QUOTE(epo @ Feb 9 2011, 04:17 PM)
but the above if we look from backward angle...
beginner > amateur > pro > beginner...when u reached pro level, giving any beginner gear, u don't have a prob to use it? is it what u mean?
if from fwd angle...
beginner > amateur > pro...For your information:
It's (a)amateur---> professional or (b) beginner ----> expert
You don't mix both up together

QUOTE(epo @ Feb 9 2011, 04:17 PM)
you're stuck with beginner gear & join discussion with pro (in sense u want to learn more) & the pro talk-talk using a methodology which is not exist in your beginner gear, you still need to
upgrade kan to practise what they're discuss.
no point just talk2 only but never tried. practical better compare to theory...
beginner will not improve with high end gear if they dunno about basic. that the facts which i'm also agreed...
What pro talk? What methodology? lolz
You're kinda generalizing the whole thing. Be specific

Of course practical work helps you learn more/faster than theoretical knowledge alone. But of course lar, you need some basic knowledge of how things work, before you can do practical stuff

QUOTE
you have no high ISO to help you, even if you did the noise control sucks.
yes it's make me THINK to upgrade to full frame to have clear ISO
Try to take the limited ISO range as a challenge lar. If you're stuck with it, you've just got to live with it.
Learn to shoot steadier at lower shutter speeds. Get faster aperture lenses. Or get a flashgun at least, to get "faster shutter speed"
QUOTE
Auto WB is dodgy.
yes it's make me THINK to upgrade with a better gear
Shoot RAW lar.Can PP later. Kao tim.
QUOTE
No Auto ISO so you have to know when to change and how to change it fast.
yes it's make me THINK to upgrade with a better gear bcoz i want to capture precise moment fast
Do you know what is fast shutter speed?
QUOTE
No lighting optimization for you so you need to take not of highlights and shadows, how to get it right.
yes it's make me THINK to upgrade with a better gear bcoz i want to capture precise moment fast
Are you even interested in replying to Goldfries' quote?
QUOTE
Lowest available AFing technology, so you have to do what you can to get the shot right.
yes it's make me THINK to upgrade with a better gear bcoz i want to capture precise moment fast
What's with the copy paste again? Do you actually understand what he said?
QUOTE
No wide / constant aperture lens with IS, so you have to learn how to hand-hold in steady manner, and how to work around with available technology to achieve what you want.
yes it's make me THINK to upgrade with a better gear bcoz i want to capture precise moment fast
QUOTE
If you think capturing fast moving subjects is hard, try capturing still subjects and make it appealing. smile.gif Do you think is that easy?
agreed coz sometime it isn't easy but you can re-do thousand times until you're satisfied...
you can take pic of 1 flower from 9am until 6pm to get your best shots...
how about moving subject/precise moments which are come once in a lifetime... a bit frust if we know the scene but miss the shoot bcoz limited of the gear capability...?
For once, I have to bloodily agree with this TOTALLY. Exactly of what I though all this while.
QUOTE
from the above can we conclude... beginner gear for a still pics /Â high gear for a still & fast pics...? (to relate the thread - photo vs gear)
Beginner bodies with fast focusing lenses, can do wonders ya know. Just search around. You'll be amazed of what they can achieve.
QUOTE
why canon doesn't produce 1dmk4 / nikon doesn't produce d3s where beginner can afford the price (below rm2k) so beginner can learn how to capture fast action/precise moments with the help of technology?
What kind of question is this? Where have you been for the last 10 years during this IT world?

Added on February 9, 2011, 4:53 pmQUOTE(epo @ Feb 9 2011, 04:43 PM)
yup that's the proper word to use when we feel our friend is down coz of beginner gear
but u know la... human requirement... will never enough...
give 100, want 10000, give 10000 want 10000000, give 10000000, want 10000000000...
What do you think drove development in Science and Technology? Give it a thought a bit
This post has been edited by -kytz-: Feb 9 2011, 04:55 PM