QUOTE(razuryza @ Feb 11 2011, 04:06 PM)
razurya is that DX sensor camera? or your d700?Mine is way too far from cat eyed bokeh
Photography The Official Nikon Discussion thread V4, Anticipating D700 replacement !
|
|
Feb 11 2011, 04:09 PM
Return to original view | Post
#221
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,457 posts Joined: Nov 2010 From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 11 2011, 04:21 PM
Return to original view | Post
#222
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,457 posts Joined: Nov 2010 From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur |
|
|
|
Feb 11 2011, 04:35 PM
Return to original view | Post
#223
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,457 posts Joined: Nov 2010 From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE(razuryza @ Feb 11 2011, 04:32 PM) erm.. cant find much sample.. maybe i'm not a bokeh person.. exactly I am thinking cat eyed bokeh is hard because the lens nowadays is ain't as goog as back then. but this one shot may show u ![]() i think its not bout the sensor.. more about the lens u using la Added on February 11, 2011, 4:33 pm nah ![]() not a bokeh person? I remember your model + christmas tree + bokeh all the way is deadly poisonous. For me. hahaha |
|
|
Feb 11 2011, 04:50 PM
Return to original view | Post
#224
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,457 posts Joined: Nov 2010 From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur |
|
|
|
Feb 11 2011, 11:58 PM
Return to original view | Post
#225
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,457 posts Joined: Nov 2010 From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur |
|
|
|
Feb 12 2011, 12:09 AM
Return to original view | Post
#226
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,457 posts Joined: Nov 2010 From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 12 2011, 12:19 AM
Return to original view | Post
#227
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,457 posts Joined: Nov 2010 From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE(Bliz @ Feb 12 2011, 12:10 AM) Well this is just for me, as i found out i always need the extra range for portraits... Most of the time i will be using my 70-200 anyway, the WA is just for few of the shots haha... good muscle you have there. Geng. okay remember to spam more landscape bro once you got your UWA QUOTE(razuryza @ Feb 12 2011, 12:11 AM) I thought you inherited 50mm ais? cun lar itu bro. |
|
|
Feb 12 2011, 01:05 AM
Return to original view | Post
#228
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,457 posts Joined: Nov 2010 From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur |
|
|
|
Feb 12 2011, 01:18 AM
Return to original view | Post
#229
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,457 posts Joined: Nov 2010 From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE(razuryza @ Feb 12 2011, 01:08 AM) is that an inheritance as well? QUOTE(Agito666 @ Feb 12 2011, 01:14 AM) oh ya wan to ask for who shooting in shopping complex...can meh? i mean last time when you bring DSLR in let's say KLCC, they wont dun allow you in meh? I bring my d3100 +1855 also can.also now the people will run away when you shoot them? (or did you use tele lens ? |
|
|
Feb 12 2011, 02:05 AM
Return to original view | Post
#230
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,457 posts Joined: Nov 2010 From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE(KTCY @ Feb 12 2011, 01:51 AM) underrated meaning the price should be higher than what it is.because it is very good. I was researching about underrated lens on Google few days ago. and there it was. I don't think you get what I said. Added on February 12, 2011, 2:07 am QUOTE(razuryza @ Feb 12 2011, 01:08 AM) that means the lens is worth more than the price.Added on February 12, 2011, 2:10 am QUOTE(aldosoesilo @ Feb 12 2011, 02:05 AM) underrated meaning the price should be higher than what it is. http://www.flickr.com/groups/d200/discuss/72157623227625972/because it is very good. I was reviewing underrated lens on Google few days ago. and there it was. I don't think you get what I said. Added on February 12, 2011, 2:07 am that means the lens is worth more than the price. http://briard.typepad.com/get_the_picture/...ikon-dslrs.html This post has been edited by aldosoesilo: Feb 12 2011, 02:17 AM |
|
|
Feb 12 2011, 02:36 AM
Return to original view | Post
#231
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,457 posts Joined: Nov 2010 From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE(KTCY @ Feb 12 2011, 02:13 AM) haha.. no problem bro. I can't play with those oldie lens. I have no idea where to find one. and budget limitation as well. anyway has anybody tried nikkor 60mm f/2.8 micro for portrait? it seems has a good review for portrait on internet. This post has been edited by aldosoesilo: Feb 12 2011, 02:36 AM |
|
|
Feb 12 2011, 03:28 PM
Return to original view | Post
#232
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,457 posts Joined: Nov 2010 From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur |
Okay I don't get it.
what is lens calibration? Sorry noob question |
|
|
Feb 12 2011, 03:37 PM
Return to original view | Post
#233
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,457 posts Joined: Nov 2010 From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 12 2011, 03:49 PM
Return to original view | Post
#234
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,457 posts Joined: Nov 2010 From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE(Tony Stark @ Feb 12 2011, 03:41 PM) QUOTE(edwardgsk @ Feb 12 2011, 03:46 PM) This is what I got from my researchQUOTE Calibrating your lens is simple. First, find a suitable static target to focus on. With both eyes open, adjust your camera so that one eye is looking through the viewfinder. Focus your lens at your target as you normally would. does it means leave the mark where the lens come into it's sharpest? Now, with both eyes open and focused on your target, slowly rotate your zoom ring until your image is sharp and your eyes no longer feel strained. Refocus your lens if necessary and repeat the procedure. You will get to a magic point where your focus and depth perception are “normal”. At this point, you should be able to remove and replace your camera from your eye with no apparent change in your target. Your lens is now calibrated to your eye. You can optionally create a small mark on your zoom ring that corresponds to the mark on the body. Later on, when you need a “normal” lens, just rotate your zoom ring to that mark, and voila. Read more: http://www.digital-photography-school.com/...e#ixzz1DjE50A9U can anyone give me a hint? This post has been edited by aldosoesilo: Feb 12 2011, 03:57 PM |
|
|
Feb 12 2011, 04:06 PM
Return to original view | Post
#235
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,457 posts Joined: Nov 2010 From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur |
This focusing issue awakening my curiosity to do testing. xD
currently testing my 35mm 1.8 |
|
|
Feb 12 2011, 04:28 PM
Return to original view | Post
#236
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,457 posts Joined: Nov 2010 From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE(Tony Stark @ Feb 12 2011, 04:18 PM) usually higher end bodies have microadjustment/AF fine tuning..by that u can try out ur focusing is correct onot. if got rajin, the whole day can try from +20 drop 1 by 1 to -20 As long as the focus in the focus box of the focusing chart should be fine right?duno if entry level bodies got this feature onot. but usually its kinda important for those who do macrowork. and usually 3rd party lenses oni have this back/front focusing issue. dont know if normal nikkor lenses got onot. I guess I have no problem then |
|
|
Feb 13 2011, 03:58 PM
Return to original view | Post
#237
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,457 posts Joined: Nov 2010 From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE(mmohdnor @ Feb 13 2011, 12:30 PM) guys, if i were to replace my kit lens 18-55 with a tight budget : get 16-85 nikon. it will please you in the long run. 1. strictly below 1.5k 2. strictly below 2k what would u guys suggest me to get for each category above? i plan to get an all-in-one/walkabout lense in the coming months (funding! haha). sometimes lazy to bring so many lenses and change it on the go. wide + tele. macro & VR feature is a big plus! <1.5k :: sigma 18-200 (new) / sigma 17-70 f2.8-4 (used) ? <2.0k :: nikkor 18-200 vr1/vr2 (used) / nikkor 16-85 (new)? *however i feel 70mm or 85mm kinda limited sometimes, cant zoom much though it is a slightly better zoom than my kitty lens. huhu. as stated in my siggy, currently owns: d3100 + 18-55mm + 35mm f1.8g + nissin di622 mkII thanks! Added on February 13, 2011, 12:38 pm is tamron 18-270mm F/3.5-6.3 Di II VC PZD any good ah? ... that one has got new motor inside http://www.tamron.com/en/photolens/di_II_a...n_one/b008.html nice walk around lens. except in low light due to small aperture. else you might consider 17-50 sigma or tamron. I prefer sigma though Added on February 13, 2011, 3:59 pm QUOTE(MichaelJohn @ Feb 13 2011, 03:57 PM) Anyone know a good lens for close up shots? you might interested on 60mm micro Nikkor. do take a look.(And i mean really close up) » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « I read a lot of good review about that lens This post has been edited by aldosoesilo: Feb 13 2011, 03:59 PM |
|
|
Feb 13 2011, 11:32 PM
Return to original view | Post
#238
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,457 posts Joined: Nov 2010 From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur |
|
|
|
Feb 14 2011, 12:03 AM
Return to original view | Post
#239
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,457 posts Joined: Nov 2010 From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur |
|
|
|
Feb 14 2011, 01:08 AM
Return to original view | Post
#240
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,457 posts Joined: Nov 2010 From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur |
guys. how often u use UWA? and do you find 18mm is not wide enough?
I am curious. hahaha |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0260sec
0.47
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 12th December 2025 - 08:40 PM |