Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography The Official Nikon Discussion thread V5, Anticipating D700 replacement !

views
     
alvinX
post Mar 1 2011, 11:15 AM

tHe l0SeR
******
Senior Member
1,041 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(KTCY @ Mar 1 2011, 10:40 AM)
12-24 and 14-24 there is weakness. Can't put filter.
I don't wanna get 14-24 because bulky and I don't need constant aperture / big aperture for landscape !

12-24 f4 sharp on f4. What think you ?
11-16 sharp but no details but 12-24 sharp with details.
Personally play with both till boring liao laugh.gif
*
Just by trying 1116 only, i already understand what you mean by that. very true...

But no doubt go for either one will not wrong. xD
alvinX
post Mar 1 2011, 11:46 AM

tHe l0SeR
******
Senior Member
1,041 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(KTCY @ Mar 1 2011, 11:35 AM)
Forget about it. Get 11-16 better if between 12-24 tokina
*
I would said 1224 is more worthy! even nikkor lose to it by miles...

1116 i will buy if i were you smile.gif

go try it by your self...

not forget to try out sigma 1020 !
alvinX
post Mar 1 2011, 11:55 AM

tHe l0SeR
******
Senior Member
1,041 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(KTCY @ Mar 1 2011, 11:47 AM)
sigma 10-20 ugly distortion !
Nikkor 12-24 lose to Tokina 12-24 ? Are you sure on this ?
*
i got no info regarding sigma one. Just that 10, maybe suit his taste.

Nope, as he said he dun wan burn his bank account. In this case 1224 may come worthy. From my point of view, if 35mm able to satisfied you, with that kind of price i doubt the IQ you will ever make you regret it.

But if you look for more 1116 is your choice.

As for me, nikkor 1224 looks more complex than 1116. Just my 2 cents.
alvinX
post Mar 1 2011, 12:05 PM

tHe l0SeR
******
Senior Member
1,041 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(aldosoesilo @ Mar 1 2011, 12:00 PM)
I tried sigma 10-20. my body doesn't AF with 1116 tokina. as it doesn't have AF motor.
Yes
Yeahh.. Agree D3100 IQ is good but the lacking of AF makes me difficult in choosing lens.
anyway thanks for the list bro. Will do further research. Thanks!  thumbup.gif
*
Lol! Then why u still considering Tokina. If you can live without af, just afs all the way. 1224 FTW!!!
alvinX
post Mar 1 2011, 07:19 PM

tHe l0SeR
******
Senior Member
1,041 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(aldosoesilo @ Mar 1 2011, 12:09 PM)
doh.gif  doh.gif
Read the post before jump into conclusion bro. some more giving feedback FTW!
I said. I am considering tokina 12-24 or tokina 11-16.
where if I want tokina 11-16 I have to upgrade my body because I don't have AF motor.
else 12-24 version II which has AF motor. so I wanted to know about the suggestion. read the previous post before saying "FTW" bro.
*
=.= read it la bro... i dun think im require to state it out all the time right? sweat.gif

if u wanna upgrade ur body to d7k for a UWA i rather suggest you go for nikkor 1224 with your D3100.

u said u dun wan burn a hole in ur bank yet u comparing a 1224 with 1116 with a new body. what kind of comparison is that. only god know what you mean. did u ever rmb what you wrote? thats why i dun think ur budget is limited.

for me, i will not recommended u upgrade from d3100 to d7000 because of the lens restriction for af somemore seems like u able to afford nikkor lens.

tats why i suggest u nikkor FTW.

« Next Oldest · Photography, Digital Imaging & Video · Next Newest »
 

Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
 0.0367sec    0.33    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 13th December 2025 - 04:00 AM
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Removal Request
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025  IPS, Inc.