Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
90 Pages « < 4 5 6 7 8 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Mitsubishi asx, This car doesnt seem to be popular here.

views
     
turbocharged
post Sep 1 2011, 09:51 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
250 posts

Joined: Jan 2011
QUOTE(Eithanius @ Aug 31 2011, 12:33 PM)
No worries mate...  biggrin.gif
I bet the rear seats on the Lexus CT200h is even more cramp than this...?  sweat.gif
*
prius has the roomiest rear seat of its class. since lexus ct200h is similar to prius, so, no, they are not cramp. lol

how you bet on things you're not sure?
Eithanius
post Sep 1 2011, 10:10 AM

::+::KukuNius(tm)::+::
*******
Senior Member
3,952 posts

Joined: Apr 2005
From: Sector 1921B, Delta Quadrant


QUOTE(turbocharged @ Sep 1 2011, 09:51 AM)
prius has the roomiest rear seat of its class. since lexus ct200h is similar to prius, so, no, they are not cramp. lol

how you bet on things you're not sure?
*
Because i've seen both the asx and the ct200h... And how can you be sure both the prius and ct200h is similar...? By pulling my leg...? tongue.gif Don't insult my intelligence k... I know what i've seen and experienced...
turbocharged
post Sep 1 2011, 10:36 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
250 posts

Joined: Jan 2011
look can be deceiving, try sit inside. ^^
Eithanius
post Sep 1 2011, 10:43 AM

::+::KukuNius(tm)::+::
*******
Senior Member
3,952 posts

Joined: Apr 2005
From: Sector 1921B, Delta Quadrant


Haha... yes I did... I still find the CT200h more cramp... but that's just my opinion since that poor fella's asx was being tore apart SP-ing the ass and the floorboard...
cybermaster98
post Sep 1 2011, 11:11 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,440 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(Eithanius @ Sep 1 2011, 10:43 AM)
Haha... yes I did... I still find the CT200h more cramp... but that's just my opinion since that poor fella's asx was being tore apart SP-ing the ass and the floorboard...
Well i havent sat inside a CT200H so i cant comment. But the Prius surely has more rear space compared the the ASX.
sonyman
post Sep 1 2011, 11:17 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,043 posts

Joined: May 2006
honestly speaking, ASX is not a very good or worth while cross over. i think other brands within its price range has better specs. Other than the rear camera. there is nothing else in that cross over. I feel if i have to chose, by preferences, 3008, Kia Sportage, Hyundai Tucson, and lastly Honda CRV, ASX, not worth. slow, and really slow.
Eithanius
post Sep 1 2011, 11:20 AM

::+::KukuNius(tm)::+::
*******
Senior Member
3,952 posts

Joined: Apr 2005
From: Sector 1921B, Delta Quadrant


QUOTE(cybermaster98 @ Sep 1 2011, 11:11 AM)
Well i havent sat inside a CT200H so i cant comment. But the Prius surely has more rear space compared the the ASX.
*
There is no doubt Prius has more rear space. But why are we comparing the Prius and ASX...?
turbocharged
post Sep 1 2011, 12:22 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
250 posts

Joined: Jan 2011
QUOTE(Eithanius @ Sep 1 2011, 11:20 AM)
There is no doubt Prius has more rear space. But why are we comparing the Prius and ASX...?
*
er....cos someone above mentioned about prius/lexus

i think thats you biggrin.gif
turbocharged
post Sep 1 2011, 12:23 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
250 posts

Joined: Jan 2011
QUOTE(sonyman @ Sep 1 2011, 11:17 AM)
honestly speaking, ASX is not a very good or worth while cross over. i think other brands within its price range has better specs. Other than the rear camera. there is nothing else in that cross over. I feel if i have to chose, by preferences, 3008, Kia Sportage, Hyundai Tucson, and lastly Honda CRV, ASX, not worth. slow, and really slow.
*
3008 is not a bad choice, must test drive smile.gif look at the stuff they are offering. and its a conti!!

we want conti car handling, or jap car handling? biggrin.gif
limkj
post Sep 1 2011, 12:36 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
241 posts

Joined: Jun 2007


QUOTE(Eithanius @ Sep 1 2011, 11:20 AM)
There is no doubt Prius has more rear space. But why are we comparing the Prius and ASX...?
*
The Lexus CT200H has less rear legroom and space compared to the Prius. The central hump at the back is very pronounced and you can sit 2 at the back comfortably. If you try to put an adult in the rear centre seat, it will be very uncomfortable.
richard912
post Sep 1 2011, 03:17 PM

d('_')b
******
Senior Member
1,821 posts

Joined: Jun 2009
From: 3°7'59"N 101°37'49"E


Alamak....this thread seems to have changed to ct-200h/Prius pulak.

Anyway, dropped by the Jalan 222 showroom but was still closed even though their neighbor (VW showroom) was open for business. Guess I'll drop by again tomorrow since I am still off.

Will be looking out for the following:
1. Wind/road noise
2. Acceleration feel (or lack thereof)
3. Seat comfort, especially the rear seats

I did notice that the Malaysian version of the ASX does not have keyless go, still conventional key to start the car. Does it have auto lights/rain sensor?
Eithanius
post Sep 1 2011, 04:14 PM

::+::KukuNius(tm)::+::
*******
Senior Member
3,952 posts

Joined: Apr 2005
From: Sector 1921B, Delta Quadrant


QUOTE(turbocharged @ Sep 1 2011, 12:22 PM)
er....cos someone above mentioned about prius/lexus

i think thats you biggrin.gif
*
I was comparing the rear space of the ASX and the CT200h for example, then you brought up Prius as a Hybrid comparison...

now I kena attacked as if I know nuts about Prius... So disappointing lar discussing with you guys. Only ended up being insulted... sad.gif
richard912
post Sep 1 2011, 04:38 PM

d('_')b
******
Senior Member
1,821 posts

Joined: Jun 2009
From: 3°7'59"N 101°37'49"E


Aiseh, don't small gas la. Any input is most welcomed, no insult intended smile.gif


Added on September 2, 2011, 12:05 pmTest drove the ASX this morning and here are some quick takes:

Drive and ride was good. Paddle shifters are very responsive indeed. The power steering however, was a tad too light. The tyre/wind/engine noise while to be expected, can be improved with aftermarket solutions like autofoam. Overall interior is ok as the main panels were covered with soft feeling materials.

Rear seats are uncomfy for those having to sit there over long distances. Seems you cannot adjust it at all even though I've read that there's a "2-step" setting. Leg room however, is quite adequate.

Trunk space is a little short, attributable to the full sized spare that comes with it.

It is seriously lacking in terms of features.

Critical : No audio control on the steering, no door auto lock as you drive off, no auto dimming rearview mirror for night driving.
Less critical : No auto lights, no rain sensor, no keyless go

This post has been edited by richard912: Sep 2 2011, 12:05 PM
lucifah
post Sep 3 2011, 11:50 PM

St. Fu
Group Icon
Staff
7,948 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: Soviet Sarawak


QUOTE(cybermaster98 @ Aug 31 2011, 03:13 AM)
RU sure it can be adjusted? When i checked it out last year, i tried and couldnt get it lower. Maybe it was already in its lowest setting.

But my take on the ASX is its surely not worth its price tag. The rear seats are really cramped and too upright. Specs wise kinda normal for most of the RM100+ range cars so nothing to shout about there.

Its facing very poor sales for a reason and i think its wise to give it a pass.
*
yes, but very minimal. only 2 steps. - each is about 1-2 deg difference (about 2" gap difference)

the rear seats are bad, i have to admit. heck, the headrests for the front seats are ugly as hell (plan to swap with other cars later)

for a crossover, this one is still one of the cheapest around

compare to CRV (outdated & lacking feature), 3008 (naza pug infamous bad after sales service), Tucson (nice car, but far too common), Sportage (very nice car, but still korean), the offer price of about 135k is reasonable


QUOTE(richard912 @ Sep 1 2011, 04:38 PM)
Aiseh, don't small gas la. Any input is most welcomed, no insult intended  smile.gif


Added on September 2, 2011, 12:05 pmTest drove the ASX this morning and here are some quick takes:

Drive and ride was good. Paddle shifters are very responsive indeed. The power steering however, was a tad too light. The tyre/wind/engine noise while to be expected, can be improved with aftermarket solutions like autofoam. Overall interior is ok as the main panels were covered with soft feeling materials.

Rear seats are uncomfy for those having to sit there over long distances. Seems you cannot adjust it at all even though I've read that there's a "2-step" setting. Leg room however, is quite adequate.

Trunk space is a little short, attributable to the full sized spare that comes with it.

It is seriously lacking in terms of features.

Critical : No audio control on the steering, no door auto lock as you drive off, no auto dimming rearview mirror for night driving.
Less critical : No auto lights, no rain sensor, no keyless go
*
the steering is electric, that's why it's a bit light.

you are very correct about the SERIOUS lackness of those feature. but all mitsu cars that i have do not auto-lock... hmm.gif

and the KENWOOD head unit is cacat - no build in bluetooth and GPS. the Triton RA edition and Pajero Sports GS has both of these, and they share the same head unit

anyhow, one more thing that this car lacks is a TURBO. why oh why it doesn't come with a turbo... would be nice to drive around with 200+hp and 300+nm torque




p/s most ppl are right when they compare this to CT200H. they are similarly sized (alhthough the lexus is more like a wagon), small and slightly sporty 5-seater car. i was one of them too until i was told to wait 6 months for the CT200h. terus i get this ASX and save myself 30k (or 60k if u get the h-line)

This post has been edited by lucifah: Sep 3 2011, 11:52 PM
richard912
post Sep 4 2011, 09:09 AM

d('_')b
******
Senior Member
1,821 posts

Joined: Jun 2009
From: 3°7'59"N 101°37'49"E


Hi lucifah

Since the ASX shares the same engine as the lancer and the latter typically have lots of upgrade options, including turbo kits, this will be something to consider when warranty expires. Know of any workshops in town that specializes in such tasks? thumbup.gif

I spoke to some friends who told me that if you want to doors to lock as you drive off, can install some after market device for this.

As I have a busy work week ahead, I'll mull over the ASX til next weekend
ar188
post Sep 4 2011, 09:38 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,206 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
wah richard, long time no see.. biggrin.gif

buying asx ar? not xc60?
richard912
post Sep 4 2011, 04:11 PM

d('_')b
******
Senior Member
1,821 posts

Joined: Jun 2009
From: 3°7'59"N 101°37'49"E


Did some research and found out that auto-unlock of all doors can be set via service centre's MUTIII diagnostics system. By default, it is set as "inactive", which can be set to "active", where all the doors unlock when you switch off the engine.

As for the auto-lock when you drive off feature, apparently can be done too by using LEXIA 3, another diagnostics tool/software.

This post has been edited by richard912: Sep 4 2011, 06:56 PM
Alpha700
post Sep 4 2011, 06:56 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
292 posts

Joined: Nov 2008
QUOTE(lucifah @ Sep 3 2011, 11:50 PM)
anyhow, one more thing that this car lacks is a TURBO. why oh why it doesn't come with a turbo... would be nice to drive around with 200+hp and 300+nm torque
*
If you must have turbo, why not look at the Subaru Forester.
Foresters here are watered down tho, no electric powered seats, no dual DIN display, no GPS etc.
richard912
post Sep 4 2011, 06:58 PM

d('_')b
******
Senior Member
1,821 posts

Joined: Jun 2009
From: 3°7'59"N 101°37'49"E


QUOTE(ar188 @ Sep 4 2011, 09:38 AM)
wah richard, long time no see..  biggrin.gif

buying asx ar? not xc60?
*
No XC60 la.....you think i have a goose laying golden eggs meh?
cybermaster98
post Sep 4 2011, 08:53 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,440 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(lucifah @ Sep 3 2011, 11:50 PM)
yes, but very minimal. only 2 steps. - each is about 1-2 deg difference (about 2" gap difference)

the rear seats are bad, i have to admit. heck, the headrests for the front seats are ugly as hell (plan to swap with other cars later)

for a crossover, this one is still one of the cheapest around

compare to CRV (outdated & lacking feature), 3008 (naza pug infamous bad after sales service), Tucson (nice car, but far too common), Sportage (very nice car, but still korean), the offer price of about 135k is reasonable
I think the best now would be the Kia Sportage. Looks really good and luxurious. For RM 136K i think its much better value for money than the ASX.


90 Pages « < 4 5 6 7 8 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0268sec    0.37    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 20th December 2025 - 10:51 AM