QUOTE(alvinX @ Jan 21 2011, 07:15 PM)
Such offer is in "Party in the USA". My friend managed to get one during that offer. Shashinki quoted RM2985.
Photography The Official Nikon Discussion thread V3, Dark Lord going strong
|
|
Jan 21 2011, 07:23 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
330 posts Joined: Sep 2007 From: East, KL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 21 2011, 07:48 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,308 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
QUOTE(bbuser91 @ Jan 21 2011, 06:35 PM) Yes you are right ! Find what is actually limiting you. Go for the Non-OS version, much cheaper, but it's 18mm instead of 17mm.I was thinking Sigma 17-50 too but too expensive for me now. You can google for it. Anyway i still give you an answer : Approximately 900g Why not invest on your skills and lenses first before upgrade to FX. You got a good Nikon D7000. If i were you, i go fully utilize Nikon D7000 then invest on lenses. Ask youself are you getting FX is because most of professional using it ? Do you fully understand what is FX ? What you want to get from FX? Haha i no offense har , i just ask you only =D , anyway just KEEP BUY BUY BUY BUY if got $$ » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « QUOTE(Kiki-Lala @ Jan 21 2011, 07:23 PM) Such offer is in "Party in the USA". My friend managed to get one during that offer. If OS is not a must, can consider the 18-50mm EX DC Macro HSM.Shashinki quoted RM2985. |
|
|
Jan 21 2011, 08:04 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,537 posts Joined: Aug 2009 From: Bangi |
QUOTE(Kent3888 @ Jan 21 2011, 12:38 PM) Yea.... Correct! u probably CAN'T focus in low light!! budget?? 17-50 + SB900!! For concerts? 70-200 VRII am using it 90% of my shoot. quite ok for its price. but a bit dissapointed with the reviews. not as good as it told. focusing super slow and low light? big AF assist from SB900 will do edThis post has been edited by Isepunye: Jan 21 2011, 08:05 PM |
|
|
Jan 21 2011, 08:08 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,435 posts Joined: Oct 2008 From: Kota Bharu |
QUOTE(Isepunye @ Jan 21 2011, 08:04 PM) am using it 90% of my shoot. quite ok for its price. but a bit dissapointed with the reviews. not as good as it told. focusing super slow and low light? big AF assist from SB900 will do ed Very true. It's failing because the AF assist light on the body is not that good. Performs very well when paired with SB900 |
|
|
Jan 21 2011, 09:39 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
871 posts Joined: Aug 2005 |
You guys seriously think that the D800 will be so much better than the D700 that it would be actually worth the upgrade cost for a hobbyist?
|
|
|
Jan 21 2011, 09:53 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
248 posts Joined: Aug 2009 From: Kelana Jaya |
QUOTE(adriancs @ Jan 21 2011, 09:39 PM) You guys seriously think that the D800 will be so much better than the D700 that it would be actually worth the upgrade cost for a hobbyist? it would be if there is a big increase in MPs (that crowd will love it), full HD video. BUT, if the flash is absent from the D800, that would be a bummer. for the D700 users, I would think spending on lenses and maybe even the recently released Pocketwizards FlexTT5 and MiniTT1 would be more beneficial and sensible, especially if photography is only a hobby to you. |
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 22 2011, 04:12 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
128 posts Joined: Dec 2008 |
if anyone letting go D700 after going for D800 let me know
|
|
|
Jan 22 2011, 04:53 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,515 posts Joined: Jan 2006 |
|
|
|
Jan 22 2011, 06:22 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
128 posts Joined: Dec 2008 |
|
|
|
Jan 22 2011, 06:39 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,883 posts Joined: Nov 2010 |
QUOTE(adriancs @ Jan 21 2011, 09:39 PM) You guys seriously think that the D800 will be so much better than the D700 that it would be actually worth the upgrade cost for a hobbyist? the D700 is a wonderful camera. atleast that's wut i know. i got a chance to hold one, its a fren of a fren's camera. well obviously i dont know how to maneuver it.the megapixel jumps from 12mp to 16 mp. that's a big different. but i read somewhere nikon put it as 12mp to gain better light-retrieval and to control noise at high-ISOs. for those who really loves to crop the 16mp can be nice, otherwise i think the 12mp is serving just fine. better fps than the d700 of course. and a video mode as well. well my current camera got this video feature and i dont use it that much. i only used it twice. first when i first got the camera so i wanted to try it, and the second time is when i was somewhere and wanted to try it again |
|
|
Jan 22 2011, 07:01 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
273 posts Joined: Dec 2010 |
Anyone knows how much is a 50mm f1.4G is selling now?
Is it that much of a difference in terms of focusing speed and IQ compared to the f1.4D? |
|
|
Jan 22 2011, 08:32 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,037 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
QUOTE(razuryza @ Jan 22 2011, 04:53 AM) loves D700... some kind of exotic camera u know... the only FX camera with no video (for today market la) Nah, D3 doesn't have video too. D3 is the probably only FF without sensor cleaning xD that one more unique Yeah, its tough to come up with a better camera than D700. I would upgrade to D800 if somehow the AF system is improved further, say more cross sensor points |
|
|
Jan 22 2011, 08:42 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
871 posts Joined: Aug 2005 |
The D700 to me feels like the F100. I have nothing else I'd want from it. Its even better than the F100 it has MLU.
As forvideo...Nikon's video is... For thelack of a better word... A piece of crap. Even my cameraphone has less rolling shutter effect. This post has been edited by adriancs: Jan 22 2011, 08:43 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 22 2011, 08:44 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
248 posts Joined: Aug 2009 From: Kelana Jaya |
QUOTE(celciuz @ Jan 22 2011, 08:32 AM) Nah, D3 doesn't have video too. D3 is the probably only FF without sensor cleaning xD that one more unique can't agree more with that. I wouldn't mind having less AF points, but if they are more spaced out from one another, then thats better!Yeah, its tough to come up with a better camera than D700. I would upgrade to D800 if somehow the AF system is improved further, say more cross sensor points |
|
|
Jan 22 2011, 09:34 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,037 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
QUOTE(a.ihsan @ Jan 22 2011, 08:44 AM) can't agree more with that. I wouldn't mind having less AF points, but if they are more spaced out from one another, then thats better! Ditto, I don't mind lesser AF points if they introduce more cross sensor points at the usually used areas. The edges of the 51AF for example. |
|
|
Jan 22 2011, 10:16 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,333 posts Joined: May 2009 From: Denai Alam | Kota Damansara |TTDI |
QUOTE(pikipiki @ Jan 22 2011, 07:01 AM) Anyone knows how much is a 50mm f1.4G is selling now? That day I tried the 1.4G, huh.... the focussing speed so slow eh, mayb I din test properly.... It feels like the focus from infinity to lock in near is very far.... Is it that much of a difference in terms of focusing speed and IQ compared to the f1.4D? |
|
|
Jan 22 2011, 10:24 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
302 posts Joined: Jul 2010 |
|
|
|
Jan 22 2011, 10:46 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
248 posts Joined: Aug 2009 From: Kelana Jaya |
QUOTE(pikipiki @ Jan 22 2011, 07:01 AM) Anyone knows how much is a 50mm f1.4G is selling now? get the 50mm f/1.8, less than RM400 for a fast normal lens : bargain! absolutely love this lens.Is it that much of a difference in terms of focusing speed and IQ compared to the f1.4D? spend the rest of your money on a trip to use that lens the difference between the 3 Nikon 50 mils are minimal in my view |
|
|
Jan 22 2011, 10:56 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
219 posts Joined: Feb 2007 |
QUOTE(a.ihsan @ Jan 22 2011, 10:46 AM) get the 50mm f/1.8, less than RM400 for a fast normal lens : bargain! absolutely love this lens. any idea where to get it?can i fix it at my d3000?coz i still new..wanna learning use for that..spend the rest of your money on a trip to use that lens the difference between the 3 Nikon 50 mils are minimal in my view by the way,is that i can put a flower hood on my 18-55???and wat that using for?? |
|
|
Jan 22 2011, 11:11 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,037 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
IMO, the G has better CA control than the D. I would go for the G because of that
A friend of mine uses his 50mm f/1.4D a lot (as in really a lot). Recently when I mount his 50mm f/1.4 and shooting it at f/1.4 the focus doesn't seem accurate like when due. Seems that the screw driven area already worn out a bit :S. Added on January 22, 2011, 12:13 pmHoly crap, D7000 + kit going for 4400 at friend's place in Melaka -.- cheap sia. This post has been edited by celciuz: Jan 22 2011, 12:13 PM |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0187sec
0.58
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 12th December 2025 - 05:38 PM |