QUOTE(Eithanius @ Aug 31 2011, 12:33 PM)
prius has the roomiest rear seat of its class. since lexus ct200h is similar to prius, so, no, they are not cramp. lolhow you bet on things you're not sure?
Mitsubishi asx, This car doesnt seem to be popular here.
|
|
Sep 1 2011, 09:51 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
250 posts Joined: Jan 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 1 2011, 10:10 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,952 posts Joined: Apr 2005 From: Sector 1921B, Delta Quadrant |
QUOTE(turbocharged @ Sep 1 2011, 09:51 AM) prius has the roomiest rear seat of its class. since lexus ct200h is similar to prius, so, no, they are not cramp. lol Because i've seen both the asx and the ct200h... And how can you be sure both the prius and ct200h is similar...? By pulling my leg...? how you bet on things you're not sure? |
|
|
Sep 1 2011, 10:36 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
250 posts Joined: Jan 2011 |
look can be deceiving, try sit inside. ^^
|
|
|
Sep 1 2011, 10:43 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,952 posts Joined: Apr 2005 From: Sector 1921B, Delta Quadrant |
Haha... yes I did... I still find the CT200h more cramp... but that's just my opinion since that poor fella's asx was being tore apart SP-ing the ass and the floorboard...
|
|
|
Sep 1 2011, 11:11 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,440 posts Joined: Jan 2010 From: Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE(Eithanius @ Sep 1 2011, 10:43 AM) Haha... yes I did... I still find the CT200h more cramp... but that's just my opinion since that poor fella's asx was being tore apart SP-ing the ass and the floorboard... Well i havent sat inside a CT200H so i cant comment. But the Prius surely has more rear space compared the the ASX. |
|
|
Sep 1 2011, 11:17 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,043 posts Joined: May 2006 |
honestly speaking, ASX is not a very good or worth while cross over. i think other brands within its price range has better specs. Other than the rear camera. there is nothing else in that cross over. I feel if i have to chose, by preferences, 3008, Kia Sportage, Hyundai Tucson, and lastly Honda CRV, ASX, not worth. slow, and really slow.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 1 2011, 11:20 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,952 posts Joined: Apr 2005 From: Sector 1921B, Delta Quadrant |
|
|
|
Sep 1 2011, 12:22 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
250 posts Joined: Jan 2011 |
|
|
|
Sep 1 2011, 12:23 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
250 posts Joined: Jan 2011 |
QUOTE(sonyman @ Sep 1 2011, 11:17 AM) honestly speaking, ASX is not a very good or worth while cross over. i think other brands within its price range has better specs. Other than the rear camera. there is nothing else in that cross over. I feel if i have to chose, by preferences, 3008, Kia Sportage, Hyundai Tucson, and lastly Honda CRV, ASX, not worth. slow, and really slow. 3008 is not a bad choice, must test drive we want conti car handling, or jap car handling? |
|
|
Sep 1 2011, 12:36 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
241 posts Joined: Jun 2007 |
QUOTE(Eithanius @ Sep 1 2011, 11:20 AM) The Lexus CT200H has less rear legroom and space compared to the Prius. The central hump at the back is very pronounced and you can sit 2 at the back comfortably. If you try to put an adult in the rear centre seat, it will be very uncomfortable. |
|
|
Sep 1 2011, 03:17 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,821 posts Joined: Jun 2009 From: 3°7'59"N 101°37'49"E |
Alamak....this thread seems to have changed to ct-200h/Prius pulak.
Anyway, dropped by the Jalan 222 showroom but was still closed even though their neighbor (VW showroom) was open for business. Guess I'll drop by again tomorrow since I am still off. Will be looking out for the following: 1. Wind/road noise 2. Acceleration feel (or lack thereof) 3. Seat comfort, especially the rear seats I did notice that the Malaysian version of the ASX does not have keyless go, still conventional key to start the car. Does it have auto lights/rain sensor? |
|
|
Sep 1 2011, 04:14 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,952 posts Joined: Apr 2005 From: Sector 1921B, Delta Quadrant |
QUOTE(turbocharged @ Sep 1 2011, 12:22 PM) I was comparing the rear space of the ASX and the CT200h for example, then you brought up Prius as a Hybrid comparison...now I kena attacked as if I know nuts about Prius... So disappointing lar discussing with you guys. Only ended up being insulted... |
|
|
Sep 1 2011, 04:38 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,821 posts Joined: Jun 2009 From: 3°7'59"N 101°37'49"E |
Aiseh, don't small gas la. Any input is most welcomed, no insult intended
Added on September 2, 2011, 12:05 pmTest drove the ASX this morning and here are some quick takes: Drive and ride was good. Paddle shifters are very responsive indeed. The power steering however, was a tad too light. The tyre/wind/engine noise while to be expected, can be improved with aftermarket solutions like autofoam. Overall interior is ok as the main panels were covered with soft feeling materials. Rear seats are uncomfy for those having to sit there over long distances. Seems you cannot adjust it at all even though I've read that there's a "2-step" setting. Leg room however, is quite adequate. Trunk space is a little short, attributable to the full sized spare that comes with it. It is seriously lacking in terms of features. Critical : No audio control on the steering, no door auto lock as you drive off, no auto dimming rearview mirror for night driving. Less critical : No auto lights, no rain sensor, no keyless go This post has been edited by richard912: Sep 2 2011, 12:05 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 3 2011, 11:50 PM
|
|
Staff
7,948 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: Soviet Sarawak |
QUOTE(cybermaster98 @ Aug 31 2011, 03:13 AM) RU sure it can be adjusted? When i checked it out last year, i tried and couldnt get it lower. Maybe it was already in its lowest setting. yes, but very minimal. only 2 steps. - each is about 1-2 deg difference (about 2" gap difference)But my take on the ASX is its surely not worth its price tag. The rear seats are really cramped and too upright. Specs wise kinda normal for most of the RM100+ range cars so nothing to shout about there. Its facing very poor sales for a reason and i think its wise to give it a pass. the rear seats are bad, i have to admit. heck, the headrests for the front seats are ugly as hell (plan to swap with other cars later) for a crossover, this one is still one of the cheapest around compare to CRV (outdated & lacking feature), 3008 (naza pug infamous bad after sales service), Tucson (nice car, but far too common), Sportage (very nice car, but still korean), the offer price of about 135k is reasonable QUOTE(richard912 @ Sep 1 2011, 04:38 PM) Aiseh, don't small gas la. Any input is most welcomed, no insult intended the steering is electric, that's why it's a bit light. Added on September 2, 2011, 12:05 pmTest drove the ASX this morning and here are some quick takes: Drive and ride was good. Paddle shifters are very responsive indeed. The power steering however, was a tad too light. The tyre/wind/engine noise while to be expected, can be improved with aftermarket solutions like autofoam. Overall interior is ok as the main panels were covered with soft feeling materials. Rear seats are uncomfy for those having to sit there over long distances. Seems you cannot adjust it at all even though I've read that there's a "2-step" setting. Leg room however, is quite adequate. Trunk space is a little short, attributable to the full sized spare that comes with it. It is seriously lacking in terms of features. Critical : No audio control on the steering, no door auto lock as you drive off, no auto dimming rearview mirror for night driving. Less critical : No auto lights, no rain sensor, no keyless go you are very correct about the SERIOUS lackness of those feature. but all mitsu cars that i have do not auto-lock... and the KENWOOD head unit is cacat - no build in bluetooth and GPS. the Triton RA edition and Pajero Sports GS has both of these, and they share the same head unit anyhow, one more thing that this car lacks is a TURBO. why oh why it doesn't come with a turbo... would be nice to drive around with 200+hp and 300+nm torque p/s most ppl are right when they compare this to CT200H. they are similarly sized (alhthough the lexus is more like a wagon), small and slightly sporty 5-seater car. i was one of them too until i was told to wait 6 months for the CT200h. terus i get this ASX and save myself 30k (or 60k if u get the h-line) This post has been edited by lucifah: Sep 3 2011, 11:52 PM |
|
|
Sep 4 2011, 09:09 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,821 posts Joined: Jun 2009 From: 3°7'59"N 101°37'49"E |
Hi lucifah
Since the ASX shares the same engine as the lancer and the latter typically have lots of upgrade options, including turbo kits, this will be something to consider when warranty expires. Know of any workshops in town that specializes in such tasks? I spoke to some friends who told me that if you want to doors to lock as you drive off, can install some after market device for this. As I have a busy work week ahead, I'll mull over the ASX til next weekend |
|
|
Sep 4 2011, 09:38 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
9,206 posts Joined: Jun 2006 |
wah richard, long time no see..
buying asx ar? not xc60? |
|
|
Sep 4 2011, 04:11 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,821 posts Joined: Jun 2009 From: 3°7'59"N 101°37'49"E |
Did some research and found out that auto-unlock of all doors can be set via service centre's MUTIII diagnostics system. By default, it is set as "inactive", which can be set to "active", where all the doors unlock when you switch off the engine.
As for the auto-lock when you drive off feature, apparently can be done too by using LEXIA 3, another diagnostics tool/software. This post has been edited by richard912: Sep 4 2011, 06:56 PM |
|
|
Sep 4 2011, 06:56 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
292 posts Joined: Nov 2008 |
QUOTE(lucifah @ Sep 3 2011, 11:50 PM) anyhow, one more thing that this car lacks is a TURBO. why oh why it doesn't come with a turbo... would be nice to drive around with 200+hp and 300+nm torque If you must have turbo, why not look at the Subaru Forester.Foresters here are watered down tho, no electric powered seats, no dual DIN display, no GPS etc. |
|
|
Sep 4 2011, 06:58 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,821 posts Joined: Jun 2009 From: 3°7'59"N 101°37'49"E |
|
|
|
Sep 4 2011, 08:53 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,440 posts Joined: Jan 2010 From: Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE(lucifah @ Sep 3 2011, 11:50 PM) yes, but very minimal. only 2 steps. - each is about 1-2 deg difference (about 2" gap difference) I think the best now would be the Kia Sportage. Looks really good and luxurious. For RM 136K i think its much better value for money than the ASX. the rear seats are bad, i have to admit. heck, the headrests for the front seats are ugly as hell (plan to swap with other cars later) for a crossover, this one is still one of the cheapest around compare to CRV (outdated & lacking feature), 3008 (naza pug infamous bad after sales service), Tucson (nice car, but far too common), Sportage (very nice car, but still korean), the offer price of about 135k is reasonable |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0268sec
0.37
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 20th December 2025 - 10:51 AM |