in myforteclub forum. It makes me real worries of the qc of assembly here. Forte might be one of my new ride few more mths later. Just waiting avante to be launch n do a comparison between tis two models in term of price, features n quality.
behkokhong
post Jun 5 2011, 01:20 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
24 posts

Joined: Nov 2009
thanks bro. where did u change ur tyre?
*

[/quote]

at Klang Hin Leong tyre services.

QUOTE(GuyM @ Jun 5 2011, 12:52 AM)
U gonna regret changing to this 912, i have used this 215/45/18 size, its horrible, should have spend a bit more for PS3 at least
*
fren, why you said so? what's the problem u faced when u used 912, mind to share? But from tyre review that i read is quite ok for ZE912 provided is cheaper than others (<rm300). of coz cant compare with PS3, but price is exp (>rm450).

This post has been edited by behkokhong: Jun 5 2011, 01:24 PM
indyboleh
post Jun 5 2011, 01:26 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
12 posts

Joined: Oct 2009


QUOTE(CyberKewl @ Jun 4 2011, 12:21 PM)
1. You mean those dealer + service centres kind? Dont need to get from those, u can get from anywhere, up to u. If you're referring to those dealer that provide good after sales service i'd recommend serdang raya branch (opposite caltex station), look for vincent lim (012-6884923). You can tell him Malcolm recommended you.
2. Up to you but i think usually the package not really worth it and takes longer time to get your car compared to if you do yourself. GOod thing is less hassle. If u dont mind the longer wait for installing the bodykit (may take up to a week extra, best u ask the sales agent).
3. Freebies I got were standard:
a. touch and go RM 10 preloaded card
b. mud flap (didnt get it at the time, no stock, dont really need it at the moment)
c. tint voucher RM 500 worth if not mistaken for raytech i think, didnt use, go for other brand tint
d. steering lock
e. "K" emblem front and back (to replace the "Naza" logo and the front and back of the car.
f. Door visor

I think that's all the freebies i got. some got more, some got less, some didnt get any. Depends which SA you get. Vincent gave me all the above i mentioned, so if you're ok with those freebies, suggest u deal with him. Very good, efficient and honest agent.
*
TQ..


Added on June 5, 2011, 1:34 pm
QUOTE(GrantHue @ Jun 4 2011, 07:06 PM)
You can find me for some discussion maybe  rclxms.gif
*
great TQ...where is your place(shop) what are u offering?
Serious buyer

This post has been edited by indyboleh: Jun 5 2011, 01:34 PM
Underhill
post Jun 5 2011, 03:06 PM

This too shall pass
****
Senior Member
567 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
How do you guys take care of your leather seats? Any product to recommend? Is it just me or it feels like the Silverstone tire on new Forte is a little more quieter?

Is the windscreen of Forte really a little greenish after tint? My tint shop says Forte windscreen has sort of green hue, that's why after tinting it looks a little green!

QUOTE(GrantHue @ Jun 5 2011, 08:26 AM)
Buddy, you can send back your car to SC.. Have some part inside the dashboard din't lock well..
*
Thanks, I'll go and have it checked on my 1K service. Only if it's a simple fix though, I don't want them to dismantle the dashboard and introduce a new one. The sound seems like it has gone away today. Probably because it's raining and cooler today? biggrin.gif

Anyway, my SA promises me emblem, full tank, steering lock, tint voucher (useless), smart tag. But I only got the full tank. Excuses:

Steering lock / emblem - No stock right now, and no money to buy yet. Wait till his salary come out.
Smart tag - He said now that, only if I buy the body kit with him.

Do you guys to choose which insurance to buy? My SA simply get RHB Insurance, and does not even have 24/7 road assistance service.

QUOTE(enson1985 @ Jun 5 2011, 11:39 AM)
It looks like recent forte owners are having tis issues. There are quite a number of owners raise up tis issue in myforteclub forum. It makes me real worries of the qc of assembly here. Forte might be one of my new ride few more mths later. Just waiting avante to be launch n do a comparison between tis two models in term of price, features n quality.
*
Make sure you go for a test drive before deciding. smile.gif

This post has been edited by Underhill: Jun 5 2011, 03:26 PM
NiCkY
post Jun 5 2011, 07:23 PM

The POWER Of Dream(tm)
*******
Senior Member
2,383 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Beside ur House Only
QUOTE(enson1985 @ Jun 5 2011, 11:39 AM)
It looks like recent forte owners are having tis issues. There are quite a number of owners raise up tis issue in myforteclub forum. It makes me real worries of the qc of assembly here. Forte might be one of my new ride few more mths later. Just waiting avante to be launch n do a comparison between tis two models in term of price, features n quality.
*
den u hav to pray they not end up like naza citra from kia carens... rclxub.gif

EpsilonStar
post Jun 5 2011, 08:52 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,245 posts

Joined: Oct 2004
From: Selangor


i went to test drive 1.6 and 2.0 yesterday.
I am not sure it's the 1.6 unit has some prob with the transmission or 1.6 is really that underpower, it feels really not responsive... When pressed, it seems unwilling, and reluctant to drop gear to pickup.

Then in 2.0, it feels so much better, and it will keep drop gear to pick up when i pressed a lil harder. What's the unit of measurement for the fuel consumption reading on the meter? coz i saw it shot up from 15 (or 0.15) to 17(or 0.17) after test drive. Although 1.6 remain about the same at about 9(or 0.9)

In a greater dilemma after test drive. 2.0 is far fetch for me, but 1.6 seems not enough umph...


CyberKewl
post Jun 5 2011, 09:02 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,900 posts

Joined: Dec 2004


QUOTE(EpsilonStar @ Jun 5 2011, 08:52 PM)
i went to test drive 1.6 and 2.0 yesterday.
I am not sure it's the 1.6 unit has some prob with the transmission or 1.6 is really that underpower, it feels really not responsive... When pressed, it seems unwilling, and reluctant to drop gear to pickup.

Then in 2.0, it feels so much better, and it will keep drop gear to pick up when i pressed a lil harder. What's the unit of measurement for the fuel consumption reading on the meter? coz i saw it shot up from 15 (or 0.15) to 17(or 0.17) after test drive. Although 1.6 remain about the same at about 9(or 0.9)

In a greater dilemma after test drive. 2.0 is far fetch for me, but 1.6 seems not enough umph...
*
you actually have two options for the 1.6 -> either use the paddle shifters to downshift manually which is estremely easy and fun to do or if you actually press harder on the accelerator it will drop a gear (unless you're already at a pretty decent speed say 120km/h. I usually use the paddle shifters if i want to have a really good pickup (i'm on 1.6 sx btw). The car doesnt seem to know when to drop a gear that well sometimes but i dont really find that to be an issue since there's shiftronic mode with paddle shifters to play with.
EpsilonStar
post Jun 5 2011, 09:09 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,245 posts

Joined: Oct 2004
From: Selangor


QUOTE(CyberKewl @ Jun 5 2011, 09:02 PM)
you actually have two options for the 1.6 -> either use the paddle shifters to downshift manually which is estremely easy and fun to do or if you actually press harder on the accelerator it will drop a gear (unless you're already at a pretty decent speed say 120km/h. I usually use the paddle shifters if i want to have a really good pickup (i'm on 1.6 sx btw). The car doesnt seem to know when to drop a gear that well sometimes but i dont really find that to be an issue since there's shiftronic mode with paddle shifters to play with.
*
One thing i would like to confirm is whether the paddle shift would work in D mode? Coz i try to down shift with that, but i feel it din down shift at all...
CyberKewl
post Jun 5 2011, 09:24 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,900 posts

Joined: Dec 2004


QUOTE(EpsilonStar @ Jun 5 2011, 09:09 PM)
One thing i would like to confirm is whether the paddle shift would work in D mode? Coz i try to down shift with that, but i feel it din down shift at all...
*
for 1.6, the paddle shifter works only if you move the shift lever to the right side (shiftronic mode) but for 2.0, you can use it in both D mode or shiftronic mode (when the lever is moved to the right). I guess its something special for 2.0 owners (additional feature). Not too big an issue actually even to shift it to the right, you dont even need to press the shift lever button, just push it to the right and you're in shiftronic mode. Want to shift back to D mode? just push it back to the left. Simple as that. Sounds easy right? It is that simple smile.gif
DaBestOne
post Jun 5 2011, 10:38 PM

-LYN- 6 ★STARS★ Trader
******
Senior Member
1,329 posts

Joined: Sep 2007
From: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.



QUOTE(CyberKewl @ Jun 5 2011, 09:24 PM)
for 1.6, the paddle shifter works only if you move the shift lever to the right side (shiftronic mode) but for 2.0, you can use it in both D mode or shiftronic mode (when the lever is moved to the right). I guess its something special for 2.0 owners (additional feature). Not too big an issue actually even to shift it to the right, you dont even need to press the shift lever button, just push it to the right and you're in shiftronic mode. Want to shift back to D mode? just push it back to the left. Simple as that. Sounds easy right? It is that simple smile.gif
*
sounds like bmw gear knob.. lol..
epo
post Jun 5 2011, 11:58 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
892 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Sg Buloh


QUOTE(EpsilonStar @ Jun 5 2011, 08:52 PM)
In a greater dilemma after test drive. 2.0 is far fetch for me, but 1.6 seems not enough umph...
*
2.0 laaa... forte body berat maaa...
TSXionCity
post Jun 6 2011, 01:08 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
171 posts

Joined: Mar 2010
From: Perth, Western Australia



QUOTE(EpsilonStar @ Jun 5 2011, 09:52 PM)
i went to test drive 1.6 and 2.0 yesterday.
I am not sure it's the 1.6 unit has some prob with the transmission or 1.6 is really that underpower, it feels really not responsive... When pressed, it seems unwilling, and reluctant to drop gear to pickup.

Then in 2.0, it feels so much better, and it will keep drop gear to pick up when i pressed a lil harder. What's the unit of measurement for the fuel consumption reading on the meter? coz i saw it shot up from 15 (or 0.15) to 17(or 0.17) after test drive. Although 1.6 remain about the same at about 9(or 0.9)

In a greater dilemma after test drive. 2.0 is far fetch for me, but 1.6 seems not enough umph...
*
strange, my uncle in KL drove my car throughout the days when i in KL yesterday(whole day) and today morning..and never complain of underpower...he said my car feels heavy, and is the right choice i get 1.6, which makes him feels much more confident in highway cruise..in the other hand, his daughter bought the Hyundai Avante X20 2.0....he feels that car is very light, although pickup speed easily, but he's not confident in it during highway cruise, my 1.6SX feels for him wins over X20's 2.0.....yet mine is old batch, 4speeder...not 6speeder...
StarGhazzer
post Jun 6 2011, 04:55 AM

太空人
*******
Senior Member
5,355 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Cera



QUOTE(EpsilonStar @ Jun 5 2011, 08:52 PM)
i went to test drive 1.6 and 2.0 yesterday.
I am not sure it's the 1.6 unit has some prob with the transmission or 1.6 is really that underpower, it feels really not responsive... When pressed, it seems unwilling, and reluctant to drop gear to pickup.

Then in 2.0, it feels so much better, and it will keep drop gear to pick up when i pressed a lil harder. What's the unit of measurement for the fuel consumption reading on the meter? coz i saw it shot up from 15 (or 0.15) to 17(or 0.17) after test drive. Although 1.6 remain about the same at about 9(or 0.9)

In a greater dilemma after test drive. 2.0 is far fetch for me, but 1.6 seems not enough umph...
*
Depends on how deep your wallet is.

Can't really comment on the 1.6L as it's not available in Australia, but the 2.0L is more than adequate for daily driving. The old 4 speed autobox does limit the accelerating potential due to its long ratios, but once you familiarise yourself with the revs you'll learn how to keep the engine within its powerband.

The 2.0L ThetaII, together with the Lancer's engine, is the most powerful engine on paper among the C-segment, but it doesn't really translate to real life performance. The 3's and Civic's engine produce lower numbers yet they are equally as quick off the line, no thanks to our Forte's gear box and late-peaking torque curve. The new 6 speed box should improve on this with shorter ratios, and numberswise it does seem to improve the century sprint by 1 second. Nevertheless, whether it really makes a significant, noticeable improvement in real-life situations remains a subjective opinion.

Peak torque comes in at 4200rpm and to maintain the acceleration you'll often need to keep the revs above 3000, which results in higher noise levels and of course, FC.

Don't be bothered about the FC reading shown on the computer - it depends on when it calculates it. If you reset it and recalculate while you're cruising on highways, you'll easily get 6-7L/100km. On average the 2.0L drinks 9-10L/100km for a mixed range, around 6-7 for frequent long-distance highway drives; but if you're constantly stuck in jams don't be surprised if it reaches 12.

At the end of the day, it goes back to how much does your wallet carry. If you can afford the higher selling price, costlier road tax, greater FC, go for the 2.0L. Otherwise the 1.6L should suffice - most of the 1.6L owners here are satisfied with the performance, although it's still worth mentioning that the Forte is not a sports car so don't expect kidney punching-accelerations.

This post has been edited by StarGhazzer: Jun 6 2011, 05:01 AM
izputra
post Jun 6 2011, 07:01 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
146 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
QUOTE(StarGhazzer @ Jun 6 2011, 04:55 AM)
Depends on how deep your wallet is.

Can't really comment on the 1.6L as it's not available in Australia, but the 2.0L is more than adequate for daily driving. The old 4 speed autobox does limit the accelerating potential due to its long ratios, but once you familiarise yourself with the revs you'll learn how to keep the engine within its powerband.

The 2.0L ThetaII, together with the Lancer's engine, is the most powerful engine on paper among the C-segment, but it doesn't really translate to real life performance. The 3's and Civic's engine produce lower numbers yet they are equally as quick off the line, no thanks to our Forte's gear box and late-peaking torque curve. The new 6 speed box should improve on this with shorter ratios, and numberswise it does seem to improve the century sprint by 1 second. Nevertheless, whether it really makes a significant, noticeable improvement in real-life situations remains a subjective opinion.

Peak torque comes in at 4200rpm and to maintain the acceleration you'll often need to keep the revs above 3000, which results in higher noise levels and of course, FC.

Don't be bothered about the FC reading shown on the computer - it depends on when it calculates it. If you reset it and recalculate while you're cruising on highways, you'll easily get 6-7L/100km. On average the 2.0L drinks 9-10L/100km for a mixed range, around 6-7 for frequent long-distance highway drives; but if you're constantly stuck in jams don't be surprised if it reaches 12.

At the end of the day, it goes back to how much does your wallet carry. If you can afford the higher selling price, costlier road tax, greater FC, go for the 2.0L. Otherwise the 1.6L should suffice - most of the 1.6L owners here are satisfied with the performance, although it's still worth mentioning that the Forte is not a sports car so don't expect kidney punching-accelerations.
*
Very good & fair explanation bro... thumbup.gif

126 Pages « < 18 19 20 21 22 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.2404sec    0.47    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 15th December 2025 - 12:23 AM