Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
13 Pages « < 9 10 11 12 13 >Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography The Official Nikon Discussion thread V4, Anticipating D700 replacement !

views
     
aldosoesilo
post Feb 10 2011, 02:36 PM

I was like LOL :D
******
Senior Member
1,457 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(KTCY @ Feb 10 2011, 02:33 PM)
What's the point ? Lens are built to go thru all that la. And cleaning it using micro fiber cloth, lens pen, and blower is more than enough.
Those cheapo filter will degrade my photos IQ lot more than the dust sleep.gif
*
I see.. Point taken. Thanks. I won't bother to but cheapo filter then laugh.gif
aldosoesilo
post Feb 10 2011, 03:17 PM

I was like LOL :D
******
Senior Member
1,457 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(C_Sagi @ Feb 10 2011, 03:03 PM)
I see, thanks for the suggestion. Fish eye not my type. Dunno how to appreciate it, hehe. tongue.gif
Think I'll go check UWA lens. Thanks again. biggrin.gif
*
I can't appreciate UWA yet. doh.gif
aldosoesilo
post Feb 10 2011, 05:08 PM

I was like LOL :D
******
Senior Member
1,457 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(edwardgsk @ Feb 10 2011, 05:06 PM)
Wah really ah Celciuz? blink.gif  *touchwood*
*
since then his built-in flash unable to survive no more
aldosoesilo
post Feb 10 2011, 05:28 PM

I was like LOL :D
******
Senior Member
1,457 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(celciuz @ Feb 10 2011, 05:14 PM)
Yalor, looks like some rambo's scars dry.gif Got lines one! LOL.
Yes~ and my lens and D700 still shooting perfectly fine biggrin.gif. Shows how macho the D700 + 85G is tongue.gif.
If you don't know anything don't simply say. No the pop up flash is still working fine. D700 is tough!
Didn't break completely, actually if never see properly won't notice. Just I want a new hood biggrin.gif.
*
oppss.. my bad. I thought something happen with your built0in flash?
aldosoesilo
post Feb 10 2011, 05:45 PM

I was like LOL :D
******
Senior Member
1,457 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(lighter @ Feb 10 2011, 05:32 PM)
yo guyz.. can Tamron 17-50 f/2.8 VC & Nikon 35mm f/1.8 use on D700 FX?
*
it causes a little vignetting if you don't mind.

http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp...essage=31742031
http://nutterphotog.blogspot.com/2009/05/n...d700-in-fx.html
aldosoesilo
post Feb 10 2011, 05:55 PM

I was like LOL :D
******
Senior Member
1,457 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(lighter @ Feb 10 2011, 05:54 PM)
thanks.. what about tamron 17-50mm f/2.8 + d700?
*
That 1 I am not sure. but I heard forumer said it can't be mounted on FX body. not sure though. tongue.gif
aldosoesilo
post Feb 10 2011, 06:26 PM

I was like LOL :D
******
Senior Member
1,457 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(bbuser91 @ Feb 10 2011, 06:12 PM)
Last time i check dpreview , and a forumer post up FX mode D700 using 35mm 1.8g usable but got abit vignetting only.

@aldo i tested , my hand sweating when holding d3100+35mm+sb-900 same goes with sb-700 , abit hard to hold but it is okay for me although bit tired. but i need flash badly so i keep tell myself forget about the tiredness and enjoy shooting !
*
There you go. Upgrade your body brows.gif brows.gif
aldosoesilo
post Feb 11 2011, 02:55 AM

I was like LOL :D
******
Senior Member
1,457 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(Agito666 @ Feb 11 2011, 12:41 AM)
do you think d800 will better than d7000?? hmm.gif
*
Indeed

QUOTE(gnome @ Feb 11 2011, 12:51 AM)
lol lens it is then laugh.gif

Time to get meself to Nikon BTS for some self poison yo tongue.gif
*
The Nikon holy trinity. tongue.gif

QUOTE(razuryza @ Feb 11 2011, 01:19 AM)
which one? y? so bad aa?
*
I like your color. it seems less saturated yet nice. moreover it is tack sharp. thumbup.gif

Today so sad, come back from office at 12 where everyone in my neighborhood playing with fireworks. I was rushing to go home go get my camera, and when I came with my camera, it was 12:30 AM. so the fireworks just gone. cry.gif cry.gif

I was helping my friend to take his portrait shoot, and accidentally my 35mm 1.8 focus sounds becoming *kreek* sound. I was like What??!! doh.gif
I tried to unmount it and mount it again for like 3 times yet still give me *kreek* sound while focusing, and eventually I try to play with the switch, make it manual focus, then M/A for like quite sometimes luckily things turn out works as normal.


Added on February 11, 2011, 2:57 am
QUOTE(invisibl3boyz @ Feb 11 2011, 02:31 AM)
guys....im goin to tke part as photographer this weekend, to help my cousin modeling for competition at the park. the q is, do i need to get reflector too? will this really goin to boost up the pic on the lighting?  and by using only 1 batt, can tahan frm 9am til 5pm? or need to get another spare batt? icon_question.gif
*
totally depends on the amount of shutter released and the amount of time you do play back on your image.

This post has been edited by aldosoesilo: Feb 11 2011, 09:51 AM
aldosoesilo
post Feb 11 2011, 10:32 AM

I was like LOL :D
******
Senior Member
1,457 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE
1)noob question: full frame and 4/3' sensor beside the ratio difference...what else got difference?  hmm.gif  let's say full frame body and mid range body...focus speed? aperture? ISO??... (i'm not get full frame anyway...get D7000 is more than enough for me...still long way to go to break my piggy bank  laugh.gif  )
Wider sensor means better ISO handling capability (you don't have to bump up your ISO as much as APS-C do, as your sensor capture more light), you get the actual focal length of your lens mean when you buy 50mm lens you will get 50mm lens unlike ASP-C with it's cropped factor (Nikon 1.5x, Canon 1.6x, Canon APS-H 1.3x), built quality indeed, usually come with better specs like 8/9 fps, superb AF system, CLS capability, better control in the body (not like entry level body where you have dig up the menu to change the control), of course better control placement.

QUOTE
he recommended D3100 and D7000...but he say same thing la... play lens enough, body is secondary... but i wan get D7000 and get spec kau kau so later i also will learn photograhpy kau kau because i pay for that body kau kau  laugh.gif
*if i get D3100 later scare boh syok because no AF there (if i get non-af lens) and i m lazy sell DSLR second hand body...  laugh.gif

he is correct I myself do recommended starter to get either D7k or D3100. APS-C sensor model doesn't make any much difference, except the CLS, built-quality and AF.
but entry level AF is actually sufficient <- come back to the person.
Lens is the major things when we are talking about ASP-C even FF lens still do a major difference I suppose. Do remember model does deprecate, today you say d7k GODLIKE 2 years later you say so-so. so does lens do deprecate, however good lens does deprecate slower true fact, 50mm 1.2 Ais <- still owning in its class, however due to technological problem there is no AF on the lens.

QUOTE
(by the way i use photoshop to draw more than i editing photo haha...)

I got to say I am more than agree, PP is boring, tiring and taking a long time.
yet if you don't do it <- usually I am too lazy to do it.
You wouldn't get amazing (woah2) color tone <- Correct me if I am wrong on this

This post has been edited by aldosoesilo: Feb 11 2011, 10:35 AM
aldosoesilo
post Feb 11 2011, 11:09 AM

I was like LOL :D
******
Senior Member
1,457 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(Agito666 @ Feb 11 2011, 10:54 AM)
1) thanks
2) getting D3100 scare will not liking it, because entry level body is light and small...grip also not nice haha...last time holding colleague's canon 400D i feel like ...
actually i m not really new to photography...learn before but not really deep into it...and once hibernate for years...now awaken because of KLIMS 2010 hot chicks
3) yes, post production photo is tiresome haha...except among many photos let's say 200-300 i will choose 2-3 photos to edit only.
*
Get whatever thing you feel you suit most, it doesn't have to be Nikon, or Canon. Leica also geng larr brows.gif brows.gif
LOL...
you are more than welcome.

QUOTE(g_pentium @ Feb 11 2011, 10:57 AM)
noted  icon_rolleyes.gif

rclxms.gif
awesome shot.
but what type of ND filter you use, is the screw type filter example B+W 77mm #110 Neutral Density (ND) 3.0 Glass Filter or Cokin glass type?

true,but can listen song while PP loh,reduce boringness.
as long dont overexposure your shot,noise, and distracting subject,pp would be a quick fix.
*
I can't hold my patient when PP it on my laptop. even open RAW file also hard. vmad.gif
CPU processor goes to 100% immediately doh.gif
RAW PP hmm.gif
I takes me more than 3 days for 50 pics I guess

QUOTE(Andy214 @ Feb 11 2011, 10:58 AM)
It's only take long time if you're NEW to it; Once you learn up, you can touch up very fast; Basically, there're many ways to touch up, even minor touch up is good, such as improving the contrast, vibrance, clarity, blacks, etc.
Plus, in lightroom, IF you're lazy, you can apply the settings to ALL your pictures, and then have a quick review which one needs further adjustment.
It all depends on you.

All I can say is, once you do PP "properly", you will start to appreciate it and see the difference; You can always compare BEFORE and AFTER. Best if you shoot RAW, as you can adjust more; To see the difference, you can shoot RAW+JPEG, then compare the PP results from RAW VS your JPEG produced by the camera... You can improve your PP skills by first matching the JPEG results and then slowly improve further. Then you will ask yourself, do you still want to PP? 
Besides, if you shoot RAW, and your camera have RAW processing, you can process your RAW image and do adjustment like adjusting the Picture Control, sharpness, etc. EVEN with this, you will see the difference already,

PP is not a must; but it's makes a difference.
*
Will do better bro. thumbup.gif
Thanks. I really2 need to learn on that.
aldosoesilo
post Feb 11 2011, 11:32 AM

I was like LOL :D
******
Senior Member
1,457 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur


SPAM
user posted image
aldosoesilo
post Feb 11 2011, 11:35 AM

I was like LOL :D
******
Senior Member
1,457 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur


SPAM
leng lui
user posted image

user posted image

user posted image
PS: Sorry they all are compressed by Facebook cry.gif


Added on February 11, 2011, 11:40 amuser posted image


Added on February 11, 2011, 11:44 amuser posted image

This post has been edited by aldosoesilo: Feb 11 2011, 11:44 AM
aldosoesilo
post Feb 11 2011, 11:51 AM

I was like LOL :D
******
Senior Member
1,457 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(bagata @ Feb 11 2011, 11:48 AM)
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

*
Sifu do teach me how to capture this kind of shoot. notworthy.gif

This post has been edited by aldosoesilo: Feb 11 2011, 11:52 AM
aldosoesilo
post Feb 11 2011, 11:58 AM

I was like LOL :D
******
Senior Member
1,457 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(celciuz @ Feb 11 2011, 11:53 AM)
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

I wanted to capture kind of panning thing as well.
never have the chance though. is it possible to capture it using 9-dot entry level AF system? plus what kind of setting?
AF-C? AF-S? AF-Servo?
aldosoesilo
post Feb 11 2011, 12:58 PM

I was like LOL :D
******
Senior Member
1,457 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur


user posted image

This post has been edited by aldosoesilo: Feb 11 2011, 01:02 PM
aldosoesilo
post Feb 11 2011, 01:02 PM

I was like LOL :D
******
Senior Member
1,457 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(Agito666 @ Feb 11 2011, 01:00 PM)
nice plane... did this photo different with the previous you posted last few posts up there?  hmm.gif
*
I never realized I've posted it. xD
edited. change the perspective of the plane. tongue.gif


This post has been edited by aldosoesilo: Feb 11 2011, 01:04 PM
aldosoesilo
post Feb 11 2011, 01:05 PM

I was like LOL :D
******
Senior Member
1,457 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur


is this considered cat-eye bokeh? hmm.gif
user posted image
aldosoesilo
post Feb 11 2011, 01:31 PM

I was like LOL :D
******
Senior Member
1,457 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(Agito666 @ Feb 11 2011, 01:18 PM)
got 45 degree ngam ngam punye shot?  tongue.gif
what is that? lol... even the "bokeh" word/term i just learn in last month  laugh.gif
*
cat-eye bokeh.
round round punya bokeh. like cat eye. tongue.gif
I myself not sure, therefore still ask. hahaha
aldosoesilo
post Feb 11 2011, 02:03 PM

I was like LOL :D
******
Senior Member
1,457 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(alvinX @ Feb 11 2011, 01:58 PM)
both were posted before... seems like u like to post repeatedly.

a kind suggest here, open up a gallery thread for C&C.
*
nop. different color tone bro the one I posted initially cold color tone.. smile.gif
just some perspective. kindly check it. haha..
Will do gallery thread later. Thanks for the suggestion
aldosoesilo
post Feb 11 2011, 04:01 PM

I was like LOL :D
******
Senior Member
1,457 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(eddy230379 @ Feb 11 2011, 02:46 PM)
if i remembered correctly you can check back postings by bro celciuz ... he wrote that he realised that he could only get cats eye bokeh with his D700 but not with D90 ...
*
meaning cat eyed bokeh is not possible to achieve when we are using DX sensor? shocking.gif

13 Pages « < 9 10 11 12 13 >Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0401sec    0.32    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 15th December 2025 - 05:09 PM