join christianity = go islam hell, join islam = go christianity hell
give up = go to hell just the same
do nothing = go to hell
same one la hellelujah
This post has been edited by hotjake: Feb 22 2012, 02:31 PM
LYN Christian Lounge V5
LYN Christian Lounge V5
|
|
Feb 22 2012, 02:30 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
194 posts Joined: Nov 2010 |
join christianity = go islam hell, join islam = go christianity hell
give up = go to hell just the same do nothing = go to hell same one la hellelujah This post has been edited by hotjake: Feb 22 2012, 02:31 PM |
|
|
Feb 22 2012, 02:43 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
322 posts Joined: Jul 2006 |
QUOTE(Piros @ Feb 22 2012, 02:28 PM) James 1:27 likes to differ with you, especially the last part of it. The correct way to define Christianity "if you must", it is both religion & relationship. To be precise this verse must be taken into context.Remember the price Christ paid is not for relationship with us but for believers sin. We must not forget that even the Seraphim (Considered as one of the most powerful angelic being and closes to God in Judaism) can't fully bear God's present in Isaiah 6. We should not think of Him and our relationship with Him is like the relationship with another human being. Though we like to emphasis in God's mercy, grace, & love. We must not forget his other attributes like holiness and righteousness we is equally important as well. After all He is the King of Kings. 26 Those who consider themselves religious and yet do not keep a tight rein on their tongues deceive themselves, and their religion is worthless. 27 Religion that God our Father accepts as pure and faultless is this: to look after orphans and widows in their distress and to keep oneself from being polluted by the world. religious here means piously observant of the external duties of the faith (amplified & greek). So in proper context (and to paraphrase in layman language); If you really think of yourselves as piously observant of the external duties of the faith but cant even contain your tongue you mess up...if you wanna be religious fine, start from the basics loving the orphans and the widows who need your help and live a righteous life. No. in Matt 27:51 it describes Jesus's death. You are partially correct that it was an atonement of sin for in that instance He who knew no sin took upon the sins of the world...but when He died the curtain in the sanctuary of the Temple was torn in two, from top to bottom. This is terribly significant. The Veil that seperated the Holy of Holies in the Temple of God was ripped in two...man has direct access to God now. Reconciliation through death which is why we can call him Abba Father and friend. Again this is basic doctrine. Should be discussed in another channel though. I do agree though that yes just because we have right standing before God doesnt mean we continue to use it a passport to continue to sin. This post has been edited by stefanong: Feb 22 2012, 02:46 PM |
|
|
Feb 22 2012, 02:45 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,145 posts Joined: Mar 2009 From: 1BORNEO |
|
|
|
Feb 22 2012, 02:46 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
322 posts Joined: Jul 2006 |
|
|
|
Feb 22 2012, 04:12 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
203 posts Joined: Jan 2010 |
QUOTE(stefanong @ Feb 22 2012, 02:43 PM) To be precise this verse must be taken into context. But your context is from verse 26-27, The context should be from verse 21-27 26 Those who consider themselves religious and yet do not keep a tight rein on their tongues deceive themselves, and their religion is worthless. 27 Religion that God our Father accepts as pure and faultless is this: to look after orphans and widows in their distress and to keep oneself from being polluted by the world. religious here means piously observant of the external duties of the faith (amplified & greek). So in proper context (and to paraphrase in layman language); If you really think of yourselves as piously observant of the external duties of the faith but cant even contain your tongue you mess up...if you wanna be religious fine, start from the basics loving the orphans and the widows who need your help and live a righteous life. No. in Matt 27:51 it describes Jesus's death. You are partially correct that it was an atonement of sin for in that instance He who knew no sin took upon the sins of the world...but when He died the curtain in the sanctuary of the Temple was torn in two, from top to bottom. This is terribly significant. The Veil that seperated the Holy of Holies in the Temple of God was ripped in two...man has direct access to God now. Reconciliation through death which is why we can call him Abba Father and friend. Again this is basic doctrine. Should be discussed in another channel though. I do agree though that yes just because we have right standing before God doesnt mean we continue to use it a passport to continue to sin. James was not saying "if you wanna be religious", he is saying this is religion. He gave an example of those people who claimed to be religious in verse 26 then move on to say "Pure and undefiled religion before God and the Father is this" (NKJV) On the account of Matt 27:51, I agree. But it is all due to sin right? If no sin, no broken relationship with God, no deaths, etc. That's what I meant when I said "not relationship". In another words by Christ death what was destroyed by sin was restored. |
|
|
Feb 22 2012, 04:19 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
801 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kingdom |
God is merciful....
|
|
|
Feb 22 2012, 04:32 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,410 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: Kay El |
May I recommend this thread for you all to continue your discussion: http://forum.lowyat.net/topic/2176065
I think if we further this discussion here, it will come under serious religious talk which is not allowed in Kopitiam. |
|
|
Feb 22 2012, 04:34 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
203 posts Joined: Jan 2010 |
QUOTE(kenmirzz @ Feb 22 2012, 02:59 PM) Polygamy is one example. You admitted that OT was influenced by the local cultural practice of the Jews, that's explain all, not inspired words of god. A sin is a sin in the eye of God in any period of time, provided that you believe God to be Omnipresent and His justice is eternal. If polygamy and concubinage was an accepted practice until the advent of Jesus Christ, because he abolished and perfected all those laws, then, God was toying with human life. Polygamy was never allowed by God. The patriarch (Abraham, David, Solomon) all sinned in this area. However God save them and forgave their sinYou find no justification for all those exterminations mentioned in OT, then you attempt to apply the logical fallacy circular reasoning, pushing me to ask god myself. Since he assumed the title "God", he can execute all the sins that he prohibited mankind to even think about such as genocide, infanticides, massacre, looting. If Jesus Christ and The Father were and are one, that means, He was aware of all these punishments exerted upon humankind in OT, He failed to save them at that time, but appeared 2500 years later and expatiate the sins of all humanity. Agnostics and atheists cannot be convinced by this lame arguments, sir. No one refute Richard Dawkins yet. Yahweh can take life whenever He wants using whatever methods because all life belongs to Him. He created and gave life and he has the power to take it back and destroy. God gave the 10 commandments to men, the 1st 4 of them is our duty to God and the rest 6 our duty to fellow man. He did not fail, Ephesians 1:3-7 tells us God choose and save those belongs to Him before the creation, He choose to save us through Jesus Christ when the creation was not He knew sin would enter the world but He allowed it. In fact He told Adam & Eve not to eat of the fruit yet they disobey. The fault lies on them not God. He never failed, we failed and now we are paying the price. The devil failed and they too will pay the price. |
|
|
Feb 22 2012, 04:52 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
322 posts Joined: Jul 2006 |
QUOTE(Piros @ Feb 22 2012, 04:12 PM) But your context is from verse 26-27, The context should be from verse 21-27 even from verse 21 -27 still doesnt negate what ive said. Pure and undefiled outward expression of your faith is this which is merely the definition of religion. thats all.James was not saying "if you wanna be religious", he is saying this is religion. He gave an example of those people who claimed to be religious in verse 26 then move on to say "Pure and undefiled religion before God and the Father is this" (NKJV) On the account of Matt 27:51, I agree. But it is all due to sin right? If no sin, no broken relationship with God, no deaths, etc. That's what I meant when I said "not relationship". In another words by Christ death what was destroyed by sin was restored. again you are partially correct. Sin yes but also restoring relationship back to God. The original reason why man was created from the Garden. |
|
|
Feb 22 2012, 04:53 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
322 posts Joined: Jul 2006 |
QUOTE(eXyzt @ Feb 22 2012, 04:32 PM) May I recommend this thread for you all to continue your discussion: http://forum.lowyat.net/topic/2176065 Agreed. This is doctrine and theology pretty heavy stuff and not suitable for a channel like this.I think if we further this discussion here, it will come under serious religious talk which is not allowed in Kopitiam. |
|
|
Feb 22 2012, 04:56 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
93 posts Joined: Apr 2010 |
|
|
|
Feb 22 2012, 04:59 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
322 posts Joined: Jul 2006 |
QUOTE(Piros @ Feb 22 2012, 04:34 PM) Polygamy was never allowed by God. The patriarch (Abraham, David, Solomon) all sinned in this area. However God save them and forgave their sin Yes you are right polygamy is never allowed by God. The kings of the time because of their failure to abide to scripture and followed the local culture ended up paying for it most severely. Sorry for the confusion.Yahweh can take life whenever He wants using whatever methods because all life belongs to Him. He created and gave life and he has the power to take it back and destroy. God gave the 10 commandments to men, the 1st 4 of them is our duty to God and the rest 6 our duty to fellow man. He did not fail, Ephesians 1:3-7 tells us God choose and save those belongs to Him before the creation, He choose to save us through Jesus Christ when the creation was not He knew sin would enter the world but He allowed it. In fact He told Adam & Eve not to eat of the fruit yet they disobey. The fault lies on them not God. He never failed, we failed and now we are paying the price. The devil failed and they too will pay the price. |
|
|
Feb 22 2012, 05:07 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
322 posts Joined: Jul 2006 |
QUOTE(kenmirzz @ Feb 22 2012, 04:56 PM) As much as I would like to; I fear that the results will be unacceptable to you. You desire to be convinced with compelling justification. But I am no spokesperson or representative for God. Im neither Judge or Jury. What I can do is merely answer questions with the little that I know from what has been written. I have avoided the Religious thread like a plague because really at the end of the day it is all a question of faith. If you do not believe it is your perogative no amount of arguing will convince you otherwise. It is not my place to win you over or judge. Everyone is entitled to what he/she believes. So if its ok I would prefer to keep discussions light and more Q&A. God Bless |
|
|
Feb 22 2012, 05:09 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
194 posts Joined: Nov 2010 |
Favouritism + All-Loving = Contradiction
|
|
|
Feb 22 2012, 05:14 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
322 posts Joined: Jul 2006 |
QUOTE(kenmirzz @ Feb 22 2012, 05:06 PM) Yes, David even committed a murder of Uriah's husband and still forgive by God? He sent Uria's husband for front line mission which resulting in his death, just because he lusted for Uriah. God forgave him. Ironically, God didnt forgave the Amorites, Amelikites, Caananites, etc. Is this a racist God? Yes, indeed. Because the god shows favoritism towards the Israelites. Actually what you stated isnt proof that the OT is a collection of Jewish myth but a statement that God is dicriminatory and practises favoritism. Again who am I to justify who gets forgiven or not? Matt 20:1 (well the whole passage actually).. its is His perogative. I dont understand it frankly but again it doesnt change a thing.Why is it hard for you all gentlemen to admit that OT is a collection of Jewish myth? This post has been edited by stefanong: Feb 22 2012, 05:15 PM |
|
|
Feb 22 2012, 05:22 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
194 posts Joined: Nov 2010 |
OT & NT = irreconcilable
many versions of bibles, chapters get thrown out to "reconcile", meaning lost in translation, selective interpretations breed many denominations etc etc deep sea scrolls must read, mother of god i tell ya This post has been edited by hotjake: Feb 22 2012, 05:26 PM |
|
|
Feb 22 2012, 05:28 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
194 posts Joined: Nov 2010 |
QUOTE(kenmirzz @ Feb 22 2012, 05:25 PM) Brother, I am a truth seeker, I apologize beforehand if I ever hurt your heart. I know from your reply that you are a decent and humble person. So far, I cannot find satisfying asnwer to this dilemma. I studied Bible and Koran. Both do not provide ample guidance because god was described as discriminatory towards certain people. i share your thoughts and dilemma and i believe many others do as wellThe most plausible answer is that OT was never authored by god, but by racist Jews who despised non-Jews. It's a collection of myth, cover to cover, if you tickle your mind a bit. God, if he ever exist, does not play favoritism, it defeats His justice. A person who kills his cat on the mere ground that the cat does not recognize him as the owner is considered as psychologically disturbed, a sadist. The description of god in OT fit into this. A sadist god who craved for recognition, a narcassistic god who longed to be acknowledged, an evil god who toyed with human life. This post has been edited by hotjake: Feb 22 2012, 05:28 PM |
|
|
Feb 23 2012, 09:12 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,268 posts Joined: Oct 2010 |
QUOTE(kenmirzz @ Feb 22 2012, 08:56 PM) Is it? Some people just want to feel psychologically comfortable and find religions provide them with the pacifier. For example, it's just like a person who convinced that he has an unlimited amount of money buried underground somewhere and will have full access to it after his passing away. He may feel psychologically persuading but that does not mean he or she has manipulation of truth, or an iota of truth. Fortunately for us mere mortals, your intellect is just as much mine, a mere mortal.Old Testament has countless problems, and those who read the books in OT will realize God was atrocious in dealing with certain tribes. Nevertheless, the urge for a focused purpose of life will cause one to be ignoring all the cruelties therein. It's sad indeed. We know murdering an innocent is wrong, universally. But when it comes to Yahweh or God, we accept it and called it "God's dispension of his Unerring Justice". We buried our intellect and wisdom whenever we try to whitewash God's evil deed. Trying to define ALL acts of God is an impossibility. We can only look at the macro purpose of God and not look at its finer details less we become HIM. IF we CAN acess to Being HIM, whither God? In my opinion, and its only my opinion, in the greater measure of things, there is ONe main purpose of this god named YHWH, that is to prepare and ensure the way of His appointed Saviour called Jesus whom he purpose to come through the nation of Israel and through the lineage of David. The many 'atrocities' that you mentioned where nations were destroyed was because a) they were evil, practcing idolatory, eg The Canaanites were known to engage in bestiality, incest, and even child sacrifice. Deviant sexual acts were the norm. This was a thoroughly evil culture, so much so that the Bible says it nauseated God. They were into brutality, cruelty, incest, bestiality, cultic prostitution, and even child sacrifice by fire. They were an aggressive culture that wanted to annihilate the Israelites. b) they were trying to destroy Israel c) Does God give a chance for repentance? It must be remembered that God gave the Canaanite people more than sufficient time to repent of their evil ways—over 400 years (Genesis 15:13-16)! The Book of Hebrews tells us that the Canaanites were "disobedient," a phrase that implies moral culpability on their part (Hebrews 11:31). The Canaanites were aware of God's power (Joshua 2:10-11, 9:9) and could have sought repentance. The example of Rahab and her family is a sure proof that the Canaanites could have avoided their destruction if they had repented before Israel's God (Joshua 2). God's desire is that the wicked turn from their sin rather than die (Ezekiel 18:31-32, 33:11). Whatever you read in the OT all points towards this sole purpose, which is the greater purpose that the billions of christians will have come to faith in Jesus their saviour. God could have destroyed creation from the beginning and started again but He did not. He showed them love, mercy and salvation. A Greater purpose than what out mere mortal minds could ever comprehend to explain. Peace |
|
|
Feb 23 2012, 09:35 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
194 posts Joined: Nov 2010 |
QUOTE(prophetjul @ Feb 23 2012, 09:12 AM) Fortunately for us mere mortals, your intellect is just as much mine, a mere mortal. The Problem of Evil gets selective interpretation all the time. Who was evil? the tribe? the person? the innocents who get slain along the big measure of God's mysterious plan? Israelite the chosen ones? See how much eveil they do today? God has no guilt, hence no punishment for this chosen people nor redemption for their victims, namely the Palestinians Trying to define ALL acts of God is an impossibility. We can only look at the macro purpose of God and not look at its finer details less we become HIM. IF we CAN acess to Being HIM, whither God? In my opinion, and its only my opinion, in the greater measure of things, there is ONe main purpose of this god named YHWH, that is to prepare and ensure the way of His appointed Saviour called Jesus whom he purpose to come through the nation of Israel and through the lineage of David. The many 'atrocities' that you mentioned where nations were destroyed was because a) they were evil, practcing idolatory, eg The Canaanites were known to engage in bestiality, incest, and even child sacrifice. Deviant sexual acts were the norm. This was a thoroughly evil culture, so much so that the Bible says it nauseated God. They were into brutality, cruelty, incest, bestiality, cultic prostitution, and even child sacrifice by fire. They were an aggressive culture that wanted to annihilate the Israelites. b) they were trying to destroy Israel c) Does God give a chance for repentance? It must be remembered that God gave the Canaanite people more than sufficient time to repent of their evil ways—over 400 years (Genesis 15:13-16)! The Book of Hebrews tells us that the Canaanites were "disobedient," a phrase that implies moral culpability on their part (Hebrews 11:31). The Canaanites were aware of God's power (Joshua 2:10-11, 9:9) and could have sought repentance. The example of Rahab and her family is a sure proof that the Canaanites could have avoided their destruction if they had repented before Israel's God (Joshua 2). God's desire is that the wicked turn from their sin rather than die (Ezekiel 18:31-32, 33:11). Whatever you read in the OT all points towards this sole purpose, which is the greater purpose that the billions of christians will have come to faith in Jesus their saviour. God could have destroyed creation from the beginning and started again but He did not. He showed them love, mercy and salvation. A Greater purpose than what out mere mortal minds could ever comprehend to explain. Peace |
|
|
Feb 23 2012, 09:39 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,268 posts Joined: Oct 2010 |
QUOTE(hotjake @ Feb 23 2012, 09:35 AM) The Problem of Evil gets selective interpretation all the time. Who was evil? the tribe? the person? the innocents who get slain along the big measure of God's mysterious plan? Israelite the chosen ones? See how much eveil they do today? God has no guilt, hence no punishment for this chosen people nor redemption for their victims, namely the Palestinians Its not selective if you care to read the OT. The Israel of the OT is quite different from the nation of Israel today. That Israel was theocratic in nature. i guess you are a Palestinean sympathizer...from your previous posts, thats why you are here to bash christianity? This post has been edited by prophetjul: Feb 23 2012, 09:40 AM |
| Bump Topic Topic ClosedOptions New Topic |
| Change to: | 0.0702sec
0.64
5 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 5th December 2025 - 04:15 AM |