what is the current price for d3100? with lens. wanna get 1

haha i thnk i like to waste my shutter at the first place. dats why my shutter damn high

What do you shoot?? And I thought mine is quite high already...

My friend got hers for 1.9k last week. Not sure which shop.

thanks. with all the standard accs?

not yet a year using my cam.. sc already pass 40k

hahaha...
just normal strap...
NIKON strap....

thanx for the explanation


you sure about this?

if 'standard accessories' means bag and 4GB card, then yes.

Different shops different bargain, perhaps?

This post has been edited by stsh90: Mar 24 2011, 02:14 AM

done this with 1 of my photog fren. there are four more pages inside



This post has been edited by scotty: Mar 24 2011, 02:37 AM

Well... the actual story happened was...

They put the lens without rear cap on the grassy ground while they're setting up. Ended up a worm went inside and they couldn't get it out even though they shook the lens here and there

Alternatively can use ACDSEE?

Problem~
It's keep me away from second hand lens.

BTW they should send for lens cleaning session right?

This post has been edited by jycheang: Mar 24 2011, 04:15 AM

Should cost almost or cheaper than 24/1.4G
Reason : 50mm easier to produce if compare with other prime lens.

50mm is the easiest lens to build due to simple construction

Still hoping for ED + N

Aiks ! How can you say that?

I think in this case, the Nikkor since it's relatively cheaper than the Sigma if I'm not wrong.

At the time when I wanted to get the Sigma 30mm f/1.4 vs Nikkor 35mm f/2.0 (the 35mm f/1.8 wasn't available), I choose the Sigma as it was 1 stop faster and was equal in performance to the Nikkor on the DX body IF YOU CAN GET A GOOD SAMPLE. The reason why you hear a lot of horror stories with the Sigma is that they have a very high sample variation which can lead you to getting a good copy or a copy that front / back focuses. If you must get the Sigma, have a test. If it's not performing, you can ask the Sigma distributor if you can send in the lens for calibration. Perhaps you might want to do some background checking on this.

Anyway, looking around, I found a review of both lenses;

http://dslr-video.com/blogmag/?p=1479

You can see that the Nikkor and the Sigma is also almost equal in the centre until you compare corner sharpness at wide open which the Nikkor wins.

If you want to play safe, the Nikkor is a better bet since it's cheaper and lighter unless you want 5mm wider, and 2/3rd stops faster lens which the Sigma will give you.

I think you're delusional. I don't know why you have to re-edit my quoted message in the spoiler and delete your own message in your reply above. Some hidden agenda?

Please go back and read your original post where you made reference that Capture One manages to extract more detail that you cannot with NX and ACR.



Congrats.

This one?

http://www.flickr.com/photos/WyLuxx/

Yup. ACDsee is a very fast viewer. Is it 32 or 64bit?

Wtf wrong with my post ? It's already disco what
Go check you google before you post !

p/s : Ya know. People like you rely on facts so damn much so GOOGLE it before post

This post has been edited by KTCY: Mar 24 2011, 08:56 AM

actually i didnt delete my own post. i just click the quote mark that i think KTCY posted and i thought it's out. i didnt deliberately delete it like what you think. if you think that then i am sorry.

what i meant in the post was capture one manage to get more micro details out of raw better than other softwares. and i am sure some will say light room will process reduction of noise out of raw better than other softwares. and dan lain lain...

i didn't say capture one was the best. best as in overall best. i just said it manage to extract more details better than other softwares.

but it was you who said capture NX2 gives best result for raw (NEF) without saying why and stuffs...

[quote=jchue73,Mar 24 2011, 08:20 AM]
Aiks ! How can you say that?
I think in this case, the Nikkor since it's relatively cheaper than the Sigma if I'm not wrong.

At the time when I wanted to get the Sigma 30mm f/1.4 vs Nikkor 35mm f/2.0 (the 35mm f/1.8 wasn't available), I choose the Sigma as it was 1 stop faster and was equal in performance to the Nikkor on the DX body IF YOU CAN GET A GOOD SAMPLE. The reason why you hear a lot of horror stories with the Sigma is that they have a very high sample variation which can lead you to getting a good copy or a copy that front / back focuses. If you must get the Sigma, have a test. If it's not performing, you can ask the Sigma distributor if you can send in the lens for calibration. Perhaps you might want to do some background checking on this.

Anyway, looking around, I found a review of both lenses;

http://dslr-video.com/blogmag/?p=1479

You can see that the Nikkor and the Sigma is also almost equal in the centre until you compare corner sharpness at wide open which the Nikkor wins.

If you want to play safe, the Nikkor is a better bet since it's cheaper and lighter unless you want 5mm wider, and 2/3rd stops faster lens which the Sigma will give you.
eh but i didnt actually say capture one is the best RAW conversion. i thought it was jchue73.
hence my explanation on how each photographer has their own preference of RAW conversion and etc...
some want speed, some want micro details, some want noise reduction...

or something was lost in the translation?
[/quote]

I think you're delusional. I don't know why you have to re-edit my quoted message in the spoiler and delete your own message in your reply above. Some hidden agenda?

Please go back and read your original post where you made reference that Capture One manages to extract more detail that you cannot with NX and ACR.


Congrats.

This one?

http://www.flickr.com/photos/WyLuxx/
Yup. ACDsee is a very fast viewer. Is it 32 or 64bit?

[/quote]

yes this is the 1

Your reply does not need to be rude or condescending. My question was genuine. I know what you're trying to imply that the SB800 is a dinosaur after SB900 is out. I own one and the SB800 is still a much sort after Nikon speedlight. Disco speedlights would fall in the category of SB28/SB26 etc.

Such a lame attempt. I'm sure you can do better?

Somehow, instead of shooting people down and making sarcastic remarks, please make yourself useful and do more to help people even if it means doing some research on yourself. You might never know you learn a thing or two.

Yes, to which I implied that was incorrect because Capture NX2 does a better job than Capture One.

Am I the one who needs to prove something? I think if you do not believe, it's fine by me. Move along and use Capture One. It's a fine software BTW.

Oh, as far as I know, you're the one who claims Capture One gives more details. Got any proof ah?

This post has been edited by jchue73: Mar 24 2011, 09:30 AM

Spam some siggy, I felt this 1.4 is veryyyy sharp to my eyes.....


KEN_5457 by Kent3888, on Flickr


KEN_5507-2 by Kent3888, on Flickr

This post has been edited by Kent3888: Mar 24 2011, 09:55 AM