QUOTE(smwah @ Mar 21 2010, 05:59 PM)
Last year I submited with extra amount of overpaid, less than 100 but so far no refund. How ler? Does they bring forward for this year?
I understand that for transport allowance are eligible to deduct, correct if I am wrong. Bcoz as for my paid slip, basic = xxx then transport allowance = xxx so it total salary. But another thing is, for medical claim, the company will put into the salary slip. So can we minus out the medical claim?
Last question, I did apply for E filling, 2 years ago, but then at the end PC problem. So nv fill in using internet, using manual. So that is mean I consider as new or old? Bcoz last time I got the number and ID but never use. If such case how should I do?
Thanks for advice.
i suggest u walk in into their office to sort out the E-Filing (reset account or check status) and also claim refund..normally its automatic but since you have issues, best to sort it out at the counter and start fresh..in any case, write in to them about your problem and they would assist you as well..
transport allowance is quite grey, the correct terms are either parking allowance or travel allowance, which are exempted up to a certain amount.. sometimes when the 'term' does not tally, you then are NOT entitled for the exemption...same goes for outstation allowance or outstation reimbursement - both are 2 different things... HR knows how to manipulate this.
For medical claim, you best check with HR. all these shall been keyed in into EA Form..so see which is under what column..that would be easiest to see what to declare and what need not to declare..
tricky, hope above gives you some kind of idea..

Added on March 22, 2010, 2:10 pmQUOTE(cherroy @ Mar 21 2010, 05:50 PM)
Internet income is not as same as foreign source of income, strictly speaking.
If your customer based in outside Malaysia, but operation wise is here, it is considered domestic income, which is taxable. Correct me if I am wrong, my understanding on this issue so far.
Foreign source income is not taxable, because it is taxed at the source there in the first place. So to avoid double taxation arises, that's why got such a ruling.
i concur..
This post has been edited by attahun: Mar 22 2010, 02:10 PM