QUOTE(Bushido @ Nov 1 2011, 09:28 PM)
Those who are asking the same old question on 560M and 460M, read the few pages before this page. EVERYTHING is there.
But so far I've tested, the 560M is not slacking on fHD gameplay performance either. Losing to the 460M on fHD gameplay doesnt mean it's unplayable at full HD. The 560M still has higher texture filling rate.
All the games im playing now, i did not downscale it to HD, full HD all the way.
FHD 24/7 = LIKE A BAWSE !!
have u tried the witcher 2 and crysis 1?? these 2 r the most pretiest games ive ever seen...almost as pretty as a girl

Added on November 1, 2011, 10:42 pmQUOTE(DoubleU @ Nov 1 2011, 10:15 PM)
pretty sure from what i'm seeing for the benchmarks of the 128bit GTX560m there isn't any difference for gaming at fHD.. maybe 2-3 frames... but if your eyes so powerful maybe should consider desktop with GTX580 liao,
Added on November 1, 2011, 10:16 pm@riku, the bag i got is this >
http://us.estore.asus.com/index.php?l=product_detail&p=894so mine fits nicely
Added on November 1, 2011, 10:17 pmoh yea btw do you guys know if logitech malaysia sells replacement feet for the G700 wireless mouse? or will i have to turn to OEM?
Aussie doesn't sell here.
true dat... normal detail textures like mafia 2 n dirt 3 will get same fps as 460m.. only those highly detailed textured FPS games like crysis, will bottleneck a bit, cuz the textures are very detailed and constantly changing at a fast rate... the bottleneck probably gone at 1600x900 i think, since the best buy version of the g74sx also using the 560m128 and has a reso of 1600x900...
well.. hopefully the next g53 series will have the same chassis and a more powderful gpu... so we can upgrade our gpu
inb4 570m 128bit

Added on November 1, 2011, 10:53 pmQUOTE(Mr_47 @ Nov 1 2011, 08:42 PM)
FHD lappy play at HD only pitty

ayam pity also, HD for teh rest of my life
This post has been edited by trustmeiamlegit: Nov 1 2011, 10:53 PM