You think Nikon only serve me as their main customer ah ?
Well, I guess it won't be here so soon as replacement unit will be from KL. 2 days to Penang again.
Photography The Official Nikon Discussion thread V5, Anticipating D700 replacement !
|
|
 Mar 1 2011, 10:37 AM
|
 
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again 
|
Where got so fast any updates ?
You think Nikon only serve me as their main customer ah ? Well, I guess it won't be here so soon as replacement unit will be from KL. 2 days to Penang again. |
Quote|
|
|
|
|
Mar 1 2011, 10:40 AM
|
All Stars
14,037 posts Joined: Nov 2004
|
QUOTE(KTCY @ Mar 1 2011, 10:37 AM) Where got so fast any updates ? KTCY, you got any contacts at the SC?You think Nikon only serve me as their main customer ah ? Well, I guess it won't be here so soon as replacement unit will be from KL. 2 days to Penang again.  |
|
|
Mar 1 2011, 10:40 AM
|
|
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
|
QUOTE(aldosoesilo @ Mar 1 2011, 10:24 AM) anyway 14-24 is pretty wide when you have FX 12-24 and 14-24 there is weakness. Can't put filter. since you are preparing for FX then shouldn't be a problem right? hhahaha.. Yeah.. I've been having fun with UWA lately. I feel like buying tokina 11-16 2.8 however since it doesn't AF with my body, what is your suggestion? should I upgrade body 1st then go for 11-16 or go for 12-24 f 4 instead?  pretty confusing. you have a good eye, I think in term of sharpness they both good. so any suggestion bro?I don't wanna get 14-24 because bulky and I don't need constant aperture / big aperture for landscape ! 12-24 f4 sharp on f4. What think you ? 11-16 sharp but no details but 12-24 sharp with details. Personally play with both till boring liao |
|
|
Mar 1 2011, 10:41 AM
|
Senior Member
1,676 posts Joined: Oct 2006 From: LiTtLe BiG pL@NeT 
|
QUOTE(KTCY @ Mar 1 2011, 10:37 AM) Where got so fast any updates ? this OOF problem is happening to most 24G ???You think Nikon only serve me as their main customer ah ? Well, I guess it won't be here so soon as replacement unit will be from KL. 2 days to Penang again. cant wait to see more of your Danbo picture spam ... |
|
|
Mar 1 2011, 10:43 AM
|
|
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
|
QUOTE(celciuz @ Mar 1 2011, 10:40 AM) KTCY, you got any contacts at the SC? Nope. I deal with Nikon sales manager for that. And Penang also got SC but I not close with them. Just know few staffs of Nikon. |
|
|
Mar 1 2011, 10:44 AM
|
Senior Member
2,538 posts Joined: Jul 2006
|
QUOTE(stsh90 @ Mar 1 2011, 10:24 AM) I'd personally prefer to see more sky than half sky half hills. Didn't apply rule of thirds? yup..that time still noob..lolAnyway, you're the dude from MMU rite. lol, how u know? QUOTE(Agito666 @ Mar 1 2011, 10:28 AM) i also from MMU as well mmu melaka? or cyber? noobest people here |
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 1 2011, 10:46 AM
|
|
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
|
QUOTE(eddy230379 @ Mar 1 2011, 10:41 AM) this OOF problem is happening to most 24G ??? Famous and common issue.cant wait to see more of your Danbo picture spam ... hopefully I can get brand new unit instead of recalibration la. |
|
|
Mar 1 2011, 10:50 AM
|
Senior Member
1,457 posts Joined: Nov 2010 From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur
|
QUOTE(KTCY @ Mar 1 2011, 10:40 AM) 12-24 and 14-24 there is weakness. Can't put filter. can't put filter also nvm lah. I don't wanna get 14-24 because bulky and I don't need constant aperture / big aperture for landscape ! 12-24 f4 sharp on f4. What think you ? 11-16 sharp but no details but 12-24 sharp with details. Personally play with both till boring liao you told me to go naked if you can't purchase good filter right? hahaha.. sharp with details and sharp w/o details? what does it mean?  1st time heard that thing. can you please tell this newbie more.  |
|
|
Mar 1 2011, 10:58 AM
|
|
All Stars
14,037 posts Joined: Nov 2004
|
QUOTE(KTCY @ Mar 1 2011, 10:46 AM) Famous and common issue. If center AF is accurate, side is not accurate... wonder how to calibrate? o_Ohopefully I can get brand new unit instead of recalibration la. |
|
|
Mar 1 2011, 11:03 AM
|
Junior Member
221 posts Joined: Feb 2011
|
QUOTE(jieseak @ Feb 28 2011, 11:58 PM) i'm new to nikon ! i vote for d7000...i'm looking for nikon d7000 as my previous canon 500D was stolen. when i come to D7000 almost all my friends, forumers advised me to take the (body only) + (35mm lens). may i know whats wrong with the D7000 package that comes with 18-105mm lens??  |
|
|
Mar 1 2011, 11:03 AM
|
|
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
|
QUOTE(aldosoesilo @ Mar 1 2011, 10:50 AM) can't put filter also nvm lah. Go have both side by side and you will understand you told me to go naked if you can't purchase good filter right? hahaha.. sharp with details and sharp w/o details? what does it mean? 1st time heard that thing. can you please tell this newbie more. QUOTE(celciuz @ Mar 1 2011, 10:58 AM) If center AF is accurate, side is not accurate... wonder how to calibrate? o_O I also don't know |
|
|
Mar 1 2011, 11:03 AM
|
 
Elite
11,861 posts Joined: Oct 2008 From: Bangalasia
|
QUOTE(noobie1 @ Mar 1 2011, 10:44 AM) yup..that time still noob..lol Cyber MMU. grad long time liao lor... got D70s because assignment that time and i didnt come through rental camera that time lol, how u know? mmu melaka? or cyber?  |
|
|
Mar 1 2011, 11:04 AM
|
|
Junior Member
221 posts Joined: Feb 2011
|
QUOTE(C_Sagi @ Mar 1 2011, 12:30 AM) Yeah, i agree but I kinda prefer d90 sound that d7k, hehe. D90 rock!!!Added on March 1, 2011, 11:09 am QUOTE(aldosoesilo @ Mar 1 2011, 10:24 AM) anyway 14-24 is pretty wide when you have FX i think u should upgrade ur body...since you are preparing for FX then shouldn't be a problem right? hhahaha.. Yeah.. I've been having fun with UWA lately. I feel like buying tokina 11-16 2.8 however since it doesn't AF with my body, what is your suggestion? should I upgrade body 1st then go for 11-16 or go for 12-24 f 4 instead? pretty confusing. you have a good eye, I think in term of sharpness they both good. so any suggestion bro?not only u can use this lens but other lens that did not hv motor... just think about the cost... u can spend the money for other stuff... Added on March 1, 2011, 11:12 am QUOTE(aldosoesilo @ Mar 1 2011, 10:50 AM) can't put filter also nvm lah. yeah...you told me to go naked if you can't purchase good filter right? hahaha.. sharp with details and sharp w/o details? what does it mean? 1st time heard that thing. can you please tell this newbie more. whats meaning by sharp with details and sharp w/o details? This post has been edited by kakisemut: Mar 1 2011, 11:12 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 1 2011, 11:13 AM
|
|
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
|
Most lens is sharp, taking 18-70 as an example. It's sharp but not much details in it if compare with 35/2
12-24 is sharp with full details even zoom till 100% while 11-16 is sharp but when you zoom in more than 50%, there isn't much details left. It's become slight blurry with pixel dot |
|
|
Mar 1 2011, 11:13 AM
|
|
Senior Member
2,538 posts Joined: Jul 2006
|
QUOTE(Agito666 @ Mar 1 2011, 11:03 AM) Cyber MMU. grad long time liao lor... got D70s because assignment that time and i didnt come through rental camera that time oic..wah..rent camera? i tot u guy kinda need the camera for long run? or izit just for that particular assignment? |
|
|
Mar 1 2011, 11:15 AM
|
|
Senior Member
1,041 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(KTCY @ Mar 1 2011, 10:40 AM) 12-24 and 14-24 there is weakness. Can't put filter. Just by trying 1116 only, i already understand what you mean by that. very true... I don't wanna get 14-24 because bulky and I don't need constant aperture / big aperture for landscape ! 12-24 f4 sharp on f4. What think you ? 11-16 sharp but no details but 12-24 sharp with details. Personally play with both till boring liao But no doubt go for either one will not wrong. xD |
|
|
Mar 1 2011, 11:18 AM
|
|
Junior Member
221 posts Joined: Feb 2011
|
QUOTE(KTCY @ Mar 1 2011, 11:13 AM) Most lens is sharp, taking 18-70 as an example. It's sharp but not much details in it if compare with 35/2 so 12-24 is the right choice?12-24 is sharp with full details even zoom till 100% while 11-16 is sharp but when you zoom in more than 50%, there isn't much details left. It's become slight blurry with pixel dot Added on March 1, 2011, 11:18 am QUOTE(alvinX @ Mar 1 2011, 11:15 AM) Just by trying 1116 only, i already understand what you mean by that. very true... wahh...But no doubt go for either one will not wrong. xD another suggestion....  This post has been edited by kakisemut: Mar 1 2011, 11:18 AM |
|
|
Mar 1 2011, 11:20 AM
|
|
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
|
QUOTE(kakisemut @ Mar 1 2011, 11:18 AM) so 12-24 is the right choice? Nikkor AF-S 12-24 f/4 ! Added on March 1, 2011, 11:18 am wahh... another suggestion.... |
|
|
Mar 1 2011, 11:21 AM
|
|
Elite
11,861 posts Joined: Oct 2008 From: Bangalasia
|
QUOTE(noobie1 @ Mar 1 2011, 11:13 AM) oic..wah..rent camera? i tot u guy kinda need the camera for long run? or izit just for that particular assignment? that time my cunning housemate go rent camera for assignment...we got 1 subject is photography ma....i still remember that time majority users are Nikon D70s + Canon 350D  This post has been edited by Agito666: Mar 1 2011, 11:22 AM |
|
|
Mar 1 2011, 11:27 AM
|
|
Senior Member
1,457 posts Joined: Nov 2010 From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur
|
QUOTE(KTCY @ Mar 1 2011, 11:03 AM) Go have both side by side and you will understand Uhmm.. Okay. ThanksI also don't know QUOTE(kakisemut @ Mar 1 2011, 11:04 AM) D90 rock!!! Yeah.. Thinking to upgrade but honestly I am expecting something with better IQ than D3100.Added on March 1, 2011, 11:09 am i think u should upgrade ur body... not only u can use this lens but other lens that did not hv motor... just think about the cost... u can spend the money for other stuff... Added on March 1, 2011, 11:12 am yeah... whats meaning by sharp with details and sharp w/o details? which doesn't burn my bank account QUOTE(KTCY @ Mar 1 2011, 11:20 AM) Nikkor AF-S 12-24 f/4 ! how about tokina 12-24? recommended? Nikkor very expensive.. should have a better consideration. |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: |  0.0601sec
 0.34
 6 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 13th December 2025 - 09:33 AM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.