^
good opportunity you can grab yours tonight.
anyway mind me asking why you sell your 50 1.8??
Photography The Official Nikon Discussion thread V3, Dark Lord going strong
Photography The Official Nikon Discussion thread V3, Dark Lord going strong
|
|
Jan 4 2011, 03:12 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,457 posts Joined: Nov 2010 From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur |
^
good opportunity you can grab yours tonight. anyway mind me asking why you sell your 50 1.8?? |
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 4 2011, 03:13 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
330 posts Joined: Sep 2007 From: East, KL |
I rarely use my 50mm after getting 17-50 Tamron.
|
|
|
Jan 4 2011, 03:15 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,457 posts Joined: Nov 2010 From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur |
^
Reason? isn't prime produce more pleasant bokeh? somehow. |
|
|
Jan 4 2011, 03:17 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
330 posts Joined: Sep 2007 From: East, KL |
imho, 50mm is kinda tight for me. soft images on f1.8. might need to turn to 2.8 to get sharper images. Posted image earlier using my Tammy 17-50. Bad side of that lens is it's kinda noisy. Focusing speed wise- so so only.
This post has been edited by Kiki-Lala: Jan 4 2011, 03:20 PM |
|
|
Jan 4 2011, 03:29 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
189 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
yea, at the moment, i use most of my photo using the 50mm 1.8, good value lens.
|
|
|
Jan 4 2011, 03:30 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,457 posts Joined: Nov 2010 From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE(Kiki-Lala @ Jan 4 2011, 03:17 PM) imho, 50mm is kinda tight for me. soft images on f1.8. might need to turn to 2.8 to get sharper images. Posted image earlier using my Tammy 17-50. Bad side of that lens is it's kinda noisy. Focusing speed wise- so so only. isn't that great for portrait? because I heard 50mm + DX sensor is the best range for portrait. I was thinking to get tammy 1750. but currently put my focus more of 50mm siggy scare disappointed with it. |
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 4 2011, 03:36 PM
|
|
Staff
30,735 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
Imo 50mm is like caught in no mans land with dx, not wide and not long enough...the 35mm is ok but of cos still not that wide, but better for general shots.
only other lens i got is 70-300vr...and i feel the tamron 17-50 may do just fine...unless i go buy 85mm |
|
|
Jan 4 2011, 03:40 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
330 posts Joined: Sep 2007 From: East, KL |
Managed to dig the one i shot with 50mm.
![]() ![]() This post has been edited by Kiki-Lala: Jan 4 2011, 03:42 PM |
|
|
Jan 4 2011, 03:40 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,308 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
QUOTE(aldosoesilo @ Jan 4 2011, 03:00 PM) if I own d90 I will grab 50mm 1.8D. Really? HeheI read a lot of fantastic review of the lens itself. a very good value of money <- People said feeling like testing myself. and the price is okay for testing. IMHO. sadly I own d3100 w/o AF-motor http://mansurovs.com/nikon-35mm-f1-8g-vs-50mm-f1-4g QUOTE(Everdying @ Jan 4 2011, 03:09 PM) im selling off my 50mm 1.8 by tonight...sticking to the 35mm 1.8...and probably get a tamron 17-50 2.8 or sigma 18-50 2.8 later. The 50mm f/1.8 is cheap, worth to keep it ma for special purpose when needed.Do share your opinion on the 17-50 f/2.8 Tamron VS 18-50mm f/2.8 Sigma. Sigma one have MACRO 1:3. Most reviews tends to lend towards Tamron and saying Tamron is way better. When I do simple test, can't really see much difference, except the Tammy VC version can get sharper image when handshake. Beside, I think the Sigma focus slightly faster. I notice when using external Flash AF Assist, the 3rd party lens tends to not focus accurately, the focus will judder as it tries to acquire focus. At first I thought what's wrong, why keep getting OOF image, but when not using external flash, it's focus spot on, after experimenting sometimes, found out the AF Assist on the external flash is distracting the focus. Anybody has any idea on this? On my 35mm f/1.8G DX, no such problem. Added on January 4, 2011, 3:43 pm QUOTE(aldosoesilo @ Jan 4 2011, 03:15 PM) It depends actually. The 50mm f/1.8D only have 7 aperture blades, when you stop down a little, your bokeh will not be rounded, it'll be 'hexagon' (is it?) shape, actually, same goes for the 35mm f/1.8G, but I find 35mm f/1.8G does slightly better; I've even gotten cat eyes bokeh before from Christmas tree lights.This post has been edited by Andy214: Jan 4 2011, 03:43 PM |
|
|
Jan 4 2011, 03:43 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,457 posts Joined: Nov 2010 From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE(Everdying @ Jan 4 2011, 03:36 PM) Imo 50mm is like caught in no mans land with dx, not wide and not long enough...the 35mm is ok but of cos still not that wide, but better for general shots. it get me more confuse now.. only other lens i got is 70-300vr...and i feel the tamron 17-50 may do just fine...unless i go buy 85mm people say 35mm is not good for portrait. go for 50mm instead.. I am just okay with 50mm. but when I tried 85mm, it's really2 out of my league it's more like tele-shooting. IMHO tele-shooting is not really nice for taking portrait. Hmm.. I think I shouldn't upgrade anything in these days. Spam! ![]() ![]() Added on January 4, 2011, 3:45 pm QUOTE(Andy214 @ Jan 4 2011, 03:40 PM) No la.. 50mm 1.4 still too expensive for me This post has been edited by aldosoesilo: Jan 4 2011, 03:45 PM |
|
|
Jan 4 2011, 03:45 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
330 posts Joined: Sep 2007 From: East, KL |
35mm just like 50mm on FF body. 85mm is pretty tight on DX body. Try to ask celciuz. Hehe.
|
|
|
Jan 4 2011, 03:50 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,457 posts Joined: Nov 2010 From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur |
|
|
|
Jan 4 2011, 03:58 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
330 posts Joined: Sep 2007 From: East, KL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 4 2011, 04:05 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
857 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
on DX. 50mm are great too.
be it a potrait lens or walkabout. some photos taken with 50mm. spam » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « |
|
|
Jan 4 2011, 04:30 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,037 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
QUOTE(Andy214 @ Jan 4 2011, 03:40 PM) Really? Hehe Cat's eye bokeh on a DX? I didn't notice cat's eye bokeh on my 85 and 70200 on D90. http://mansurovs.com/nikon-35mm-f1-8g-vs-50mm-f1-4g The 50mm f/1.8 is cheap, worth to keep it ma for special purpose when needed. Do share your opinion on the 17-50 f/2.8 Tamron VS 18-50mm f/2.8 Sigma. Sigma one have MACRO 1:3. Most reviews tends to lend towards Tamron and saying Tamron is way better. When I do simple test, can't really see much difference, except the Tammy VC version can get sharper image when handshake. Beside, I think the Sigma focus slightly faster. I notice when using external Flash AF Assist, the 3rd party lens tends to not focus accurately, the focus will judder as it tries to acquire focus. At first I thought what's wrong, why keep getting OOF image, but when not using external flash, it's focus spot on, after experimenting sometimes, found out the AF Assist on the external flash is distracting the focus. Anybody has any idea on this? On my 35mm f/1.8G DX, no such problem. Added on January 4, 2011, 3:43 pm It depends actually. The 50mm f/1.8D only have 7 aperture blades, when you stop down a little, your bokeh will not be rounded, it'll be 'hexagon' (is it?) shape, actually, same goes for the 35mm f/1.8G, but I find 35mm f/1.8G does slightly better; I've even gotten cat eyes bokeh before from Christmas tree lights. But on FX, it appears at almost every light source located at the edge of the frame. ![]() QUOTE(aldosoesilo @ Jan 4 2011, 03:43 PM) it get me more confuse now.. Here's a 200mm on D90,people say 35mm is not good for portrait. go for 50mm instead.. I am just okay with 50mm. but when I tried 85mm, it's really2 out of my league it's more like tele-shooting. IMHO tele-shooting is not really nice for taking portrait. Hmm.. I think I shouldn't upgrade anything in these days. Spam! » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « Added on January 4, 2011, 3:45 pm No la.. 50mm 1.4 still too expensive for me ![]() QUOTE(Kiki-Lala @ Jan 4 2011, 03:45 PM) Haha, it depends on preference.QUOTE(aldosoesilo @ Jan 4 2011, 03:50 PM) yeah.. 35mm = 52.5mm on DX Only reason I like the 85mm is because of the f/1.4 and also lightweight compared to 70200.and 50 = 75mm on DX. but IDK people prefer to use 50mm for portrait on DX body. and use 85mm for FX. This post has been edited by celciuz: Jan 4 2011, 04:33 PM |
|
|
Jan 4 2011, 04:32 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,457 posts Joined: Nov 2010 From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur |
|
|
|
Jan 4 2011, 04:36 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,037 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
|
|
|
Jan 4 2011, 04:38 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,457 posts Joined: Nov 2010 From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur |
CY what is the secret of getting awesome model? can share??
your model really2.. cannot tahann. |
|
|
Jan 4 2011, 04:41 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,037 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
Err, can't help you on that unfortunately. They are my friends and I just asked them for a photo shoot that's all.
|
|
|
Jan 4 2011, 04:45 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
857 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
whats the secret to have so many beautiful friends?? haha
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.3624sec
0.88
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 14th December 2025 - 05:41 PM |